NORTHERN CHRISTIAN COLLEGE

“The Institution for Better Life”

Laoag City, Philippines

PROCEEDINGS DURING THE PROPOSAL DEFENSE OF

ARNEL G. SINAMPAGA
(MAEd Student)

| Venue: NCC FH Bldg., Oral Defense and Conference Room | Date: 10 Novemver 2017 | Time: 9:30 am |

Corrected Title:

STUDENTS COGNITION AND IMPLEMENTATION OF THE K-12 CURRICULUM: THEIR

RELATIONSHIP TO THE STIUDENTS PROFICIENCY IN THE PUBLIC
SECONDARY SCHOOLS

Adviser : Norberto S. Galiza, Ed.D.

Panel Members : Nenita P. Blanco, Ed.D. (Chairman)
Anabelle C. Felipe, Ph.D.
Norma L. Fernando, Ed.D.
Gerardo S. Garcia, Ed.D.

Suggestions from the Panel:

1) Focus on the theory of efficacy.

2) Change the paradigm. Add Student Cognition (indicators: 1) Expectations about PE and
2) Attitudes about PE) and Extent of Implementation as independent variables. These
should be in two separate boxes and make sure that these should be included in the
questionnaire.
3) Recast the second paragraph of page 1 and the whole of page 2.
4) Provide a status quo in the introduction of the study about the observed behaviors and
attitudes of the students towards PE. Also, how PE is organized in high school.
5) On page 3, don’t make yet a conclusion about the study and avoid sweeping statements.
6) On page 39, check the criteria for physical fitness. It is suggested that a rubric should be
developed for it.
 7) Rubrics should measure the variables.
8) Specify whether the sports and games are individual or team.
9) Improve the questionnaire on page 36, appendix c. Items should focus on what the
teacher does to implement all the domains. Include KSA questions, 10 per domain.
10) A rubric for sports should be improved. There should be 1 rubric for individual and 1 for
team but the same in content.
11) Expand the definitions. Include a definition for wellness, lifestyle, etc.
12) Place ‘public secondary schools’ under the significance of the study to the scope and
delimitation.
13) Remove the students as respondents.
14) In the data gathering procedure, mention also that principal will be asked for the conduct
of the study.
15) Check the interpretations on page 30 and 41. Reconcile the interpretations with the ones
in the questionnaire.
16) All sources that are mentioned in the study should be properly cited and should be listed
in the ‘literature cited’ part of the paper. Moreover, remove all sources listed in ‘literature
cited’ which are not used in the study.
17) Present the revised questionnaire to the chairman.

—Nothing Follows—

Remark: Passed

Prepared by:

Edward O. Almazan Jr.

Recorder