Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
presence of Narrowband
Interference
Yohannes Alemseged and Klaus Witrisal
yohannes@sbox.tugraz.at.
Introduction
Data model
Detection Schemes
Simulation Results
Tx System:
Transmitted Refference(TR) Differential UWB
Receiver:
TR AutoCorrelation Receiver (AcR)
Interferor:
IEEE 802.11a WLAN Service
Dj
Ts
Integrate& xW1
damp
Ts Z
Dj
x W2
Ts
s(t) xWNcr
β(t)
a r̂(t) Detection of TR UWB signal in the presence of Narrowband Interference – p.5/23
-/ . ,
! & !
+
UWB signal
"
"
Received Signal:
#
#
$
%
"
/.
- ,
0
! &
For differential TR scheme,
'
+
( 1
!
"
'
)
(
0
,
'
) ) '
*
+
1
"
System Model:
-/ ,
0
UWB signal
:
<
8
+
,
fc −
.- &
2
Wβ
/
!
*
(
Pβ
"
01/
#
32
otherwise
4 $
NBI, IEEE802.11a OFDM passband signal
(
fc +
2
Wβ
5
)
$
76
%
8
#
Figure 2: Model of the narrowband interference
System Model:
NBI Model
Z
Z
Z
Z
Z
Correlator Output
- -
-
-
-
Z
-
Expanding further the correlator output equations;
-
-
System Model:
Received Signal
+
(
'
+
0
(
'
'
'
,
'
'
First term can be neglected for
is in GHz range and is about for indoor
,
propagation
Detection of TR UWB signal in the presence of Narrowband Interference – p.9/23
Data Model
Fixed phase sinusoid modulated by a Short time
autocorrelation function of the baseband NBI signal
+
'
$
/
Samples will be well correlated if
For IEEE 802.11a WLAN ,
c is a sampled vector of
$
/
0
'
'
'
/
is due to the "data by data" term, and is a bias term due
to interference among pulses
&
+
$
%
0
&
&
Find an estimate of that minimizes the following norm
Setting the derivative of the cost function to zero
#
!"
Where
is x data matrix is x unitary
matrix and is x unitary matrix
where
containing the data from unitary matrix is used for
separation
Detection of TR UWB signal in the presence of Narrowband Interference – p.13/23
NBI Mitigation: Adaptive Constant Modulus Algorithm
Constant amplitude of binary antipodal
symbols are transmitted
The adaptation equation can be written as;
-
will be reconstructed by 0 substition or nulling the
smaller singular values
Detection Error
$
0
'
'
'
/
Optimum combiner that minimizes assuming and
noise is uncorrelated with the NBI and UWB signal, will be;
+
'
'
'
$
/
Computing requires knowledge of the model parameters
NBI:
Sampled versions of the UWB, NBI and Noice at the receiver front end
signaling: OFDM 0.5
0.4
NBI
Noise
UWB
0.3
carrier frequency: 0.2
5.125GHz 0.1
−0.1
no of carriers: 48 −0.2
−0.3
−0.5
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
UWB:
Tr: Differential-TR
No of pulses/sym: 9 Figure 3: UWB (LDC), NBI and Noise at the front end
Symbol Period: 100ns
Delay: 0.2ns
SIR=−20dB , Threshold BER=0.48, SVD BER=0.047 SIR=−20dB , Threshold BER=0.48, SVD BER=0.047
0 500
−100 0
−200 −500
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Bias bias
100 200
0 0
−100 −200
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
20 50
0 0
−20 −50
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
20 5
0 0
−20 −5
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Data data
Figure 4: Sampled output of the correlators (sym- Figure 5: sampled output of the correlators (cor-
bol axis) rlators axis)
SIR=10, Threshold BER=0, SVD BER=0 SIR=10, Threshold BER=0, SVD BER=0
10 2
0
0
−10
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140
−2
Data 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
0.4 Data
2
0.2
0 0
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140
Bias
−2
0.05 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Bias
0 0.5
−0.05 0
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140
0.05
−0.5
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
0
0.5
−0.05
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 0
−0.5
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
BER curves for Threshold detector and SVD detector BER curves for LS with training symbols, CMA (with codevector), Threshold detector
0 0
10 10
−1
−1
10
10
−2
10
bit error rate (BER)
−2
−3
10
−3
10
−4
10
−4
10 threshold detector
−5
10 LS 288/288
Threshold detector
LS 32/288
SVD
−5 adaptive CMA
10 −6
−30 −20 −10 0 10 20 30 10
−30 −25 −20 −15 −10 −5 0
signal−to−interference ratio (SIR) [dB]
signal−to−interference ratio (SIR) [dB]
Figure 8: BER plots for conventional threshold de- Figure 9: BER plots for LS solution and Adaptive
tector vs SVD CMA (initialization with code vector)
−1
10
−1
10
−2
10
−2
10
−3
10
−3
10
−4
10
Threshold Detector
−4
10 −5 LS
Threshold Detector 10
LS with training sq LS−TrSyb
CMA−ReducedRank AdptCMA−MinRank
CMA AdptCMA
−6
10
−30 −25 −20 −15 −10 −5 0 5 10 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
signal−to−interference ratio (SIR) [dB] signal−to−noice ratio (SNR) [dB]
Figure 10: BER plots for 35dB SNR and SIR Figure 11: BER plots for -10dB SIR and SNR axis
axis(model parameters used for initialization)
A data model has been derived for LDC schemes which could
provide us a better understanding and insight for possible
interference cancellation.