Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
'Department of Health Risk Analysis and Toxicology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands, 2Geotechnical Institute,
OeFPZ Arsenal, Vienna, Austria
only a few studies, predominantly conduct- been performed, but the lake was still con- were stored in clean polyethylene jars (2
ed in the area of the U.S. Great Lakes, have nected to the river via a channel until the liter). Upon arriving at the laboratory, the
been performed to estimate human health mid-1980s when the lake was disconnected sediment samples were separated into sub-
risks in relation to recreational activities on from the river Meuse. At present, during samples for the respective pretreatment
freshwater lakes (13-18). Various studies high flow rates and consequently by the procedures.
have estimated health risks in relation to flooding of the river, polluted river sediment The surface water samples were taken at
fish consumption from different lakes may still enter the lake. The maximum the same location as the sediment samples
(13,19-22). Recreational or subsistence depth of Lake Dilkensplas is 14 m and the and stored in polyethylene bottles (100
anglers may be at higher risk because they surface area is 14.8 ha. The surface area of ml), which were previously cleaned with
probably consume more fish, and conse- Lake Eijsden is about 156 ha, and the mean diluted nitric acid (5%). Water samples
quently fish contaminants, than the general depth is 6 m, with a maximum of 8 m. The were acidified to pH <2 with concentrated
population (13). Next to ingestion of fish, lake has been in existence for approximately nitric acid and centrifuged for 15 min at
the dermal route represents an important 20 years, and until 1995, enclosure works 2,500 rpm. The freshwater samples were
exposure pathway, in particular for organic have been executed in a small part of the stored at 40C for further analysis.
compounds like DDT and most of the lake (24). Various recreational activities take Collection of suspended matter was
PAHs (12,14,23). place at both lakes. At Lake Eijsden, various only performed at the beach zone of the
In this paper we describe a human beaches and swimming areas exist, and the freshwater lakes. Suspended matter was
health risk assessment as a function of lake is used by boaters, windsurfers, and sampled using polyethylene buckets. Five
recreational activities in relation to envi- recreational anglers. Yacht clubs and camp- liters of surface water were collected. After
ronmental pollution (e.g., by the heavy ing sites are located around the lake. the suspended matter settled, the water
metals As, Cd, Cu, Pb, and Zn and 16 Swimming, windsurfing, and fishing are the layer was filtered. In order to concentrate
EPA-listed PAHs) of two artificial freshwa- recreational activities that occur at Lake the amount of suspended matter, this pro-
ter lakes, one connected to the river Meuse Dilkensplas, where a camping site is also cedure was repeated. In total, 50 1 of sur-
and the other currently disconnected from located. During the summer season, 2,000 face water were sampled (10 buckets per
the river. An existing exposure assessment to 5,000 people visit Lake Eijsden and about site). The concentrated samples were stored
model, SEDISOIL, was applied to estimate 500 people visit Lake Dilkensplas. in clean polyethylene jars (2 liter). Samples
human health risks (12). This model incor- Furthermore, both lakes are eutrophic and were centrifuged for 15 min at 3,000 rpm.
porates all relevant exposure pathways and have an ecological function (24). After the supernatant was removed, the
is based on an exposure model to quantify residue was dried with nitrogen.
health risk in relation to contaminated Sampling
soils; it is currently used by the Dutch gov- Sediment, surface water, and suspended Chemical Analysis
ernment as a guidance model to determine matter samples were collected in the spring Heavy metals. The sediment samples were
the urgency of remediation of sediment of 1995. Sediment samples (top 10 cm) dried at 105°C, sieved (2 mm), and subse-
pollution. Two different methods were were taken at the beach zone and from a quently ground in an agate mortar. From
applied to estimate human exposure risks boat at deeper parts of the lakes by a Van each dried sample collected at two differ-
in relation to recreational activities: 1) Veen grab. At each sample location within ent zones at Lake Eijsden (beach zone and
human exposure risks were estimated by 1 m2, three subsamples were taken and total lake) and Lake Dilkensplas, 30 g of
means of the standard SEDISOIL model, homogenized. A total of 27 sediment sam- dried sediment were taken, bulked, and
which solely uses data on sediment concen- ples was collected from the freshwater Lake successively passed through different
trations of relevant pollutants; and 2) loca- Eijsden and 16 samples from Lake sieves. The sediment and suspended mat-
tion-specific input data derived from actual Dilkensplas. The homogenized samples ter samples (0.5 g) were boiled under
measurements of samples of surface water
and suspended matter were incorporated in Lake Dilkensplas
the model to refine the exposure model 1:8,500
and to replace some default assumptions.
In addition, we compare the measured con-
centrations of contaminants in sediment in Lake Eijsden
both lakes to the previous study performed 1:22510w
in 1989 and discuss the differences
between the lakes in relation to the connec-
tion of the river Meuse.
Methods
Study Area
The location of the study area is shown in
Figure 1. The artificial freshwater lake, Lake
Eijsden, actually is a branch of the river
Meuse. Lake Dilkensplas is an artificial
freshwater lake that is currently disconnect-
ed from the river. In the mid-1960s at the
beginning of the enclosure works, the lake 1, . -1
50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400
had been connected to the river. Since
1974/1975, no further enclosure works have Figure 1. Map of the area showing the geographical variation of Pb in sediment of both lakes.
reflux for 2.5 hr in Aqua Regia and then soxhlet apparatus for 4 hr. After the extract EF= exposure frequency (days/365 days),
filtered. The Cd, Cu, and Pb concentra- was concentrated under reduced pressure on AF = absorption factor (unitless), and BW
tions in sediment, suspended matter, and a rotary evaporator at 45°C to approximately = body weight (kg).
water were measured by graphite furnace 50 ml, petroleum ether was added to a total
atomic absorption spectrometry with of 100 ml. From this extract, 0.5 ml was dis- Ingestion ofsurface water (mg/kg/day)
Zeeman background correction, with the solved in 1 ml acetonitrile and concentrated = CWx IRw x EFx AF
Zn concentration being determined by under nitrogen until the upper petroleum BW (2)
flame atomic absorption spectrometry. ether layer was evaporated; the sample was
Determination of the arsenic content in then analyzed by high performance liquid where CW= concentration of the contami-
water samples was performed by atomic chromatography with fluorescence detection nant in surface water (mg/liter) and IRw =
absorption spectrometry applying the (25). The PAH concentration was quantified ingestion rate of surface water (liter/expo-
hydride generation technique. The As con- by comparison with selected standards. The sure day).
tent of sediments and suspended matter detection limit of the individual PAHs in
was also determined by graphite furnace sediment was 8 pg/kg dw. Ingestion of suspended material (mg/kg/day)
atomic absorption spectrometry with Soil characteristic. All sediment samples = CMx CMWxIRwx EFx AF,
Zeeman background correction. were analyzed for organic matter as loss on BW (3)
The detection limit of heavy metals in ignition by 550°C for 4 hr. The day content
sediment/suspended matter was 0.18 mg/kg of the sediment (particulate fraction <2 pm) where CM= concentration of the contami-
dry weight (dw) for As, 0.02 mg/kg dw for was determined in seven samples at both nant in suspended matter (mg/kg dw) and
Cd, 0.36 mg/kg dw for Cu, 0.48 mg/kg artificial lakes. The samples were treated CMW = suspended matter content of sur-
dw for Pb, and 7.8 mg/kg dw for Zn. The with H202 and HCI and then sieved over a face water (kg/liter).
detection limits in water were estimated to be 38-pm sieve, after which the fraction (<2
0.9 p/l, 0.1 p/l, 1.8 p/l, 2.4 p/l and 3.9 pm) was separated by a settling technique. Dermal contact with contaminated sediment
pg/l for As, Cd, Cu, Pb and Zn, respectively. (mg/kg/day)
To prevent contamination, all used glass Risk Assessment = CSx SAsxADxASSX Mfx EDsx EFxAF,
and plastic labware was previously washed For quantification of exposure in relation to BW (4)
in diluted nitric acid and deionized water. sediment contaiination by heavy metals and
Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons. The PAHs, a multiple pathway exposure model where SAs = dermal surface area for sedi-
PAH concentration of the sediments was (SEDISOIL) was used (12. The model was ment exposure (mi2), AD = dermal adher-
determined by a method described by developed by the National Institute of Public ence rate for sediment (mg/cm2), ASs =
Schilderman et al. (25). The method has Health and Environmental Protection and dermal absorption rate for sediment
been partly modified to quantify PAHs in indudes six exposure routes: the ingestion of (liter/hr), Mf= matrix factor (unitless), and
sediments. The 16 EPA-listed PAHs [naph- sediment, surface water -induding suspended EDs = exposure duration from dermal
thalene, acenaphthylene, acenaphtene, fluo- matter, dermal contact via surface water and exposure to sediment (hr/day).
rene, phenanthrene, anthracene, fluoran- sediment, and fish consumption. The fol-
thene, pyrene, benzo(a)anthracene, chrysene, lowing equations are incorporated into the Dermal contact with contaminated surface
benzo(b)fluoranthene, benzo(k)fluoranthene, model to calculate total exposure. water (mg/kg/day)
benzo(a)pyrene (BaP), benzo(ghz)pyrene, = CWx SAw x ASw x EFx EDw x AF
dibenzo(ah)anthracene and indeno(1,2,3- Ingestion of contaminated sediment (mg/kg/day) BW (5)
ca)pyrene] were measured except for ace-
naphthylene, which cannot be measured by = CSxIRsxEFxAF ASw = 5000 x (0.038 + 0.153 x K)
fluorescence detection. Briefly, after filtra- BW (1) 5000 + (0.038 + 0.153 x K)
tion of the water layer, the wet sediment (10
g) was mixed with a suitable amount of where CS = concentration of the contami- x exp (-0.016 x
anhydrous Na2SO4 and extracted with nant in sediment (mg/kg dw), IRs = inges-
petroleum ether (40-60°C; 120 ml) in a tion rate of sediment (kg dw/exposure day), 1.5 (6)
Table 1. Parameters used in the exposure model (12) where SAw = dermal surface area for expo-
sure in surface water (m2), ASw = dermal
Parameter Child Adult References absorption rate for exposure in surface
Ingestion rate of sediment (IRs) (kg dw/exposure day) 10-3 0.35 x 10-3 Assumption water [(mg/m2)/(mg/liter)/hr], EDw =
Ingestion rate of fish (1Rf) (kg fw/day) 0.015 0.055 (2627) exposure duration from dermal exposure to
Ingestion rate of surface water (IRw) (liter/exposure day) 50 x 10-3 50 x 10-3 (28) surface water (hr/day), Kw = octanol/water
Absorption factor (AF) (unitless) 1 1 Assumption
Dermal absorption rate (ASs) (liter/hr) 0.01 0.005 (29) partition coefficient, and M = molecular
Dermal surface area for sediment exposure (SAs) (m2) 0.17 0.28 (29) weight (g/mol).
Dermal surface area for exposure in surface water (SAw) (m2) 0.95 1.80 (30)
Dermal adherence rate for sediment (AD) (mg/cm2) 0.51 3.75 (29,30 Ingestion of fish (mg/kg/day)
Matrix factor (Mf) (unitless) 0.15 0.15 (29) = CFx IRfx FIxAF,
Exposure frequency (EF) (days/365 days) 30 30 Assumption BW
Body weight (BW) (kg) 15 70 (30 (7)
Suspended matter content of surface water (CMW) (kg/liter) 30 x 10- 30 x 104 (31)
Exposure duration to sediment (EDs) (hr/day) 8 8 (29) where CF = concentration of the contami-
Exposure duration in surface water (EDw) (hr/day) 2 1 Assumption nant in fish [mg/kg fresh weight (fw)], IRf=
Fraction contaminated (Fl) (unitless) 0.5 0.5 (32) ingestion rate of fish (kg fw/day), and FI =
Abbreviations: dw, dry weight; fw, fresh weight fraction contaminated (unitless).
ues). The concentration ratio between sus- Beuch-Ei'jsden Ejjaden Dilkenspias Beach-Fjsden Eijsden Dilksnsplas
pended matter and sediment is 1.5 for Figure 2. Concentrations (mean ± standard devia- Figure 3. Concentrations (mean ± standard devia-
heavy metals and 2.0 for organic com- flon) of some heavy metals and the sum of EPA-list- tion) of some heavy metals (pg/I) in surface water
pounds (12). Furthermore, for the loca- ed PAHs (mg/kg dw) in sediment samples from the samples from the artificial freshwater lakes
tion-specific calculation procedure, data on artificial lakes Eijsden and Dilkensplas, The Eijsden and Dilkensplas, The Netherlands. The
heavy metal concentrations (mean values) Netherlands. dw, dry weight. The concentrations of concentration of Zn was multiplied by 10. The sta-
from surface water and suspended matter Pb and Zn were multiplied by 10. The statistical sig- tistical significance of differences have been
(only Lake Eijsden) were directly used to nificance of differences were evaluated by the evaluated by the Mann-Whitney U-test.
Mann-Whitney U-test. *Significantly different from beach zone (p<0.001).
calculate total average exposure. In general, *Significantly different from beach zone (p<0.f001). 'Significantly different from Lake Eiisden (p<0.05).
amounts of sampled suspended matter **Significantly different from Lake Eijsden (p<0.05).
were insufficient for reliably measuring
PAH contents, which indicated that for PAH compounds. The cancer potencies of the below the detection limit were replaced by
PAH exposure assessment, only the stan- various PAH compounds were compared with half the detection limit.
dard model could be applied. For both the cancer potency of BaP, after which a scal-
exposure assessments, exposure via individ- ing factor was established. By this method, the Results
ual pathways and total exposure were cal- evaluation of PAH mixtures can be expressed Chemical Analysis
culated for both children and adults. as BaP equivalents. Nisbet and Lagoy (33) pro-
Calculated total heavy metal exposure posed the following TEF factors for the 16 Figure 2 shows As, Cd, Cu, Pb and Zn
levels were compared with the tolerable EPA-listed PAHs: dibenzo(ah)anthracene, 5; contents as well as the sum of the 16 EPA-
daily intake (TDI). The TDI refers to the BaP, 1; benzo(a)anthracene, 0.1; benzo(b)fluo- listed PAHs in sediment samples collected
reference dose of a substance that can be ranthene, 0.1; benzo(k)fluoranthene, 0.1; inde- at the two freshwater lakes. Results from
taken in daily without identifiable risk at no(1,2,3-ca)pyrene, 0.1; anthracene, 0.01; the beach zone and the total lake with
lifetime exposure. Additionally, the hazard benzo-(ghz)perylene, 0.01; chrysene, 0.01; ace- respect to Lake Eijsden are shown separate-
index was calculated, which refers to the naphthene, 0.001; acenaphthylene, 0.001; flu- ly. The heavy metal and PAH concentra-
ratio of the calculated lifetime daily expo- oranthene, 0.001; fluorene, 0.001; naphtha- tions varied between sampling sites, but in
sure divided by the reference dose (TDI) lene, 0.001; phenanthrene, 0.001; and pyrene, general, comparable levels were observed in
(16). Daily exposure (milligrams per kilo- 0.001. The BaP equivalent concentration is the sediment samples taken from Lake Eijsden
gram per day) averaged over a lifetime (e.g, sum of the weighted potency factor of each (total) and Lake Dilkensplas.
70 years) was calculated: compound in the mixture multiplied by the Considerable variations in sediment
concentration of the compound in the mix- heavy metal and PAH contents existed in
6 x daily exposurechild ture. The carcinogenic risks associated with each lake. The sum of the EPA-listed PAHs
70 exposure to BaP equivalents averaged over a in Lake Eijsden (total) and Lake Dilkensplas
lifetime (e.g., 70 years) were calculated and varied from 2.6 to 29.9 mg/kg dw and 0.89
+ 64 x daily exposureadut compared to the Dutch maximum permissible to 25.5 mg/kg dw, respectively. In Lake
individual risk level (MPR), which corresponds Eijsden (total), the sediment values were
7 (8) to an annual probability to die as a conse- 14-22 mg/kg dw for As, 2-10 mg/kg dw for
quence of cancer of 106. Cd, 29-115 mg/kg dw for Cu, 39-191
If the hazard index is below 1, no health mg/kg dw for Pb, and 149-970 mg/kg dw
risk may occur. For Pb, a distinction was Statistical Analyses for Zn. In Lake Dilkensplas, the concentra-
made between the TDI for adults and chil- The Spearman rank correlation coefficient tions of heavy metals were 11-47 mg/kg dw
dren because children are more sensitive to was used to determine relationships between for As, 1-20 mg/kg dw for Cd, 15-237
Pb than adults. The TDIs for heavy metals heavy metal, PAH contents in sediment, mg/kg dw for Cu, 48-430 mg/kg dw for Pb,
were derived from Bocking et al. (12). and bottom soil characteristics, and to corre- and 188-2,080 mg/kg dw for Zn. The high-
For quantification of health risks in rela- late mutual data. A p<0.05 was considered est heavy metal concentrations were mea-
tion to PAH exposure, the TEF (toxic equiva- statistically significant. sured in sediment samples collected from the
lency factor) approach was used (33,34). The Statistical differences between the lakes center of Lake Dilkensplas, and were approx-
TEF approach was designed to estimate the with respect to bottom soil characteristics, imately 2-4 times above the mean levels in
toxicity of complex mixtures for risk assess- heavy metal content in sediment and surface the lake. For example, the Pb variation
ment purposes (33,35). PAH compounds were water, and PAH concentration in sediments between sampling sites is shown in Figure 1.
separated into two subdasses: carcinogens and were analyzed by the Mann-Whitney U-test. At the beach zone of Lake Eijsden, the
noncarcinogens. Benzo(a)pyrene was assumed Again, p<0.05 was considered statistically heavy metal content and the sum of EPA-
to be one of the most potent carcinogenic significant. For statistical purposes, all values listed PAHs in sediment were remarkably
Tabhl Hazard index and average total exposure levels of heavy metals estimated by the standard model and by incorporating locaton-specific data (pg/kglday)
Lake Eijsden Lake Dilkensplas
Standard Location specific Standard Location Specific
Adult Child Adult Child Adult Child Adult Child
As
53xlr 2.5x104 1.1x10 5.3x103 5.3x105 t5x104
Ingesdon offish 3.4 x1tZ 4S t 1.8x103 2.2 x1 3.8x10-2 4.9x102 1.8x10- 2.2x10
Hazard index* 0.02
aW PI.t.
0.008 0.03
t .
0.00
;
PM1
Ingeston of sediment - 9x1 3.8x1fr 2.9x 1 3.8 x 10-2 2.1 x0 7x 10-2 2.1 x 10- 2.x 10-2
Cu
lngesdionofsuifacewatr 9.3x10 4A4xl0- .1.4x104 6.3x104 8.2x10-3 4.1 x10-1 2.2x104 1.0x10-3
s-
the standard exposure model, in comparison decades, the quality of the lake sediments significantly lower at the beach zone of
to the calculated averaged exposure levels by for both lakes in general has changed only Lake Eijsden as compared to the total lake.
taking location-specific data into account. to a minor extent during the previous years. After the flooding of the river Meuse in
The difference in exposure levels was mainly The quality of the river Meuse may January 1995, the sludge was removed and
due to the ingestion offish and the ingestion influence the quality of the freshwater lakes new sand was pumped onto the beach zone
of surface water while swimmnig. along the river. Although Lake Dilkensplas of Lake Eijsden. The more sandy sediment
is now disconnected from the river, sedi- and low organic matter content (2%) also
Discussion ment/sludge may accumulate into the lake contributed to the lower heavy metal and
Environmentl Monitoring as a result of flooding of the river. Lake PAH concentrations in the sediment at the
Eijsden is connected to the river and there- beach zone (36). The As levels represent
Heavy metals and PAH levels determined fore directly affected by the river. Since background levels for both sites in the lake
in sediment in the two artificial freshwater 1989, two flooding disasters have occurred (beach and total).
lakes in this study were not significantly dif- along the Belgium and Dutch part of the When comparing lake sediment con-
ferent from those determined 7 years previ- river, at the end of December 1993 and at centrations, heavy metals significantly cor-
ously in the same lakes (10). An exception the end of January 1995, and sedimentation related with each other. Diffuse sources
was Cd. The mean levels in sediment in of polluted suspended matter and sediments (for example, atmospheric deposition,
both lakes were decreased, by 15% for Lake have occurred. However, comparable results industrial discharges, and road traffic) may
Eijsden and by 50% for Lake Dilkensplas, were found in sediment samples taken from contribute to the heavy metal load in both
as compared to 1989. However, at that both lakes. This suggests that a direct or lakes; furthermore, postdepostional remobi-
time, only one sample was taken from Lake indirect connection to the river Meuse lization may occur (5). To identify the
Dilkensplas and two samples (beach zone appears less important for the pollution of main source, geochemical and paleolimno-
and deeper part) from Lake Eijsden. both freshwater lakes; sediment contamina- logical studies must be performed (5). In
Although the chemical quality of the sur- tion presumably reflects historical pollution. addition, heavy metals correlated signifi-
face water, induding suspended matter, of The concentrations of heavy metals cantly with organic matter and day fraction
the river Meuse has improved over the last (except for As) and PAHs in sediment were of the sediments (only Lake Dilkensplas),
which indicates that heavy metals may be were taken while standing in the water by more than two orders of magnitude.
adsorbed by Fe hydroxides, Fe/Mn oxides, (depth, 1 m), and we assume that the sur- However, the relative contribution of sur-
or carbonates (37). Surfaces of these parti- face sediments were disturbed; therefore, face water ingestion during swimming to
cles are negatively charged, and interaction relatively more suspended material was the total average exposure levels of heavy
may occur with the positively charged heavy sampled. Because the water samples were metals was small. The total average expo-
metals. Additionally, other factors may directly acidified without filtration in the sure was dominated by the expoure
influence sorption and desorption processes laboratory, consequently higher heavy metal through ingestion of fish (adults) or
related to the properties of sediment (e.g, concentrations were found in the surface through ingestion of sediment (children).
grain size, pH, temperature, water content, water from the beach zone of Lake Eijsden. Various assumptions applied in this risk
cation exchange capacity, salt concentra- assessment contribute to uncertainty about
tion), the properties of water (e.g., pH), and Risk Assessment the estimated risks: (e.g., exposure frequency
the properties of the chemical itself (chemi- There are only a few reports on possible and durations, ingestion rate of sediments
cal speciation and water solubility) (38,39). health risks in relation to recreational activ- and contaminated fish, the concentration in
The adsorption to these compounds influ- ity on freshwater lakes or estuaries, in par- surface water and suspended matter, and the
ences the potential availability to biota ticular in an estuary in the Tidewater fish content and absorption factors) (13,14).
(5,39). Because heavy metals tend to adsorb region of Virginia, and from areas of the For example, it was assumed that exposure
to clay and organic matter in sediment, the Great Lakes in the United States and levels, exposure duration, and exposure fre-
Dutch environmental standards for sedi- Canada (13-18). These studies identify quency do not change in a lifetime and that
ment and soil are normalized for the clay ingestion of contaminated fish as an impor- human activities remain the same. It is
content (25%) and organic matter content tant exposure pathway in relation to expo- apparent that the probability of this is
(10%). Results from this study indicate that sure to PCBs, PAHs, and heavy metals in extremely small. To illustrate this, people
in both lakes, the intervention value for Zn sediments. In these studies, PCB exposure spend only a fraction of their lifetime in any
(environmental standards) normalized to accounted for the excess cancer risk, which one location (41).
organic matter and clay fraction was exceed- was mainly due to the consumption of crab In a conservative approach, it is
ed in more than 80% of the sediment sam- (Tidewater region) (14) and carp (Great assumed that 100% of the compound in
ples. Other heavy metals incidentally Lakes) (15). The noncarcinogenic risks the ingested sediment or fish is sorbed from
exceeded these environmental standards. were of minor importance, except for sub- the gastrointestinal tract (12). Compound-
PAHs are primarily adsorbed on. organic sistence anglers in the Great Lakes area, specific absorption factors for ingestion
matter (38), and a significant correlation where exposure to heptachlor epoxide (17), exposure routes in the present study are not
was observed between the organic matter dieldrin (18), and methyl mercury and available for all compounds (12). Dermal
content of the sediments and the sum of copper contaminations (16,17) exceeded absorption depends on the dermal absorp-
EPA-listed PAHs for Lake Eijsden (total). the health-based standards. tion rate for the individual compounds. For
However, for Lake Dilkensplas no signifi- The results of this health risk assessment example, in the exposure model a dermal
cant correlation was found. indicate that sediment contamination by Pb absorption rate of 0.5%/hr (adult) and
No correlation was observed between the and Zn in both lakes may present a health 1%/hr (child) for organic compounds and
heavy metal concentration in sediment and hazard, if the risks are calculated on the basis 0%/hr for inorganic compounds has been
the surface water concentration for both of the standard exposure model. However, used to estimate dermal exposure through
lakes. We measured the total concentration by taking location-specific data into sediment exposure (12).
(dissolved and particulate forms) of heavy account, including data of actually measured The contaminant concentration in fish
metals in surface water. In river systems As, contaminant concentrations in surface water is modeled by the bioconcentration factor
Cd, Cu, and Zn appear to occur in 10-50% and suspended matter, in the estimation of (BCF) and the concentration in surface
as the dissolved fraction and Pb appears in exposure levels, the health hazards were water of the contaminant. The heavy metal
1-10% dissolved (5,39). The monitoring insignificant. Furthermore, the additional concentrations in surface water were over-
network at the river Meuse, managed by the exposure through recreational activities on estimated by more than two orders of mag-
Association of Rhine and Meuse water sup- both freshwater lakes appeared to be much nitude; therefore, the concentrations in fish
ply companies, determines total concentra- lower than background values; an exception were also overestimated by more than two
tion of heavy metals in surface water (9). was Pb, for which the additional exposure orders of magnitude, which had a remark-
During the same sampling period, higher levels contributed for approximately 100% able influence on total average exposure
surface water concentrations of Pb and Zn (adults) and 300% (children) to background levels in relation to sediment pollution for
(total concentration) were observed in the exposure levels. Background exposures to heavy metals.
river Meuse at the monitoring station at As, Cd, Cu, Pb, and Zn have been estimat- Also, different physical, chemical, and
Lake Eijsden in comparison to the total Pb ed to be approximately 0.18, 0.26, 21, 0.46, physiological parameters influence the BCF.
and Zn concentrations measured in the sur- and 190 jg/kg/day, respectively (40). Examples are the age of the fish, the species,
face water in Lake Eijsden. The concentra- In the present study, measured concen- chemical speciation, dietary habits of the fish,
tions of heavy metals in the river Meuse are trations of heavy metals in surface water and the physical and chemical properties of
more influenced by industrial discharges, were remarkably lower than the predicted sediments (5,13,42-44). Concentrations in
which result in an increase of suspended concentrations. Ratios of measured versus fish estimated by a mean BCF value are
matter concentrations (5). predicted concentrations in surface water therefore of limited accuracy (12).
Concentrations of heavy metals in sur- for Lake Eijsden were 4.2 x 10-3, 0.014, In addition, no information on the
face water at the beach zone of Lake Eijsden 0.024, and 6.2 x 10-3 for the heavy metals amount and frequency of fish caught at both
were significantly higher in comparison to Cd, Cu, Pb, and Zn, respectively. For Lake lakes and consumed by recreational anglers
concentrations in the lake itself. This was Dilkensplas, the ratios were in the same was direcdy available. For freshwater recre-
probably due to the sampling strategy at the range. The standard model overestimated ational anglers on lakes and ponds, Finley et
beach zone of Lake Eijsden. These samples heavy metal concentrations in surface water al. (45) recommend a fish consumption rate
of 1.7 g/day as the median value and 15 exposure route due to sediment contamina- 7. Gumgum B, Unii E, Tez, Z, Guilsun Z. Heavy metal pol-
g/day as the 95th percentile as default values tion with BaP. Exposure to lower molecular lution in water, sediment and fish from the Tigris river
for risk assessment. To estimate human weight PAHs in sediments was due to der- in Turkey. Chemosphere 29:111-116 (1994).
8. Sanders M. Distribution of polycyclic aromatic hydro-
health risks for recreational anglers and their mal exposure of surface water while swim- carbons in oyster (Crassostrea virginica) and surface
families with regard to consumption of con- ming and ingestion of contaminated fish. sediment from two estuaries in South Carolina. Arch
taminated fish from the Great Lakes, a fish For higher molecular PAHs (log Ko. range Environ Contam Toxicol 28:397-405 (1995).
9. RIWA. The river Meuse Annual Report 1993 [in
ingestion rate of 54 g/day has been assumed, 5-6.2), exposure was due to the ingestion of Dutch]. Amsterdam:Association of Rhine and Meuse
from which 25% is self-caught (16-18). In contaminated fish, and for the very high Water Supply Companies, 1995.
the exposure model applied in this study, molecular PAHs (log KW >6.2), exposure 10. Province of Limburg. Complementary Research of
Sediments [in Dutch]. Maastricht, The Netherlands:
the default fish ingestion rate was 55 and 15 was through dermal exposure to sediments Province of Limburg, 1989.
g/day for adults and children, respectively, and the ingestion of fish (11). The very high 11. Guidelines for bathing quality (76/160/EEC).
considering 50% of the fish consumption molecular PAHs (log ow >6.2), predomi- Luxembourg:Luxembourg Office for Official
Publications of the European Communities, 1976.
self-caught (12). This assumption (25 g/day antly dibenzo(ah)anthracene, contributed 12. Bockting GJM, Koolenbrander JGM, Swartjes FA.
for adults) is at the extreme of the exposure more than 75% to the total BaP equivalents SEDISOIL. Estimation of human exposure to sedi-
distribution recommended by Finley et al. in sediments. This indicates that the expo- ments [in Dutch]. Rpt no 715810011. Bilthoven, The
Netherlands:National Institute of Public Health and
(45). Furthermore, the concentrations in sure levels of BaP for the pathways of inges- the Environment, 1996.
fish were based on uncooked whole fish tion of contaminated fish and dermal expo- 13. Crane JL. Carcinogenic human health risks associat-
instead of the edible parts of the fish, which sure while swimming were overestimated ed with consuming contaminated fish from five Great
also represented conservative assumptions because the very high molecular PAHs are Lakes areas of concern. J Great Lakes Res
22(3):653-668 (1996).
(15). Therefore, exposure through ingestion less soluble in water, which is reflected by 14. Adams MR, Hanna CA, Mayernik JA, Mendez WM Jr.
of contaminated fish was highly overestimat- lower surface water concentrations and Probabilistic health risk assessment for exposures to
ed by using these conservative assumptions. lower concentrations in fish. estuary sediments and biota contaminated with poly-
chlorinated biphenyls, polychlorinated terphenyls
Ingestion of sediment was considered an In summary, the application of the and other toxic substances. Risk Anal 14(4):577-594
important exposure route if exposure was standard exposure model, which is current- 11994).
calculated based on location-specific input ly used by the Dutch government, leads to 15. U.S. Great Lakes National Program Office. Risk
Assessment and Modeling Overview Document. EPA
data. However, no specific data on the sedi- the conclusion that sediment contamina- 905-R93-007. Chicago, IL:U.S. Environmental
ment ingestion rate by children and adults tion by Pb and Zn may cause a health risk Protection Agency, 1993.
were available for risk assessment purposes. in relation to recreational activities on both 16. Crane JL. Baseline Human Health Risk Assessment:
Ashtabula River, Ohio, Area of Concern. EPA 905-R92-
Therefore, sediment ingestion rates are lakes, which is mainly due to the exposure 007. Athens, GA:U.S. Environmental Protection
based on soil ingestion rates in relation to through ingestion of fish. However, upon Agency, 1992.
contaminated sites (12). In the standard inclusion of location-specific data, in par- 17. Crane JL. Baseline Human Health Risk Assessment:
exposure model, a sediment ingestion rate ticular the concentrations in surface water, Saginaw River, Michigan, Area of Concern. EPA 905-
R92-008. Athens, GA:U.S. Environmental Protection
of 1 g/day (82 mg/day annual average) for the exposure risk estimates are reduced by Agency, 1992.
children has been used as a default value. more than two orders of magnitude. We 18. Crane JL. Baseline Human Health Risk Assessment:
This assumption seems to be plausible, but therefore recommend that location-specific Buffalo River, New York, Area of Concern. EPA 905-
R93-008. Athens, GA:U.S. Environmental Protection
conservative. Finley et al. (45) recommend- data should be used if exposure through Agency, 1993.
ed a default value of 110 mg/day as the ingestion of contaminated fish is a relevant 19. Hicks HE. The Great Lakes: a historical overview.
95th percentile and 16 mg/day as the medi- exposure pathway. Furthermore, calculated Toxicol Ind Health 12(2/3:303-313 (1996).
20. Tremblay NW, Gilman AP. Human health, the Great
an value for the child soil ingestion rate. risks do not represent actual risks due to Lakes, and environmental pollution: a 1994 perspec-
The other exposure routes were of minor the incorporation of conservative assump- tive. Environ Health Perspect 103(suppl 9):3-5 (1995).
importance in relation to total exposure lev- tions. In general, exposure risk assessment 21. Vena JE, Buck GM, Kostyniak P, Mendola P,
Fitzgerald E, Sever L, Freudenheim J, Greizerstein H,
els for heavy metals. For example, the inges- of the present type can be used for screen- Zielezny M, McReynolds J, Olson J. The New York
tion of suspended matter while swimming ing purposes to identify important expo- angler cohort study: exposure characterization and
contributed less than 1% to the total average sure pathways and to determine the reproductive and developmental health. Toxicol Ind
Health 12(3/4):327-334 (1996).
exposure levels. The concentration of heavy urgency of sediment remediation actions. 22. Pellettieri MB, Hallenbeck WH, Brenniman GR, Cailas
metals in suspended matter was also mod- M, Clark M. PCB intake from sport fishing along the
eled on the basis of partition coefficients. REFERENCES AND NOTES Northern Illinois shore of Lake Michigan. Bull Environ
Equilibrium was assumed between surface Contam Toxicol 57:766-770 (1996).
1. Ploco SS. Using modular planning and modular mod- 23. Moody RP, Chu I. Dermal exposure to environmental
water and suspended matter (12). The pre- elling towards sound water quality managment of the contaminants in the Great Lakes. Environ Health
dicted ratios versus measured concentrations river Meuse. Eur Water Pollut Control 5(6):41-50 Perspect 103(suppl 9):103-114 (1995).
in suspended matter for Lake Eijsden were 24. RIZA. Report of the Project Ecological Rehabilitation
(1995). of the River Meuse. The Ecology of Gravel Pits
0.71, 0.57, 0.49, 0.60, and 0.79 for the 2. Ketelaars HAM, Volz J, Jiilich WFB. Biological and
exotoxicological monitoring of the rivers Rhine and Adjacent to the River Meuse in The Netherlands. An
heavy metals As, Cd, Cu, Pb, and Zn, Meuse by the drinking water industry. Water Sci Overview of Studies Conducted. Rpt no 28. Lelystad,
respectively. The predicted values were Technol 29(3):249-251 (1994). The Netherlands:The Institute of Water Management
3. Vreedenburgh EGH, Waals JMJ. Recent develop- and Waste Water Treatment, 1995.
slightly higher, but have no influence on the ments in drinking-water supply from the international 25. Schilderman PAEL, Hoogewerff JA, van Schooten FJ,
total average exposure levels. rivers Rhine and Meuse in The Netherlands. Aqua Maas LM, Moonen EJC, van Os BJH, van Wijnen JH,
To estimate human risks in relation to 4:197-204 (1987). Kleinjans JCS. Possible relevance of pigeons as an
indicator species for monitoring air pollution. Environ
contaminated PAH sediments we used the 4. Klink FJ. An alternative approach to achieve a clean Health Perspect 105 (3):322-330 (1997).
TEF approach. In this approach, the sum of river Meuse. Water Sci Technol 29(3):121-123 (1994). 26. Heijna-Merkus E, Hof M. Harmonization of Model
5. Foster IDL, Charlesworth SM. Heavy metals in the Parameters. Rpt no 679102022. Bilthoven, The
EPA-listed PAHs in sediments were hydrological cycle: trends and explanation. Hydrol Netherlands:National Institute of Public Health and
expressed as BaP equivalents to calculate the Process 10:227-261 (1996). the Environment, 1993.
carcinogenic risk associated with exposure to 6. Christensen ER, Irwan AL, Razak A, Rachdawong P, 27. Ministery of Public Health and Culture. Results of the
Karls JF. Sources of polycyclic aromatic hydrocar- Food Consumption Survey 1992 [in Dutch). Rijswijk,
a mixture of PAH compounds (33). The bons in sediments of the Kinnickinnic River, The Netherlands, 1993.
ingestion of fish was the predominant Wisconsin. J Great Lakes Res 23(1):61-73 (1997).
28. Van Wijnen JH. Health risk assessment in relation to 35. Birnbaum LS, DeVito MJ. Use of toxic equivalency 41. Paustenbach DJ, Jernigan JD, Bass R, Kalmes R,
soil pollution (Vogelmeer) [in Dutch]. T Soc Geneesk factors for risk assessment for dioxins and related Scott P. A proposed approach to regulating contami-
60:555-559 (1982). compounds. Toxicology 105:391-401 (1995). nated soil: identify safe concentrations for seven of
29. Hawley, JK. Assessment of health risk from exposure 36. Absil MCP, van Scheppingen Y. Concentrations of the most frequently encountered exposure scenarios.
to contaminated soil. Risk Anal 5:289-302 (1985). selected heavy metals in benthic diatoms and sedi- Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 16:21-56 (1992).
30. Veerkamp W, ten Berge W. Hazard assessment of ment in the Westerschelde Estuary. Bull Environ 42. Allen-Gil SM, Gubala CP, Landers DH, Lasora K.
chemical contaminants in soil. ECETOC Technical Rpt Contam Toxicol 56:1008-1015 (1996). Heavy metal accumulation in sediment and freshwa-
40. Brussels:European Chemical Industry Ecology 37. Stone M, Droppo IG. Distribution of lead, copper and ter fish in U.S. Arctic Lakes. Environ Toxicol
and Toxicology Centre, 1990. zinc in size-fractionated river bed sediment in two Cheml6(4):733-741 (1997).
31. RIZA. The Possibility for Surface Water Organism to agricultural catchments of southern Ontario, Canada. 43. Linde AR, Arribas P, Sanchez-Galan S, Garcia-
Survive [in Dutch). Rpt. no 89016a. Lelystad, The Environ Pollut 93 (3):353-362 (1996). Vazquez E. Eel (Anguilla anguilla) and brown trout
Netherlands:The Institute of Water Management and 38. Paustenbach DJ. A survey of health risk assessment. (Salmo trutta) target species to assess the biological
Waste Water Treatment, 1989. In: The Risk Assessment of Environmental and impact of trace metal pollution in freshwater ecosys-
32. Fiore BJ, Anderson HA, Hanrahan LP. Olson LJ, Human Health Hazards: A Textbook of Case Studies tems. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 31:297-302 (1996).
Sonzogni WL. Sport fish consumption and body (Paustenbach DJ, ed). New York:Wiley, 1989. 44. Brannon JM, Price CB, Reilly FJ Jr, Pennington JC,
burden levels of chlorinated hydrocarbons. A study of 39. Salomons W, Mook WG. Biogeochemical processes McFarland VA. Effects of sediment organic carbon on
Wisconsin anglers. Arch Environ Health 44:82-88 (1989). affecting metal concentrations in lake sediments distribution of radiolabeled fluoranthene and PCBs
33. Nisbet ICT, LaGoy PK. Toxic equivalency factors (lJsselmeer, The Netherlands). Total Environ among sediment interstitial water and biota. Bull
(TEFs) for polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs). 16:217-229 (1980). Environ Contam Toxicol 51:873-880 (1993).
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 16:290-300 (1992). 40. CCRX. Results of measurements of the radioactive 45. Finley B, Proctor D, Scott P, Harrington N,
34. Kleinjans JCS, Moonen EJC, Dallinga JW, Albering contaminations in The Netherlands. Rijswijk, The Paustenbach D, Price P. Recommended distributions
HJ, van den Boogaard AJM, van Schooten FJ. Netherlands:Coordinating Committee of the for exposure factors frequently used in health risk
Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in whiskies. The Monitoring of Radioactive and Xenobiotic assessment. Risk Anal 14 (4):533-553 (1994).
Lancet348:1731 (1996). Substances, 1991.
S - S S - *5