Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
LECTURE #. 1 UK CONSTITUTION
Public law deals with the law relating to how countries are governed. There are two
parts in the study of Public Law: Constitutional Law which establishes the principal
institutions of the state, defines the powers of those institutions and determines how
these institutions are held to account for those powers; Administrative Law confers
the legal powers and duties on individual public bodies and legal challenges to
government bodies through, for example, judicial review.
WHAT IS A CONSTITUTION?
‘…the whole system of government of a country, the collection of rules which establish
and regulate or govern the government.’ Professor K. C. Wheare.
From these definitions, particularly the second, it can be discerned that a constitution
is something prior to government, it gives legitimacy to government and
defines the power under which government may act. It dictates and limits
government exercise of its powers. It defines the legality of power.
In most modern states these rules are contained in a single document which may or
may or not incorporate a Bill or Rights. The Bill or Rights will normally provide citizens
with guarantees regarding the protection of certain civil liberties. Such constitutions are
subject to judicial interpretation in the sense that the courts can assess the legality of
the legislative measures by reference to the constitutional document. For the citizens of
the country, the constitution is an enormously important document because it prevents
the state from abusing its powers and safeguards the rights of the individual.
Unlike most modern states, Britain does not have a codified constitution but an
unwritten one formed of Acts of Parliament, court judgments, customs and conventions.
The United Kingdom, therefore, does not have a document of fundamental importance
EXAM TIP
In considering the status of individual rights in the UK, remember that, although the
unwritten constitution does not protect rights, we now have the European Convention
on Human Rights, as implemented by the Human Rights Act 1998, which does provide
greater protection for certain rights.
A point of comparison can be made with the USA where, following the American War of
Independence, a written document was prepared, which established fundamental
constitutional principles and safeguarded rights of citizens. Written constitutions usually
evolve from states - such as the USA - and some former British Colonies that desired to
make a clean break, start anew, or to establish a state that was once governed by
another. The absence of any such break in the UK history explains its mainly unwritten
constitution.
EXAM TIP
Make sure to point out that many written constitutions are produced after a revolution,
where the citizens rise up against what they see as an oppressive state. In this way the
US constitution was written after the War of Independence from Britain and the French
constitution was produced after the French Revolution. You can also make the point
that, although most countries have a written constitution, the UK is not the only country
without such a document. Both New Zealand and Israel also have unwritten
constitutions
In order to protect the citizen against the state, the constitution has to be strong
(otherwise the government will simply change it) but, if it is too strong, then it cannot
be amended to reflect changes in society. For example, the original US constitution
Flexible - the ease with which it can be amended. Under the doctrine of Parliamentary
Sovereignty, parliament is the supreme law making body and passes any law by a
simple majority vote in parliament and no court may hold an Act of Parliament void.
Exhibit mainly but not complete Separation of powers - The doctrine of the
separation of powers stipulate that power should not be placed in the hands of any one
institution. Though the institutions of the state are not considered to be completely
separate it is believed that there are sufficient checks and balances in place.
Monarchical - In Britain the Monarchy remains with the Queen as Head of State and
succession to the throne is hereditary. The Queen holds widespread formal powers in
practice however these are largely exercised by the elected government of the day by
the Prime Minister.
Statute – Not all Acts of Parliament can be considered constitutional. Examples are the
Bill or Rights 1689 established Parliament (rather than the monarch) as the supreme
law-making body in England. Restricted the powers of the King and set out basic
individual rights; the Acts of Settlement 1700 which provided for the succession to the
throne; the Act of the Union 1706 United England and Scotland, giving power to the
Westminster Parliament to legislate over Scotland; The European Communities Act 1972
which gave effect to EU law in the UK; the Human Rights Act 1998 made domestic
courts ‘courts of human rights’ by providing direct access to many of the rights
contained in the European Convention on Human Rights. Placed a statutory obligation
on the state to act in accordance with the Convention rights; the Parliament Act 1911 &
1949 removed the ability of the House of Lords to reject legislation which has been
passed by the House of Commons; Constitutional Reform Act 2005 provided for judicial
independence and judicial accountability; Magna Carta 1297 provided for civil liberties.
M v Home Office [1994] when they held the Secretary had committed contempt of
court by not allowing a Zairean teacher back into the United Kingdom.
It is a positive aspect of the Common Law that it protects the right of citizens while
making the government accountable to the citizens for their actions, the only issue
being the uncertainty behind the Common Law, these decisions are not easily accessible
and as mentioned previous, very indeterminate and ever changeable. This also shows
that the constitutional ideas present within are completely unprotected and not able to
be determined by ordinary citizens – unless they know where to look. In addition,
parliament can easily set aside or even repeal judicial decisions easily, even
retrospectively, further showing that the constitutional common law is even more un-
entrenched than statutes.
The Royal Prerogative – Dicey described this as; “…the residue of discretionary and
arbitrary authority, which at any time is legally left in the hands of the crown." These
are, privileges and immunities belonging to the Crown, such as the power to declare
war, enter into treaty obligations, issue passports, recognize foreign governments and
maintain domestic law and order. One of the most important aspects of prerogative
powers is that, traditionally, they have not been enforceable by the courts. They have
been seen as ‘non-justiciable’, which means that the court will recognize that a
prerogative power applies in a given situation but cannot enforce it. This made such
powers largely unaccountable.
Council of Civil Service Unions v. Minister for the Civil Service (the ‘GCHQ Case’) (1985)
It was decided by the government that workers at the secret Government
Communications Headquarters (GCHQ) should not be allowed to join a trade union in
case this led to them going on strike. The government altered, by means of prerogative
power, the terms of employment of the workers to prohibit union membership. The
union sought judicial review of the policy. It was held that, although this particular
prerogative power remained non-justiciable, there was nothing in principle to prevent
the courts from considering the use of prerogative powers. This has led to various
prerogative powers being challenged in later cases.
The ‘GCHQ case’ is extremely important, even though the union lost their challenge to
the policy. The key point is that the court recognised that it had the power to review
some prerogative powers – this had previously been thought impossible.
The Cabinet Manual – Written in 2010 – 2011 forms a guide to laws, conventions and
rules on the operation of government. Though it provides rules and practices it is not
intended to be a source of any rule.
Conventions of the British Constitution include such things as the Queen’s right to
refusing a Royal Assent, however it is unlikely that the Queen will ever refuse royal
assent due to convention. Similarly, the Queen has the power to appoint anybody to be
her Prime Minister, but convention dictates that she will choose the leader of the party
with the most seats in Parliament. Another convention is that minister has a
responsibility towards parliament, in which ministers speak with one voice and have
confidentiality and unanimity. Although these conventions have no punishment failing to
comply with them will seriously damage political reputation and could lead to anarchy if,
for example, the queen decided to appoint a Prime Minister not part of the Commons.
It could be argued that these are such important rules that they ought to be enshrined
in law. The reply might be that leaving them as they are allows them to be amended
easily and gradually through practice. Also, if they were obeyed as if they are law, why
do they need to be enshrined in law, assuming they could be adequately defined.
Further conventions allow discretion and can be waived of particular circumstances
make this impossible. Their non-legal nature helps to keep the judiciary and the courts
out of politics and political controversy.
WRITTEN CONSTITUTION
ADVANTAGES DISADVANTAGES
All key provisions are contained in a single Requires one document to encompass the
document. regulation of the entire constitution.
Provides a clear statement of how the May lead to litigation over the precise
state should operate with no uncertainty meanings of the terms used, particularly if
over words. Everyone can read and agree the language is outdated.
what it says.
Protects the individual from abuses by the May be difficult to amend if the provisions
government of the day. become outdated (e.g. the USA and
slavery).
Provides clear protection of individual May be inflexible and unresponsive to
rights. change.
UNWRITTEN CONSTITUTION
ADVANTAGES DISADVANTAGES
Flexible and responsive to changing Can appear vague and uncertain. No single
circumstances. agreed source of constitutional law.
Leaves the state free to develop the law Leaves the state free to abuse its powers
for the benefit of citizens. and develop laws which act against its
citizens.
Encourages the evolution of the Provides no protection for individual civil
constitution. liberties.
CONSTITUTIONAL PRINCIPLES
RULE OF LAW
A core constitutional principle, the rule of law, is a phrase that was popularized by legal
scholar A. V. Dicey in his 1885 work, Introduction to the Study of the Law of the
Constitution, which is recognized as a work of authority on the constitution by the British
Parliament. This is the idea that all laws and government actions conform to principles.
These principles include equal application of the law: 1)everyone is equal before the law
RvR
R married his wife in August 1984 but the marriage became strained, and his wife
moved back to her parents' house in October 1989, leaving a letter expressing her
intention to seek a divorce. A few weeks later, in November 1989, R broke into the
house while his wife's parents were out, and attempted to force her to have sexual
intercourse with him against her will. He also assaulted her, squeezing his hands around
her neck. The police arrested R and charged him with rape. HOL declared that it is
possible for a H to rape his W at a time when it have been lawful for him to do so.
ECHR upheld this decision despite the fact that it imposed retrospective criminal liability.
SEPARATION OF POWERS
The essence of the doctrine is that there should be ideally a clear demarcation of
personnel and functions between the (3 elements of a democratic constitution)
legislature, executive, and judiciary in order for no one body to have excessive
power and to put in place a system of checks and balances between the institutions.
The legislature - law-making body, and is comprised of the House of Commons and
the House of Lords.
The executive - is all the institutions and persons concerned with the implementation
of the laws made by the legislature. It involves central and local government and the
armed forces.
The judiciary is made up mainly of professional judges, and their main function is ‘to
determine disputed questions of fact and law in accordance with the law laid down by
Parliament and expounded by the courts and …is exercised mainly in the civil and
criminal courts.’
French Legal writer Montesquieu believed that: “When legislative power is united with
executive power in a single person or in a single body of the magistracy, there is no
liberty” Therefore, if power is concentrated in one group of persons, the result would
inevitably be corruption and an abuse of power. Tyranny and dictatorship would ensue
and this, in turn, would mean a loss of liberty for the people as there would be no group
to ensure checks and balances.
There are significant departures from the pure doctrine under the UK’s constitution, that
is, there is no strict separation of Powers.
Saunders explains that: ‘…If there was a strict separation, and we did not have overlaps
or checks and balances, our system of Government would become unmoveable. A lack
of cooperation between limbs would result in constitutional deadlock and therefore, ‘…
complete separation of powers is possible neither in theory nor in practice.’
Historically, the position of Lord Chancellor was distinctive in that he was a member of
all three branches of Government and exercised all three forms of power. He would sit
as speaker in the House of Lords (legislative function), was head of the judiciary (judicial
function), and was a senior cabinet minister (executive function). After the Human
Rights Act 1998 and the case of McGonnell v UK (2000), the Government announced
changes to the role of Lord Chancellor in the UK.
McGonnell v UK (2000 - the applicant challenged the Bailiff of one of the Channel
Islands (Guernsey) who has a position analogous to the Lord Chancellor in that he
15 Prepared by: Reeshema Britton
combines judicial and executive functions and had had a role in previous legislative
proceedings. The actual appeal concerned a refusal of planning permission and an
alleged breach of Article 6(1) of the European Convention. The European Court of
Human Rights held that whilst no actual bias was suggested on the part of the Bailiff,
his involvement in the proceedings gave rise to a legitimate sense on the part of the
applicant that there was doubt about his judicial impartiality and independence.
Government enacted the Constitutional Reform Act 2005, which meant that the
Chancellor was replaced as head of the judiciary by the Lord Chief Justice. He was
replaced as speaker in the House of Lords by the creation of the post of Lord Speaker,
and now only appoints judges on the basis of recommendation from a Judicial
Appointments Commission.
These changes show that there is a strong importance still placed upon the doctrine of
separation of powers. However it is still possible to see overlaps within the three limbs.
JUDICIAL INDEPENDENCE
The Primary role of the judiciary is to adjudicate upon legal disputes that are brought
before the courts. This involves interpreting and applying legislation and developing and
applying common law. To achieve this, the judiciary must be able to decide cases free
from pressure from politicians and other improper pressures from, for example, the
media and the general public.
M v Home Office
Executive is bound by the rule of law and judicial remedies
HOMEWORK QUESTION