Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
MANII.A
13 2{u?
.eEs
THE HOHORABLE SPEAKER OF THE HOUSE
AHD THE LADIE$ AHD GENTLEMEI'I OF
THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
I. GENERAL COMiliXNTS
For two decades, we have been constrained by the outdated provisions of our
tax laws under the National lnternal Revenue Code, as amended. ln particular, the
high personal income tax rates have placed a significant burden to our laborers.
Today, a rnajor breakthrough in the legislative history has taken place, where we not
only break this trend but provide for additional resources that we will use to fund the
social and economic infrastructure that wlll beneftt the poor"
ln line with this, the oveniding consideration is the promotion of fairness of the
tax system for individuals perforning similar work. Given the significant reduction in
the personal income tax, the employees of these firms shCIuld follow the regular tax
rates applicable to other individual taxpayers.
Section 31:
Section 33:
The above prwisions go against the principle of lirniting the VAT zenr-rating
to direct exporters. The proliferation of separate customs teriitories, which include
buildings, creates significant leakages in our tax system" This makes the tax
system
ftighly inequitable and significantly reduces the revenues that could be better u*ed
for the poor. As to tourism enterprises, the current law only allows for duty and
tax
free importation of capital equipment, transportation equipment and other goods.
The TIEZA Law explicitly allows only duty and tax iree importation or iapital
equipment, transportafion equipmentand*other goods (in certain case$ and always
subjec{ to rules provided by the DOf}. Thus, this provision actually grants a
new
incentive to suppliers of registered tourisrn enterprises. At any rate, ihe TIEZA law,
which is still in effect fer two rnora years, ean be used to avail of the above-
mentioned incentives.
I am ccnstrained to veto the prnvision which provides for the above under
line
12 o{ $ec. 38 in the enrCIlled bill, to wit
.,4Nf,} BEGIHNING
JAHUARY 1, E019, SELF.EMPLOYEN AHD PROFES$IOHALS
ffiTH T0TAL AI{I{UAL GRO$S sALEs ANI}/O* SRos$ ..-
Hicelprs Noi
EXCEEDING FIVE HUNDRED THOUSANO PE.OS IESOO,OOOIJ'
I am constrained ts veto the provieion which provides for the above under line
25 Sec. 43 of the enrolled bill, to wit:
.,PETROLEUM
PROOUET$, IHSLUNIilG NAPHTHA, LPG. PETROLEUIIfi, COKE,
RERHERY FUEL AHD orHER FRooUCTs oF nrsfrr-r-*ircn, r[irru
UsED
lllPUT, FEEIISTOCI( OR AS RAIiY MI|TERIAL tN THE rrlnr*i.lr*,cTunrxG A$
oF
PETRocHEilllsAL PRoDUCTE, oR rN TlrE nrrrr*rrue- oF- pETRoLEUnfi
PRODUGTS' OR AS REPLACEMEHT FUEL FOR NATI,'RAL.CAS.FIRED.
coltilBNElt cYcLE PouuEn pLANT [,] tN LIEU oF LocALLt-ExrRAcrEn
NATURAL GAs ouRlNG THE Hotl.AvAilmrlrrv rfensoF, ilrii.lrcr
RULE$ AHtr REGULlrrloHs r0 EE PRoltrulcArip-af
ro rHE
iriisrincrAny
OF
FINANCE, PER LITER OF VO-LUM-E CAPACIW, ZERO (PO.OO}, TUNTXENMORE.
THJ\? THE BY.FRONUGT INCLUOING FUEL bru, UIrSEr. FUEL, KEROSEHE,
PYROLYSIq GASoLINE, LIQUiHEn PETROLEUTT{ GAsES,
AtUt} $tMtLAR OILS
HAYING ['lloRE oR LE$$ THE sArur sEnrnmruc-Fbd[h,
PRODUCED lH THE PRocEsstNG oF NApHTHA tHTo
wnlcr{ ARE
isinocnEMEAL
PR0nUQTS SHALL BE suBJEcr
rHE sEcrlou,
ro ilienpplrc*eli- excrse rAx
lfEqryEq*t!- ExcEFr wuer,r ducrr-riiFnonucrs
TR.A!*ISFERREII ro ANy or rxf i-oidr- oii- iEEilxEnre"d -ifinoue ARE
BARTER g[-E]GI!ANGE, FoR THE punposr or runrnEn piibcrsstruG
H *ALE,
BLENIIIHG lNTo rlNmxeo pnonutri witcH ARE $uBJEcT oR
To ExctrE TAx
UNDER THIS SECTION."
The pravision runs the risk of being too general, covering all types
petroleum products, which may be subject to auuse-by of
dc thus
taxpayerr,
massive revenue erosion. At any rata, the tax cade atriaoy identifieslead to
petroleum which
products can be exempted.
The provision effectively amends the $in Tax Law, or RA 10351, which provides
for guaranteed funds for universal health care, The pr',ovision will effectively
diminish
the share of the health sector in ihe proposed alloca*an.