Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
Appropriate sensory input is critical for young children with timbre perception training (Driscoll, 2012). After training, they
cochlear implants (CIs) and facilitates brain plasticity of the popula- may develop their own strategies to make coherent judgments by
tion (Giraud, Price, Graham, & Frackowiak, 2001; Lazard, Giraud, relying on the specific attributes (e.g., short attack time, as in per-
Gnansia, Meyer, & Sterkers, 2012). In addition to the research sup- cussive instruments) of different sounds that they can effectively
1
2 Music Therapy Perspectives
Table 1.
Demographic Information of Participants
Participant Gender Age (yrs) Age at CI (yrs) CI use (yrs) Implant devices
1 M 5.4 4.3 1.0 Freedom
2 F 5.8 2.3 3.4 N5
3 M 3.5 1.9 1.6 Freedom
4 F 2.8 1.6 1.2 N5
5 M 4.8 1.4 2.5 Freedom
6 M 3.9 3.9 0.1 N5
Table 4.
Subtest Items in Music Perception Measurement
Table 5.
Changes in Discrimination Task Performance After Training
Measures
Table 6.
Changes in Identification Task Performance After Training
Table 7.
Comparison of Task Performance Rates During Each Subtest at Pretest and Posttest
Pretest Posttest
Subtest performance rate M SD M SD Z p
Discrimination test
Rhythm 32.0 8.4 58.0 13.0 –2.060 .039*
Pitch (Melodic pattern) 40.0 15.8 64.0 20.7 –1.604 .109
Timbre (Korean) 41.7 16.8 56.8 9.3 –1.473 .141
Identification test
Rhythm 57.5 6.8 85.0 16.3 –2.041 .041*
Pitch (Melodic contour) 50.0 26.5 77.5 13.7 –1.841 .066
Timbre (Western) 57.5 30.1 87.5 15.3 –1.841 .066
Song 65.0 33.5 80.0 20.9 –0.816 .414
remembered when required to process a song with multiple Fritz, J. B., Elhilali, M., David, S. V., & Shamma, S. A. (2007). Auditory attention:
cues (Galvin et al., 2007). Also, the use of ethnic instruments Focusing the searchlight on sound. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 17, 1–19.
doi:10.1016/j.conb.2007.07.011
could be considered for development of both general and cul-
Fujita, S., & Ito, J. (1999). Ability of nucleus cochlear implantees to recognize music.
ture-dependent music preferences in young populations with Annals of Otology, Rhinology, and Laryngology, 10, 634–640.
CIs (Hwang, 2011; Kim, Cho, Kim, & Yoo, 2015). Galvin, J. J. III, Fu, Q., & Nogaki, G. (2007). Melodic contour identification by
The results, however, should be considered with caution cochlear implant listeners. Ear & Hearing, 28(3), 302–319. doi:10.1097/01.
because of the lack of a control group. Along with the baseline aud.0000261689.35445.20
data in terms of developmental level of speech and language, Galvin, J. J. III, Fu, Q., & Shannon, R. V. (2009). Melodic contour identification and
music perception by cochlear implant users. Annals of the New York Academy
the inclusion of a larger sample may corroborate the applicabil-
of Sciences, 1169, 518–533. doi:10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.04551.x
ity of this program with regard to how systematic music-based Geers, A., Tobey, E., Moog, J., & Brenner, C. (2008). Long-term outcomes
interventions should operate in facilitating and improving skills of cochlear implantation in the preschool years: From elementary
to process musical information. Intervening at an early age in grades to high school. International Journal of Audiology, 47(2), 21–30.
cases of cochlear implantation is strongly correlated with lan- doi:10.1080/14992020802339167
guage performance (Dettman, Pinder, Briggs, Dowell, & Leigh, Gfeller, K., Driscoll, V., Kenworthy, M., & van Voorst, T. (2011). Music therapy for
2007; Geers, Tobey, Moog, & Brenner, 2008), and additional preschool cochlear implant recipients. Music Therapy Perspectives, 29, 39–49.
doi:10.1093/mtp/29.1.39
music training may promote age-appropriate development in
Gfeller, K., Witt, S., Adamek, M., Mehr, M., Rogers, J., Stordahl, J., & Riggenberg,
efficient ways. Structural elements in music may be effectively S. (2002). Effects of training on timbre recognition and appraisal by postlin-
used to facilitate the perception of temporal and spectral infor- gually deafened cochlear implant recipients. Journal of the American Academy
mation of auditory and language input (See, Driscoll, Gfeller, of Audiology, 13, 132–145.
Kliethermes, & Oleson, 2013). Also, it would enhance the Gfeller, K., Witt, S., Spencer, L. J., Stordahl, J., & Tomblin, B. (1999). Musical involve-
developmental process, leading to more successful processing ment and enjoyment of children who use cochlear implants. Volta Review,
of auditory and speech information (Yucel et al., 2009). Future 100(4), 213–233.
Giraud, A. L., Price, C. J., Graham, J. M., & Frackowiak, R. S. (2001). Functional
studies are needed to examine how direct and specific music
plasticity of language-related brain areas after cochlear implantation. Brain,
perception and speech perception training outcomes generalize 124, 1307–1316.
to areas that were not directly trained, such as more complex or Gordon, E. E. (1979). Primary measures of music audiation. Chicago: GIA.
novel stimuli. Further investigation is needed to determine how Hopyan, T., Gordon, K. A., & Papsin, B. C. (2011). Identifying emotions in
the structured intervention facilitates not only successful engage- music through electrical hearing in deaf children using cochlear implants.
ment in and processing of music-related tasks, but also general Cochlear Implants International, 12(1), 21–26. doi:10.1179/1467010
10X12677899497399
enjoyment of the musical environment for children with CIs.
Hsiao, F., & Gfeller, K. (2012). Music perception of cochlear implant recipients with
implications for music instruction: A review of literature. Update: Applications
of Research in Music, 30(2), 5–10. doi:10.1177/8755123312437050
References
Hwang, S. Y. (2011). Comparative study on music preference between school-aged
Abdi, S., Khalessi, M. H., Khorsandi, M., & Gholami, B. (2001). Introducing music children with cochlear implant and normal hearing. Journal of Music and
as a means of habilitation for children with cochlear implants. International Human Behavior, 8(2), 47–64.
Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology, 59(2), 105–113. doi:10.1016/ Innes-Brown, H., Marozeau, J. P., Storey, C. M., & Blamey, P. J. (2013). Tone, rhythm,
S0165-5876(01)00460-8 and timbre perception in school-age children using cochlear implants and
Chen, J. K., Chuang, A. Y. C., McMahon, C., Hsieh, J., Tung T., & Li, L. P. (2010). hearing aids. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, 24(9), 789–806.
Music training improves pitch perception in prelingually deafened children doi:10.3766/jaaa.24.9.4
with implants. Pediatrics, 1254, 793–800. doi:10.1542/peds.2008-3620 Kim, S. J., Cho, Y. S., Kim, E. Y., & Yoo, G. E. (2015). Can young adolescents with coch-
Dettman, S. J., Pinder, D., Briggs, R. J. S., Dowell, R. C., & Leigh, J. R. (2007). lear implants perceive different timbral cues? Cochlear Implants International,
Communication development in children who receive the cochlear implant 16(2), 61–68. doi:10.1179/1754762814Y.0000000083
younger than 12 months: Risks versus benefits. Ear & Hearing, 28(2), 11–18. Lazard, D. S., Giraud, A. L., Gnansia, D., Meyer, B., & Sterkers, O. (2012).
doi:10.1097/AUD.0b013e31803153f8 Understanding the deafened brain: Implications for cochlear implant rehabil-
Driscoll, V. D. (2012). The effects of training on recognition of musical instruments itation. European Annals of Otorhinolaryngology, Head, and Neck Diseases,
by adults with cochlear implants. Seminars in Hearing, 33(4), 410. 129(2), 98–103. doi:10.1016/j.anorl.2011.06.001
Music Perception Training for Pediatric Cochlear Implant Recipients Ages 3 to 5 Years: A Pilot Study 7
Lee, S. Y. (2006). Music activities for facilitation of developmental domains for See, R. L., Driscoll, V. D., Gfeller, K., Kliethermes, S., & Oleson, J. (2013). Speech
children from age three to six. Journal of Music and Human Behavior, 3(1), intonation and melodic contour recognition in children with cochlear implants
29–62. and with normal hearing. Otology & Neurotology, 34(3), 490–498. doi:10.1097/
Luo, X., Fu, Q., & Galvin, J. J. (2007). Vocal emotion recognition by normal hear- MAO.0b013e318287c985
ing listeners and cochlear implant users. Trends in Hearing, 11(4), 301–315. Stacey, P. C., Fortnum, H. M., Barton, G. R., & Summerfield, A. Q. (2006). Hearing-
doi:10.1177/1084713807305301 impaired children in the United Kingdom, I: Auditory performance, communica-
Nakata, T., Trehub, S. E., Mitani, C., & Kanda, Y. (2006). Pitch and timing in the songs tion skills, educational achievements, quality of life, and cochlear implantation.
of deaf children with cochlear implants. Music Perception, 24(2), 147–154. Ear & Hearing, 27(2), 161–186. doi:10.1097/01.aud.0000202353.37567.b4
doi:10.1525/mp.2006.24.2.147 Thompson, W. F., Shellenberg, E. G., & Husain, G. (2004). Decoding speech pros-
Nakata T., Trehub S. E., Mitani C., Kanda Y., Shibasaki A., & Schellenberg, E. G. ody: Do music lessons help? Emotion, 4, 46–64. doi:10.1037/1528-3542.4.1.46
(2005). Music recognition by Japanese children with cochlear implants. Trehub, S. E., Vongpaisal, T., & Nakata, T. (2009). Music in the lives of deaf children
Journal of Physiological Anthropology and Applied Human Science, 24, 29–32. with cochlear implants. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1169,
doi:10.2114/jpa.24.29 534–542. doi:10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.04554.x
Nam, U. (2008). Timbre of Korean traditional instruments. In C. Kim (Ed.), Korean Won, J. H., Drennan, W., Kang, R. S., & Rubinstein, J. T. (2010). Psychoacoustic abil-
traditional instruments acoustics seminar (pp. 66–98). Seoul, South Korea: ities associated with music perception in cochlear implant users. Ear & Hearing,
National Gugak Center. 31(6), 796–805. doi:10.1097/AUD.0b013e3181e8b7bd
Petersen, B., Mortensen, M. V., Hansen, M., & Vuust, P. (2012). Singing in the key Yucel, E., & Belgin, E. (2006). Speech and musical perception in cochlear implant
of life: A study on effects of musical ear training after cochlear implantation. and hearing aid user adolescents. Journal of International Advanced Otology,
Appendix Continued