Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use, available at
http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp. JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use provides, in part, that unless
you have obtained prior permission, you may not download an entire issue of a journal or multiple copies of articles, and you
may use content in the JSTOR archive only for your personal, non-commercial use.
Please contact the publisher regarding any further use of this work. Publisher contact information may be obtained at
http://www.jstor.org/action/showPublisher?publisherCode=epw.
Each copy of any part of a JSTOR transmission must contain the same copyright notice that appears on the screen or printed
page of such transmission.
JSTOR is a not-for-profit organization founded in 1995 to build trusted digital archives for scholarship. We work with the
scholarly community to preserve their work and the materials they rely upon, and to build a common research platform that
promotes the discovery and use of these resources. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.
Economic and Political Weekly is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to
Economic and Political Weekly.
http://www.jstor.org
SPECIAL ARTICLES
ConceptualisingBralimaniLcalPatriarchy in
Early India
Gender, Caste, Class and State
Uma Chakravarti
Castehierarchyand genderhierarchyare the organisingprinciplesof the brahmanicalsocial orderand are
closely interconnected.This article exploresthe relationshipbetweencaste and gender,focusing on what is
possibly the centralfactorfor the subordinationof the uppercaste woman:the needfor effectivesexual con-
trol oversuch womento maintainnot only patrilinealsuccessionbut also castepurity,the institutionunique
to Hindu society.
STUDIES of women in early Indian history The task of exploring the connections bet- caste can be ensured without closely guar-
have tended to focus on what is broadly ween patriarchy and other structures within ding women who form the pivot for the en-
termed as the 'status of women', which in a historical context was pioneered by Gerda tire structure. As Yalman's informants
turn has led to a concentration of attention Lerner (1986) and her work is both theoreti- pointed out the honour and respectability
on a limited set of questions such as mar- cally and methodologically useful for of men is protectedand preservedthrough
riage law, property rights, and rights relating historians. In outlining the historical process their women. The appearanceof puberty
to religious practices, normally viewed as in- of the creation of patriarchy in the thus marksa profoundly'dangerous'situa-
dices of status. The limited focus has left a Mesopotamian region Lerner describes her tion and is the context for major rituals
major lacuna in our understanding of social growing awareness of the fact that crucial which indicates the important relationship
processes which have shaped men, women, to the organisation of early Mesopotamian between female purity and purity of caste.
and social institutions in early India. It is society was the total control of women's sex- It is in orderto stringentlyguard the purity
now time to move away from questions of uality by men of the dominant class. She had of castesthat veryearlyon pre-pubertymar-
'status' whether high or low, and to look in- been puzzled by her evidence wherein riages were recommended for the upper
stead at the structural framework of gender women seemed to have greatly differing castesespeciallybrahmanas[Yalman: 25-58].
relations, i e, to the nature and basis of the statuses, some holding high positions and Yalmanalso points out that caste blood is
subordination of women and its extent and enjoying economic independence but whose always bilateral, i e, its ritualiquality is
specific form in early Indian society. In this sexuality was controlled by men. This led her received from both parents. Thus ideally
context we may point out that although the to recognise that there was a need to look both parents must be of the same caste.
subordination of women is a common beyond economic questions and focus on the However,this cannot alwaysbe ensuredand
feature of almost all stages of history, and control over women's sexuality and the man- is the basis of grave anxiety in the texts.
s prevalent in large parts of the world, the ner in which reproduction was organised and The anxiety about polluting the ritual
xtent and form of that subordination has thus to look for the causes and effects of orderand the quality of the blood through
een conditioned by the social and cultural such sexual control [Lerner 1986: 8]. A women is best demonstratedin the horror
environment in which women have been similar exploration of the process of of miscegenyas we shall show. In the theore-
placed. establishing control over women's sexuality tical explanations for the proliferationof
The general subordination of women in a highly stratified and closed structure caste the most polluting and low castes are
assumed a particularly severe form in India could be useful in analysing the connections attributedto miscegeny,i e, the mixing of
through the powerful instrument of religious between caste, class, patriarchy, and the state castes ('varnasamkara').Most polluting are
traditions which have shaped social prac- in the brahmanical texts of early India. The those castes which are the products of
tices. A marked feature of Hindu society is structure that came into being has shaped reprehensibleunions between women of a
its legal sanction for an extreme expression ghe ideology of the upper castes and con- highercaste and men of a lower caste. The
of social stratification in which women and tinues to be the underpinning of beliefs and ideologues of the caste system had a p.r-
the lower castes have been subjected to practices extant todav. ticular horror of hypogamy-pratiloma-or
humiliating conditions of existence. Caste A possible starting point for an explora- against the grain as it was described-and
hierarchy and gender hierarchy are the tion of the historical evidence on the crucial reservedfor it the severestcondemnationand
organising principles of the brahmanical place of' control over women's sexuality the highest punishmentas will be evident.
social order and despite their close intercon- within the larger structure in which Violations continued to be punished until
nections neither scholars of the caste system brahmanical patriarchy was located thus recenttimes by drowningmother and child
nor feminist scholars have attempted to could be the practices and beliefs prevalent (Yalman: 52] and excommunication and
analyse the relationship between the two. I among the upper castes as studied by anthro- ritual death.
will explore here (very tentatively) the rela- pologists. An insightful essay by Nur Yalman The safeguardingof the caste structureis
tionship between caste and gender, focusing (1962) on the castes of Ceylon and Malabar' achievedthroughthe highlyrestrictedmove-
on what is possibly the central factor for the shows that the sexuality of women, more ment of women or even through female
subordination of the upper caste women: the than that of men, is the subject of social seclusion. Women are regarded as gate-
need for effective sexual control over such concern. Yalman argues that a fundamental ways-literally points of entrance into the
women to maintain not only patrilineal suc- principle of Hindu social organisation is to caste system. The lower caste male whose
cession (a requirement of all patriarchal construct a closed structure to preserve land, sexualityis a threatto-uppercaste purityhas
societies) but also caste purity, the institu- women, and 'ritual quality within it. The to be institutionallypreventedfrom having
tion unique to Hindu society. The purity of three are structurally linked and it is impossi- sexualaccess to women of the highercastes
women has a centrality in brahmanical ble to maintain all three without stringently so women must be carefully guarded
patriarchy, as we shall see, because the purity organising female sexuality. Indeed neither [Ganesh 1985:16;Das 1976:129-45].When
of caste is contingent upon it. land, nor ritual quality, i e, the purity of the structureto preventmiscegeny breaks