UniversitiTeknikal Malaysia Melaka

FakultiKejuruteraanElektrik

BEKU 4883 – Engineering Ethic

Case Study Report 1 Rubric

Title Selection : _____________________________________ Date of Submission : _______________

No. Name Job / Function Matriks No.

No Assessment / Section of Report Marks Marks Given

1.0 Abstract 5
Abstract is clear and well described 4-5
Abstract is not well described 2–3
Abstract is not presented or is plagiarized 0–1
2.0 Introduction 5
Thorough knowledge 4-5
Case study scenario explain effectively and accurate and
includes substantial information on topic.
Substantial knowledge 2-3
Case study scenario explain effectively but have (1-2) error and
includes required information on topic
Partial knowledge 1
Case study scenario not explain well and includes some
information on topic
Plagiarized Detected 0
3.0 Writing Technique 5
writing/ format are clear, sources documented properly, almost 4-5
free of spelling / grammatical errors
writing / format are somewhat clear, sources documented 2-3
somewhat properly, some spelling / grammatical errors
writing and format are unclear, sources not documented 0–1
properly, numerous spelling / grammatical errors
4.0 Content 15
Demonstrates full knowledge (ethical theory, problem-solving 10 – 15
technique, safety and sustainability issues) and properly
explained, Accurate, comprehensive and well supported. Clear
No Assessment / Section of Report Marks Marks Given
use of statistic, tables, picture to support the explanation.
Adequate explanation but could be elaboration further. limited 5-9
use of statistics, tables, pictures and limited additional research
evident, used somewhat effectively
Poor explanation of information, Misinterprets the knowledge. 1–4
no use of statistics, tables, pictures no additional research
evident and a lot of cut-and-paste version found
Plagiarized Detected 0
5.0 Discussion 10
Based on scenarios/case study with Including code of ethics 7-10
(NSPE, BEM, IEEE ……) in explanation correctly
Based on scenarios/case study and including code of ethics 4-6
(NSPE, BEM, IEEE ……) but incorrect
Not based on scenario and not include code of ethics 0-3
6.0 Conclusion and recommendation 5
Clear and complete summarization of the project achievement. 4-5
Clear and realistic recommendations for the assignment.
Some summary of points made, but nothing beyond summary; 2–3
no broad conclusions/lessons.Acceptable recommendations for
the assignment.
Conclusion and recommendation are irrelevant and arguable. 0–1
7.0 Appendixes 5
Most of the minutes meeting found and coherent with the 4-5
project report.
Found minutes of meeting and thorough discussion found 2-3
Not found minutes meeting and only discussion found. 0–1
TOTAL MARK 50

Comment / Suggestion :

_____________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________

Evaluated by;

Name :

Date :