ISSUE: 20180126- Re Religious Freedom - Re gender-neutral pronouns, etc, & the constitution

As a CONSTITUTIONALIST my concern is the true meaning and application of the constitution.

I happen on 25 January 2018 to read an article of Jacinta Nampijinpa Price “Attacking
Australia Day Rejects our History” While she claims that on 26 January 1949 all Australian
Aboriginals became Australian Citizen this part I dispute, whereas otherwise I view it was a very
good article. After all since federation those Aboriginals who had been granted franchise voted in
the first federal election in 1901. Constitutionally the Commonwealth cannot provide Australian
citizenship, this as one can only obtain Australian citizenship and so automatically when one
becomes a State Citizen. In AEC v Schorel-Hlavka the court on 4 December 2002 (by consent)
ordered that my s778B NOTICE OF CONSTITUTIONAL MATTERS which also challenge the
constitutional validity of the purported Australian citizenship Act 1948 be heard and determined
by the High Court of Australia. This after more than 15 years never has so far eventuated.
However, in further litigation the court on 19 July 2006 upheld both my appeals with my
extensive written submissions in the ADDRESS TO THE COURT remaining unchallenged by
the Commonwealth.
http://www.watoday.com.au/wa- news/inconvenient-fact-native- title-can-only-exist-if- australia-was-settled-not-
invaded-20180119-h0l9hb.html
Inconvenient fact: Native title can only exist if Australia was settled, not invaded
As such Aboriginals and others has to accept that if Australia was invaded and so conquered then
forget about native title!
Australia Day is not what I personally had much to do with. However, one has to consider the
overall application. Many who naturalised on this day hold it to be of importance.
We have people of all kind of countries and while they are supposed to assimilate into the
community, while they can still practice in their own environment their customs, traditions and
religions for so far it is within the legal provisions of applicable laws we find however that too
often there are enclaves where tranquillity and peace is not on the mind of those who migrated
and even those who are historically descended from earlier generations of Australians.
As if we do not have enough problems we then have out politicians at state and federal level
seeking to social engineer the community rather than to represent their constituents.
http://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-37875695#_=_
Toronto professor Jordan Peterson takes on gender-neutral pronouns
By Jessica Murphy BBC News, Toronto 4 November 2016
QUOTE
Posted 8.25pm 25-1-2018 by Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.
Dr Jordan Peterson I salute you or daring to stand up for your rights. In my view there are “he”, “she”, and
“it”. The latter one referring to anyone who doesn't claim to be a “he” or “she”.
I couldn't care less if someone wants to be identified by him/her/itself as being “xyz” or whatever that are
their rights, however they cannot force m then to so to say fall inline with their what I consider utter and
sheer nonsense. Neutral pronouns is not for example “ze” as in Dutch it can mean a group of people
regardless of sexuality “she”! With most words it can have a certain meaning in one language and another
meaning in another language. The issue is not some person identifying as “he”, “she”, or “it” as again that is
the persons choice but it is another thing to demand another person to be denied his/her FREEDOM OF
SPEECH to cave in to their demands. With those who propose to be of fluid gender it would be sheer
impossible to know what the person might ben he perception in “his”, “her”, or “it” mind at any moment. To
me “ze” is not neutral if it relates to a group of sex mixed people (one or more male and female) but not if it
refers to a person as a female. Likewise this might be so with other so called gender neutral words in other
p1 26-1-2018 © G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.
INSPECTOR-RIKATI® about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
Email: admin@inspector-rikati.com. For further details see also my blog at Http://www.scrib.com/InspectorRikati
 languages. When commenced my letters I refer to “Sir/Madam” as often not knowing the person being male
or female. Some might be offended with “Madam” holding this might be the “Madam” of a brothel. However
I cannot be held accountable for the mental perceptions of others. When I receive letter starting with “Dear”
from some debt collecting agency I hardly find it a suitable word, in particularly where I so to say tell them to
shove it, this because I had no debt the claimed to refer to. A “LaPagomi snowflake” is a person with a
“donut-brain”, where the black-hole sucks in everything, without the person having a clue how to use it, and
neither shows any outwards competence rather more a gross incompetence, totally unreliable in the nonsense
this person utters as it has an ever switching mentality saying things that is totally incoherent in constitutional
terms but to the person himself/herself it seems to be making sense. For those who wonder what LaPagoni
stands for, the La it is for a person with a law degree, Pagoni is as to whom (male/female or whatever) is a
Member of Parliament and/or Minister/ and/or Government employee. “Pagomi snowflake” is one without a
law degree. As such those in the Parliament who are misusing their legislative power to terrorize ordinary
citizen that thymus comply with the gender bender may do better to get out of politics this as their duty is to
represent all constituents and not just the gender benders.
END QUOTE
We have so many politicians so to say falling over each other promoting SSM (Same Sex
Marriage) regardless of the HIV (Aids) that goes with nit and the financial burden upon the
general community by this, while the Government increases taxes against smokers on the basis
of being a health hazard. So HIV somehow is not a health hazards?
And while those politicians were going on and on about love and equality and so the yes army
even using violence against those merely making known it is OK to say NO, this purported love
and equality is obviously limited to their own and no one else.
We now have calls for Sharia Law to be applied, besides what already is, which clearly is a
denial of love and equality, this as women who are forced to live under sharia law are clearly
denied love and equality.
Re Religious Freedom - Re gender-neutral pronouns
This document can be downloaded from:
https://www.scribd.com/document/369973370/20180125-G-H-Schorel-Hlavka-O-W-B-to-Re-Religious-Freedom-
Re-Gender-neutral-Pronouns A council in Melbourne is holding a transgender swimming pool event
where others are denied to attend. Is this the purported equality?
When certain nationals from Africa were permitted to settle in the commonwealth of Australia
many warned about the dangers associated with certain nationalities but politicians scoffed on
this. They pretended to know better. Well the crimes now committed of home invasions, etc,
underlines it was never appropriately addressed. Likewise I have no doubt that the so called
SSM can be defeated on constitutional grounds and then well the harm inflicted upon all those
who believed to be lawfully married find they never were.
Thu, 31 Oct 2002
QUOTE
Dear Mr Schorel-Hlavka
Thank you for your letter.
There is no bias, any more than there would be for a woman judge sitting in a case involving women or
a male judge in a rape case.
Your views on the Constitution appear to have overlooked s 51(xxxvii) of the Constitution. If that
power were not enough, and none of the other heads of power sufficed, it is true that an amendment of
the Constitution might be required. Alternatively, there are cooperative schemes for parallel
legislation. Ours is a cooperative federation, as the Constitution itself envisaged.
Sincerely, Michael Kirby
END QUOTE
The above was from the then Judge of the High Court of Australia Michael Kirby J. Clearly then
His Honour did not then hold that marriage powers in the constitution was sufficient!
It is clear that way back in 2002, I then already made clear that a referendum to amend the
constitution would be required and that the Interpretation Act 1889 (UK) applied to the
Commonwealth of Australia Act 1900 (UK).
As I warned about in recent times you cannot have persons living with Sharia law in violation of
Australian law and then not expect to end up in problems. It is so to say merely a time bomb
waiting to go off.

p2 26-1-2018 © G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

INSPECTOR-RIKATI® about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
Email: admin@inspector-rikati.com. For further details see also my blog at Http://www.scrib.com/InspectorRikati
I warned on 15 July 2016 about Bourke Street Mall and electronic bollard to be needed in tram
tracks to avoid mass killings and repeated this also on 21 December 2016 but by 20 January 2017
nothing had eventuated by all those politicians but 6 people then ended up being killed! And by
now the electronic bollards are still not fitted in the tram tracks. This while politicians are eager
to pretend to the general community they do care, well actually hiding as cowards behind
security that is!
And getting back to the homosexuals by whatever name/identity you like to refer to them, their
love and equality is limited to their self interest.
https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2017/nov/14/marriage-equalitys-next-fight-is-
freedom-to-discriminate-a-right-worth-protecting
Marriage equality's next fight: is freedom to discriminate a right worth protecting?
What the politicians have accomplished is to ensure further division. Those homosexuals are not
satisfied with SSM but seek to dictate others. That is what they consider if equality where they
have the right to discriminate against others that their desires and conduct must be accepted by
others regardless of the rights of those others.
Hansard 21-1-1898 Constitution Convention Debates
QUOTE Sir JOHN DOWNER.-
I want to know from what point of view this can be called federal? We keep our property; we are left to the
free exercise of our brains and bodies; there is no interference with the individual; state rights are to be
preserved. Surely, collaterally with that, state rights ought to be preserved too.
END QUOTE
Well, the politicians have made clear you are not to be entitled to use your brains as you desire
because you shall conform to gender bending, etc.

Article reproduced with modifications from ACL website

http://www.acl.org.au/please_speak_up_for_religious_freedom?utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=eNews%2016
%20January%202018&utm_content=eNews%2016%20January%202018+CID_f20da342f449a1f00048f3df832a969
6&utm_source=CreateSend&utm_term=Read%20more#splash-signup
People should be free to speak publicly about their religious view of marriage without fear of being
taken to a government tribunal, as was Archbishop Julian Porteous in Tasmania.
Parents should have the right to be notified of and then withdraw their children from classes teaching
radical LGBTIQ sex and gender theory.
In the same way, a Muslim printer should not be forced to print copies of the Torah, wedding service
providers should not be forced to participate in a vision of marriage that violates their sincerely held beliefs
on marriage. We should make reasonable accommodations for each other’s views and live and let live.
Religious charities should be allowed to hold their view of man-woman marriage without fear of losing
government funding or charitable status.
Preachers should be allowed to place their sermons regarding man-woman marriage on-line without fear
of being taken to an anti-discrimination tribunal or commission.
Religious schools should be allowed to teach children their view of marriage without fear of being
reported to a government commission.
People should not be forced into making statements about marriage or gender with which they disagree.
Religious schools and organisations should be allowed to positively discriminate in employment for
people who adhere to their beliefs on marriage.
State and federal anti-discrimination law should be amended to ensure that no-one can be prosecuted for
expressing the view that marriage is between one man and one woman.
Celebrants should be allowed to practice freely in accordance with their conscience.
People should not fear being sacked from their jobs (as happened to a young Canberra woman) because
they express their views on marriage.
People should not be coerced under threat of losing their job into resigning from the boards of religious
organisations that dissent from the state’s new definition of marriage.
There should be no legal detriment to anyone who expresses the view that marriage is between one
man and one woman.
I ask that this submission be considered by the Panel and I give consent for this submission to be
published by the Panel among its default, public list of submissions received.
https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2018/jan/03/philip-ruddock-says-religious-freedom-inquiry-
submissions-could-be-kept-secret

p3 26-1-2018 © G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

INSPECTOR-RIKATI® about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
Email: admin@inspector-rikati.com. For further details see also my blog at Http://www.scrib.com/InspectorRikati
Philip Ruddock says religious freedom inquiry submissions could be kept secret
Well perhaps this might go to the land of deception?
https://pmc.gov.au/news-centre/domestic-policy/religious-freedom-review-advice-individuals-
and-organisations-provided-submission-or-10-january-2018
Religious Freedom Review - advice for individuals and organisations that provided a submission
on or before 10 January 2018
QUOTE
Objective

The Panel shall examine and report on whether Australian law (Commonwealth, State and Territory)
adequately protects the human right to freedom of religion.

Scope

In undertaking this Review, the Panel should:

 Consider the intersections between the enjoyment of the freedom of religion and other human rights.
 Have regard to any previous or ongoing reviews or inquiries that it considers relevant.
 Consult as widely as it considers necessary.
END QUOTE
How incompetent is this of a Parliament to have passed legislation without first having
appropriately consider these matters. It just underlines (La)Pogomi snowflakes conduct!
No Parliament should pass legislation without ensuring appropriate consideration has been given
to the pros and cons of the legislative provisions intended to be passed. It is like driving an
unroadworthy motor vehicle and well just wait until some innocent person is injured or even
killed and then you just go and try to use band-aid legislation that may or may not address the
relevant issues.
https://www.nbcnews.com/.../u-s-supreme-court-rejects-transgender-rights-case-n7295...
Supreme Court Rejects Gavin Grimm's Transgender Bathroom Rights ...
Also consider:
http://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-37875695#_=_
Toronto professor Jordan Peterson takes on gender-neutral pronouns
Professor Against Political Correctness Jordan B Paterson
And while politicians are nearly all falling over each other about love and equality, that is to
harness voters at least in my view, let’s look around the world how they show their love and
equality mantra.
http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-london-42750634
Celine Dookhran trial: Woman given '10 minutes to live'
https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/11779/hijab-sharia-law-police
"I Am Sick of Hijab, Sharia Law, Sharia Police"
https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/11482/islam-oppression-women
Islamic Oppression of Women: A Hot New Market
https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/10621/western-gays-islam-persecution
QUOTE
Why Do Western Gays Abandon Their Islamic Brothers?
The LGBT establishment has, it seems, been hijacked by a politicized elite that cares little about the rights of
their brethren in the Islamic world.
 LGBT activists and celebrities have never once promoted a boycott of the Islamic regimes that stone,
execute and jail their homosexual citizens. Why do they not orchestrate a campaign to boycott Iranian,
Indonesian, Palestinian and Turkish goods?
 Whenever Islamic radicalism has been defeated after its reign of horror and fear, what follows among
ordinary citizens are scenes of hope and liberation.
p4 26-1-2018 © G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.
INSPECTOR-RIKATI® about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
Email: admin@inspector-rikati.com. For further details see also my blog at Http://www.scrib.com/InspectorRikati
 Syrian women burned the burqas the Islamic State forced them to wear, after the militants were being driven
out from the city of Manbij. "Damn this stupid invention that they made us wear," one woman said as she set
fire to the garment. "We're humans, we have our freedom".
When the Taliban tyranny in Afghanistan ended, women's faces also began to reappear on the streets; and men,
forced by the Taliban to grow beards, flocked to buy razors.
Why hasn't the West raised the question of gay rights under Islam? Go ask the LGBT establishment.
END QUOTE
LET US BE CLEAR ABOUT IT THAT THERE WILLALWAYS BE PROFESSIONAL
STIRRERS AS THEY ARE GETTING FUNDED TO PROTEST. THEY ARE THERE TO
KEEP THEIR JOB AND SO PROTESTING IS THEIR JOB.
We should however had parliamentarians who ought to be well aware of this and understand that
you do not simply pass Bills to become law merely in some hurry to please some and can’t give a
darn about the harm upon innocent people.
Let be clear about it I didn’t hesitate to refuse to vote in 2001 as I held compulsory voting was
unconstitutional and well it took about 5 years of litigation but in the end I succeeded! I have no
doubt that the same will be with the SSM amendment of the Marriage Act. It will not be I who
will cause suffering as I have been on it since at least 2002, but the very politicians who as
terrorist pursued to have their way rather than to allow proper debates and amendments and so
that if the proposed legislation was to be claimed unconstitutional there would be a minimal
harm eventuating from it.
Hansard 9-3-1898 Constitution Convention Debates
QUOTE
Sir JOHN DOWNER.-I know that my right honorable friend, judging probably from the time I am
taking now, thinks that in such a case I would take a long time, if I were in the Senate. I admit that his
surmise is quite right in my case. I admit there are persons on whom this terrorism could not be
practised, or on whom, if practised, it would probably not be effective. But I am thinking of persons of
weaker minds and wills, and I say that, as far as this Constitution is concerned, it is absolutely
necessary to put some provision in this Bill which will strengthen the Senate and prevent it being
intimidated in the way indicated. We have been frittering away the first principles of the Federal
Constitution long enough.
END QUOTE
HANSARD 8-2-1898 Constitution Convention Debates
QUOTE
Mr. HIGGINS.-I did not say that it took place under this clause, and the honorable member is quite right in
saying that it took place under the next clause; but I am trying to point out that laws would be valid if
they had one motive, while they would be invalid if they had another motive.
END QUOTE
The SSM survey was about SAME SEX survey and not gender bending, as such for that also the
survey was deceptive! And I suspect manipulated for a purported result!
https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/11774/belgium-migration-data
How to Manipulate Migration Data? Take Belgium...
QUOTE
It should probably not come as a shock that statistics can be, and often are, presented and manipulated
by elites. In Belgium -- and in all of Western Europe except Austria -- they form an informal
multiculturalist lobby, which dominates universities, NGOs, public institutions and the media, in order
to promote a pro-migration agenda.
END QUOTE
And
QUOTE
Disdain for the concerns of citizens
One of the surest means to dismiss the legitimate worries of a population is to ridicule people as if the major
part of the population were ignorant. One can, for example, make use of a popular opinion poll asking, say,
the number of Muslims in the country and then laugh at a popular exaggeration in the numbers. If Belgians
(or Europeans) were just better informed or less stupid, the commentary on the poll results would say, people
would stop worrying about migration, and everything would be shiny in the Brave New World again. These
kind of tricky surveys, however, are only used for migration numbers; never for unemployment rates, literacy
rates or GDP growth. No one is even trying to take into account this popular anxiety, even as it reveals
intensifying societal unease.
p5 26-1-2018 © G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.
INSPECTOR-RIKATI® about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
Email: admin@inspector-rikati.com. For further details see also my blog at Http://www.scrib.com/InspectorRikati
END QUOTE
If Australia Day is to have any real meaning of being a POLITICAL UNION created for the
“common” “wealth” of all those residing in the commonwealth of Australia then the first port of
call is to ensure politicians are understanding/comprehending this and no Bill will be passed
unless sufficient debated in both Houses of Parliament and all pros and cons having been
addressed.
Multiculterism can only succeed if all persons regardless of their customs, traditions, religion or
non-religion, colour of skin, nationality, etc are all willing to show equality to each other within
the confines of the law that is whatever the common law and relevant statute law is in each
State/Territory. Multiculterism cannot exist is there are enclaves/ghetto’s where there are special
rights/obligation outside the ordinary rule of law.
Australia Day should be that we celebrate that all people are equal within the provisions of law
and not that for example Sharia Law denied women equality.
Feminist who cannot care less to do something about the denial of equality of women are
cowards.
Equality is not and never can be that for example homosexuals and transgender’s and any other
gender bender somehow can dictate others and force them to submit to their demands. Let them
for their own mentality have whatever name or title they may desire within the confines of the
law but not to dominate/dictate others to be subjected to accept their kind of personal
perceptions.
FREEDOM OF SPEECH, POLITICAL LIBERTY and RELIGIOUS LIBERTY are enshrined in
our constitution and only if all play our part to ensure this is so we can each for our own reason
and within our own ways celebrate in harmony Australia Day, regardless of those who may feel
indifferent

This correspondence is not intended and neither must be perceived to state all issues/details.

Awaiting your response, G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. (Gerrit)

MAY JUSTICE ALWAYS PREVAIL® (Our name is our motto!)

p6 26-1-2018 © G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

INSPECTOR-RIKATI® about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
Email: admin@inspector-rikati.com. For further details see also my blog at Http://www.scrib.com/InspectorRikati