Você está na página 1de 3

GROUP 2 11:00-13:30 Room: 5419.

0222
Username First Name Last Name Presentation date
s2408066 Johnno Kuipers 15 September, Friday
s2210789 Kristian Faber 15 September, Friday
s3522717 Laurine Zwart 15 September, Friday

s3375250 Brandt de Vries 22 September, Friday


s2966417 Paola Lievano Cruz 22 September, Friday
s3466930 Till Fleck 22 September, Friday

s2564734 Paul Hartman 29 September, Friday


s3420000 Thandeka Wolf 29 September, Friday
s2596571 Arnoud Koens 29 September, Friday
s2405652 Lennard Rauh 29 September, Friday
s2550121 Garko Kuijzer 06 October, Friday
s3332195 Marit Schütte 06 October, Friday
s3223655 Rama Putra 06 October, Friday
06 October, Friday
Article
Healey, P. (1996). The communicative turn in planning theory and its implications for spatial strategy formation. Environment an
Brand, R., & Gaffikin, F. (2007). Collaborative planning in an uncollaborative world. Planning Theory, 6(3), 282-313.
Hytönen, J. (2016). The problematic relationship of communicative planning theory and the Finnish legal culture. Planning Theo

Forester, J. (1982) Planning in the Face of Power, Journal of the American Planning Association, 48:1, 67-80
Flyvbjerg, B. (2003) ‘Rationality and power’. In Campbell, S. and S. Fainstein (eds.) Readings in Planning Theory, second edition
Bickerstaff, K., & Walker, G. (2005). Shared visions, unholy alliances: power, governance and deliberative processes in local tra

Byrne, D. (2003) Complexity Theory and Planning Theory: A Necessary Encounter, Planning Theory, 2: 171-178.
Duit, A., & Galaz, V. (2008) Governance and complexity—emerging issues for governance theory. Governance, 21(3), 311-335.
Rauws, W. S., Cook, M. & van Dijk, T. (2014) How to make development plans suitable for volatile contexts, Planning, Practice
Moroni, S. (2015). Complexity and the inherent limits of explanation and prediction: Urban codes for self-organising cities. Plann
Hall, P. A., & Taylor, R. C. (1996). Political science and the three new institutionalisms. Political studies, 44(5), 936-957.
González, S., & Healey, P. (2005). A sociological institutionalist approach to the study of innovation in governance capacity. Urb
Lai, L. W. (2016). “As planning is everything, it is good for something!” A Coasian economic taxonomy of modes of planning. Pla
Sorensen, A. (2015). Taking path dependence seriously: an historical institutionalist research agenda in planning history. Planni
mation. Environment and Planning B: Planning and design, 23(2), 217-234.

culture. Planning Theory, 15(3), 223-238

g Theory, second edition, Oxford (UK): Blackwell, pp. 318-29.


ve processes in local transport planning. Urban Studies, 42(12), 2123-2144.

rnance, 21(3), 311-335.


exts, Planning, Practice & Research, 29, 2: 133-151.
-organising cities. Planning theory, 14(3), 248-267.
44(5), 936-957.
vernance capacity. Urban Studies, 42(11), 2055-2069.
f modes of planning. Planning Theory, 15(3), 255-273.
planning history. Planning Perspectives, 30(1), 17-38.

Você também pode gostar