REFERENCES

Alexiadou, Artemis. 2002. Functional Structure in Nominals: Nominalizations and Ergativity,

Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin.

Anderson, Stephen. 1992. A-morphous Morphology, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

Arad, Maya. 1998. VP structure and the syntax-lexicon interface. Doctoral dissertation, Univer-
sity College London (published by MIT Working Papers, MITOPL 16, 1999).

Arad, Maya. 1999a. On the contents of v: evidence from the Hebrew binyan system. Paper
presented at the Second Conference on the Syntax of Semitic languages, University of Illinois,
Urbana-Champaign.

Arad, Maya. 1999b. ‘On “little v”’, in Karlos Arregi, Benjamin Bruening, Cornelia Krause and
Vivian Lin (eds.), MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 33, Papers on Morphology and Syntax,
Cycle 1, pp. 1–25.

Arad, Maya. 2002. ‘Hebrew lexical causatives’, in Jamal Ouhalla and Ur Shlonsky (eds.), Themes
in Arabic and Hebrew Syntax, Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp. 241–266.

Arad, Maya. 2003. ‘Locality constraints on the interpretation of roots: the case of Hebrew
denominal verbs’, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 21: 737–778.

Arad, Maya and Ur Shlonsky. 2001. ‘Locality domains for interpretation: affixation above and
below vP’. Paper presented at the ApplFest, MIT.

Aronoff, Mark. 1976. Word-Formation

r in Generative Grammar, MIT Press, Cambridge,
Massachusetts.

Aronoff, Mark. 1994. Morphology by Itself,

f MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

Baker, Mark. 1988. Incorporation, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Illinois.

Bat El, Outi. 1994. ‘Stem modification and cluster transfer in Modern Hebrew’, Natural Language
and Linguistic Theory 12: 571–596.

Bat El, Outi. 1997. ‘On the visibility of word-internal morphological features’, Linguistics 35:
289–316.

Bat El, Outi. 2001. In search of the roots of the root. Paper presented at the Root and Template
Morphology Workshop, University of Southern California.

275
276 R EFERENCES

Beard, Robert. 1966. The affixation of adjectives in contemporary literary serbo-croatian. Doc-
toral dissertation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.

Beard, Robert. 1995. Lexeme-Morpheme Based Morphology: A General Theory of Inflection and
Word-Formation
r , State University of New York Press, Albany.

Berman, Ruth. 1975. ‘Rishumam ha-leksikali sel

ˇ pealim, soraˇ
ˇ sim
ˇ u-vinyanim’ (Lexical entries
for verbs, roots and patterns), in Rephael Nir and Ben Zion Fischler (eds.), Kilshon Amo,
Council on the Teaching of Hebrew, Jerusalem.

Berman, Ruth. 1978. Modern Hebrew Structure, Tel

T Aviv University Press, Tel Aviv, Israel.

Bobaljik, Jonathan. 2000. ‘The ins and outs of contextual allomorphy’, in University of Maryland
Working Papers, vol. 10, pp. 35–71.
W

Bobaljik, Jonathan. 2001. ‘The implications of rich agreement: why morphology doesn’t drive
syntax’, in Proceedings of WCCFL 20, pp. 82–95.

Bobaljik, Jonathan and Höskuldur

¨ Thr´ainsson.
´ 1998. ‘Two heads aren’t always better than one’,
Syntax 1: 37–71.

Bolozky, Shmuel. 1978a. ‘Some aspects of modern Hebrew phonology’, in Berman (1978).

Bolozky, Shmuel. 1978b. ‘Word-formation strategies in the Hebrew verbal system: denominative
verbs’, Afroasiatic Linguistics 5.3: 2–26.

Borer, Hagit. 1984. Parametric

r Syntax, Foris, Dordrecht.

Borer, Hagit. 1990. The syntax and morphology of derived nominals. Unpublished manuscript,
University of Massachusetts, Amherst.

Borer, Hagit. 1991. ‘The causative–inchoative alternation: a case study in parallel morphology’,
The Linguistic Review 8: 119–158.

Borer, Hagit. 1994. The projection of arguments, in E. Benedicto and J. Runner (eds.), Functional
Projections, UMass Occasional Papers, pp. 19–47.

Borer, Hagit. 1998. ‘Passive without theta grids’, in S.G. Lapointe, D.K. Brentari and P.M. Farrell
(eds.), Morphological Interfaces, CSLI Publications, Stanford, CA, pp. 60–99.

Borer, Hagit. 2005. Determining Structures, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

Brown, Cecil H. 1999. Lexical Acculturation in Native American Languages, Oxford University
Press, Oxford.

Chomsky, Noam. 1970. ‘Remarks on nominalization’, in Roderick Jacobs and Peter Rosenbaum
(eds.), Readings in English Transformational Grammar, Ginn, Massachusetts, pp. 184–221.

Chomsky, Noam. 1995. The Minimalist Program, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
 R EFERENCES 277

Chomsky, Noam. 1998. ‘Minimalist inquiries: the framework’, MIT Occasional Papers in Lin-
guistics 15, MIT, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

Chomsky, Noam. 1999. ‘Derivation by phase’, MIT Occasional Papers in Linguistics 17, MIT,
Cambridge, Massachusetts.

Clark, Eve and Herbert Clark. 1979. ‘When nouns surface as verbs’, Language 55: 767–811.

Di Sciullo, Anna Maria and Edwin Williams. 1987. On the Definition of Word, MIT Press,
Cambridge.

Doron, Edit. 1999. The semantics of semitic templates. Unpublished manuscript, Hebrew Uni-
versity, Jerusalem.

Doron, Edit. 2003. ‘Agency and voice: the semantics of semitic templates’, Natural Language
Semantics 11: 1–67.

Embick, David. 1998. ‘Voice systems and the syntax/morphology interface’, MIT Working Papers
in Linguistics 32, Papers from the UPenn/MIT Roundtable on Argument Structure and Aspect,
MIT, Cambridge, Massachusetts, pp. 73–118.

Embick, David. 2000. ‘Features, syntax, and categories in the Latin perfect’, Linguistic Inquiry
31.2: 185–229.

Embick, David and Rolf Noyer. 2001. ‘Movement operations after syntax’, Linguistic Inquiry
32.4: 555–595.

Engelhardt, Miriam. 2000. ‘The projection of argument-taking nominals’, Natural Language

and Linguistic Theory 18: 41–88.

Even Shoshan, Avraham. 1978. Ha milon ha ivri he xadaˇ (the new Hebrew dictionary), Kiryat
Sefer Press, Israel.

Fodor, Jerry A. 1970. ‘Three reasons for not deriving ‘kill’ from ‘cause to die”, Linguistic Inquiry
1: 429–438.

Fodor, Jerry A. 1994. The Elm and the Expert: Mentalese and Its Semantics, The 1993 Jean
Nicod Lectures, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

Fodor, Jerry A. 1998. Concepts: Where Cognitive Science Went Wrong, The 1996 John Locke
Lectures, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

Fodor, Jerry A. and Ernie Lepore. 1998. ‘The emptiness of the lexicon, critical reflections on
James Pustejovsky’s The Generative Lexicon’, Linguistic Inquiry 29(2): 269–288

Gesenius. 1910. Gesenius’ Hebrew Grammar, edited by E. Kautzsch, revised by A.E. Cowley,
Clarendon Press, Oxford.

Glinert, Lewis. 1989. The Grammar of Modern Hebrew, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
278 R EFERENCES

Goshen-Gottshtein, Moshe, Zeev Livne and Shlomo Shapan (1967). Hadikduk haivri haˇimuˇ
ˇ ˇ i,
Schocken Press, Jerusalem.

Graf, Dafna and Adam Ussishkin. 2002. Loanword phonology in Modern Hebrew. Unpublished
manuscript, Heinrich-Heine-Universität
¨ Dusseldorf
¨ and University of Arizona.

Grimshaw, Jane. 1990. Argument Structure. MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

Hale, Ken and Samuel J. Keyser. 1998. ‘The basic elements of argument structure’, in Heidi
Harley (ed.), MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 32, Papers from the UPenn/MIT Roundtable
on Argument Structure and Aspect, MIT, Cambridge, Massachusetts, pp. 73–118.

Hale, Ken and Samuel J. Keyser. 2002. Prolegomana to a Theory of Argument Structure, MIT
Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

Halle, Morris. 2000. ‘Distributed morphology: impoverishment and fission’, in Jacqueline

Lecarme, Jean Lowenstamm and Ur Shlonsky (eds.), Research in Afroasiatic Grammar:
Papers From the Third Conference on Afroasiatic Languages, John Benjamins, Amsterdam,
P
pp. 125–149.

Halle, Morris and Alec Marantz. 1993. ‘Distributed morphology and the pieces of inflection’,
in Ken Hale and Samuel. J. Keyser (eds.), The View from Building 20, MIT Press Cambridge,
Massachusetts, pp. 111–176.

Harley, Heidi. 1995. Subjects, events and licensing. Doctoral dissertation, MIT.

Harley, Heidi. 1999. ‘Denominal verbs and aktionsart’, in Liina Pylkkänen,

¨ Angeliek van Hout
and Heidi Harley (eds.), MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 35, Papers from the Upenn/MIT
Roundtable on the Lexicon, MIT, Cambridge, Massachusetts, pp. 73–85.

Harley, Heidi and Rolf Noyer. 1998. ‘Licensing in the non-lexicalist lexicon: nominalizations,
vocabulary items and the encyclopedia’, in H. Harley (ed.), MITWPL 32, Papers from the
MIT/Upenn Round Table on argument structure and aspect, pp. 119–137.

Haspelmath, Martin. 1993. ‘More on the typology of inchoative/causative verb alternations’,

in Bernard Comrie and Maria Polinsky (eds.), Causatives and Transitivity, John Benjamins,
Amsterdam, pp. 87–120.

Haspelmath, Martin. 2003. Against iconicity and markedness. Paper presented at the Linguistics
Colloquium, Stanford University.

Hayes, Bruce. 1981. A metrical theory of stress rules. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, MIT,
distributed by Indiana University Linguistics Club.

van Hout, Angeliek. 1996. Event semantics of verb frame alternations. Doctoral dissertation,
Tilburg University.

Jackendoff, Ray. 1972. Semantic Interpretation in Generative Grammar, MIT Press, Cambridge,
Massachusetts.

Jackendoff, Ray. 1990. Semantic Structures, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

 R EFERENCES 279

Jacobsen, Wesley. 1992. The Transitive Structure of Events in Japanese, K

Kurosio Publishers,
Tokyo.

Kayne, Richard. 1975. French

r Syntax, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

Kiparsky, Paul. 1982a. ‘Word-formation and the Lexicon’, in Fred Ingeman (ed.), Proceedings
of the Mid-America Linguistics Conference, University of Kansas, pp. 3–29.

Kiparsky, Paul. 1982b. ‘Lexical morphology and phonology’, in Linguistics in the Morning Calm,
Hanshin Publishing Company, Seoul, Korea.

Kratzer, Angelika. 1996. ‘Severing the external argument from its verb’, in Johan Rooryck
and Laurie Zaring (eds.), Phrase Structure and the Lexicon, Dordrecht, Kluwer, pp. 109–
137.

Kripke, Saul. 1972. Naming and Necessity, Harvard University Press, Cambridge Massachusetts.

Lakoff, George. 1970. Irregularity in Syntax, Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York.

Levin, Beth. 1993. English Verb Classes and Alternations, The University of Chicago Press,
Chicago, Illinois.

Levin, Beth. 1999. ‘Objecthood: an event structure perspective’, in Proceedings of CLS 35, vol. 1,
The Main Session, Chicago Linguistic Society, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, pp.
223–247.

Levin, Beth and Malka Rappaport Hovav. 1995. Unaccusativity at the Syntax–Lexical Semantics
Interface, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

Lieber, Rochelle. 1980. On the organization of the lexicon. Doctoral dissertation, MIT.

Lowenstamm, Jean. 2002. Templates and verbal derivation. Unpublished manuscript, University
of Paris VII.

McCarthy, John. 1979. Formal problems in semitic phonology and morphology. Doctoral dis-
sertation, MIT.

McCarthy, John. 1981. ‘A prosodic theory of nonconcatenative morphology’, Linguistic Inquiry

12: 373–418.

Marantz, Alec. 1984. On the Nature of Grammatical Relations, MIT Press, Cambridge,
Massachusetts.

Marantz, Alec. 1991. ‘Case and licensing’, in Proceedings of ESCOL, pp. 234–253.

Marantz, Alec. 1995. A late note on late insertion. Unpublished manuscript, MIT.

Marantz, Alec. 1996. ‘Cat’ as a phrasal idiom’. Unpublished manuscript, MIT.

Marantz, Alec. 1997. ‘No escape from syntax: don’t try morphological analysis in the privacy
of your own lexicon’, in Alexia Dimitriadis et al. (eds.), UPenn Working Papers in Lin-
280 R EFERENCES

guistics 4.2, Proceedings of the 21st Annual Penn Linguistics Colloquium, Philadelphia,
pp. 201–225.

Marantz, Alec. 1999a. Case and derivation: properties of little v. Unpublished manuscript, MIT.

Marantz, Alec. 1999b. Creating words above and below little v. Unpublished manuscript, MIT.

Marantz, Alec. 2000. Roots: the universality of root and pattern morphology. Paper presented at
the Conference on Afro-Asiatic languages, University of Paris VII.

Marantz, Alec. 2001. Words. Unpublished manuscript, MIT.

Myers, Scott. 1984. ‘Zero derivation and inflection’, MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 7, MIT
Workshop in Morphology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, pp. 53–69.
W

Nedjalkov, Vladimir. 1969. ‘Nekatorye verojatnostnye universalii v glagolom slavoobrazovanii’,

in I. Vardul (ed.), JJazykovye universalii I lingvistiˇceskaja
ˇ slovoonrazovanii, Nauka, Moscow,
pp. 106–114.

Nir, Rephael. 1976. ‘škifut

ˇ lesonit
ˇ u-psixoleˇsonit
ˇ ba-ivrit ha-xadaˇsa’
ˇ (Linguistic and psycholin-
guistic transparency in Modern Hebrew), in Rephael Nir and Ben Zion Fischler (eds.), Kilshon
Amo, Council on the Teaching of Hebrew, Jerusalem.

Noyer, Rolf. 1997. F

Features, Positions and Affixes in Autonomous Morphological Structure,
Garland Publishers, New York.

Oltra Massuet, Isabel. 1999. On the notion of theme vowel: a new approach to catalan verbal
morphology. Master’s thesis, MIT.

Ornan, Uzi. 1971. ‘Binyanim uvsisim, netiyot ugzarot’, Hauniversita 16: 15–22.

Pesetsky, David. 1995. Zero Syntax, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

Pinker, Steven. 1994. ‘How could a child use verb syntax to learn verb semantics’, in L. Gleitman
and B. Landau (eds.), Lexical Acquisition, Special Issue of Lingua, MIT Press, Cambridge,
MA, pp. 377–410.

Postal, Paul. 1969. ‘Anaphoric islands’, in R.I. Binnick, et. al. (eds.), P
Papers from the Fifth Re-
gional Meeting Chicago Linguistic Society, Department of Linguistics, University of Chicago,
Chicago, Illinois, pp. 209–239.

Postal, Paul. 1970. ‘On the surface verb remind’, Linguistic Inquiry 1: 37–120.

Postal, Paul. 1971. Cross-Over Phenomena, Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York.

Prince, Alan. 1975. The phonology and morphology of Tiberian Hebrew. Doctoral dissertation,
MIT.

Prince, Alan and Paul Smolensky. 1993. Optimality Theory: Constraint Interaction in Generative
Grammar, Rutgers University Center for Cognitive Science, Technical Report 2.
 R EFERENCES 281

Pustejovsky, James. 1995. The Generative Lexicon, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

Pylkkänen,
¨ Liina. 2002. Introducing arguments. Doctoral dissertation, MIT.

Raffelsiefen, Renate. 1993. ‘Relating words, a model of base recognition’, Linguistics Analysis
23: 3–159.

Ravid, Dorit. 1990. ‘Internal structure constraints on new-word-formation devices in Modern

Hebrew’, F Folia Linguistica 24(3–4), 289–347.

Reinhart, Tanya. 1996. ‘Syntactic effects of lexical operations: reflexives and unaccusatives’,
Occasional Paper, University of Utrecht.

Reinhart, Tanya and Tal Siloni. 2000. Against an unaccusative analysis of reflexives. Unpublished
manuscript, Tel Aviv University.

Reinhart, Tanya and Tal Siloni. 2003. ‘Against the unaccusative analysis of reflexives’, To appear
in A. Alexiadou, E. Anagnostopoulou and M. Everaert (eds.), The Unaccusativity Puzzle:
Studies in the Syntax–Lexicon Interface, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

Rosen, Haim. 1962. A T

Textbook of Israeli Hebrew, Chicago University Press, Chicago.

Sadka, Yitzchak. 1975. Hadikduk Hamaasi, Kiryat sefer, Jerusalem.

Schwarzwald, Ora. 1974. ‘šoraˇ

ˇ sim,
ˇ bsisim umivne hamorfemot’, Leˇonenu 35: 131–136.

Schwarzwald (Rodrigue), Ora. 1998. ‘Inflection and derivation in Hebrew linear word formation’,
Folia Linguistica 32(3–4), 265–287.
F

Shlonsky, Ur. 1997. Word Order and Clause Structure in Hebrew and Arabic, Oxford University
Press, Oxford.

Sportiche, Dominique. 1998. P

Partitions and Atoms of Clause Structure: Subjects, Agreement,
Case and Clitics, Routledge, London.

Ungebaum, Boris. 1967. Russian Grammar, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

Ussishkin, Adam. 1999. ‘The inadequacy of the consonantal root: Modern Hebrew denominal
verbs and output–output correspondence’, Phonology 16.3: 401–442.

Ussishkin, Adam. 2001. Fixed prosody and the epiphenomenon of root-and-pattern morphology.
Paper presented at the Workshop on Root and Template Morphology, University of Southern
California.

Waltke, Bruce K. and Patrick O’Connor. 1990. Biblical Hebrew Syntax, Eisenbrauns, Winona
W
Lake, Indiana.
 INDEX
Akkadian, 33
Alexiadou, Artemis, 261-262
Alternations, 18-19, 111, 114, 116, 123,
126-127, 132-144, 168, 173-174, 185,
197, 228-229, 234 see also argument
structure, causative alternation, stative
alternation
Anderson, Stephen, 8-9
Anti-Causative Alternation, 174-175, 177,
179-180
Arabic, 5, 35
Arad, Maya, 9, 75, 129, 136, 139, 155, 168,
178, 197, 226, 238
Argument Structure, 113, see also
Alternations
Aronoff, Mark, 1, 11, 13, 19, 35-39, 120-121,
149-153, 156-157, 190, 238-239
Baker, Mark, 1, 186, 242
Bat El, Uti, 1, 13, 15, 22-23, 35-36, 47-49,
51, 76, 95, 182, 246, 253, 265, 267-269
Beard, Robert, 9
Berman, Ruth, 17, 61, 119-120
Binyanim, see verbal patterns, see also under
individual Binyanim
Binyan 1, 28, 30, 43, 46, 67, 69-70, 80-92,
96-97, 99, 102-103, 109-114, 123-149,
151-155, 157-160, 162-163, 165-173,
175, 177-181, 185, 188-189, 194-204,
206, 208-214, 216-220, 223-224,
226-227, 229-233, 237
Binyan 2, 28-29, 43, 80-82, 84-87, 89,
109-110, 112-114, 123-126, 128-141,
143-149, 151-155, 160-163, 168-173,
177-178, 180-181, 185, 188-189,
195-204, 206, 208-215, 220, 223-224,
226-233, 237
283
Binyan 3, 28-30, 43, 46, 67-69, 80-90, 92, 96,
99, 108-115, 123-129, 131-137, 139,
141-142, 144-149, 152-155, 157-160,
162-163, 165-170, 172-173, 175, 177,
179-181, 185, 189, 193, 195, 198-205,
208-209, 212-214, 216-221, 224,
226-233, 237
Binyan 4, 28, 30, 43, 108, 120, 125-127,
131-134, 137, 139, 141, 152, 155, 163,
185, 212-213
Binyan 5, 28-29, 43, 67-70, 80-91, 93, 96-99,
108, 111-115, 120, 123-126, 128-149,
152-155, 157-159, 162, 163, 165-173,
175, 177-181, 185, 188-189, 195-199,
201-206, 208-209, 211-214, 216-221,
223, 225-233, 237
Binyan 6, 28-30, 43, 108, 120, 125-126,
131-134, 137-140, 152, 155, 163, 185,
212-213
Binyan 7, 28-30, 43, 46, 67, 80-90, 108-109,
111-114, 120, 123-129, 131-137,
139-143, 145-149, 152-155, 160-163,
168-173, 175, 177, 179-181, 185,
188-189, 193, 195, 198-206, 208-211,
214, 216, 218-219, 221, 224, 226-233,
237
Bobaljik, Jonathan, 9-10, 15, 26, 40, 45, 186,
192, 227
“Body-Part” Alternation, 137
Bolozky, Shmuel, 28, 30, 61, 237
Borer, Hagit, 154, 163, 196-197, 237, 273
Brown, Cecil, 102-104
Catalan, 47
Causative, 19, 110-111, 113-114, 132,
135-136, 168, 174-175, 188, 199,
205-209, 233-234
284 I NDEX
Causative Alternation, 174-175, 177,
179-180, 205-209
Chomsky, Noam, 22, 32, 41, 186, 195, 247
Clark, Eve, 254
Clark, Herbert, 254
Classical Greek, 33
Conjugation Classes, 199-201, 218-235,
237-238
Consonantal Roots, 14, 25, 27, 31, 42-43, 45
Decomposition, 2-7
Denominal Verbs see under noun-derived
verbs, see also word formation from
words
Diacritics on Roots, 227-228, 231, 234
Directionality, 185
Di Sciullo, Anna- Maria, 8
Distributed Morphology, 1, 8-12, 24-26, 35,
40, 52
Doron, Edit, 20, 67, 110, 114, 120-121, 130,
140, 149, 157-173, 185, 190, 215-216,
219-221, 238-239
Embick, David, 8-10, 15, 26, 32, 40, 42, 191
Encyclopedia, 9, 77, 193, 201-205, 218-219,
228-229
Engelhardt, Miriam, 75, 261, 264
English, 5, 11, 26, 35, 57, 101, 241
Even Shoshan, Avraham, 34, 60, 70, 121
Exponents, 9-10, 46, 48, 49
Features, Morpho-syntactic, 9-10, 14, 40-41
Features, Morpho-phonological, 41, 43-44
Fodor, Jerry, 3-6
French, 174
Georgian, 272
Gesenius, 60, 119
Glinert, Lewis, 60, 119
Goshen-Gottshtein, Moshe, 119
Graf, Dafna, 50
Grimshaw, Jane, 217
Hale, Ken, 154, 196-199, 205, 227, 242, 264
Halle, Morris, 8-10, 25-26, 41
Harley, Heidi, 10, 199, 205, 227, 262
Haspelmath, Martin, 20, 121, 173-181
Hayes, Bruce, 258, 263
Van Hout, Angeliek, 196
Inchoative, 111, 113, 199, 233-234
Irregular Alternations, 140, 142
Jackendoff, Ray, 2-4, 6
Jacobsen, Wesely, 174-176, 180
Japanese, 175-176, 180
Kayne, Richard, 216-217
Keyser, Jay, 154, 196-199, 205, 227, 242, 264
Kiparsky, Paul, 8, 254-259, 263
Kratzer, Angelica, 40, 155, 213
Kripke, Saul, 4
Late Insertion, 8-9, 24, 26, 52, 238
Latin, 151, 187, 221
Lepore, Ernie, 3
Levin, Beth, 55-56, 59, 79, 98, 104, 113, 122,
142, 170, 205, 256, 259-260
Lexeme-Based Lexicon, 94-95
Lexicalist Hypothesis, 25
Lieber, Rochelle, 8
Little v, 195
Locality Constraint on the Interpretation of
Roots, 247-248, 271
Lowenstamm, Jean, 182
Manner of Motion, 75, see also under Roots,
semantic types of
Many-Many Morphology, 185-189
Many-to-One Morphology, 186
Marantz, Alec, 8-11, 25-26, 32, 42, 57,
97-98, 155, 186, 196-197, 213,
216-217, 242-243, 247, 262
McCarthy, John, 13, 30, 43, 61, 99, 122, 151,
220, 267
MCM, 17-19, 56-57, 59, 62-63, 65-66, 68-75,
78-83, 85, 87, 90, 91-94, 101-105, 107,
115-116, 122-127, 130, 133, 142,
144-149, 171-172, 188-189, 203-204,
207-208, 222-224, 228-229, 231,
236-237, 244-245
Melodic Overwriting, 47
Mišqalim,
ˇ see under nominal patterns, see
also non-mišqalic
ˇ nouns
Morphemes, 10
Myers, Scott, 258-259, 263
 I NDEX 285

Nash, Léa,
´ 272 Dividing, 87
Nedjalkov, Vladimir, 174 Entity, 89
Nir, Rephael, 61 Getting, 86
Non-Mišqalic
ˇ Nouns, 34 Holding, 86
Non-Transitive Patterns, 184 Letting Go, 86
Nominalization, 57, 261 Manner of Motion, 89, 129
Nominal Patterns, 25, 31-35, 42-43, 48, Manner of Speaking, 90
71-72, 78, 244-245, 249-250 Mental Activity, 80-82
Non-Transitive Verbs, 109 Motion from Source, 84
Noun/Verb Asymmetry, 15, 31-44 Motion, 83-84
Noun-Derived Nouns, 252 Needing, 86
Noun-Derived Verbs, 13-14, 22, 245-261, Perception
r , 80-82
266-267 Piercing, 86
Noyer, Rolf, 8, 10, 32, 40, 42, 191 P
Possession , 86
Property, 88
O’connor, Patrick, 119 Psychological State, 89
Oltra Massuet, Isabel, 47 Putting Together, 87
One-to-Many Morphology, 186 Receiving, 86
Ornan, Uzi, 120 Relation, 82-83
Satisfying, 86
Passive, 18-19, 30, 126-127, 131-132, 185, Substance, 89
195, 212-215 Subtracting, 85-86
Pattern morphology, 13-15, 17-19, 21, see Temporal Concepts, 87
T
also nominal patterns, verbal patterns Transfer
r , 83-84
Pesetsky, David, 217, 242 Roots in word formation, see Root Derived
Phase, 247-248, 251-252, 266, 268, 271 Verbs, Word formation from roots
V
Pinker, Steven, 56 Root Derived Verbs, see also word formation
Postal, Paul, 2 from roots, 14, 20-22, 191, 194, 201,
Prince, Alan, 50, 152 205, 235-236, 240, 245-261, 270
Pustejovsky, James, 2-4, 6 Root Hypothesis, 6, 8, 10-17, 23, 26, 34-35,
Pylkkänen,
¨ Liina, 40, 136, 213 44, 52-53, 94-96, 196, 236, 238, 240,
243
Raffelsiefen, Renate, 258, 263 Rosen, Haim, 119
Rappaport Hovav, Malka, 113, 170, 205 Russian, 26-27, 36-39, 156, 272
Ravid, Dorit, 61, 100
Reflexive, 110-111, 113, 133, 136, 215 Sadka, Yitzchak, 119
Reinhart, Tanya, 67, 113, 161, 205, 216-217 Schwarzwald, Ora, 61, 120
Roots, semantics contents of, 53-105., see Separation, 8-9
also MCM Shlonsky, Ur, 51, 72, 108, 238
Roots, semantic types of: Siloni, Tal, 217
Activity, 88, 129 Single Occurrence Roots, 18-19, 123, 126,
Adding, 85-86 128-130, 172, 201-203, 222, 231, 237
Allotting, 87 Smolensky, Paul, 50
Configuration, 82-83 Spell-Out, 44, 46, 227, 229-235
Cutting, 87 Sportiche, Dominique, 217
Damaging, 86 State Roots, 88
Defining, 87 Stative, 111, 113, 133, 199, 209-212
Directed Motion, 85 Stative Alternation, 209-212
286 I NDEX

Stem Modification, 47-48, 50-51 183-184, 189-190, 192-196, 198-203,

Sumerian, 33 207, 218, 222, 224, 229, 231, 237-238,
Syllabic Roots, 34-35, 42 244
Syncretism, 21, 187, 188, 190, 194, 200-201, Verb-Derived Nouns, 252, 261-262
V
218, 222, 235-237 Verb-Derived Verbs, 20-21, 191, 201, 216,
V
Synonyms, 19, 123, 146-149, 189, 204-205, 235-236
222, 229, 231, 236-237 Vocabulary Insertion, 45-46
V
Syntactic Word-Formation, 8, 52, 238 Voice, 30, 43-44, 46, 49, 190-191, 213,
V
214-215, 217, 236
Templates, 29, 42
T
Waltke, Bruce, 119
W
Thráinsson,
´ Hoskuldur, 186
Williams, Edwin, 8
W
Transitivity, 192, 195-198, 224-226
T
Word Formation, 1, 14-15, 17, 55, 154, 242,
W
Transitivity Alternations, 184
T
244 see also Syntactic Word-Formation,
Transitivity Constraints, 184
T
Word Formation from Roots
W
Truncation, 11
Word Formation from Roots, 11, 54, 183,
W
240-243, 253-254, 268, 271
Ungebaum, Boris, 36 Word Formation from Words, 183, 240-243,
W
Ussishkin, Adam, 36, 50, 61, 110, 114, 182, 254, 257, 268, 270-271
265, 267
Yiddish, 35
Y
Verbal Patterns, 25, 28-31, 35-36, 42-44, 46,
V
48, 60, 77, 97, 106-110, 150-152, 154, Zero-Related Pairs, 7, 26, 254-256, 259,
156, 162, 164, 168-169, 171-173, 262-263