Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
Theory of Knowledge
Martin Crnicki
Candidate number: ---------------
increases”
Goethe’s quote suggests that one has confidence in knowledge when he knows a little.
As knowledge increases, it raises more questions which in turn leads to uncertainty. There is an
impartial nature to the argument where we can remain content in ignorance. This argument
paints our pursuit for knowledge futile. On the other hand the case can be made for knowledge
being a guiding force towards investigation that leads to further knowledge. What I would like
to pursue within this essay is how we gain knowledge and the nature of its discovery. Does
gaining new knowledge lead to more questions? Increasing knowledge tells us what we do not
know. To specify further, the statement reads as ignorance implies definitive knowledge. In the
essay it is necessary to define terms such as confidence, ignorance, and doubt. This will be
implicitly defined through the use of the Natural Sciences and the Arts as areas of knowledge.
As a comparative purpose the sciences and the arts are seemingly incompatible. I intend on
trying to reconcile the two through finding similarity between the two areas. Several attempts
will be made by using emotion, perception, intuition and reason as support for the claims set
forth.
Knowledge is absolute. To satisfy criteria of knowledge being true, one meets three
conditions. Belief, Truth, and Justification. The problem that is recognized as the Gettier
(Follow the course of the points through essay, need to compile into one big poorly written
whole)
Don’t talk about appreciation and understanding of art without linking importance of
sense perception.
Art communicates an idea and appeals to other ways of knowing in which creativity is
implicitly defined.
Link music as a strong instigator of emotion, imagination plays a crucial role in the
Aristotle values art for its cathartic capabilities, where through emotion one is
essentially ‘cleansed’.
Catharsis -
Link to the greek tragedies, essentially when watched, the individual is cleansed. Is this
Plato, on the other hand, valued reason more than the arts and felt that the arts would
A platonic conception of an ideal life was that a rational life was better than an
emotional one. Linking this conception back to the KQ at hand, provides both sides of
argument.
Art draws its strength from human imagination.
Ability to conceive ideas creatively through arts can lead us to a deeper understanding
Arts are limited in that it they stem from the human imagination, no tangible roots.
At first the connection between the two isn’t apparent. Typically the first thought that
arises is that they contrast in that they aim to discover what’s out there and expand on
our understanding of the world. What more evidently sets things apart is methodology,
strict, regulated and leaves little room for imagination and creativity.
Contrast, arises where in some situations the arts can provide us with the confidence of
a truth, an axiomatic claim. Tapping into WOK emotion, allows for us to so much more
lack in knowledge.
The arts can offer us knowledge that the sciences cannot give us.
Other disciplines give us knowledge but art broadens our boundaries of understanding of
A scientist tries to paint a picture of the natural world through the scientific method.
The universe is inconceivably complex, the general notion behind this is that we are only
but a percentage
During the past two years, there has been formulation of a proof that no matter what
laws of physics govern a universe, there are inevitably facts about the universe that we
can not learn by experiment or predict with the help of some tools. Theories