Você está na página 1de 5

Int. J.

Cancer: 119, 2221–2224 (2006)


' 2006 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

SHORT REPORT
Antioxidant vitamins supplementation and mortality: A randomized trial in head
and neck cancer patients
Isabelle Bairati1, François Meyer1*, Edith Jobin1, Michel Gelinas2, Andre Fortin3, Abdenour Nabid4,
François Brochet5 and Bernard Têtu1
1
Laval University Cancer Research Center, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada
2
Centre Hospitalier de l’Universit
e de Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
3
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Quebec, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada
4
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada
5
Complexe Hospitalier de la Sagamie, Saguenay, Quebec, Canada

There has been concern that long-term supplementation with high- or placebos during radiation therapy and for 3 years after radiation
dose antioxidant vitamins, especially vitamin E (a-tocopherol), may therapy ended. Concerns about adverse effects of b-carotene
increase all-cause mortality. We conducted a randomized controlled supplementation prompted the investigators to halt the use of b-
trial with a-tocopherol (400 IU/day) and b-carotene (30 mg/day) carotene after the first 156 patients had been enrolled. The trial
supplements among 540 head and neck cancer patients treated by was continued with a-tocopherol alone.
radiation therapy. Supplementation with b-carotene was discontin-
ued during the trial. The supplements were given during radiation Follow-up information was obtained by the collaborating radia-
therapy and for 3 additional years. During the follow-up (median tion oncologists and the study nurses every 6 months during the
6.5 years), 179 deaths were recorded. All death certificates were 3 years following the end of radiation therapy and then once a year
obtained. All-cause and cause-specific mortality rates were com- until the end of the study. At each follow-up visit during the sup-
pared between the 2 arms of the trial by Cox regression. All-cause plementation period, the study nurse assessed compliance sepa-
mortality was significantly increased in the supplement arm: hazard rately for each supplement or placebo by dividing the total number
ratio: 1.38, 95% confidence interval 1.03–1.85. Cause-specific mor- of unreturned capsules by the number of days between visits. As
tality rates tended to be higher in the supplement arm than in the
placebo arm. Our results concur with previous reports to suggest per protocol, follow-up was continued beyond the supplementa-
that high-dose vitamin E could be harmful. tion period because a prolonged residual effect of antioxidant sup-
' 2006 Wiley-Liss, Inc. plementation was anticipated. Copies of medical notes, pathology
reports and hospital records were requested for all important
health events and hospitalizations during follow-up. In most in-
Key words: randomized trial; cancer; mortality; antioxidant vitamins; stances, deaths were identified by the study staff in the collaborat-
a-tocopherol; b-carotene ing hospitals. In addition, to ensure complete ascertainment, re-
cord linkage with the Quebec mortality files was performed using
Recently published metaanalyses of randomized trials testing the unique Quebec health insurance identifier from enrollment
antioxidant vitamins and minerals supplementation have provided until December 31, 2004, for all but 10 participants who did not
evidence for their lack of efficacy, and raised concern about consent to this record linkage. Death certificates were obtained for
increased mortality thus questioning the perceived benefits of all participants who died either from the hospital where the patient
these supplements.1–3 We conducted a multicenter, double-blind, had died or from the Institut de la statistique du Quebec. The cause
placebo-controlled, randomized chemoprevention trial with a-to- of death was taken as indicated on the death certificate except
copherol and b-carotene supplements among patients treated by when evidence from medical and hospital data clearly indicated
radiation therapy for head and neck cancer.4,5 Here, we report the another cause. In all cases, the cause of death was assigned with-
trial results for all-cause and cause-specific mortality. out knowledge of the patient intervention arm assignment.
Follow-up time was calculated from the time of randomization
Methods until the date of last visit (for the 10 participants who had not con-
sented to record linkage), the date of death or December 31, 2004.
Between October 1, 1994 and June 6, 2000, 540 patients with Distribution of time until failure in the 2 treatment arms was
stage I or II head and neck cancer were recruited in 5 radiation described using Kaplan-Meier survival curves. The analysis, per-
therapy centers in the province of Quebec, Canada, to take part in formed under the intention-to-treat principle, compared the mortal-
a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized chemoprevention ity rates in the 2 study arms in Cox proportional hazards models.6
trial with a-tocopherol and b-carotene supplements. The primary For each hazard ratio (HR), the 95% confidence interval (CI) was
objective of the trial was the prevention of second primary calculated. The Cox models were used to adjust for covariates; how-
cancers. On the basis of an expected 50% reduction of the rate of ever, none of the observed effects was confounded by patient base-
second primary cancers in the supplement arm, 555 patients had to line characteristics. The proportionality assumption of the models
be randomized to provide a statistical power of 80% to the trial.
was always satisfied. All analyses were performed using SAS, ver-
The institutional review board of each participating center ap-
sion 8.2 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC). All statistical tests are 2-sided.
proved the study protocol. All patients gave written informed con-
sent prior to randomization. Patients with any of the following
conditions were ineligible for the study: Karnofsky performance Results
score of less than 60; multiple primary head and neck cancers or a During the recruitment period, 1,151 new patients with stage I
history of cancer; severe cardiovascular disease; inadequate renal, or II squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck were treated
hepatic or hematologic function; anticoagulant therapy; pregnancy
or average daily supplement intake of b-carotene or vitamin E
in the preceding year greater than 6.0 mg and 50 IU, respectively. Grant sponsor: National Cancer Institute of Canada with funds from the
A computer-generated randomization list was prepared in advance Canadian Cancer Society; Grant numbers: 4738, 8176, 13211.
*Correspondence to: E-mail: francois.meyer@chuq.qc.ca
for each collaborating center using an allocation ratio of 1:1 and Received 13 December 2005; Accepted 15 February 2006
random permuted blocks. Patients were randomly assigned to DOI 10.1002/ijc.22042
receive a daily supplementation consisting of vitamin E (1 capsule Published online 13 July 2006 in Wiley InterScience (www.interscience.
of 400 IU DL-a-tocopherol) and b-carotene (1 capsule of 30 mg) wiley.com).

Publication of the International Union Against Cancer


2222 BAIRATI ET AL.

FIGURE 1 – Flow diagram of subjects’ progress through the trial.

TABLE I – BASELINE CHARACTERISTICS OF THE 540 TRIAL PARTICIPANTS


BY TREATMENT ARM
Supplement arm Placebo arm p-value

Total number of 273 267


patients randomized
Patients randomized to 79 77
a-tocopherol and
b-carotene or placebos
Patients randomized 194 190
to a-tocopherol
alone or placebo
Age (years) [mean (SD)] 63 (10) 62 (9) 0.30
Male sex [no. (%)] 223 (82) 203 (76) 0.11
Smokers in preceding 178 (65) 165 (62) 0.41
year [no. (%)]
Laryngeal cancer 225 (82) 225 (84) 0.56
[no. (%)]
Stage II [no. (%)] 101 (37) 107 (40) 0.46
Plasma a-tocopherol 33 (10) 34 (14) 0.27
(lmol/l) [mean (SD)] FIGURE 2 – Kaplan-Meier curves of survival until death from any cause
Plasma b-carotene 0.23 (0.18) 0.23 (0.24) 0.79 among participants randomly assigned to the supplement arm (solid line) or
(lmol/l) [mean (SD)] to the placebo arm (dotted line). Data are only shown up to 10 years of fol-
low-up because of the small numbers of participants beyond that time.

in the participating radiation oncology centers. Of these 1,151, (Fig. 1). The baseline characteristics of the 273 and 267 patients
15% refused to participate and 38% were ineligible. The remain- randomly assigned to the supplement and placebo arms, respec-
ing 47% (n 5 540) were eligible and consented to be enrolled tively, were similar in the 2 groups (Table I). The compliance with
ANTIOXIDANT VITAMINS SUPPLEMENTATION AND MORTALITY 2223
TABLE II – NUMBER OF DEATHS, MORTALITY RATE (PER 1,000 PERSON-YEARS (PY)) FOR DEATHS OF ANY CAUSE AND FOR DEATHS ATTRIBUTED
TO THE INITIAL HEAD AND NECK CANCER, TO A SECOND PRIMARY CANCER, TO ANY CANCER, OR TO NONCANCER RELATED CAUSES, CRUDE HAZ-
ARD RATIOS (HR) AND 95% CONFIDENCE INTERVALS (CIS) ASSOCIATED WITH THE INTERVENTION ACCORDING TO THE TYPE OF SUPPLEMENTATION1
Supplement arm Placebo arm
Cause of death Supplementation HR (95% CI)
No. deaths Mortality rate No. deaths Mortality rate
per N at risk (per 1,000 py) per N at risk (per 1,000 py)

Any cause Any supplementation 102/273 62.63 77/267 45.52 1.38 (1.03–1.85)
Any cause a-Tocopherol 1 b-carotene 37/79 66.58 30/77 50.99 1.31 (0.81–2.11)
Any cause a-Tocopherol alone 65/194 60.58 47/190 42.61 1.43 (0.98–2.07)
Initial cancer Any supplementation 32/273 19.65 23/267 13.60 1.42 (0.83–2.43)
Second primary Any supplementation 39/273 23.95 31/267 18.33 1.32 (0.83–2.12)
cancer
Any cancer Any supplementation 71/273 43.60 54/267 31.93 1.36 (0.96–1.94)
Noncancer causes Any supplementation 35/273 21.49 27/267 15.96 1.36 (0.82–2.24)
1
Any supplementation: a-tocopherol 1 b-carotene or a-tocopherol alone; a-tocopherol 1 b-carotene; a-tocopherol alone.

the prescribed supplementation was excellent throughout the trial. mortality. All patients in the supplement arm of the trial were
During the prescribed supplementation period, 36 patients in the exposed to a-tocopherol during the entire supplementation period.
intervention arm and 34 patients in the placebo arm stopped taking Some have also been exposed to b-carotene for a short period of
the capsules and were assigned zero compliance for the rest of the time at the beginning of the trial. Our results suggest that, in our
supplementation period. In the supplement arm, the average com- trial, the addition of b-carotene to a-tocopherol did not markedly
pliance, assessed by capsule count, was 90% during radiation ther- affect the mortality rates.
apy and 88, 84 and 80% during the 1st, 2nd and 3rd years after the Three trials testing specifically b-carotene supplementation
end of radiation therapy, respectively. In the placebo arm, these showed moderate (relative risk (RR) ranging from 1.07 to 1.18),
figures were 89, 86, 83 and 80%, respectively. often not statistically significant, increases in all-cause and cancer
The median duration of radiation therapy was 43 days and the mortality7–9 while another10 has not (RR 5 1.02). Nine trials test-
median duration of the supplementation was 3.1 years. These ing specifically a-tocopherol supplementation have assessed its
durations were identical in the 2 arms of the trial. The median du- effect on all cause mortality; 5 of them7,11–14 showed no effect
ration of follow-up was 6.4 years in the supplement arm and (RR 0.85–1.04) while 4 others15–18 indicated moderate, not statis-
6.6 years in the placebo arm of the trial. A total of 179 deaths, 102 tically significant, increases in all-cause mortality (RR 1.07–1.22).
in the supplement arm and 77 in the placebo arm, were recorded Four of these trials have examined the effect of a-tocopherol sup-
during the follow-up. Figure 2 presents the distribution of survival plementation on cancer specific mortality, 3 of them7,14,16 showed
time until death in the 2 treatment arms. Overall survival was con- a moderate, not statistically significant increase (RR 1.08–1.12)
sistently lower among participants randomized to the supplement while the other13 indicated no association. The interpretation of
arm (p 5 0.033). Table II presents the crude hazard ratios associ- the results is less straightforward for the several trials in which the
ated with supplementation for death of any cause, death attributed supplementation combined a-tocopherol with other antioxidant
to the initial head and neck cancer, to the second primary cancer, vitamins (often b-carotene and vitamin C) and minerals.3
to cancer (either the initial head and neck cancer or the second pri- Although vitamin E is considered relatively safe, long term use
mary cancer), and to noncancer causes. When compared with par- of high-dose could be associated with adverse effects.19 At high
ticipants in the placebo arm, those randomized to the supplement dose, vitamin E may have prooxidant effects and displace other
arm had a statistically significant increased all-cause mortality antioxidants thus increasing vulnerability to oxidative dam-
rate: HR 5 1.38 (95% CI 5 1.03–1.85). The hazard ratios for spe- age.20,21 Despite the absence of proven benefits, antioxidant vita-
cific causes of death were consistently increased and of similar min supplements are taken at high doses for prolonged periods of
magnitude (HR ranging from 1.31 to 1.43). Higher all-cause mor- time by many healthy adults, by people at high risk of cardiovas-
tality rates were observed in patients who had received a-tocoph- cular disease or cancer and by cancer patients.22,23 Approximately
erol alone (HR 5 1.43, 95% CI 5 0.98–2.07) and in those who 11% of the U.S. adult population consumes at least 400 IU of vita-
had also received b-carotene supplements in addition to a-tocoph- min E per day.22 Our results concur with previous reports3 to sug-
erol for some time at the beginning of the trial (HR 5 1.31, 95% gest that high-dose vitamin E could be harmful.
CI 5 0.81–2.11).

Discussion Acknowledgements
Our results add to the growing evidence that long-term supple- Dr. Bairati is the recipient of a senior scientist award from the
mentation with high-dose antioxidant vitamins could increase Fonds de Recherche en Sante du Quebec.

References
1. Vivekananthan DP, Penn MS, Sapp SK, Hsu A, Topol EJ. Use of anti- of antioxidant vitamins to prevent acute adverse effects of radiation
oxidant vitamins for the prevention of cardiovascular disease: meta- therapy in head and neck cancer patients. J Clin Oncol 2005;23:5805–
analysis of randomised trials. Lancet 2003;361:2017–23. 13.
2. Bjelakovic G, Nikolova D, Simonetti RG, Gluud C. Antioxidant sup- 6. Collett D. Modelling survival data in medical research. Boca Raton:
plements for prevention of gastrointestinal cancers: a systematic CRC Press, 2003.
review and meta-analysis. Lancet 2004;364:1219–28. 7. The a-tocopherol, b-carotene cancer prevention group. The effect of
3. Miller ER, Pastor-Bariuso R, Dalal D, Riemersma RA, Appel LJ, vitamin E and b-carotene on the incidence of lung cancer and other
Guallar E. Meta-analysis: high-dosage vitamin E supplementation cancers in male smokers. N Engl J Med 1994;330:1029–35.
may increase all-cause mortality. Ann Intern Med 2005;142:37–46. 8. Omenn GS, Goodman GE, Thornquist MD, Balmes J, Cullen MR,
4. Bairati I, Meyer F, Gelinas M, Fortin A, Nabid A, Brochet F, Mercier Glass A, Keogh JP, Meyskens FL, Jr, Valanis B, Williams JH, Jr,
JP, Tetu B, Harel F, Masse B, Vigneault E, Vass S, et al. A random- Barnhart S, Cherniack MG, et al. Effects of a combination of b-caro-
ized trial of antioxidant vitamins to prevent second primary cancers in tene and vitamin A on lung cancer and cardiovascular disease. N Engl
head and neck cancer patients. J Natl Cancer Inst 2005;97:481–8. J Med 1996;334:1050–5.
5. Bairati I, Meyer F, Gelinas M, Fortin A, Nabid A, Brochet F, Mercier JP, 9. Lee IM, Cook NR, Manson JE, Buring JE, Hennekens CH. b-Caro-
Tetu B, Harel F, Abdous B, Vigneault E, Vass S, et al. Randomized trial tene supplementation and incidence of cancer and cardiovascular
2224 BAIRATI ET AL.

disease: the Women’s Health Study. J Natl Cancer Inst 1999;91: 16. Collaborative Group of the Primary Prevention Project (PPP). Low-
2102–6. dose aspirin and vitamin E in people at cardiovascular risk: a random-
10. Hennekens CH, Buring JE, Manson JE, Stampfer M, Rosner B, Cook ized trial in general practice. Lancet 2001;357:89–95.
NR, Belanger C, LaMotte F, Gaziano JM, Ridker PM, Willett W, Peto 17. Boaz M, Smetana S, Weinstein T, Matas Z, Gafter U, Iaina A, Knecht
R. Lack of effect of long-term supplementation with b-carotene on the A, Weissgarten Y, Brunner D, Fainaru M, Green MS et al. Secondary
incidence of malignant neoplasms and cardiovascular disease. N Engl J prevention with antioxidants of cardiovascular disease in endstage re-
Med 1996;334:1145–9. nal disease (SPACE): randomized placebo-controlled trial. Lancet
11. Sano M, Ernesto C, Thomas RG, Klauber MR, Schafer K, Grundman 2000;356:1213–18.
M, Woodbury P, Growdon J, Cotman CW, Pfeiffer E, Schneider LS, 18. Marras C, Lang AE, Oakes D, McDermott MP, Kieburtz K, Shoulson
Thal LJ. A controlled trial of Selegiline, a-tocopherol, or both as I, Tanner CM, Fahn S. High-dosage vitamin E supplementation and
treatment for Alzheimer’s disease. N Engl J Med 1997;336:1216–22. all-cause mortality. Ann Intern Med 2005;143:152–3.
12. Gruppo Italiano per lo Studio della Sopravvivenza nell’Infarcto mio- 19. Bendich A, Machlin LJ. Safety of oral intake of vitamin E. Am J Clin
cardio. Dietary supplementation with n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids Nutr 1988;48:612–9.
and vitamin E after myocardial infarction: results of the GISSI-Pre- 20. Roberts HJ. Perspective on vitamin E therapy. J Am Med Assoc 1981;
vention trial. Lancet 1999:354:447–55. 246:129–31.
13. The HOPE and HOPE-TOO Trial Investigators. Effects of long-term 21. Huang HY, Appel LJ. Supplementation of diets with a-tocopherol
vitamin E supplementation on cardiovascular events and cancer. J Am reduces serum concentrations of g- and d-tocopherol in humans.
Med Assoc 2005;293:1338–47. J Nutr 2003;133:3137–40.
14. Lee IM, Cook NR, Gaziano JM, Gordon D, Ridker PM, Manson JE, 22. Ford ES, Ajani UA, Mokdad AH. The prevalence of high intake of
Hennekens CH, Buring JE. Vitamin E in the primary prevention of vitamin E from the use of supplements among U.S. adults. Ann Intern
cardiovascular disease and cancer. The Women’s Health Study: a Med 2005;143:116–20.
randomized controlled trial. J Am Med Assoc 2005;294:56–65. 23. Weiger WA, Smith M, Boon H, Richardson MA, Kaptchuk TJ, Eisen-
15. Mitchinson MJ, Stephens NG, Parsons A, Bligh E, Schofield PM, berg DM. Advising patients who seek complementary and alternative
Brown MJ. Mortality in the CHAOS trial. Lancet 1999;353:381–2. medical therapies for cancer. Ann Intern Med 2002;137:889–903.

Você também pode gostar