Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
Legend, as well as
Bridge Across
in spite of adhering to the construction
specifications, the life of marine structures
can be adversely affected by aggressive
environmental conditions, especially the
chloride ion concentration on the struc-
Open Sea
R BHASKARAN,
ture's surface. The corrosion initiation
period for various structural components
ranges from six to 28 years, depending
upon the concrete grade and concrete
N. PALANISW~&, AND N.S. RENGASWAMY~ The life-cycle cost analysis (LCCA)
cover.
Central Electrochemical Research Institute, Karaikudi, Tamilnadu used in this work shows that galvanic
protection is a cost-effective technology
for this structure.
[
Cx = Cs 1 - erf -
I (1)
1% by weight mass of concrete; therefore,
assuming Cs = 1% and Cx= 0.033%:
MAINTENANCE COSTS
Annual Maintenunce
where Cx= the total chloride level at depth $22,200 has been spent every year to
" ,>
x at age "t" in years, C, = surface chloride maintain the bridge. Generally, the work
level, and D = diffusion coefficient in The propagation period for the kind of consists of the maintenance of the roadway
cm2/s. marine exposure prevailing at this bridge surface, bearings, expansion joints (Figure
D can be calculated by using the fol- is 25 years to the state of visual cracking. 2), drainage spouts, dust cleaning, electric
lowing equation:' The initiation period plus propagation lampposts (Figure 3), tollgate, etc.
period equals the total life period or life
to repair. Maintenunce Painting
The maximum water cement ratio used Table 2 shows the life periods to repair A four-coat system of anticorrosive
in the road bridge was 0.45. for various components of the bridge, paint was applied to the entire bridge
--
EQUIVALENT ANNUAL COST OF CORROSION
Expenditure Present Present
(US. Worth Value
Details Year Dollars) Factor (U.S. Dollars)
Direct Expenditure
a. ~nnualhaintenance Annual
User Cost
Based on these costs, the LCCA has
The user cost arises because lane clo-
sures during bridge maintenance work
Method of Evaluation been made (Table 3). The data in Table
Different methods are available to
increase travel time. The user cost is cal- 3 show that the annual cost of corrosion,
evaluate the financial worth or the return
culated as follows: based on a 50-year design life, is
on investment associated with a project
User cost =Time to cross x increase in -$43,000.
or its various alternatives. For the bridge,
travel time x days with user cost x value net present value is the most relevant
of time x traffic affected. method and it is used here. The expected Preventive Maintenance
Accordingly, 0.05 x (1 + 1.50) x 30 x long-term inflation of 8% and long-term A galvanic cathodic protection (CP)
$2.22 x 500 = $4,167. interest of 12% were used to calculate the system based on strip anodes has been
discount rate. considered. This will be used in conjunc-
REVENUE tion with a single-coat polyurethane (PU)
Twenty to 25 vehicles cross the bridge paint system for the concrete surfaces. The
Discount rate (Yo)=
every hour. The toll is $0.55 per vehicle. concept is that the galvanic protection will
This toll is the only revenue derived from prevent further corrosion of embedded
the bridge. steel reinforcement, and the PU coating
system on the concrete will prevent further
EQUIVALENT ANNUAL COST OF CORROSION W I T H
intrusion of chloride ions, thus minimiz- GALVANIC PROTECTION
ing deterioration of the concrete. The Expenditure Present Present
LCCA is shown in Table 4. The annual (US. Worth Value
cost of corrosion under this scheme, based Details Year Dollars) Factor U S . Dollars)
on a 50-year design life, is -$40,000. Direct kmnditure
Acknowledgments
The authors gratefully acknowledge
the Research Associateship awarded to Dr.
R. Bhaskaran by the Council of Scientific
& Industrial Research, EMR Division
(New Delhi, India), which allowed them
to carry out this work at the Central Elec-
trochemical Research Institute (Karai-
d. Maintenance replacement
kudi, India). They also gratefully ac- expansion joints 20 th 111,111 0.484 53,778
knowledge the cooperation extended by 40th 111,111 0.234 26,000
the National Highway authorities of the
Bearings 25th 222,222 0.403 89.555
Ramnad division.
Electric lampposts 10th 11,111 0.695 7,722
References 20th
30th
11,111
11,111
0.484
0.336
5,378
3,733
I. http:l/www.indolink.com/Religion/r091702-130924.
P~P. 40th 11,111 0.234 2,600
2. S.A. Reddi, "Pambnn Bridge: Aspccrs of Projccr
Managemenr-I," Indian Concrete J. 62, 1 l (1988): pp. Indirect Expenditure
568-579. a. User cost Annual 4,167 22.470 93,632
3. S.A. Reddi. "Pamban Bridge: Aspects of Project
Managenicu-11," Indian Concrete J. 62, 12 (1988): pp.
Total Present Value 2,004,274
629-632. Less: Income
4. D. Srinivasan, "Bridge Building-A Way of Life; rhe a. Collection from toll gate Annual 50,000 22.470 1,123,500
Story of the Pamban Bridge" (Madras, India: Indian Concrete Net Present Value 880,774
Instirute, 1996). Annual Cost Factor 0.045
5. K. Tuutti, "Corrosion of S ~ einl Concrete" (Swedish Equivalent Annual Cost 39,635
Foundation For Concrete Research and Swedish Board for e540.000
Technical Development, 1982).
6. D.W. Pfeifer, "High-Performance Concrete and Re-
inforcing Stccl with a 100-Year Service Life," PC1 J. (2000):
pp. 46-54. control and has done corrosion auditing in the N.S. RENGASWAMYwas an emeritus scientist
7. D.W. Hobbs, ed., "Minimum Requirements for sugar, pulp and paper, fertilizer, and petrochem- at the Central Electrochemical Research Insti-
Durable Concrete" (British Cement Assoc., Berks, 1988). ical industries in India. tute, Karaikudi. He has 45 vears of research
p. 52. and development experience in corrosion and
8. J.P. Broomfield, Uh'igh's Handhook, 2nd N. PALANISWAMY is deputy director and head its control, including 30 sponsored projects
.
ed R. Winston Revie, ed. (New York, NY: John Wiley &
of the Corrosion Protection Division at the and 43 consultancy assignments. He has
Sons, Inc., 2000). pp. 581-($00.
9, D , ~~, ~ b J,D, b ~Matthews,
, Require. Central Electrochemical Research Institute, developed a cost-effectiveCP technology for
menn for Concrete to Resist DcrcriorarionD,,C LoChloride- Karaikudi. He has 28 years of experience in reinforced concrete bridges and structures. He
Induced Corrosion," D.W. ~ o b b s ed. , (Blackwater, uK: corrosion and its control, with 93 papers and has a doctorate in engineering from the lndian
British Cement ASSOC. Berks. 1988), p. 60. four patents to his credit. He works in the areas Institute of Science and received a National
of CP, concrete corrosion, and biological corro- Merit Award from the Electrochemical Society
R. BHASKARAN is a research associate at sion. He has a doctorate in science from of India and the Smt. Annapurna Award for Best
the Central Electrochemical Research Insti- Madurai Kamaraj University, Madurai, and Publication from the Society for Advancement
tute, Karaikudi, Tamilnadu-630 006, India. He received the NIIS-Meritorious contribution of Electrochemical Science and Technology,
specializes in economic aspects of corrosion award during 2004 at New Delhi, India. India.