Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
UDL Rationale
University of Kansas
Brent Seager
UDL Rationale
There are four distinct processes involved with Universal Design for Learning (UDL)
instruction planning, which allows educators to be effective in implementing lessons that are
geared toward improving and adapting the learning environment for all students. When
effectively implementing UDL instruction, I must first establish clear learning outcomes, as this
ensures that challenges in the learning environment are reduced (Edyburn, 2010, p. 34). The
second step in the UDL framework is to anticipate student needs, which can be challenging, and
remaining flexible will allow the educator to adapt to most situations involving student needs
(Noonoo, 2014, p. 23-24). Successful UDL frameworks include determining the effectiveness of
the instruction, and in this lesson, I will assess the students and determine which area or areas
need improvement for the next lesson/activity (Carr & Hardin, 2010, p. 141-142). When
educators use the UDL framework to design and implement lessons, it significantly improves the
learning outcomes for struggling students (Courey & et al., 2012, p. 10-11). Even though using
the UDL framework can be challenging, I believe that the benefits of using this system are
invaluable when implementing and designing lessons for students in the classroom.
Outcomes
While the goal of every educator is for their students to be successful, this can be
challenging to achieve; as each student in the classroom has varying needs and different learning
styles. Using the UDL framework and setting clear and measurable goals will reduce anxiety
and confusion in the classroom. With the reduction of confusion and anxiety, general education
and special education students will be more successful in achieving the prescribed outcomes for
a lesson or activity (Edyburn, 2010, p. 33-38). The learning outcomes I have established for this
lesson and associated activities involve introducing and modeling the persuasive writing
technique for my students. Currently, many of my students have social skills deficits, and this
UDL RATIONALE 3
will cause persuasive writing to be challenging. In setting clear expectations and learning
outcomes, I will be able to more effectively monitor and guide student learning during this and
future lessons.
Student Needs
The learning needs of each student can vary significantly from classroom to classroom,
and therefore, many educators need to consider the learning needs of each student prior to
designing and implementing lessons and activities. The UDL framework can be used to
incorporate and include the diverse needs of each student in lesson planning. Which will create a
more variable learning environment that is geared towards the learning needs and styles of the
students (Orr & Hammig, 2009, p. 181-183). Prior to designing my lesson, I considered the
learning needs and challenges that each student might have with the assignments and activities of
this lesson. Even though I have considered learner variability and needs, I understand that
adjustments may need to be made while delivering the lesson, and I am ready to adapt as
necessary.
Assessment
To effectively implement activities and lessons within the UDL framework, educators
will need to assess the students and outcomes of the assignment or activity. This allows the
educator to determine student competence and achievement of the lesson goals. The assessment
data should also be used to guide instruction and planning for future lessons and activities, as this
data can point to strengths and areas of need for each student (Carr & Hardin, 2010, p. 141-142).
When assessing a lesson or activity, each educator has several different formal and informal
options. Using two different types of assessment allows the teacher to evaluate the lesson more
effectively. I will be using formal assessment in grading the assessment map and informal
Experience
The UDL framework provides the students with a customizable and scaffolded
experience. The content and activities within the UDL framework are engaging and motivate the
students to participate in the activities, which improves the learning outcomes for each student.
The UDL framework can significantly improve the learning environment by addressing learner
needs within the classroom, and providing the necessary support for struggling learners (Courey
& et al., 2012, p. 10-11). In my lesson, students will have several topic choices, as this will
provide engagement and motivation. I am also modeling and using a variety of instructional
strategies to make this activity and lesson engaging for each individual learner.
Conclusion
While implementing the UDL framework for lesson planning and delivery might seem to
be an overwhelming task, remembering and addressing the four principles of this framework
allow educators to more effectively design and implement lessons. Effective lessons and the
UDL framework are most effective when paired with clear and specific learning outcomes,
which I have identified in my lesson as the students beginning with the persuasive writing
process. The next effective practice to implementing the UDL framework is the consideration of
student needs and learner variability, which I have considered during the planning process and
will implement changes as necessary during delivery of the lesson. A third effective practice of
the UDL framework is assessing the students, I have chosen to use formal and informal
assessment measures to assess and guide future instruction. The fourth effective practice is the
instructional experience, and I believe that the students will have an excellent experience during
the instruction and will be motivated and engaged to participate in future lessons and activities.
Even though other effective practices can be used to design and implement lessons, the UDL
UDL RATIONALE 5
framework is one of the most beneficial, as it considers the various learning styles and needs of
each student.
UDL RATIONALE 6
References
Carr, J.W. & Hardin, S. (2010). The key to effective assessment: Writing measurable student
Courey, J.C., Tappe, P., Siker, J. & LePage, P. (2013). Improved lesson planning with Universal
Design for Learning (UDL). Teacher Education and Special Education, 36(1), p. 10-11.
Edyburn, D.L. (2010). Would you recognize Universal Design for Learning if you saw it? Ten
propositions for new directions for the second decade of UDL. Learning Disability
Orr, A.C. & Hammig, S.B. (2009). Inclusive postsecondary strategies for teaching students with
181-183.
Noonoo, S. (2014). 6 ways to engage every learner using UDL: Universal Design for Learning
can make your lessons more accessible and your lesson-planning more fun. The Journal,
41(11), p. 23-24.