Luz Farms, Petitioner, vs. The Honorable Secretary of The Department of Agrarian Reform, Respondent

2/5/2018 [G.R. No. 86889 : December 4, 1990.] 192 SCRA 51 LUZ FARMS, Petitioner, vs.
s. THE HONORABLE SECRETARY OF THE DEPARTMENT OF …
ChanRobles™ Virtual Law Library™ | chanrobles.com™
Like 2 Tweet Share

Search
Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence > Year 1990 > December 1990 Decisions > [G.R. No. 86889 : December
4, 1990.] 192 SCRA 51 LUZ FARMS, Petitioner, vs. THE HONORABLE SECRETARY OF THE DEPARTMENT OF
AGRARIAN REFORM, Respondent.:
Custom Search
Search
EN BANC
[G.R. No. 86889 : December 4, 1990.]
ChanRobles On-Line Bar Review 192 SCRA 51
LUZ FARMS, Petitioner, vs. THE HONORABLE SECRETARY OF THE DEPARTMENT
OF AGRARIAN REFORM, Respondent.
DECISION
PARAS, J.:
This is a petition for prohibition with prayer for restraining order and/or preliminary
and permanent injunction against the Honorable Secretary of the Department of
Agrarian Reform for acting without jurisdiction in enforcing the assailed provisions of
R.A. No. 6657, otherwise known as the Comprehensive Agrarian Reform Law of 1988
and in promulgating the Guidelines and Procedure Implementing Production and Profit
Sharing under R.A. No. 6657, insofar as the same apply to herein petitioner, and
further from performing an act in violation of the constitutional rights of the petitioner.
As gathered from the records, the factual background of this case, is as follows:
On June 10, 1988, the President of the Philippines approved R.A. No. 6657, which
includes the raising of livestock, poultry and swine in its coverage (Rollo, p. 80).
On January 2, 1989, the Secretary of Agrarian Reform promulgated the Guidelines and
DebtKollect Company, Inc. Procedures Implementing Production and Profit Sharing as embodied in Sections 13
and 32 of R.A. No. 6657 (Rollo, p. 80).
On January 9, 1989, the Secretary of Agrarian Reform promulgated its Rules and
Regulations implementing Section 11 of R.A. No. 6657 (Commercial Farms). (Rollo, p.
81).
Luz Farms, petitioner in this case, is a corporation engaged in the livestock and poultry
business and together with others in the same business allegedly stands to be
adversely affected by the enforcement of Section 3(b), Section 11, Section 13, Section
16(d) and 17 and Section 32 of R.A. No. 6657 otherwise known as Comprehensive
Agrarian Reform Law and of the Guidelines and Procedures Implementing Production
and Profit Sharing under R.A. No. 6657 promulgated on January 2, 1989 and the Rules
and Regulations Implementing Section 11 thereof as promulgated by the DAR on
January 9, 1989 (Rollo, pp. 2-36). : rd
Hence, this petition praying that aforesaid laws, guidelines and rules be declared
unconstitutional. Meanwhile, it is also prayed that a writ of preliminary injunction or
ChanRobles Intellectual Property restraining order be issued enjoining public respondents from enforcing the same,
insofar as they are made to apply to Luz Farms and other livestock and poultry raisers.
Division
http://www.chanrobles.com/cralaw/1990decemberdecisions.php?id=20 1/17
2/5/2018 [G.R. No. 86889 : December 4, 1990.] 192 SCRA 51 LUZ FARMS, Petitioner, vs. THE HONORABLE SECRETARY OF THE DEPARTMENT OF …
This Court in its Resolution dated July 4, 1939 resolved to deny, among others, Luz
Farms' prayer for the issuance of a preliminary injunction in its Manifestation dated
May 26, and 31, 1989. (Rollo, p. 98).
Later, however, this Court in its Resolution dated August 24, 1989 resolved to grant
said Motion for Reconsideration regarding the injunctive relief, after the filing and
approval by this Court of an injunction bond in the amount of P100,000.00. This Court
also gave due course to the petition and required the parties to file their respective
memoranda (Rollo, p. 119).
The petitioner filed its Memorandum on September 6, 1989 (Rollo, pp. 131-168).
On December 22, 1989, the Solicitor General adopted his Comment to the petition as
his Memorandum (Rollo, pp. 186-187).
Luz Farms questions the following provisions of R.A. 6657, insofar as they are made to
apply to it:
(a) Section 3(b) which includes the "raising of livestock (and poultry)" in the
definition of "Agricultural, Agricultural Enterprise or Agricultural Activity."
(b) Section 11 which defines "commercial farms" as "private agricultural lands
devoted to commercial, livestock, poultry and swine raising . . ."
(c) Section 13 which calls upon petitioner to execute a production-sharing plan.
(d) Section 16(d) and 17 which vest on the Department of Agrarian Reform the
authority to summarily determine the just compensation to be paid for lands
covered by the Comprehensive Agrarian Reform Law.
(e) Section 32 which spells out the production-sharing plan mentioned in
Section 13 —
". . . (W)hereby three percent (3%) of the gross sales from the production of
such lands are distributed within sixty (60) days of the end of the fiscal year as
December-1990 compensation to regular and other farmworkers in such lands over and above
the compensation they currently receive: Provided, That these individuals or
Jurisprudence entities realize gross sales in excess of five million pesos per annum unless the
DAR, upon proper application, determine a lower ceiling.
[G.R. No. 32945 : December 3, 1990.] MARIANO T.
NASSER, Petitioner, vs. THE COURT OF APPEALS, In the event that the individual or entity realizes a profit, an additional ten
HON. MALCOLM SARMIENTO, in his capacity as
Presiding Judge, Court of First Instance of Pampanga,
(10%) of the net profit after tax shall be distributed to said regular and other
Branch I, AURORA RIVERA CANLAS, PATERNO R. farmworkers within ninety (90) days of the end of the fiscal year . . ."
CANLAS, and TOMAS CENTILLAS, Respondents. [G.R.
No. 32946. December 3, 1990.] MARIANO T. NASSER, The main issue in this petition is the constitutionality of Sections 3(b), 11, 13 and 32
Petitioner, vs. THE COURT OF APPEALS, PATERNO R. of R.A. No. 6657 (the Comprehensive Agrarian Reform Law of 1988), insofar as the
CANLAS, AURORA RIVERA-CANLAS, TOMAS
CENTILLAS and THE CHIEF OF POLICE OF SAN
said law includes the raising of livestock, poultry and swine in its coverage as well as
ISIDRO, DAVAO ORIENTAL, Respondents. the Implementing Rules and Guidelines promulgated in accordance therewith. :-cralaw
[G.R. No. 39430 : December 3, 1990.] FRANCISCO The constitutional provision under consideration reads as follows:
MANLAPAZ, DELFIN SANGCAP, DOMINGO SANGCAP,
PEDRO CUNANAN, FAUSTO DE LA PENA and ARTICLE XIII
HONORATA DE LA PENA, Petitioners, vs. HON. COURT
OF APPEALS, HON. JUDGE LORENZO R. MOSQUEDA, x x x
HON. JUDGE VIRGILIO CANIVEL, TEODORO RIVERA,
PABLO RIVERA, RENATO RIVERA and BONIFACIO AGRARIAN AND NATURAL RESOURCES REFORM
RIVERA, Respondents.
Section 4. The State shall, by law, undertake an agrarian reform program
[G.R. No. 55466 : December 3, 1990.] MANILA founded on the right of farmers and regular farmworkers, who are landless, to
SURETY & FIDELITY CO., INC., Petitioner, vs. COURT
OF APPEALS and WILLIAM H. QUASHA, Respondents. own directly or collectively the lands they till or, in the case of other
farmworkers, to receive a just share of the fruits thereof. To this end, the State
[G.R. No. 78778 : December 3, 1990.] 191 SCRA shall encourage and undertake the just distribution of all agricultural lands,
814 LEONIDA CORONADO, FELIX BUENO, MELANIA
RETIZOS, BERNARDINO BUENASEDA and JOVITA subject to such priorities and reasonable retention limits as the Congress may
MONTEFALCON, Petitioners, vs. THE COURT OF prescribe, taking into account ecological, developmental, or equity
APPEALS and JUANA BUENO ALBOVIAS, Respondents. considerations, and subject to the payment of just compensation. In
[G.R. No. 79560 : December 3, 1990.] 191 SCRA determining retention limits, the State shall respect the rights of small
823 ANDRES E. DITAN, Petitioner, vs. PHILIPPINE landowners. The State shall further provide incentives for voluntary land-
OVERSEAS EMPLOYMENT ADMINISTRATION sharing.
ADMINISTRATOR, NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS
COMMISSION, ASIAWORLD RECRUITMENT, INC., x x x"
AND/OR INTRACO SALES CORPORATION,
Respondents. Luz Farms contended that it does not seek the nullification of R.A. 6657 in its
[G.R. No. 80904 : December 3, 1990.] 191 SCRA entirety. In fact, it acknowledges the correctness of the decision of this Court in
830 BALTAZAR, PEDRO, URSULA, and DOMINGO, all the case of the Association of Small Landowners in the Philippines, Inc. vs.
surnamed PANTIG, Petitioners, vs. VENANCIO Secretary of Agrarian Reform (G.R. 78742, 14 July 1989) affirming the
BALTAZAR, Respondent.
constitutionality of the Comprehensive Agrarian Reform Law. It, however,
[G.R. No. 82115 : December 3, 1990.] 191 SCRA argued that Congress in enacting the said law has transcended the mandate of
836 PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, Plaintiff-Appellee, the Constitution, in including land devoted to the raising of livestock, poultry
vs. ROMEO ORTIZ y BALLARES, Accused-Appellant.
and swine in its coverage (Rollo, p. 131). Livestock or poultry raising is not
[G.R. No. 84884 : December 3, 1990.] EULALIO M. similar to crop or tree farming. Land is not the primary resource in this
RUIZ and ILUMINADA RUIZ, Petitioners, vs. HON. undertaking and represents no more than five percent (5%) of the total
DOROTEO N. CANEBA, THE CITY SHERIFF OF MANILA
AND/OR HIS DEPUTIES, ZENAIDA SANGALANG and
investment of commercial livestock and poultry raisers. Indeed, there are many
ADOLFO CRUZ, Respondents. owners of residential lands all over the country who use available space in their
residence for commercial livestock and raising purposes, under "contract-
[G.R. No. 87264 : December 3, 1990.] MARIANO
DINGLASAN and FELICIDAD DINGLASAN, Petitioners,
growing arrangements," whereby processing corporations and other commercial
vs. THE HON. MARIA ALICIA M. AUSTRIA, Presiding livestock and poultry raisers (Rollo, p. 10). Lands support the buildings and
Judge of Branch 159, Regional Trial Court, Pasig, other amenities attendant to the raising of animals and birds. The use of land is
Metro Manila, National Capital Judicial Region, The
GOVERNMENT SERVICE INSURANCE SYSTEM, and
incidental to but not the principal factor or consideration in productivity in this
CONCEPCION T. TINIO, Respondents. industry. Including backyard raisers, about 80% of those in commercial
livestock and poultry production occupy five hectares or less. The remaining
[G.R. No. 89545 : December 3, 1990.] SPOUSES
ROLANDO DOLORFINO and MONINA FULE,
20% are mostly corporate farms (Rollo, p. 11).
Petitioners, vs. THE HON. COURT OF APPEALS,
SEVERO ALCOS and EFIGENIA DE LUNA-ALCOS,
Respondents. On the other hand, the public respondent argued that livestock and poultry raising is
[UDK No. 9864 : December 3, 1990.] RUFINA VDA. embraced in the term "agriculture" and the inclusion of such enterprise under Section
DE TANGUB, Petitioner, vs. COURT OF APPEALS, 3(b) of R.A. 6657 is proper. He cited that Webster's International Dictionary, Second
PRESIDING JUDGE of the [CAR] RTC, Branch 4, Iligan Edition (1954), defines the following words:
City, and SPOUSES DOMINGO and EUGENIA MARTIL,
Respondents. "Agriculture — the art or science of cultivating the ground and raising and
[G.R. No. 58668 : December 4, 1990.] 192 SCRA 1
harvesting crops, often, including also, feeding, breeding and management of
SANTIAGO ESCARTE, JR., ERNESTO VILLANUEVA, livestock, tillage, husbandry, farming.
FELIXBERTO VILLANUEVA, and LOURDES
VILLANUEVA, Petitioners, vs. OFFICE OF THE It includes farming, horticulture, forestry, dairying, sugarmaking . . .
PRESIDENT OF THE PHILIPPINES and TEODORO
MEDINA, Respondents. Livestock — domestic animals used or raised on a farm, especially for profit.
[G.R. No. 71929 : December 4, 1990.] 192 SCRA 9 Farm — a plot or tract of land devoted to the raising of domestic or other animals."
ALITALIA, Petitioner, vs. INTERMEDIATE APPELLATE (Rollo, pp. 82-83).
COURT and FELIPA E. PABLO, Respondents.
The petition is impressed with merit.
192 SCRA 21 CONSOLACION VILLANUEVA,
Petitioner, vs. THE INTERMEDIATE APPELLATE The question raised is one of constitutional construction. The primary task in
COURT, JESUS BERNAS and REMEDIOS Q. BERNAS,
Respondents.
constitutional construction is to ascertain and thereafter assure the realization of the
purpose of the framers in the adoption of the Constitution (J.M. Tuazon & Co. vs. Land
[G.R. No. 80505 : December 4, 1990.] 192 SCRA 28 Tenure Administration, 31 SCRA 413 [1970]). : rd
THE PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, Plaintiff-Appellee,

vs. MARIO TANDOY y LIM, Defendant-Appellant. Ascertainment of the meaning of the provision of Constitution begins with the
language of the document itself. The words used in the Constitution are to be given
PEOPLE'S FINANCING CORP. and ENRIQUE V. their ordinary meaning except where technical terms are employed in which case the
ARCENAS, Petitioners, vs. COURT OF APPEALS significance thus attached to them prevails (J.M. Tuazon & Co. vs. Land Tenure
(Sixteenth Division), GAUDIOSO MANLIGUEZ and
PURIFICACION MANLIGUEZ, Respondents. Administration, 31 SCRA 413 [1970]).
[G.R. No. 86586 : December 4, 1990.] 192 SCRA 42 It is generally held that, in construing constitutional provisions which are ambiguous or
NATIONAL IRRIGATION ADMINISTRATION, of doubtful meaning, the courts may consider the debates in the constitutional
Petitioner, vs. HONORABLE TEODORO P. REGINO, convention as throwing light on the intent of the framers of the Constitution. It is true
PRESIDING JUDGE, REGIONAL TRIAL COURT, BRANCH
84, QUEZON CITY and CONSTRUCTION SERVICES OF that the intent of the convention is not controlling by itself, but as its proceeding was
AUSTRALIA-PHILIPPINES INC., Respondents. preliminary to the adoption by the people of the Constitution the understanding of the
convention as to what was meant by the terms of the constitutional provision which
LUZ FARMS, Petitioner, vs. THE HONORABLE was the subject of the deliberation, goes a long way toward explaining the
SECRETARY OF THE DEPARTMENT OF AGRARIAN understanding of the people when they ratified it (Aquino, Jr. v. Enrile, 59 SCRA 183
REFORM, Respondent. [1974]).
[G.R. No. 88177 : December 4, 1990.] 192 SCRA 84 The transcripts of the deliberations of the Constitutional Commission of 1986 on the
DOLORES A. PAREDES, Petitioner, vs. CIVIL SERVICE
COMMISSION AND REMEDIOS A. AMOR, Respondents. meaning of the word "agricultural," clearly show that it was never the intention of the
[G.R. No. 89530 : December 4, 1990.] 192 SCRA 84 framers of the Constitution to include livestock and poultry industry in the coverage of
DOLORES A. PAREDES, Petitioner, vs. CIVIL SERVICE the constitutionally-mandated agrarian reform program of the Government.
COMMISSION, MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD
AND REMEDIOS A. AMOR, Respondents. The Committee adopted the definition of "agricultural land" as defined under Section
[G.R. No. 93054 : December 4, 1990.] 192 SCRA 166 of R.A. 3844, as laud devoted to any growth, including but not limited to crop
100 Cordillera Regional Assembly Member lands, saltbeds, fishponds, idle and abandoned land (Record, CONCOM, August 7,
ALEXANDER P. ORDILLO, (Banaue), Ifugao Provincial 1986, Vol. III, p. 11).
Board Member CORAZON MONTINIG, (Mayoyao),
Former Vice-Mayor MARTIN UDAN (Banaue), The intention of the Committee is to limit the application of the word "agriculture."
Municipal Councilors MARTIN GANO, (Lagawe), and
TEODORO HEWE, (Hingyon), Barangay Councilman Commissioner Jamir proposed to insert the word "ARABLE" to distinguish this kind of
PEDRO W. DULAG (Lamut); Aguinaldo residents agricultural land from such lands as commercial and industrial lands and residential
SANDY B. CHANGIWAN, and DONATO TIMAGO; Lamut properties because all of them fall under the general classification of the word
resident REY ANTONIO; Kiangan residents ORLANDO
PUGUON, and REYNAND DULDULAO; Lagawe
"agricultural". This proposal, however, was not considered because the Committee
residents TOMAS KIMAYONG, GREGORIO DANGO, contemplated that agricultural lands are limited to arable and suitable agricultural
GEORGE B. BAYWONG, and VICENTE LUNAG; Hingyon lands and therefore, do not include commercial, industrial and residential lands
residents PABLO M. DULNUAN and CONSTANCIO
GANO; Mayoyao residents PEDRO M. BAOANG,
(Record, CONCOM, August 7, 1986, Vol. III, p. 30).
LEONARDO IGADNA, and MAXIMO IGADNA; and
Banaue residents PUMA-A CULHI, LATAYON BUTTIG,
In the interpellation, then Commissioner Regalado (now a Supreme Court Justice),
MIGUEL PUMELBAN, ANDRES ORDILLO, FEDERICO posed several questions, among others, quoted as follows:
MARIANO, SANDY BINOMNGA, GABRIEL LIMMANG,
ROMEO TONGALI, RUBEN BAHATAN, MHOMDY x x x
GABRIEL, and NADRES GHAMANG, Petitioners, vs. THE
COMMISSION ON ELECTIONS; The Honorable "Line 19 refers to genuine reform program founded on the primary right of
FRANKLIN M. DRILON, Secretary of Justice; Hon. farmers and farmworkers. I wonder if it means that leasehold tenancy is
CATALINO MACARAIG, Executive Secretary; The
Cabinet Officer for Regional Development; Hon.
thereby proscribed under this provision because it speaks of the primary right
GUILLERMO CARAGUE, Secretary of Budget and of farmers and farmworkers to own directly or collectively the lands they till. As
Management; and Hon. ROSALINA S. CAJUCOM, OIC, also mentioned by Commissioner Tadeo, farmworkers include those who work in
National Treasurer, Respondents.
piggeries and poultry projects.
[G.R. No. 30616 : December 10, 1990.] 192 SCRA
110 EUFRACIO D. ROJAS, Plaintiff-Appellant, vs.
I was wondering whether I am wrong in my appreciation that if somebody puts
CONSTANCIO B. MAGLANA, Defendant-Appellee. up a piggery or a poultry project and for that purpose hires farmworkers
therein, these farmworkers will automatically have the right to own eventually,
[G.R. No. 36827 : December 10, 1990.] THE
DIRECTOR OF FOREST ADMINISTRATION, THE directly or ultimately or collectively, the land on which the piggeries and poultry
DIRECTOR OF LANDS and THE REPUBLIC OF THE projects were constructed. (Record, CONCOM, August 2, 1986, p. 618).
PHILIPPINES, Petitioners, vs. HON. RAMON C.
FERNANDEZ, HERMOGENES CONCEPCION, JR., and x x x
EMILIO A. GANCAYCO, ET AL., Respondents. [G.R. No.
56622 : December 10, 1990.] THE DIRECTOR OF The questions were answered and explained in the statement of then
LANDS and THE DIRECTOR OF FOREST DEVELOPMENT, Commissioner Tadeo, quoted as follows:
Petitioners, vs. COURT OF APPEALS (Ninth Division),
GREGORIO A. LEGASPI and VALENTINA CERVANIA, x x x
Respondents. [G.R. No. 70076 : December 10, 1990.]
REYNALDA ESPEJO, BENITA GARLITOS and "Sa pangalawang katanungan ng Ginoo ay medyo hindi kami nagkaunawaan.
ENRIQUETA OXCIANO, Petitioners, vs. INTERMEDIATE
APPELLATE COURT, HON. ANTONIO M. BELEN, as Ipinaaalam ko kay Commissioner Regalado na hindi namin inilagay ang
Judge of the Regional Trial Court of Lingayen, agricultural worker sa kadahilanang kasama rito ang piggery, poultry at
Pangasinan Branch XXXVIII and ASTERIO SAURA, livestock workers. Ang inilagay namin dito ay farm worker kaya hindi kasama
Respondents.
ang piggery, poultry at livestock workers (Record, CONCOM, August 2, 1986,
[G.R. No. 44749 : December 10, 1990.] 192 SCRA Vol. II, p. 621).
141 PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, Plaintiff-Appellee,
vs. MELVIN GIRON y SANTOS, Accused-Appellant. It is evident from the foregoing discussion that Section II of R.A. 6657 which includes
"private agricultural lands devoted to commercial livestock, poultry and swine raising"
151 RUBEN DELFIN, BENITO DOLOSA, CORNELIO in the definition of "commercial farms" is invalid, to the extent that the aforecited
AGUILAR, ANASTACIO GORDOLA, CESAR PANALIGAN, agro-industrial activities are made to be covered by the agrarian reform program of
LUIS VIESCA, VICENTE GUADAMOR, JUAN CAGATIN,
SIMEON CHICA, REYNALDO CINCO, WILFREDO IPAS, the State. There is simply no reason to include livestock and poultry lands in the
SIMEON TAGAYONA, FLORENCIO SINAMBAN, coverage of agrarian reform. (Rollo, p. 21).
FERMINIO DIEGO, POLICARPIO DILE, EDDIE DE
CASTRO, AQUILINO CABILITASAN, CRISOGONO Hence, there is merit in Luz Farms' argument that the requirement in Sections 13 and
CANTERO, GUALBERTO REBUSTER, RODOLFO 32 of R.A. 6657 directing "corporate farms" which include livestock and poultry raisers
GATCHALIAN, ANGELITO DOMINGO, FERNANDO
JOVER, RAFAEL SALCEDO, SIMON DIANA, BENJAMIN to execute and implement "production-sharing plans" (pending final redistribution of
GONZALES, JR., BENIGNO ROJA, DEMETRIO SIMEON, their landholdings) whereby they are called upon to distribute from three percent (3%)
JOSE TELAN, HILARIO VILLANUEVA, NICK of their gross sales and ten percent (10%) of their net profits to their workers as
FRANCISCO, PACIFICO DALIPE, EUPEMIO DALITE,
ARTEMIO DE CASTRO, ISABELO RASTICA, ANECITO additional compensation is unreasonable for being confiscatory, and therefore violative
RASTICA, LAMBERTO NIETO, ESMERALDO TATEL, of due process (Rollo, p. 21).:-cralaw
PASCUAL BATOCTOY, ESMENIO PATRICIO, ARMANDO

DE GUZMAN, JESUS MALLARI, JOSE MALLARI, It has been established that this Court will assume jurisdiction over a constitutional
SULPICIO MALLARI, GENEROSO COS, AGAPITO question only if it is shown that the essential requisites of a judicial inquiry into such a
ESPINOSA, VIRGILIO SEVAÑES, RICARDO MANZAN,
OSCAR BENSOL, PABLO DIAGSAY, EMILIO DIAGSAY, question are first satisfied. Thus, there must be an actual case or controversy involving
PAULINO COMETA, MATERO COREA, BENJAMIN a conflict of legal rights susceptible of judicial determination, the constitutional
LACANARIA, GAUDY TIU, JOVENCIO AGUILAR, question must have been opportunely raised by the proper party, and the resolution of
ROMULO POSADA, RICARDO POSIC, ALFONSO
SALGADO, RICARDO TAGANAP, ARMANDO RAMIREZ, the question is unavoidably necessary to the decision of the case itself (Association of
FELIPE RAMIRES, EDELBERTO BERNARDO, PONCIANO Small Landowners of the Philippines, Inc. v. Secretary of Agrarian Reform, G.R. 78742;
MONTILLA, JUAN MONTILLA, IGNACIO PANCHITO, Acuna v. Arroyo, G.R. 79310; Pabico v. Juico, G.R. 79744; Manaay v. Juico, G.R.
JEORGE SERRAN, VICTOR IGNIS, LUCAS IGAT,
BARTOLOME MAGDAEL, AUGUSTO ROSALINAS, 79777, 14 July 1989, 175 SCRA 343).
RAFAEL SOCITO, JORGE CO, LUCINO WAGAN, CELSO
BARADA, WINSTON DIENZO, PAULINO SANCHEZ, However, despite the inhibitions pressing upon the Court when confronted with
ELESEO SANCHES, CONRADO SANCHES, GENEROSO constitutional issues, it will not hesitate to declare a law or act invalid when it is
ANTONIO, AGUSTIN LOPEZ, RUDY SOCITO, SEGUNDO convinced that this must be done. In arriving at this conclusion, its only criterion will
SOCITO, JOAQUIN PARAS, DOMINADOR BUTAHON,
GERMOGENES GINGCO, HONORIO DETOITO, ELIGIO be the Constitution and God as its conscience gives it in the light to probe its meaning
MENDOZA, RUBEN QUITORIANO, LEON DELA CRUZ, and discover its purpose. Personal motives and political considerations are
PACITO SALES, ANTONIO CEMANES, IRENEO irrelevancies that cannot influence its decisions. Blandishment is as ineffectual as
LUBUGIN, FORTUNATO MATO, ROMEO MERIC,
ALBERTO GALLO, MELCHOR SALGADO, SIMEON intimidation, for all the awesome power of the Congress and Executive, the Court will
QUIJANO, ANTONIO CARAAN, CARLITO GUZMAN, not hesitate "to make the hammer fall heavily," where the acts of these departments,
ALBERTO SALMON, FELIMON TAN, FERNANDO or of any official, betray the people's will as expressed in the Constitution (Association
FAUSTINO, CONRADO DAVID, REYNALDO NOLASCO,
ANTONIO NIETO, JAIME CAMACHO, ALBERTO of Small Landowners of the Philippines, Inc. v. Secretary of Agrarian Reform, G.R.
PANGLAO, ROSAURO GANAC, ALFREDO ARCABIO, 78742; Acuna v. Arroyo, G.R. 79310; Pabico v. Juico, G.R. 79744; Manaay v. Juico,
PEDRO MANASALA, VICENTE BELARMINO, ROMULO G.R. 79777, 14 July 1989).
SIOCO, SEVERINO ATIENZA, JR., RUFO ABALOS,
JESUS POSADA, ALBINO BACARRO, ERNESTO DAJAY, Thus, where the legislature or the executive acts beyond the scope of its constitutional
WILFREDO VILLALON, CELESTINO BACARRO, MANUEL
TOLENTINO, ERNESTO ANTONIO, OSCAR ABUNDIO, powers, it becomes the duty of the judiciary to declare what the other branches of the
ZOSIMO IJARES, RUBEN ARISTORENAS, GAUDENCIO government had assumed to do, as void. This is the essence of judicial power
CASTILLO, DOMINGO DELA TORRE, DANILO conferred by the Constitution "(I)n one Supreme Court and in such lower courts as
RONCADA, RAFEL PUPA, ALFONSO SAPINORO,
LUISITO JACRIQUE, MARCELINO BESA, ANSELMO may be established by law" (Art. VIII, Section 1 of the 1935 Constitution; Article X,
DATELES, ALBERTO PALCULAN, BIENVENIDO Section I of the 1973 Constitution and which was adopted as part of the Freedom
FUENSALIDA AND JOSE ORZAL, Petitioners, vs. THE Constitution, and Article VIII, Section 1 of the 1987 Constitution) and which power this
HON. AMADO G. INCIONG in his capacity as Deputy
Minister of Labor; NLRC Commissioners DIEGO Court has exercised in many instances (Demetria v. Alba, 148 SCRA 208 [1987]).
ATIENZA, CLETO VILLATUYA and GERONIMO
QUADRA; ATLANTIC CONTAINER CORPORATION; PREMISES CONSIDERED, the instant petition is hereby GRANTED. Sections 3(b), 11,
INLAND INDUSTRIES, INC., LAZARO ARRIOLA, 13 and 32 of R.A. No. 6657 insofar as the inclusion of the raising of livestock, poultry
BIENVENIDO KATALBAS, AURORA JEREZA, GOSHI DE and swine in its coverage as well as the Implementing Rules and Guidelines
YULO AND PAZ YULO AND ROBERTO JACINTO,
Respondents. promulgated in accordance therewith, are hereby DECLARED null and void for being
unconstitutional and the writ of preliminary injunction issued is hereby MADE
[G.R. No. 55361 : December 10, 1990.] 192 SCRA permanent.
163 SPOUSES TEOFILO ERCILLO and TERESITA
ERCILLO, Petitioners, vs. COURT OF APPEALS and SO ORDERED.
SPOUSES LUTGARDA CIFRA and BENJAMIN CIFRA,
SR., represented by their son and attorney-in-fact, Fernan (C.J.), Narvasa, Melencio-Herrera, Gutierrez, Jr., Cruz, Gancayco,
BENJAMIN CIFRA, JR., and HON. JOSE P. CASTRO,
Respondents.
Padilla, Bidin, Griño-Aquino, Medialdea and Regalado, JJ., concur.

Feliciano, J., is on leave.
169 ERNESTO DICHOSO, Petitioner, vs. The
HONORABLE COURT OF APPEALS and TEODOLFO
RAMOS, Respondents.
Separate Opinions
177 FILIPINAS MILLS, INC., BUENAVENTURA TAN and
VIRGINIA DUMLAO-TAN, Petitioners, vs. HON.
ABELARDO M. DAYRlT, in his capacity as Presiding
SARMIENTO, J., concurring:
Judge of the Court of First Instance of Manila, Branch
II, ASSOCIATED CITIZENS BANK and OSCAR V.
I agree that the petition be granted.
ATAYDE, in his capacity as the Deputy Sheriff of the
CFI-Manila, Branch II, Respondents.
It is my opinion however that the main issue on the validity of the assailed provisions
of R.A. 6657 (the Comprehensive Agrarian Reform Law of 1988) and its Implementing
[G.R. No. 69863-65 : December 10, 1990.] 192 Rules and Guidelines insofar as they include the raising of livestock, poultry, and swine
SCRA 183 LINO BROCKA, BENJAMIN CERVANTES,
COSME GARCIA, RODOLFO SANTOS, VALENTINO
in their coverage cannot be simplistically reduced to a question of constitutional
SALIPSIP, RICARDO VEGA, ERIC MARIANO, JOSE construction.
EMMANUEL OYALES, RONNIE MATTA, ALFREDO VIAJE,
RUBEN EUGENIO, REYNALDO ORTIZ, ORLANDO It is a well-settled rule that construction and interpretation come only after it has been
ORTIZ, NOEL REYES, EDUARDO IMPERIAL, NESTOR demonstrated that application is impossible or inadequate without them. A close
SARMIENTO, FRANCO PALISOC, VIRGILIO DE
GUZMAN, ALBERTO REYES, JESSIE PINILI, ROMULO reading however of the constitutional text in point, specifically, Sec. 4, Art. XIII,
AUGUIS, DOMINADOR RESURRECION III, RONNIE particularly the phrase, ". . . in case of other farmworkers, to receive a just share of
LAYGO, ROSAURO ROQUE, CLARENCE SORIANO, the fruits thereof," provides a basis for the clear and possible coverage of livestock,
OCTAVO DEPAWA, CARLITO LA TORRE, SEVERNO
ILANO, JR., DOMINGO CAJIPE, ALAN ALEGRE, RAMON poultry, and swine raising within the ambit of the comprehensive agrarian reform
MARTINEZ, MA. GILDA HERNANDEZ, EDNA P. program. This accords with the principle that every presumption should be indulged in
VILLANUEVA, DOLLY S. CANU, MELQUIADES C. favor of the constitutionality of a statute and the court in considering the validity of a
ATIENZA, ELIGIO P. VERA CRUZ, ROGER C. BAGAN,
ABUNDIO M. CALISTE, Petitioners, vs. JUAN PONCE statute should give it such reasonable construction as can be reached to bring it within
ENRILE, MAJ. GENERAL FIDEL V. RAMOS, BRIG. the fundamental law. 1
GENERAL PEDRO BALBANERO, COL. ABAD, COL.
DAWIS, SERGIO APOSTOL, P/LT, RODOLFO M. The presumption against unconstitutionality, I must say, assumes greater weight when
GARCIA and JUDGE RICARDO TENSUAN, Respondents. a ruling to the contrary would, in effect, defeat the laudable and noble purpose of the
[G.R. No. 74762 : December 10, 1990.] 192 SCRA law, i.e., the welfare of the landless farmers and farmworkers in the promotion of
191 COMMERCIAL MOTORS CORPORATION, social justice, by the expedient conversion of agricultural lands into livestock, poultry,
Petitioner, vs. COMMISSIONERS, SECOND DIVISION, and swine raising by scheming landowners, thus, rendering the comprehensive nature
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS COMMISSION, and
PEDRO UMLAS, Respondents. of the agrarian program merely illusory.
The instant controversy, I submit, boils down to the question of whether or not the
199 ANGELINA P. SANTIAGO, Petitioner, vs. The
assailed provisions violate the equal protection clause of the Constitution (Article II,
Honorable DEPUTY EXECUTIVE SECRETARY and HI- section 1) which teaches simply that all persons or things similarly situated should be
CEMENT CORPORATION, Respondents. treated alike, both as to rights conferred and responsibilities imposed. 2
[G.R. No. 79962 : December 10, 1990.] 192 SCRA There is merit in the contention of the petitioner that substantial distinctions exist
209 LUCIO R. CRUZ, Petitioner, vs. COURT OF
APPEALS AND CONRADO Q. SALONGA, Respondents. between land directed purely to cultivation and harvesting of fruits or crops and land
exclusively used for livestock, poultry and swine raising, that make real differences, to
[G.R. No. 80397 : December 10, 1990.] 192 SCRA wit:
224 S & A GAISANO INCORPORATED, CANUTO CUPIN,
represented by his son Salvador P. Cupin as Attorney- x x x
in-Fact; VICENTE CUPIN; EVARISTO CUPIN,
represented by his wife Marites R. Cupin as Attorney- No land is tilled and no crop is harvested in livestock and poultry farming. There are no
in-Fact; RAMON CUPIN; FE CUPIN and
BUENAVENTURA CUPIN, both represented by their tenants nor landlords, only employers and employees.
brother Ramon Cupin as Attorney-in-Fact, Petitioners,
vs. HON. VICENTE A. HIDALGO, Executive and Livestock and poultry do not sprout from land nor are they "fruits of the land."
Presiding Judge of Regional Trial Court of Butuan City
and Agusan del Norte; Branch V, Region X; VICTOR Land is not even a primary resource in this industry. The land input is inconsequential
CHAN; ATTY. ARTURO RICAFORTE, in his capacity as that all the commercial hog and poultry farms combined occupy less than one percent
Register of Deeds of Butuan City; CITY ENGINEER (1%) (0.4% for piggery, 0.2% for poultry) of the 5.45 million hectares of land
VICTORIOSO GO, in his capacity as National Building
Official of Butuan City, Respondents. supposedly covered by the CARP. And most farms utilize only 2 to 5 hectares of land. : nad
[G.R. No. 82215 : December 10, 1990.] 192 SCRA In every respect livestock and poultry production is an industrial activity. Its use of an
232 ANTIPAZ PRESCO y PARAS, ANTONIO AMORES y inconsequential portion of land is a mere incident of its operation, as in any other
PARAS, and ANSELMA PARAS, Petitioners, vs. HON. undertaking, business or otherwise.
COURT OF APPEALS, HON. MARIANO UMALI, Judge of
the Regional Trial Court of Cavite, Branch 25, Trece The fallacy of defining livestock and poultry production as an agricultural enterprise is
Martires City, HON. EDWINA P. MENDOZA, Judge of
the Municipal Trial Court of General Trias, Cavite, nowhere more evident when one considers that at least 95% of total investment in
MODESTO PARAS, and SIMPLICIO SANCHEZ, these farms is in the form of fixed assets which are industrial in nature.
Respondents.
These include (1) animal housing structures and facilities complete with drainage,
[G.R. No. 82374 : December 10, 1990.] 192 SCRA waterers, blowers, misters and in some cases even piped-in music; (2) feedmills
vs. ERNESTO AVILA y MENDOZA AND JOHN DOE, complete with grinders, mixers, conveyors, exhausts, generators, etc.; (3) extensive
Accused-Appellant. warehousing facilities for feeds and other supplies; (4) anti-pollution equipment such
as bio-gas and digester plants augmented by lagoons and concrete ponds; (5)
246 ALLIED BANKING CORPORATION, Petitioner, vs. deepwells, elevated water tanks, pumphouses and accessory facilities; (6) modern
HON. SECRETARY SEDFREY ORDOÑEZ (Public equipment such as sprayers, pregnancy testers, etc.; (7) laboratory facilities complete
Respondent) and ALFREDO CHING (Private with expensive tools and equipment; and a myriad other such technologically
Respondent), Respondents.
advanced appurtances.
[G.R. Nos. 84132-33 : December 10, 1990.] 192
SCRA 257 NATIONAL DEVELOPMENT COMPANY AND How then can livestock and poultry farmlands be arable when such are almost totally
NEW AGRIX, INC., Petitioners, vs. PHILIPPINE occupied by these structures?
VETERANS BANK, THE EX-OFFICIO SHERIFF and
GODOFREDO QUILING, in his capacity as Deputy The fallacy of equating the status of livestock and poultry farmworkers with that of
Sheriff of Calamba, Laguna, Respondents. agricultural tenants surfaces when one considers contribution to output. Labor cost of
[G.R. No. 85531 : December 10, 1990.] 192 SCRA livestock and poultry farms is no more than 4% of total operating cost. The 98%
266 PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, Plaintiff-Appellee, balance represents inputs not obtained from the land nor provided by the farmworkers
vs. AMANDO TASARRA and ABELARDO TASARRA, — inputs such as feeds and biochemicals (80% of the total cost), power cost, cost of
Accused-Appellants.
money and several others.
274 PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, Plaintiff-Appellee, Moreover, livestock and poultry farmworkers are covered by minimum wage law rather
vs. LYDIA RAMA, Defendant-Appellant. than by tenancy law. They are entitled to social security benefits where tenant-farmers
are not. They are paid fixed wages rather than crop shares. And as in any other
277 JOSE A. SADDUL, JR., Petitioner, vs. THE HON. industry, they receive additional benefits such as allowances, bonuses, and other
COURT OF APPEALS and THE PEOPLE OF THE incentives such as free housing privileges, light and water.
PHILIPPINES, Respondents.
Equating livestock and poultry farming with other agricultural activities is also
[A.M. No. P-86-32 : December 10, 1990.] 192 SCRA fallacious in the sense that like the manufacturing sector, it is a market for, rather than
288 ALFREDO LLANES, complainant, vs. GAUDIOSO
BORJA, DEPUTY SHERIFF, RTC, BRANCH 19, NAGA a source of agricultural output. At least 60% of the entire domestic supply of corn is
CITY, Respondent. absorbed by livestock and poultry farms. So are the by-products of rice (rice-bran),
coconut (copra meal), banana (banana pulp meal), and fish (fish meal). 3
296 DIRECTOR OF LANDS, DIRECTOR OF FORESTRY x x x
and REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES, Petitioners, vs.
HON. JUAN P. AQUINO, as Judge of the Court of First In view of the foregoing, it is clear that both kinds of lands are not similarly situated
Instance of Abra, Second Judicial District and ABRA
INDUSTRIAL CORPORATION, Respondents. and hence, cannot be treated alike. Therefore, the assailed provisions which allow for
the inclusion of livestock and poultry industry within the coverage of the agrarian
[G.R. No. 68514 : December 17, 1990.] 192 SCRA reform program constitute invalid classification and must accordingly be struck down
305 TRADERS ROYAL BANK, Petitioner, vs. HON.
INTERMEDIATE APPELLATE COURT and HON. as repugnant to the equal protection clause of the Constitution. chanrobles virtual law library
GREGORIO S. CENDAÑA, in his capacity as DIRECTOR

OF THE NATIONAL MEDIA PRODUCTION CENTER
(NMPC), Respondents
Endnotes
315 CAGAYAN DE ORO COLISEUM, INC., Petitioner, vs. SARMIENTO, J., concurring:
OFFICE OF THE MINISTER OF LABOR AND
1. In re Guarina, 24 Phil. 37; Yu Cong Eng v. Trinidad, 70 L. ed., p. 1059.
EMPLOYMENT, represented by Deputy Minister
VICENTE LEOGARDO, JR. and ANGEL CHAVES, 2. Ichong v. Hernandez, 101 Phil. 1155.
Respondents.
3. Rollo, 29-30.
320 DIRECTOR OF LANDS, Petitioner, vs. SPOUSES
FRANCISCO K. REDOR and ANGELITA CASTRO, and
HON. SALVADOR P. DE GUZMAN, JR., Presiding Judge
of the Regional Trial Court, Branch XXVII, Sta. Cruz,
Laguna, Respondents.
Back to Home | Back to Main
326 DR. OFELIA P. TRISTE, Petitioner, vs. LEYTE
STATE COLLEGE BOARD OF TRUSTEES, namely: Hon.
Lourdes R. Quisumbing, Secretary of the Department QUICK SEARCH
of Education, Culture and Sports and Chairman of the
Board and/or Dr. Minda C. Sutaria as the authorized
representative; Dr. Purificacion M. Flores, President of
the Leyte State College and Vice-Chairman of the 1901 1902 1903 1904 1905 1906 1907 1908
Board; Director Venancio Baclagon, National
Economic and Development Authority, Regional Office 1909 1910 1911 1912 1913 1914 1915 1916
No. VIII and Member of the Board; HON. SEDFREY A. 1917 1918 1919 1920 1921 1922 1923 1924
ORDOÑEZ, Secretary of Justice and Chairman of the
Review Committee under Executive Order No. 17; and 1925 1926 1927 1928 1929 1930 1931 1932
DR. CRES V. CHAN-GONZAGA, Respondents. 1933 1934 1935 1936 1937 1938 1939 1940
[G.R. No. 83530 : December 18, 1990.] 192 SCRA 1941 1942 1943 1944 1945 1946 1947 1948
342 CRISTITO AUSTRIA y RODIS, Petitioner- 1949 1950 1951 1952 1953 1954 1955 1956
Appellant, vs. PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES and THE
HONORABLE COURT OF APPEALS, Respondents- 1957 1958 1959 1960 1961 1962 1963 1964
Appellees. 1965 1966 1967 1968 1969 1970 1971 1972

1973 1974 1975 1976 1977 1978 1979 1980
358 SIXTO S. BRILLANTES, JR., Petitioner, vs. 1981 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988
HAYDEE B. YORAC, in her capacity as ACTING
CHAIRPERSON of the COMMISSION ON ELECTIONS,
1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996
Respondent. 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004
[G.R. Nos. 95203-05 : December 18, 1990.] 192

2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
SCRA 363 SENATOR ERNESTO MACEDA, Petitioner, vs. 2013 2014 2015 2016
ENERGY REGULATORY BOARD (ERB); MARCELO N.
FERNANDO, ALEJANDRO B. AFURONG; REX V.
TANTIONGCO; and OSCAR E. ALA, in their collective
official capacities as Chairman and Members of the
Board (ERB), respectively; CATALINO MACARAIG, in
his quadruple official capacities as Executive
Secretary, Chairman of Philippine National Oil Main Indices of the Library ---> Go!
Company; Office of the Energy Affairs, and with
MANUEL ESTRELLA, in their respective official
capacities as Chairman and President of the Petron
Corporation; PILIPINAS SHELL PETROLEUM
CORPORATION; with CESAR BUENAVENTURA and REY
GAMBOA as chairman and President, respectively;
CALTEX PHILIPPINES with FRANCIS ABLAN, President
and Chief Executive Officer; and the Presidents of
Philippine Petroleum Dealer's Association, Caltex
Dealer's Co., Petron Dealer's Asso., Shell Dealer's
Asso. of the Phil., Liquefied Petroleum Gas Institute
of the Phils., any and all concerned gasoline and
petrol dealers or stations; and such other persons,
officials, and parties, acting for and on their behalf; or
in representation of and/or under their authority,
Respondents. [G.R. Nos. 95119-21 : December 18,
1990.] 192 SCRA 363 OLIVER O. LOZANO, Petitioner,
vs. ENERGY REGULATORY BOARD (ERB), PILIPINAS
SHELL PETROLEUM CORPORATION, CALTEX (PHIL.),
INC., and PETRON CORPORATION, Respondents.

vs. JUVENAL KYAMKO, Accused-Appellant.
[A.C. No. 2756 : December 18, 1990.] 192 SCRA

381 PRUDENTIAL BANK, Petitioner, vs. BENJAMIN M.
GRECIA, Respondent.

388 JULITA FRANCISCO and her husband,
HERMENEGILDO TANKENKO, and RESTITUTO
FRANCISCO and his wife, FELISA ABEJO, Petitioners,
vs. CRISPIN V. BAUTISTA, Judge of the Court of First
Instance of Bulacan; FRANCISCA FRANCISCO,
MAXIMA FRANCISCO and FRANCISCO FRANCISCO,
Respondents.
[G.R. Nos. 88710-13 : December 19, 1990.] 192

SCRA 396 UNION OF FILIPRO EMPLOYEES (UFE),
MANUEL L. SARMIENTO, BENJAMIN M. ALTAREJOS,
RODOLFO D. PAGLINAWAN, CARMELITA G. NUQUI,
CORAZON Y SAZON, RODRIGO P. LUCAS, RUDOLPH C.
ARMAS, EDUARDO A. ABELLA, ANGEL A. CANETE,
JUANITO T. CAPILI, ADOLFO S. CASTILLO, JR.,
PONCIANO A. CARINGAL, ERIBERTO S. LEONARDO,
ADELAIDA B. MIRA, EUGENIA C. NUÑEZ, PAZ B. SAN
JOSE, VENUSITO S. SOLIS, EMMANUEL S. VILLENA,
ALFONSO R. RICAFRENTE, MELANIO C. LANTIN,
AMADOR M. MONTOJO, RODOLFO M. MUNSOD,
RENATO P. DIAZ, RODRIGO M. URGELLES, CARLOS B.
SAN JOSE, EUSTAQUIO E. BUNYI, NELSON P.
CENTENO, SOTERO A. GACUTAN, GUILLERMO G. DE
BORJA, DIONISIO H. NIPALES, EUGENIO S. SAN
PEDRO, MANUEL DELA FUENTE, CARLO MEDINA,
CESAR B. PONCE, JORGE B. CASTRO, JR., RICARDO
AREVALO, REY M. BEO, FELIX ESGUERRA, REYNALDO
ALMENANZA, MELITON C. ROXAS (as represented by
his surviving spouse, MA. CORAZON ROXAS), ROMEO
A. ARANDELA, ISIDRO A. NATIVIDAD, EMILIANO M.
SAYAO, CELSO J. CENIDO, PAUL C. MEJARES,
SILVERIO C. PAMPANG, DIONISIO S. CANLOBO,
GILBERT C. NOBLE, RODOLFO D. CALONG-CALONG,
SR., PEPITO Q. QUITLONG, DIONISIO C. COMPLETO,
ANTONIO T. AVELINO, ANGELITO PAYABYAB, ISAIAS
A. RIEZA, DEODITO M. BELARMINO, QUEZON G.
MATEO, CARLITO PRE, CIPRIANO P. LUPEBA, EFREN
P. DINSAY, WILDON C. BARROS, SUSAN A. BERRO,
MANUEL A. LAVIN, ROY U. BACONGUIS, JEROME T.
FIEL, ANASTACIO G. CABALLERO, JR., ROGELIO E.
RAIZ, JOSE T. ISIDTO, ANGELITO M. ANICIETE, RAUL
ROBERTO C. NANQUIL, LIZA T. VILLANUEVA, CESAR S.
CRUZ, REYNALDO L. CALIGUIA, ERNESTO M.
SOLOMON, OSCAR G. AGUINALDO, DIEGO P. OLIVA,
JAIME D. NILLAS, ELPIDIO A. HERMOCILLA, DANTE L.
ESCOSURA, FEDERICO P. CONTEMPRATO, LAURO C.
MAKILING, RENATO O. MINDANAO, RAFAEL C. TURA
AND QUINTIN J. PEDRIDO, JR., Petitioners, vs.
NESTLÉ PHILIPPINES, INC., NATIONAL LABOR
RELATIONS COMMISSION, HON. EDUARDO G. MAGNO,
HON. ZOSIMO T. VASALLO and HON. EVANGELINE S.
LUBATON, Respondents.

414 UNION OF FILIPRO EMPLOYEES, Petitioner, vs.
THE HONORABLE NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS
COMMISSION and NESTLE PHILIPPINES, INC.,
Respondents.

430 EDUARDO ACOP, ROGER ALMENDAREZ,
BIENVENIDO AMBRAY, BENITO ARELLANO, WILLIAM
ARMENDARES, HERMINIO ARREZA, TEODORO
ARREZA, PEREGRINO BANGUIS, MOISES BARENG,
HIPOLITO BONGGOT, RAMON BUCALON, MELITO
BUENAVIDES, FELIX CAGONG, LORENZO CALIWATAN,
ANGEL CALUMBA, HENRY CARIAGA, GEORGE CASANO,
REYNALDO CAPUTOLAN, FELOMENO CHATO, JULIETO
CONGSIGNA, REYMUNDO CUADRA, EUFRONIO
CUBERO, BIENVENIDO CURAYAG, RUDICASTRO
CURAYAG, JOVENCIO DARAY, DAVID DE LEON,
NELSON ECHIN, ROLANDO ESCATRON, BERTINO
ESPINOLA, CRESENCIO FRANCIS, MATEO FRIAS,
RODOLFO FUENTES, BENEDICTO GALLOGO, HERMANO
GALOPE, JORGE GALVE, ERNESTO GONABO, VIRGILIO
GRUMO, JEMELITO GUBAL, RICARDO GUILLEN,
GENEROSO HERNANDEZ, JR., NELSON JABAY, EMILIO
JACINTO, EMELIANO JALA, JR., IGNACIO JURALBAR,
ALFREDO LOMOLJO, CELESTINO LOMOLJO, EDUARDO
LOPEZ, LUCIO LOPIO, SAMUEL LOREDO, NORBERTO
LORIA, MARCOS LOSIS, MARIO LUENGAS, NICOLAS
MAGHINAY, ROGELIO MATILDO, FLORANTE MIRANDA,
ANACLETO MONTON, NARCISO MONTON, ERNESTO
OROZCO, CHARLITO ORQUITA, MERLCHOR PANTO,
CASIMIRO PEREGRINO, EDUARDO PLAZA, NELSON
PLAZA, PAQUITO PLAZA, PEDRO PLAZA, FREDIOMIO
QUIÑONES, PEPE RAMIREZ, JOEL REMEDIO, EDUARDO
REVELLEZA, GERALDO ROSIL, JR., TEMESTOCLES
RUBENAL, REMEGIO SABUSIDO, ROGER SOTES,
BELTRANO SULLANO, JAIME SULLANO, ERNIE
TACUGDOY, WENIFREDO TOCMO, SR., PAQUITO
TRUGILLO, ANIOLITO URBIZTONDO, ROMARICO
URIARTE DARIO ORQUIZA, BERTINO VALLEJO,
FRANCISCO VEGA, CRESENCIO YPARRAGUIRRE, RUDY
YPARUAGUIRRI and EDUARDO SACRAGON, SR.,
Petitioners, vs. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS
COMMISSION, (Fifth Division), SURIGAO
DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION (SUDECOR) and RET.
GEN. REYNALDO G. DILAN, Vice President for Field
Operations & Administration, Respondents.
[A.M. No. RTJ-89-380 : December 19, 1990.] 192

SCRA 434 EFREN JAVIER and PEDRO JAVIER,
Complainants, vs. JUDGE SALVADOR P. DE GUZMAN,
JR., Respondent.

445 DOMINGO REYES, Petitioner, vs. THE HONORABLE
JUDGE SERAFIN

454 LILIA AGUIRRE, GENATO AGUIRRE and BENITO
AGRAVA, Petitioners, vs. THE HONORABLE COURT OF
FIRST INSTANCE OF LEYTE, BRANCH III, EDUARDO
TAMPIL and LETICIA A. TAMPIL, Respondents.

459 WORLD MACHINE ENTERPRISES, Petitioner, vs.
INTERMEDIATE APPELLATE COURT AND J.R.
LITHOPLATES, Respondents.

469 ROMEO J. ORDOÑEZ, Petitioner, vs. THE HON.
ALFREDO J. GUSTILO, in his capacity as presiding
judge of Regional Trial Court of Cavite, Branch XVI,
Cavite City, Municipality of Rosario, Cavite, former
Mayor Calixto D. Enriquez of Rosario, Cavite, and
Valeriano Espiritu of Mabolo, Bacoor, Cavite,
Respondents.

vs. FRANCISCO DE GUZMAN y DE DIOS, Accused-
Appellant.
[G.R. Nos. 86492-94 : December 20, 1990.] 192

SCRA 483 THE PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, Plaintiff-
Appellee, vs. LEOPOLDO MONTANTE, Defendant-
Appellant.

492 PENTAGON SECURITY and INVESTIGATION
AGENCY, Petitioner, vs. VICENTE T. JIMENEZ, ET AL.,
and NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS COMMISSION,
SECOND DIVISION, Respondents.

496 HON. RAUL S. MANGLAPUS, in his capacity as
Secretary of Foreign Affairs, Petitioner, vs. HON.
ANDRES E. MATIAS, Judge of the Regional Trial Court
of Manila (Branch 45) and GAVINO P. ABAYA,
Respondents.
[G.R. Nos. 92029-30 : December 20, 1990.] 192

SCRA 507 NICANOR G. DE GUZMAN, JR., Petitioner,
vs. HON. COURT OF APPEALS, Former Fifth Division,
HON. REGIONAL TRIAL COURT, National Capital
Judicial Region, Br. 48, Manila, and ENRIQUE KP. TAN,
Respondents.

514 FNCB FINANCE, Petitioner, vs. NAPOLEON
ESTAVILLO, Respondent.

521 PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, Petitioner, vs.
HON. FELICIDAD CARANDANG VILLALON and
FEDERICO DE GUZMAN, Respondents.
[G.R. Nos. 48535-36 : December 21, 1990.] 192

SCRA 533 KOH TIECK HENG, Petitioner, vs. PEOPLE OF
THE PHILIPPINES and COURT OF APPEALS,
Respondents.

548 PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, Appellant, vs.
SALVADOR MONTEIRO, Appellee.

554 DIONG BI CHU, alias PATRICK CHANG, CHANG KA
HEE and LU LIONG CORPORATION, Petitioners, vs.
THE HON. COURT OF APPEALS, HON. GREGORIO G.
PINEDA, as Presiding Judge, Court of First Instance of
Rizal, Branch XXI; JAIME NAVOA and MILAGROS DE
LEOS, Respondents.
[G.R. No. 63753-54 : December 21, 1990.] 192

SCRA 561 PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, Plaintiff-
Appellee, vs. GREGORIO BERINGUEL, ARTURO
DEVARAS, ARTEMIO TULANG (at large), and RUFINO
CAMINONG (at large), accused. GREGORIO
BERINGUEL and ARTURO DEVARAS, Accused-
Appellants.

575 TIMOTEO POJAS, Petitioner, vs. THE HONORABLE
MERCEDES GOZO-DALOLE, REGIONAL TRIAL COURT
JUDGE, CITY OF TAGBILARAN, IRENEA POJAS,
CESARIA LAGROSA and CORNELIA BETINOL,
Respondents.
[G.R. Nos. 78551-52 : December 21, 1990.] 192

Appellee, vs. ROLANDO MARCEDONIO y VILLANUEVA
and ANTONIO MARCEDONIO y VILLANUEVA, Accused-
Appellants.

vs. SALVADOR V. LUTAÑEZ alias "Jun Plementero",
Defendant-Appellant.

598 NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF FREE TRADE
UNIONS (NAFTU), Petitioner, vs. MAINIT LUMBER
DEVELOPMENT COMPANY WORKERS UNION-UNITED
LUMBER AND GENERAL WORKERS OF THE
PHILIPPINES. (MALDECOWU-ULGWP), Respondents.

604 HYDRO RESOURCES CONTRACTORS
CORPORATION, Petitioner, vs. THE COURT OF TAX
APPEALS and THE HON. DEPUTY MINISTER OF
FINANCE, ALFREDO PIO DE RODA, Respondents.
[G.R. No. 83257-58 : December 21, 1990.] 192

SCRA 612 OSIAS ACADEMY and MONICA R. DE
CASTRO, Petitioners, vs. THE DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
AND EMPLOYMENT, CONCHITA MERCADO, NECITAS
GACIS, EVELYN B. GARAIS, ESTRELLA GATON, EVA L.
CAYETANO, TERESA G. BILAZON, SUSAN G. FUELLAS,
ELVIRA D. GACIS, LOURDES CORREA, JULIETA A.
MANALO, NILA G. GABELO and TEODORO GUANIZO,
Respondents.

621 THE PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, Plaintiff-
Appellee, vs. DANTE BARTULAY Accused-Appellant.

vs. ED FERNANDEZ AVILA, Defendant-Appellant.

Appellee, vs. ISAGANI DESLATE and ROMY
FRANCISCO alias "Romeo Francisco", Accused,
ISAGANI DESLATE, Appellant.

Appellee, vs. ISABELO SANCHEZ y PANDILI, Accused-
Appellant.
[G.R. Nos. 89682-83 : December 21, 1990.] 192

Appellee, vs. BENJAMIN HERICO, Defendant-
Appellant.

Appellee, vs. GERONIMO GOLES, Defendant-Appellant.

674 ATTY. TEODORO V. CABILAN & ALEJANDRO A.
PARALISAN, Petitioners, vs. HON. JUDGE JOSE R.
RAMOLETE & PROVINCIAL/CITY JAIL WARDEN of
Cebu City, Respondents.

680 RICARDO VILLAFLOR, Petitioner, vs. COURT OF
APPEALS and PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES,**
Respondents.

691 VICENTE GERARDO, VALENTINA GERARDO,
CORNELIO GERARDO, BENJAMIN GERARDO, ANGEL
GERARDO, & CONSTANTE GERARDO, Petitioners, vs.
HON. FLORENTINO DE LA PEÑA, Presiding Judge,
Branch VI, Court of First Instance of Ilocos Norte,
TERESA ANTONIO BELZA, VISITACION ANTONIO
ADINA, ILUMINADA PASCUA ANTONIO, FELICIDAD
BATACAN MATA, POLICARPO BATACAN, BASILIO
BATACAN, ISABEL BANGLOY, IRINEO BANGLOY,
EDUARDO BANGLOY, DIONICIO BANGLOY, DOMINGA
BANGLOY, and ERMINIO BANGLOY, Respondents.

vs. MARIO ABLAO, ISAGANI SACOP, LEOPOLDO DE
GUZMAN, PEDRO LADIANA, ZENON SAMONTE,
ALFREDO DEL MUNDO, BRUNO ABLAO, ISIDORO
GALEMA, DANILO MERCADO, RUSTICO LIWANAG,
FRANCISCO BALDEMECA, HECTOR SAMONTE and
DAVID ABLAO, accused, MARIO ABLAO, ISAGANI
SACOP, LEOPOLDO DE GUZMAN, PEDRO LADIANA,
ZENON SAMONTE, and ALFREDO DEL MUNDO,
Accused-Appellants.

709 SPOUSES EUFRACIO ROJAS AND CONCEPCION
ROJAS, Petitioners, vs. HON. COURT OF APPEALS,
AND SPOUSES FELIX E. MEDALLA AND DIONISIA
PACATAN MEDALLA, Respondents.

725 INVESTMENT AND UNDERWRITING
CORPORATION OF THE PHILIPPINES, Petitioners, vs.
COMPTRONICS PHILIPPINES, INC. and GENE V.
TAMESIS, Respondents.

735 FRANCISCO JOSE, ANTONIO, ERLINDA, JOVITA,
ARACELI, DOLORES, VIRGINIA, MARTA, LEDINIA, and
ANITA, all surnamed RAMON JAO, Petitioners, vs.
COURT OF APPEALS and LAUREANA C. VDA. DE
BAIRAN, as administratrix of the Estate of Pablo
Bairan, Respondents.

743 REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES, Petitioner, vs.
THE HONORABLE SANDIGANBAYAN (FIRST
DIVISION), Respondents.

768 JOSE ORDA and IMELDA LOZADA, Petitioners, vs.
THE HONORABLE COURT OF APPEALS and GIL
GALANG Respondents.
G.R. No. 32945 December 3, 1990 - MARIANO T.

NASSER v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.
G.R. No. 39430 December 3, 1990 - FRANCISCO

MANLAPAZ, ET AL. v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.
G.R. No. 55466 December 3, 1990 - MANILA

SURETY & FIDELITY CO., INC. v. COURT OF APPEALS,
ET AL.
G.R. No. 78778 December 3, 1990 - LEONIDA

CORONADO, ET AL. v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.
G.R. No. 79560 December 3, 1990 - ANDRES E.

DITAN v. PHILIPPINE OVERSEAS EMPLOYMENT
ADMINISTRATION ADMINISTRATOR, ET AL.
G.R. No. 80904 December 3, 1990 - BALTAZAR

PANTIG, ET AL. v. VENANCIO BALTAZAR
G.R. No. 82115 December 3, 1990 - PEOPLE OF THE

PHIL. v. ROMEO B. ORTIZ
G.R. No. 84884 December 3, 1990 - EULALIO M.

RUIZ, ET AL. v. DOROTEO N. CANEBA, ET AL.
G.R. No. 87264 December 3, 1990 - MARIANO

DINGLASAN, ET AL. v. MARIA ALICIA M. AUSTRIA, ET
AL.
G.R. No. 89545 December 3, 1990 - ROLANDO

DOLORFINO, ET AL. v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.
UDK No. 9864 December 3, 1990 - RUFINA VDA. DE

TANGUB v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.
G.R. No. 58668 December 4, 1990 - SANTIAGO

ESCARTE, JR., ET AL. v. OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT OF
THE PHIL., ET AL.
G.R. No. 71929 December 4, 1990 - ALITALIA v.

INTERMEDIATE APPELLATE COURT, ET AL.
G.R. No. 74577 December 4, 1990 - CONSOLACION

VILLANUEVA v. INTERMEDIATE APPELLATE COURT, ET
AL.

PHIL. v. MARIO L. TANDOY
G.R. No. 80791 December 4, 1990 - PEOPLE’S

FINANCING CORP., ET AL. v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET
AL.
G.R. No. 86586 December 4, 1990 - NATIONAL

IRRIGATION ADMINISTRATION v. TEODORO P.
REGINO, ET AL.
G.R. No. 86889 December 4, 1990 - LUZ FARMS v.
SEC. OF THE DEPT. OF AGRARIAN REFORM
G.R. No. 88177 December 4, 1990 - DOLORES A.

PAREDES v. CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION, ET AL.
G.R. No. 93054 December 4, 1990 - ALEXANDER P.

ORDILLO, ET AL. v. COMMISSION ON ELECTIONS, ET
AL.
G.R. No. 30616 December 10, 1990 - EUFRACIO D.

ROJAS v. CONSTANCIO B. MAGLANA
G.R. No. 36827 December 10, 1990 - DIRECTOR OF

FOREST ADMINISTRATION, ET AL. v. RAMON C.
FERNANDEZ, ET AL.
G.R. No. 44749 December 10, 1990 - PEOPLE OF

THE PHIL. v. MELVIN S. GIRON
G.R. No. 50661 December 10, 1990 - RUBEN

DELFIN, ET AL. v. AMADO G. INCIONG, ET AL.
G.R. No. 55361 December 10, 1990 - TEOFILO

ERCILLO, ET AL. v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.
G.R. No. 55613 December 10, 1990 - ERNESTO

DICHOSO v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.
G.R. No. 56620 December 10, 1990 - FILIPINAS

MILLS, INC., ET AL. v. ABELARDO M. DAYRlT, ET AL.
G.R. No. 69863-65 December 10, 1990 - LINO

BROCKA, ET AL. v. JUAN PONCE ENRILE, ET AL.
G.R. No. 74762 December 10, 1990 - COMMERCIAL

MOTORS CORPORATION v. COMMISSIONERS, NLRC,
SECOND DIVISION
G.R. No. 78163 December 10, 1990 - ANGELINA P.

SANTIAGO v. DEPUTY EXECUTIVE SECRETARY, ET AL.
G.R. No. 79962 December 10, 1990 - LUCIO R.

CRUZ v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.
G.R. No. 80397 December 10, 1990 - S & A

GAISANO INC., ET AL. v. VICENTE A. HIDALGO, ET AL.
G.R. No. 82215 December 10, 1990 - ANTIPAZ P.

PRESCO, ET AL. v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.

THE PHIL. v. ERNESTO M. AVILA, ET AL.
G.R. No. 82495 December 10, 1990 - ALLIED

BANKING CORPORATION v. SEDFREY ORDOÑEZ
G.R. Nos. 84132-33 December 10, 1990 -

NATIONAL DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, ET AL. v.
PHILIPPINE VETERANS BANK, ET AL.

THE PHIL. v. AMANDO TASARRA, ET AL.

THE PHIL. v. LYDIA RAMA
G.R. No. 91041 December 10, 1990 - JOSE A.

SADDUL, JR. v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.
A.M. No. P-86-32 December 10, 1990 - ALFREDO

LLANES v. GAUDIOSO BORJA, ET AL.

LANDS, ET AL. v. JUAN P. AQUINO, ET AL.
G.R. No. 68514 December 17, 1990 - TRADERS

ROYAL BANK v. INTERMEDIATE APPELLATE COURT,
ET AL.
G.R. No. 71589 December 17, 1990 - CAGAYAN DE

ORO COLISEUM, INC. v. MINISTER OF LABOR AND
EMPLOYMENT, ET AL.

LANDS v. FRANCISCO K. REDOR, ET AL.
G.R. No. 78623 December 17, 1990 - OFELIA P.

TRISTE v. LEYTE STATE COLLEGE BOARD OF
TRUSTEES, ET AL.
G.R. No. 83530 December 18, 1990 - CRISTITO R.

AUSTRIA v. PEOPLE OF THE PHIL., ET AL.
G.R. No. 93867 December 18, 1990 - SIXTO S.

BRILLANTES, JR. v. HAYDEE B. YORAC
G.R. Nos. 95203-05 December 18, 1990 - ERNESTO

MACEDA v. ENERGY REGULATORY BOARD, ET AL.

THE PHIL. v. JUVENAL KYAMKO
A.C. No. 2756 December 18, 1990 - PRUDENTIAL

BANK v. BENJAMIN M. GRECIA
G.R. No. 44167 December 19, 1990 - JULITA

FRANCISCO, ET AL. v. CRISPIN V. BAUTISTA, ET AL.
G.R. Nos. 88710-13 December 19, 1990 - UNION OF

FILIPRO EMPLOYEES, ET AL. v. NESTLE PHILIPPINES,
INC., ET AL.
G.R. No. 91025 December 19, 1990 - UNION OF

FILIPRO EMPLOYEES v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS
COMMISSION, ET AL.
G.R. No. 95478 December 19, 1990 - EDUARDO

ACOP, ET AL. v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS
COMMISSION, ET AL.
A.M. No. RTJ-89-380 December 19, 1990 - EFREN

JAVIER, ET AL. v. SALVADOR P. DE GUZMAN, JR.
G.R. No. 46198 December 20, 1990 - DOMINGO

REYES v. SERAFIN E. CAMILON, ET AL.
G.R. No. 53556 December 20, 1990 - LILIA

AGUIRRE, ET AL. v. COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE OF
LEYTE, ET AL.
G.R. No. 72019 December 20, 1990 - WORLD

MACHINE ENTERPRISES v. INTERMEDIATE
APPELLATE COURT, ET AL.
G.R. No. 81835 December 20, 1990 - ROMEO J.

ORDOÑEZ v. ALFREDO J. GUSTILO, ET AL.

THE PHIL. v. FRANCISCO DE GUZMAN
G.R. Nos. 86492-94 December 20, 1990 - PEOPLE

OF THE PHIL. v. LEOPOLDO MONTANTE
G.R. No. 88114 December 20, 1990 - PENTAGON

SECURITY, ET AL. v. VICENTE T. JIMENEZ, ET AL.
G.R. No. 89618 December 20, 1990 - RAUL S.

MANGLAPUS v. ANDRES E. MATIAS, ET AL.
G.R. Nos. 92029-30 December 20, 1990 - NICANOR

G. DE GUZMAN, JR. v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.
G.R. No. 93394 December 20, 1990 - FNCB

FINANCE v. NAPOLEON ESTAVILLO

THE PHIL. v. FELICIDAD CARANDANG VILLALON, ET
AL.
G.R. Nos. 48535-36 December 21, 1990 - KOH

TIECK HENG v. PEOPLE OF THE PHIL., ET AL.

THE PHIL. v. SALVADOR MONTEIRO
G.R. No. 49588 December 21, 1990 - DIONG BI

CHU, ET AL. v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.
G.R. No. 63753-54 December 21, 1990 - PEOPLE OF

THE PHIL. v. GREGORIO BERINGUEL, ET AL.
G.R. No. 76519 December 21, 1990 - TIMOTEO

POJAS v. MERCEDES GOZO-DALOLE, ET AL.

OF THE PHIL. v. ROLANDO MARCEDONIO

THE PHIL. v. SALVADOR V. LUTAÑEZ

ASSO. OF FREE TRADE UNIONS v. MAINIT LUMBER
DEVT. COMPANY WORKERS
G.R. No. 80276 December 21, 1990 - HYDRO

RESOURCES CONTRACTORS CORPORATION v. COURT
OF TAX APPEALS, ET AL.
G.R. No. 83257-58 December 21, 1990 - OSIAS

ACADEMY, ET AL. v. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND
EMPLOYMENT, ET AL.

THE PHIL. v. DANTE BARTULAY

THE PHIL. v. ED FERNANDEZ AVILA

THE PHIL. v. ISAGANI DESLATE, ET AL.

THE PHIL. v. ISABELO P. SANCHEZ

OF THE PHIL. v. BENJAMIN HERICO

THE PHIL. v. GERONIMO GOLES
G.R. No. 43491 December 26, 1990 - TEODORO V.

CABILAN, ET AL. v. JOSE R. RAMOLETE, ET AL.
G.R. No. 46210 December 26, 1990 - RICARDO

VILLAFLOR v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.
G.R. No. 61527 December 26, 1990 - VICENTE

GERARDO, ET AL. v. FLORENTINO DE LA PEÑA, ET AL.

THE PHIL. v. MARIO ABLAO, ET AL.
G.R. No. 77668 December 26, 1990 - EUFRACIO

ROJAS, ET AL. v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.
G.R. No. 81039 December 26, 1990 - INVESTMENT

AND UNDERWRITING CORP. OF THE PHIL. v.
COMPTRONICS PHILIPPINES, INC., ET AL.

JOSE, ET AL. v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.
G.R. No. 88336 December 26, 1990 - REPUBLIC OF

THE PHIL. v. SANDIGANBAYAN
G.R. No. 92625 December 26, 1990 - JOSE ORDA,

ET AL. v. COURT OF APPEALS, ET AL.



ET AL.






AL.



THE PHIL., ET AL.


AL.


AL.

REGINO, ET AL.



AL.


FERNANDEZ, ET AL.






SECOND DIVISION


G.R. No. 80397 December 10, 1990 - S & A




G.R. Nos. 84132-33 December 10, 1990 -







ET AL.

EMPLOYMENT, ET AL.


TRUSTEES, ET AL.







INC., ET AL.

COMMISSION, ET AL.

COMMISSION, ET AL.



LEYTE, ET AL.









AL.










EMPLOYMENT, ET AL.


















ET AL.





AL.



THE PHIL., ET AL.


AL.


AL.

REGINO, ET AL.



AL.


FERNANDEZ, ET AL.







SECOND DIVISION


G.R. No. 80397 December 10, 1990 - S & A




G.R. Nos. 84132-33 December 10, 1990 -






ET AL.

EMPLOYMENT, ET AL.


TRUSTEES, ET AL.







INC., ET AL.

COMMISSION, ET AL.

COMMISSION, ET AL.



LEYTE, ET AL.









AL.









EMPLOYMENT, ET AL.















Copyright © 1998 - 2018 ChanRobles Publishing Company | Disclaimer | E-mail Restrictions ChanRobles™ Virtual Law Library™ | chanrobles.com™ RED

Luz Farms, Petitioner, vs. The Honorable Secretary of The Department of Agrarian Reform, Respondent

Enviado por

Dados do documento

Título original

Direitos autorais

Formatos disponíveis

Compartilhar este documento

Compartilhar ou incorporar documento

Opções de compartilhamento

Você considera este documento útil?

Este conteúdo é inapropriado?

Direitos autorais:

Formatos disponíveis

Luz Farms, Petitioner, vs. The Honorable Secretary of The Department of Agrarian Reform, Respondent

Enviado por

Direitos autorais:

Formatos disponíveis

2/5/2018 [G.R. No. 86889 : December 4, 1990.] 192 SCRA 51 LUZ FARMS, Petitioner, vs.

s. THE HONORABLE SECRETARY OF THE DEPARTMENT OF …

ChanRobles™ Virtual Law Library™ | chanrobles.com™

Like 2 Tweet Share

THE PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, Plaintiff-Appellee,

PASCUAL BATOCTOY, ESMENIO PATRICIO, ARMANDO

[G.R. No. 55613 : December 10, 1990.] 192 SCRA

GREGORIO S. CENDAÑA, in his capacity as DIRECTOR

[G.R. No. 93867 : December 18, 1990.] 192 SCRA

[G.R. Nos. 95203-05 : December 18, 1990.] 192

[G.R. No. 95263 : December 18, 1990.] 192 SCRA

[A.C. No. 2756 : December 18, 1990.] 192 SCRA

[G.R. No. 44167 : December 19, 1990.] 192 SCRA

[G.R. Nos. 88710-13 : December 19, 1990.] 192

[G.R. No. 91025 : December 19, 1990.] 192 SCRA

[G.R. No. 95478 : December 19, 1990.] 192 SCRA

[A.M. No. RTJ-89-380 : December 19, 1990.] 192

[G.R. No. 46198 : December 20, 1990.] 192 SCRA

[G.R. No. 53556 : December 20, 1990.] 192 SCRA

[G.R. No. 72019 : December 20, 1990.] 192 SCRA

[G.R. No. 81835 : December 20, 1990.] 192 SCRA

[G.R. No. 82002 : December 20, 1990.] 192 SCRA

[G.R. Nos. 86492-94 : December 20, 1990.] 192

[G.R. No. 88114 : December 20, 1990.] 192 SCRA

[G.R. No. 89618 : December 20, 1990.] 192 SCRA

[G.R. Nos. 92029-30 : December 20, 1990.] 192

[G.R. No. 93394 : December 20, 1990.] 192 SCRA

[G.R. No. 43659 : December 21, 1990.] 192 SCRA

[G.R. Nos. 48535-36 : December 21, 1990.] 192

[G.R. No. 49454 : December 21, 1990.] 192 SCRA

[G.R. No. 49588 : December 21, 1990.] 192 SCRA

[G.R. No. 63753-54 : December 21, 1990.] 192

[G.R. No. 76519 : December 21, 1990.] 192 SCRA

[G.R. Nos. 78551-52 : December 21, 1990.] 192

[G.R. No. 78854 : December 21, 1990.] 192 SCRA

[G.R. No. 79526 : December 21, 1990.] 192 SCRA

[G.R. No. 80276 : December 21, 1990.] 192 SCRA

[G.R. No. 83257-58 : December 21, 1990.] 192

[G.R. No. 83696 : December 21, 1990.] 192 SCRA

[G.R. No. 84918 : December 21, 1990.] 192 SCRA

[G.R. No. 87807 : December 21, 1990.] 192 SCRA

[G.R. No. 89407 : December 21, 1990.] 192 SCRA

[G.R. Nos. 89682-83 : December 21, 1990.] 192

[G.R. No. 91513 : December 21, 1990.] 192 SCRA

[G.R. No. 43491 : December 26, 1990.] 192 SCRA

[G.R. No. 46210 : December 26, 1990.] 192 SCRA

[G.R. No. 61527 : December 26, 1990.] 192 SCRA

[G.R. No. 70556 : December 26, 1990.] 192 SCRA

[G.R. No. 77668 : December 26, 1990.] 192 SCRA

[G.R. No. 81039 : December 26, 1990.] 192 SCRA

[G.R. No. 85157 : December 26, 1990.] 192 SCRA

[G.R. No. 88336 : December 26, 1990.] 192 SCRA

[G.R. No. 92625 : December 26, 1990.] 192 SCRA

G.R. No. 32945 December 3, 1990 - MARIANO T.

G.R. No. 39430 December 3, 1990 - FRANCISCO

G.R. No. 55466 December 3, 1990 - MANILA

G.R. No. 78778 December 3, 1990 - LEONIDA

G.R. No. 79560 December 3, 1990 - ANDRES E.

G.R. No. 80904 December 3, 1990 - BALTAZAR

G.R. No. 82115 December 3, 1990 - PEOPLE OF THE

G.R. No. 84884 December 3, 1990 - EULALIO M.

G.R. No. 87264 December 3, 1990 - MARIANO

G.R. No. 89545 December 3, 1990 - ROLANDO