Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
U
NDERSTANDING WHY SOME PA-
Death (SAHD), a self-report measure assessing desire for hastened death among in-
tients with a terminal illness dividuals with life-threatening medical illness.
seek to hasten their death re-
Results Sixteen patients (17%) were classified as having a high desire for hastened
mains an important ele-
death based on the SAHD and 15 (16%) of 89 patients met criteria for a current ma-
ment in both the physician-assisted sui- jor depressive episode. Desire for hastened death was significantly associated with a
cide debate as well as the practice of clinical diagnosis of depression (P=.001) as well as with measures of depressive symp-
palliative care.1-3 Conflicting findings re- tom severity (P,.001) and hopelessness (P,.001). In multivariate analyses, depres-
garding the importance of factors such sion (P=.003) and hopelessness (P,.001) provided independent and unique contri-
as pain, depression, and physical func- butions to the prediction of desire for hastened death, while social support (P= .05)
tioning have fueled debates regarding and physical functioning (P = .02) added significant but smaller contributions.
how best to respond to patient expres- Conclusions Desire for hastened death among terminally ill cancer patients is not un-
sions of a desire to die.4,5 common. Depression and hopelessness are the strongest predictors of desire for has-
Unfortunately, the growing litera- tened death in this population and provide independent and unique contributions. In-
ture on interest in physician-assisted terventions addressing depression, hopelessness, and social support appear to be important
suicide has been plagued by method- aspects of adequate palliative care, particularly as it relates to desire for hastened death.
JAMA. 2000;284:2907-2911 www.jama.com
ological shortcomings that limit the con-
clusiveness of published findings.6 In
response to methodological concerns, associated with desire for hastened Recently, researchers have devel-
researchers have identified the con- death enables researchers to explore oped scales designed to assess the con-
cept of “desire for hastened death” as a issues central to end-of-life care in a struct of desire for hastened death.8-10
unifying construct underlying requests broad spectrum of terminally ill indi- Chochinov et al8 developed the first
for assisted suicide, euthanasia, and sui- viduals rather than the minority who such scale, a clinician-rated single-
cidal thoughts in general.7-9 Studying request assisted suicide. item scale, the Desire for Death Rating
desire for death may be preferable to
Author Affiliations: Department of Psychiatry and Palliative Care Institute, Calvary Hospital, Bronx, NY
studying requests for assisted suicide Behavioral Sciences, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Can- (Dr Brescia).
because the latter are influenced by legal cer Center, New York, NY (Drs Breitbart and Kaim, Corresponding Author: William Breitbart, MD, De-
Mss Pessin and Funesti-Esch, and Mr Nelson); partment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Me-
and social constraints as well as desire Department of Psychology, Fordham University, morial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, 1242 Second Ave,
for hastened death. Studying factors Bronx, NY (Dr Rosenfeld and Ms Galietta); and the New York, NY 10021 (e-mail: breitbaw@mskcc.org).
©2000 American Medical Association. All rights reserved. (Reprinted) JAMA, December 13, 2000—Vol 284, No. 22 2907
6 months and the average time until Catholic, with 18% Protestant, 16% Jew-
Table 1. Subject Characteristics
death was 28 days. Patients were eli- ish, and 13% other (or no) religious af-
Characteristic No. (%)
gible for study participation if they filiation. Seventy-eight percent of the
Sex
Male 37 (40) spoke English, were sufficiently cog- sample (63 of 81, data were missing for
Female 55 (60) nitively intact to provide informed con- 11 subjects) reported pain during the
Age, y
#50 18 (20) sent and valid data, and were not con- preceding 2 weeks; the average pain in-
51-65 21 (24) sidered likely (by their physician) to tensity (based on a 0-10 rating scale) for
66-75 24 (27) suffer psychological harm from partici- these patients was 4.3 (SD=2.1), reflect-
76-85 18 (20)
.85 8 (9) pation. Patients approached for partici- ing mild to moderate pain. At the time
Education pation represented 22% of the total pa- of study participation, 37 (40%) of 92
Less than high school 22 (24)
High school/GED* 31 (34) tients admitted during the study period were prescribed antidepressants, al-
More than high school 39 (42) (most patients admitted were too cog- though these medications were occa-
Marital status
Single 26 (29) nitively impaired or ill to participate in sionally prescribed for pain.
Married/cohabiting 26 (28) research). Prior to participation, all pa-
Separated/divorced 29 (32) Procedures
Widowed 10 (11)
tients were informed of the nature,
Race risks, and benefits of study participa- Participants who consented to partici-
White 64 (70) tion and consented to participate. The pate and scored 20 or higher on the
African American 19 (21)
Hispanic 8 (9) study was approved by the Calvary Hos- Mini-Mental State Examination were ad-
Religion pital institutional review board. ministered several clinician-rated and
Catholic 46 (52)
Protestant 16 (18) Of 154 patients offered participa- self-report measures (because of poten-
Jewish 14 (16) tion, 122 consented (79%; most pa- tial fatigue or vision problems, all ques-
Other 12 (13)
Prior psychiatric treatment tients who refused cited physical dis- tionnaires were read to participants).
Yes 28 (32) comfort and/or fatigue as the reason). An Most evaluations were completed in a
No 60 (68) additional 22 patients were excluded be- single interview, although testing was oc-
Prior suicide attempt
Yes 4 (5) cause their Mini-Mental State Exami- casionally divided into 2 sessions con-
No 82 (95) nation score11 was below 20, resulting ducted over the next few days (incom-
* GED indicates General Educational Development in a sample of 100 patients who met in- plete data were retained whenever
certificate.
clusion and exclusion criteria. Only 92 possible, providing patients had com-
of these 100 patients provided suffi- pleted the SAHD and most of the rel-
Scale. More recently, Rosenfeld et al9,10 cient data to permit data analysis (80 evant measures; because the order of ad-
published a 20-item self-report mea- subjects completed the entire battery). ministration was varied, missing data are
sure of desire for hastened death for use Eight patients were unable to complete not likely to be systematically biased).
with medically ill patients, the Sched- the study because of physical deterio- The measures administered included
ule of Attitudes Toward Hastened Death ration or death; 3 patients withdrew be- the following: the SAHD,9,10 the Struc-
(SAHD). Both of these measures as- cause of psychological distress, and 7 tured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV
sess the extent to which medically ill withdrew for other reasons (eg, in- [Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Men-
individuals desire a more rapid death creased confusion, family member tal Disorders, Fourth Edition] (SCID),12
than would occur naturally. In our request). The data presented herein are the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale
study, we used the SAHD to assess the based on the 92 patients who provided (HDRS),13 the Beck Hopelessness Scale
factors influencing desire for has- sufficient data to permit most statisti- (BHS),14 the Duke-University of North
tened death among hospitalized, ter- cal analyses. Carolina Functional Social Support Ques-
minally ill cancer patients. The pur- The sample included 55 women and tionnaire (FSSQ),15 the Functional
pose of this investigation was to explore 37 men (TABLE 1), with an average age Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-
the relationships between desire for has- of 65.9 years (SD=15.6) and an aver- Spiritual Well-Being Scale,16 the Brief Pain
tened death and depression, hopeless- age of 12.7 years of education (SD=3.7). Inventory,17 the Memorial Symptom
ness, social support, and physical symp- Most patients were white (70%); 21% Assessment Scale,18 the Karnofsky Per-
toms to improve end-of-life care. were African American, and 9% were formance Rating Scale (KPRS),19 and an
Hispanic. The demographic composi- abbreviated version of the McGill Qual-
METHODS tion of the sample was roughly compa- ity of Life Questionnaire.20 Assessments
Patients rable to the overall composition of pa- were conducted jointly by 2 investiga-
Patients were recruited after admis- tients hospitalized during the study tors to establish reliability. Demo-
sion to a 200-bed palliative care hos- period (female, 54%; average age, 70.2 graphic and medical data were elicited
pital in New York City between June years; white, 60%; African American, from subjects and hospital charts. Patients
1, 1998, and January 31, 1999. Pa- 24%; Hispanic, 13%; and other, 2%). diagnosed with major depression (based
tients had a life expectancy of less than Fifty-two percent of the sample was on SCID interviews) were referred to the
2908 JAMA, December 13, 2000—Vol 284, No. 22 (Reprinted) ©2000 American Medical Association. All rights reserved.
Disentangling the constructs of de- concern is whether the SAHD can dif- that individuals with a major depres-
pression and hopelessness is particu- ferentiate individuals who have sion can be effectively treated, even in the
larly difficult in the context of terminal “accepted” death from those who desire context of terminal illness, but no re-
illnesses. Because terminal illness is by a hastened death. While some SAHD search has addressed whether such treat-
definition incurable, many individuals items might be endorsed by those who ment influences desire for hastened
might confuse a “hopeless” prognosis accept their death yet do not want to has- death.26-28 A more challenging question
with a “hopeless” cognitive style. Our ex- ten death, most items assess interest in is how to address hopelessness, in the ab-
perience and these data suggest that pa- hastening death. By analyzing these data sence of depressive illness, among ter-
tients often maintain hope during the fi- using a cutoff score to reflect a high desire minally ill patients. Interventions to ad-
nal weeks of life, although what they for hastened death, the likelihood of con- dress hopelessness have not been
hope for may evolve as death nears. In- fusing “acceptance” of death with desire systematically studied and represent an
deed, less than half of our sample en- for hastened death is thereby mini- important new frontier in palliative care.
dorsed a large number of items on the mized. Another methodological issue Psychotherapeutic interventions such as
BHS, a measure of pessimism. Further, concerns the generalizability of our find- cognitive behavioral therapy targeting
because hopelessness can be a symp- ings, as our sample was recruited from a pessimistic cognitions or spirituality-
tom of depression, these 2 constructs are state-of-the-art palliative care facility. This based interventions to address existen-
often assumed to be more overlapping sample represents an ethnically and eco- tial issues such as a loss of meaning may
than may be justified. We found only a nomically diverse group that is likely rep- help decrease hopelessness.27-29 Further
modest correlation between these 2 mea- resentative of terminally ill cancer research regarding the impact of treat-
sures (r=0.29), indicating that depres- patients receiving high-quality pallia- ments for depression and/or hopeless-
sion and hopelessness are distinct con- tive care. It is possible that the preva- ness on desire for hastened death is
structs. lence of desire for hastened death and needed to formulate appropriate clini-
The data and conclusions described depression would be even greater in cal responses to patients who express a
here are tempered by methodological patients receiving less adequate pallia- desire for hastened death.
limitations. First, although we mea- tive care.
Funding/Support: This research was supported by the
sured desire for hastened death, we can- Because depression and hopeless- Faculty Scholar’s Program, Open Society Institute
not determine which, if any, of these ness are not identical, clinical interven- Project on Death in America (Dr Breitbart, scholar).
Additional support was provided by the Emily Davie
patients would have requested assisted tions may need to target these issues se- and Joseph S. Kornfeld Foundation and the philan-
suicide if this option were legal. A related lectively. There is a general consensus thropy of Jack and Sarah Rudin.
REFERENCES
1. Ganzini L, Nelson HD, Schmidt TA, et al. Physi- nitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res. 20. Cohen SR, Mount BF, Strobel MG, et al. The
cian’s experiences with the Oregon Death With Dig- 1975;12:189-198. McGill Quality of Life Questionnaire: a measure of
nity Act. N Engl J Med. 2000;342:557-563. 12. Spitzer RL, Gibbon M, Williams JBW. Structured quality of life appropriate for people with advanced
2. Sullivan AD, Hedberg K, Fleming DA. Legalized phy- Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Axis I Disorders- disease. Palliat Med. 1995;9:207-219.
sician-assisted suicide in Oregon—the second year. Nonpatient Edition (SCID-NP) Version 2.0. New York, 21. Serlin RC, Mendoza TR, Nakamura Y, et al. When
N Engl J Med. 2000;342:598-604. NY: Biometrics Research Department, New York State is cancer pain mild, moderate or severe? grading pain
3. Meier DE, Emmons C-A, Wallenstein S, et al. A na- Psychiatric Institute; 1996. severity by its interference with function. Pain. 1995;
tional survey of physician-assisted suicide and eutha- 13. Hamilton M. A rating scale for depression. J Neu- 61:277-284.
nasia in the United States. N Engl J Med. 1998;338: rol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1960;23:56-61. 22. Breitbart W, Rosenfeld B, Passik S. Interest in phy-
1193-1201. 14. Beck AT, Weissman A, Lester D, et al. The mea- sician assisted suicide among ambulatory HIV-infected
4. Foley KM. Competent care for the dying instead surement of pessimism: the Beck Hopelessness Scale. patients. J Am Psychiatry. 1996;153:238-242.
of physician-assisted suicide. N Engl J Med. 1997; J Consult Clin Psychol. 1974;42:861-865. 23. Emanuel EJ, Fairclough DL, Daniels ER, Clarridge
336:54-58. 15. Broadhead WE, Gehlbach SH, De Gruy FV, et al. BR. Euthanasia and physician assisted suicide: atti-
5. Hendin H, Klerman G. Physician-assisted suicide: The Duke-UNC Functional Social Support Question- tudes and experiences of oncology patients, oncolo-
the dangers of legalization. Am J Psychiatry. 1993; naire: measurement of social support in family medi- gists, and the public. Lancet. 1996;347:1805-1810.
150:143-145. cine patients. Med Care. 1988;26:709-723. 24. Chochinov HM, Wilson KG, Enns M, Lander S.
6. Rosenfeld, B. Depression, assisted suicide and the 16. Brady MJ, Peterman AH, Fitchett G, et al. A case Depression, hopelessness, and suicidal ideation. Psy-
right to die. Psychol Public Policy Law. In press. for including spirituality in quality of life measure- chosomatics. 1998;39:366-370.
7. Brown JH, Henteleff P, Barakat S, Rowe CJ. Is it ment in oncology. Psychooncology. 1999;8:417- 25. Ganzini L, Johnston WS, McFarland BH, et al. At-
normal for terminally ill patients to desire death? Am 428. titudes of patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis
J Psychiatry. 1986;143:208-211. 17. Cleeland CS. Measurement of pain by subjective and their care givers toward assisted suicide. N Engl J
8. Chochinov HM, Wilson KG, Enns M, et al. Desire report. In: Chapman CR, Loeser JD, eds. Advances in Med. 1998;339:967-973.
for death in the terminally ill. Am J Psychiatry. 1995; Pain Research and Therapy, XXII: Issues of Pain Mea- 26. Block SD. Assessing and managing depression in
152:1185-1191. surement. New York, NY: Raven Press; 1989:391- the terminally ill patient. Ann Intern Med. 2000;132:
9. Rosenfeld B, Breitbart W, Stein K, et al. Measur- 403. 209-218.
ing desire for death among patients with HIV/AIDS: 18. Portenoy R, Thaler HT, Kornblith AB, et al. The Me- 27. Moorey S, Greer S, Bliss J, Law M. A comparison
the Schedule of Attitudes Toward Hastened Death. morial Symptom Assessment Scale: an instrument for of adjuvant psychosocial therapy and supporting coun-
Am J Psychiatry. 1999;156:94-100. evaluation of symptom prevalence, characteristics and seling in patients with cancer. Psychooncology. 1998;
10. Rosenfeld B, Breitbart W, Galietta M, et al. The distress. Eur J Cancer. 1994;30A:1326-1336. 7:218-228.
Schedule of Attitudes Toward Hastened Death: mea- 19. Karnofsky DA, Burchenal JH. The clinical evalu- 28. Spiegel D. Essentials of psychotherapy interven-
suring desire for death in terminally ill cancer pa- ation of chemotherapeutic agents in cancer. In: tion for cancer patients. Support Care Cancer. 1995;
tients. Cancer. 2000;88:2868-2875. MacLeod CM, ed. Evaluation of Chemotherapeutic 3:252-256.
11. Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR. “Mini- Agents. New York, NY: Columbia University Press; 29. Rousseau P. Spirituality and the dying patient.
mental state”: a practical method of grading the cog- 1949:191-205. J Clin Oncol. 2000;18:2000-2002.
©2000 American Medical Association. All rights reserved. (Reprinted) JAMA, December 13, 2000—Vol 284, No. 22 2911