Proceedvlgs of The First Joint BMESlEMBS Conference Serving Humanity, Advancing Technology Od 1516. W, AWh.
GA, USA
Ah' INFORMATIC MODEL OF HUMAN OPERATOR CONTROL
C.A. Phillips' and D.W. Repperger" *BHE/WSU,Dayton, OH 45435;"AFRLJHECP, WPAFB, OH 45433 Abstract The human operator informatic model is a transfer A preliminary mformatic model has previously function of an LTI systems (SISO). We first defme the accounted for information processing that represents the reaction time (TD) information processing block [from movement time of the buman operator. However, the buman equation (6)] and the movement time (first order lag) operator response time is the s u m of both reaction time (RT) information processing block [from eqnation (l)] with both and movement time (MT). The human informatic model blocks in cascade. Combining the two blocks in cascade described herein now also accounts for the additional results in the transfer function for the human operator information processing that occnrs during choice RT. The informatic model: fmal human operator informatic model (accounting for both a e-sT~ YO - M MT and RT) is a transfer function of a linear and time (7) invariant system (LTQ and is of single input-single output YlN s+aM (SISO) configuraion and has been applied to descrihe a feed- For a unit-step input of magnitude A, the output forward human control system. Laplace transform of this coutrol system is: Introduction A preliminary informatic model has accounted for .. information processing that represents the movement time (MT) of the human operator [l]: The inverse Laplace transform of equation (8) is a function, f (t-To) where TD> 0 and YO - aM (1) Fort 5 To: YIN SfaM Yo=O (9) The movement informan'c frwuency (a,.,)in units of Fort > TD: Hem is: aM= 1 /TM (2) Results Y o = ~e lUM(~-TD) [-- I (10) where: T~ = movement time constant (sec.) An example application is a ship's sonar operator The human operator response (action time, AT) is sitting at a console viewing a sonar screen with an the sum of both reaction time (RT) and movement time; information content of approximately Hs=5 bits. The Mathematically this may be expressed as follows: operator will press an alert button (response output) when a AT=RT+MT (3) suspect object (stimulus input) is seen. Two different where: AT = action time (seconds) operators (A=high skill [p=9.2 bits per second] and B=low RT = reaction time (seconds) skill [p=5.0 bits per second]) are evaluated. Operators A and and MT = movement time (seconds). B interact with two different alert push button (PB) Background confisurations (#l=arm movement [a&S Hz] and Choice reaction time may be mathematically related R=!iier movement [aFlOHz]). to the information content of the stimulus event (Hs) by The #2 PB configuration improves A and B response means of the Hick-Hymen las: time by an average twenty-five percent. In addition, B (using RT= a + bHs (4) the #2 PB confguration) has a response time comparable to where: a = sjm& reaction time (Hs = 0); b = a proportionality constant analogous to a A (using the #1 PB configuration). reciprocal baud rate (second per bit): Discussion The human operator informatic model demonstrates b=I/P (5) a trade-off between the choice RT information processing where p = choice reaction time baud rate (bits per second). rate ((3) and the MT information processing rate (ad.The Methods model bas effectively described a feed-forward human The f m l development of the human operator control system (e.g. the sonar operator), and can also be informatic model beings by approxiouting the information applied to a feedback human control system when certain processing associated with choice reaction time as a pure approximations are utiliid. time delay (To). Such a representation is reasonably Reference appropriate in an operational setting, and mathematically well 111. Phillips, C.A., Repperger, D.W.,andchelette, T.L.: A defmed in control systems theory. fust approximation of the human operator describing function Equation (4) may then be restated as: model based upon an information theoretic of buman TD=a+hHs (6) performance. ' 16367-383, 1998.