a) objectivist, subjectivist and balanced (rational) paradigms.
Scholarly approaches to text interpretation can be roughly divided by the ctiterion
of preference given to one of the textual senses, i.e. universal, the author's or the reader's sense. Accordingly, we can distinguish the following trends, or paradigms of literary text interpretation from ancient times to the 70-80s of the 20th C., when they achieved a definite form: 1) objectivist paradigm: treats the sense attributed to the text by its author as objective and explicable, thus being the major purpose of research; 2) subjectivist paradigm: literary text interpretation is not determined by the text itself but relies completely on its readers' perspectives; 3) balanced, or rational paradigm: proceeds from the assumption that the sense of literary text can be elicited from the dialogue between the text and the reader. The German philisopher Hans-Georg Gadamer formulated 2 basic assumptions of interpretation: 1) interpretation is, principally, open and infinite; 2) text comprehension is inseparable from the interpreter's self-understanding.
b) hermeneutic, psychological, pragmatic, allegoric-symbolical and
philological perspectives. The hermeneutic prospective, (focuses on the reader's perception)followed by Umberto Eco, among other scholars, advocates the active role of the interpreter and an "open-ended reading", i.e. potentially unlimited elucidation of a text. The radical hermeneutic approach falls under the subjectivist trend of interpretation, finding the reader's sense of a text to be only valid one and discarding the author's intention. Eco abides by the rational paradigm by trying to reconcile the objectivist and subjectivist trends with his "third possibility" - looking for an "intention of the text". The psychological (psychoanalytical) perspective (focuses on the author's perception) is based upon the Freudian and Jungian treatment of the literary text as a form of sublimation of the writer's subconscious, primarily sexual, desires and archetypal images. Using this approach, an interpreter looks for hidden connections between the writer's style and his/her phsychological traits. This perspective complies with the main postulates of the objectivist paradigm. Psychological approaches attempt to apply modern psychological theories to authors and their works. Critics use such approaches to explore the motivations of characters and the symbolic meanings of events, writer's own motivations and reader's personal responses to a text. Because of the predominance of Freudian psychology in the twenties century, psychological criticism usually relies upon the theories of Sigmund Freud. Freud's ideas are complex and multiple not all of them relate to literature. But literary critics (4) find three of them very attractive: the dominance of the unconscious mind over the conscious, the expression of the unconscious mind through symbols, in dreams and the primacy of sexuality as a motivating force in human behavior. These three ideas are related.
The pragmatic perspective of the literary text interpretation is aimed at the
exloration of implied relationships between the author and the adressee; in other terms, the author's expectations about the reader and his/her literary response. This perspective belongs to the rational paradigm. The allegoric-symbolic perspective treats the literary text as an ambigouos (twofold) construction that conceals hidden ("dark", obscure) senses under the cover of its images. The philological perspective intergrates linguostylistic and literary stylistic approaches to the analysis of fiction. The goal of this interpretation is to decode both the author's and reader's senses of a fictional text through the study of the text genesis and its impact upon the reader. This perspective is a crossroads where different interpretative paradigms converge.
3) The main categories of a literary text:
• The main categories of a literary text:
• integration; • conceptuality; • implicitness; • discreteness; • modality; (im)personality. 1.Integration represents unification of all parts of literary text for the sake of achieving its wholeness. The two facets of integration are cohesion and coherence. Cohension - is an outer (or formal) organization of text based on lexical, grammatical and other links between words, sentences, paragraphs, chapters, etc. Coherence - a feature of the internal (or semantic) organization of text based on logical links between successive ideas. 2) Conceptuality is the fundamental text category, which is defined as the organization of a text around a certain idea. At the heart of any text lays an organizing idea or concept, which ensures thesemantic unity of the text. To reveal the main idea (the concept), – the theme and the message of a text should be profoundly analyzed. Theme is the general content of a text, presented in a condensed way, and distancing from the plot details of a text eases the process of defining the theme. By the message of a text, all the implicative conclusions are meant; these inferences are to be drawn from the text individually. And usually the message of any literary work is revealed through different facades at all stages of its reading and interpretation 3)In any literary text its main idea is implicit. This phenomenon has linguistic nature, as there is always sub-text, which conveys additional sense. And the richer a reader’s thesaurus is, the higher his/her ability to identify anddecode text implications. Scholars distinguish many implicates, among them: superficial implicates (“time savers” or expressive means based on the reduction of the syntactical pattern, for example: ellipsis, aposiopesis, asyndeton, etc. [12, p.64]), trite implicates (“dead” metaphors, for example), local implicates (authors’ style carriers), deep implicates (are important for decoding the message of a whole text), deep implicates (important for a whole text interpretation images) and dark implicates (reminiscence - the act of recalling or narrating past experiences; allusion - a passing reference; oblique or obscure mention, deciphering requires specific knowledge) 4)In order to interpret adequately any text, the category of discreteness should be also profoundly analyzed. Discreteness of a literary text refers to its formation from certain parts. To define text discreetness, the reader should isolate its compositional structure and partitioning. Along with the classical plot elements, a sub-plot should be also profoundly analyzed as it may be of equal significance as to the main plot [9, p. 91]. The classical plot includes the following elements: exposition, the beginning of the plot, plot complications, the resolution, and the conclusion. In some texts an interpreter may observe the classical plot parts rearrangement. This feature of literary texts usually also comprises an independent development of sup-plots and an unpredictable presentational sequency of events (illogical backbone of the plot). This technique may be analyzed in the spectrum of modality of a text. 5)The other textual category which should be taken into account is modality. It is a common knowledge that all the literary texts possess modality, in other words, there are no stylistically neutral literary texts. Modality is understood as: a logical correspondence of textual content to the objective reality (objective modality); and the author’s attitude towards the narrated events, which is revealed through a selection of language resources, images, stylistic devices and other textual elements (subjective modality). Being a brainchild of the author’s comprehension of reality, a literary text (nowadays we observe this phenomenon even in the economically or politically tinged speeches or texts) reflects the picture of the world strained through the author’s personality. The choice of the theme of the literary work, modal and evaluative words, the choice of objects for narration, - all these add to manifestation of modality. The author’s interpretation of the reality depends also on the ways time and space are reproduced in a text. The way the events in a literary work are described may correspond to their real sequence and duration on the one hand, or a researcher may observe multi-dimensional literary space and time. In this case we speak about flashbacks and flash forwards. The precise investigation of stylistic devices and expressive means adds to the revealing the subjective modality of a text