Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
9C GAT
Mr. Acre
1 June 2016
Hanna – Munoz 1
Tower
Introduction:
One dark day in May, a millionaire decided that they wanted their own tower. They hired
two people that had the brains and creativity to fill the task of doing all of the math and building
the tower.
The wanted design was a Hawaiian hut. Also, the millionaire wanted an aquarium
underneath the floor to make it seem as if they were walking on water. If all the requirements
The millionaire wanted a ten sided tower and had the plot size available of 43 by 43 feet.
The tower was to be built using all of the available space possible, while also staying within the
local rules. The tower also had to be built perpendicular above the available plot. The aquarium
also has to be built within the floor, while keeping a stable and strong foundation. Along with
one foot thick walls, there are several more sizing requirements that needed to be met to be
acceptable.
Hanna – Munoz 2
Part Two
Figure 1, above, shows the base of the tower in the plot. The base is made out of the four
polygons that will be shown in the upcoming figures. The polygons are used to show the footings
In Figure 2, the process of maximizing the plot is explained. To get the maximum
working space of 37 x 37, three feet were subtracted from each side within the plot, since the
tower cannot be built three feet within the boundaries of the plot. The maximized plot size is now
37 x 37 feet.
In Figure 3, the central angle formula is displayed. This helped to find the central angle of
the given polygon. The central angle measure was found by dividing 360 by the number of sides
(n) in the polygon. For the given polygon, 360 was divided by 10, resulting in a central angle
Hanna – Munoz 3
measure of 36°. The central angle of this polygon is used to find further measurements, like
In Figure 4, the sides that are going to be used in the following figures to calculate the
heights of the triangles are shown. This polygon is also known as polygon one. The length of one
side of the polygon is 2x, which is also the base used to find the height (h in Figure 4) of the
triangle in order to find the area of the entire polygon. All of this will be calculated in the
following figures.
Figure 5 shows how to find the height of the triangle shown in Figure 4. Half of the
central angle, which is 36°, was found to be 18°. The cosine (adjacent divided by hypotenuse) of
that angle was multiplied by the hypotenuse of the triangle, so the height of the triangle (adjacent
Figure 6 displays the process of calculating the base of one triangle. The sine (opposite
divided by hypotenuse) of 18 degrees is used. To find the base, the hypotenuse (18.5) was
multiplied by both sides. This means that the sine of 18 degrees was multiplied by 18.5, which is
5.72. This product was then multiplied by two to get the base of one triangle, which is now 11.43
ft.
The way to calculate the area of one triangle in polygon one is displayed in Figure 7. The
area is 10 times one of the triangles area which is ½(base*height). The substitutions in the
equation are the 10(1/2)(the base found in Figure 6)*(the height found in Figure 5). The area
found from one triangle is 100.59. This product is then multiplied by ten, which results the final
Figure 8 shows the outermost polygon or polygon 2. The length of one side and the
height of one triangle in polygon 2 are used to find the area of polygon 2. The base of the
triangle (x in figure 8) is used to find half the side length of the complete polygon. The height of
one triangle (h in figure 8) is drawn from the center of the polygon to one vertex of the polygon.
In Figure 9, the process of finding the height of one triangle in polygon two is displayed.
Half of the central angle, which is 36°, was found to be 18°. To scale down from polygon one,
the height found was subtracted by one foot because each polygon is exactly one foot apart, so
Figure 10 displays the process of calculating the base of one triangle. The tangent of 18 is
used because the angle that is known is 18 degrees and the opposite side from the angle is being
found so tangent, opposite/adjacent is easiest to use. The tangent is then multiplied by the
adjacent side which is also known as the height found in Figure 9. Then everything is multiplied
by two because only half of the triangle was being used to find one half of the base. The final
length of the base of one triangle in polygon two is approximately 10.78 ft.
The area is 10 times one of the triangles area which is ½(base*height). The substitutions
in the equation are the 10(1/2)(the base found in Figure 10)*(the height found in Figure 9). The
area found from one triangle is 89.48 and then that is multiplied by ten which get the final area of
Figure 12 shows the third outermost polygon or polygon 3. The length of one side and the
height of one triangle in polygon 3 are used to find the area of polygon 3. The base of the
triangle (x in figure 12) is used to find half the side length of the complete polygon. The height
of one triangle (h in figure 12) is drawn from the center of the polygon to one vertex of the
polygon.
Figure 13 shows how to find the height of the triangle shown in Figure 12. Half of the
central angle, which is 36°, was found to be 18°. The cosine (adjacent divided by hypotenuse) of
that angle was multiplied by the hypotenuse of the triangle, so the height of the triangle (adjacent
Figure 14 displays the process of calculating the base of one triangle. The tangent of 18 is
used because the angle that is known is 18 degrees and the opposite side from the angle is being
found so tangent, opposite/adjacent is easiest to use. The tangent is then multiplied by the
adjacent side which is also known as the height found in Figure 13. Then everything is
multiplied by two because only half of the triangle was being used to find one half of the base.
The area is 10 multiplied by one of the triangles’ area which is ½(base*height). The
substitution in the equation are the 10(1/2)(the base found in Figure 14)*(the height found in
Figure 13). The area found from one triangle is 79.02. This product is then multiplied by ten,
Figure 16 shows the innermost polygon or polygon 4. The length of one side and the
height of one triangle in polygon 4 are used to find the area of polygon 4. The base of the
triangle (x in Figure 16) is used to find half the side length of the complete polygon. The height
of one triangle (h in Figure 16) is drawn from the center of the polygon to one vertex of the
polygon.
Figure 17 shows how to find the height of the triangle shown in Figure 16. Half of the
central angle, which is 36°, was found to be 18°. The cosine (adjacent divided by hypotenuse) of
that angle was multiplied by the hypotenuse of the triangle and then three is subtracted because
there is one foot in from each polygon, so the height of the triangle (adjacent side to reference
Figure 18 displays the process of calculating the base of one triangle. The tangent of 18 is
used because the angle that is known is 18 degrees and the opposite side from the angle is being
found so tangent, opposite/adjacent is easiest to use. The tangent is then multiplied by the
adjacent side which is also known as the height found in Figure 17. Everything is then multiplied
by two, because only half of the triangle was being used to find one half of the base. The final
The area is 10 multiplied by one of the triangles’ area, which is ½(base*height). The
substitutions in the equation are 10(1/2)(the base found in Figure 18)*(the height found in Figure
17). The area found from one triangle is 69.21. This product is then multiplied by ten, which
Part Three
Hanna – Munoz 11
Figure 20 shows the footing. It was three feet wide extending from polygon 1 to polygon
4. It was 3.5 feet deep to fit the pool. The length of the inner base which is polygon 4 was
previously found to have a base of feet 10.13 feet and the length of the outer base, or polygon 1,
V of footing= (1005.85*3.5)-(692.08*3.5)
V of footing= 3520.475-2422.28
Figure 21 shows the volume of concrete for the footing. The volume is found by doing
the area of polygon 1 and multiplying that by 3.5 then subtracting the area of polygon 4 times
3.5. It is multiplied by 3.5 because as shown in Figure 20, that is the height of the footing. So
when the areas are plugged in from part 2, it becomes (1005.85*3.5)-(692.08*3.5). When the
math is done the final volume of 1098.181 ft3 is found so that is how much concrete was needed.
Hanna – Munoz 12
Figure 22 above shows the floor. It had to cover all of polygon 4 so the base of each side
V of floor=692.08*1/3
V of floor≈230.694 ft3
Figure 23.Volume of the Plexiglass needed for Floor
Figure 23 shows the volume of the floor. The floor extended to polygon 4 and was 4
inches thick, as shown in figure 22. Since everything was in feet, the 4 inches was converted to
feet which is 1/3 of a foot. Using that information the numbers were plugged into the equation to
find the volume of (area of base)(height of prism) can be used. The area of polygon 4 which was
previously found in figure 14 was 692.08 and when multiplied by ⅓ the volume of the floor was
Figure 24 shows the dimensions needed to construct the aquarium. The aquarium had to
be located inside the footing of polygon 4 so it was 3.5 feet deep with a side length of 10.13 feet.
V of water=(0.75*3.5)692.08
V of water≈1816.714 ft3
Figure 25. Volume of Water Needed for Aquarium
Figure 25 shows the volume of the water needed for the aquarium. The aquarium needed
to be 75% filled. To find the volume of water 75% of 3.5 was needed to be multiplied by the area
of polygon 4 previously found as 692.08. To find the height .75 was multiplied by 3.5 to find
75% of 3.5. When the equation, (0.75*3.5)692.08 was solved the volume of water needed for
Cost of Concrete=$4715
Figure 26. Cost Analysis of Concrete needed
Figure 26 shows how the cost of the concrete was found. The concrete is sold for $115
per cubic yard. So the volume of the footing found in Figure 21, which was 1098.181 feet3, was
Hanna – Munoz 14
multiplied by 115, the cost of the concrete. That was then divided by 27 to convert it into feet.
That was then rounded up because only a part of a bag of concrete cannot be bought, the whole
bag has to be. When the math was solved the cost of the concrete was $4715.
Cost of Plexiglas=(692.08/32)*1100
Cost of Plexiglas=21.63*1100
Cost of Plexiglas=$24200
Figure 27. Cost Analysis of Plexiglas needed
Figure 27 shows how much the plexiglass would cost. For each 48” x 96” x 4” sheet of
plexiglass the cost was $1100. Since the plexiglass being sold and the height of the plexiglass for
floor had the same thickness, the width can be disregarded. The plexiglass that was used needed
to be converted from inches into feet so 48 and 96 were divided by 12 making it 4’ x 8’. When 4
and 8 are multiplied together it is a total of 32 feet. Now the the area of polygon 4, found
previously as 692.08 ft2, which was can be divided by 32 and multiplied by the cost which was
1100.The cost was rounded up to $24200 because only a part of a sheet cannot be purchased.
Part Four
Figure 28 shows the side lengths of the rectangle and half of the polygon in the door. The
base/width of the door was required to be three feet wide. The height of the door was required to
be five feet high. The polygon is the same shaped polygon as the base of the tower. The
radius/hypotenuse of one triangle in the polygon is half of the width of the door, which would be
1.5 ft. The length of one side of the polygon was found to be .93 ft., which will be explained in
Half of the decagon topped the door, above the rectangular part of the door. To find the
area of this half decagon, the base and height of one triangle in the polygon need to be found.
Since the radius is also the hypotenuse of one triangle in the decagon, the sine of 18 could be
used. 1.5 is multiplied by the sine of 18 to find the base. Doing this resulted in
approximately .46. This number was then multiplied by two because it only counted as half of
the base of one triangle in the polygon. When this was done, the final base of the triangle was
found to be approximately .93 ft. This base is also the length of one side of the decagon.
The cosine (adjacent divided by hypotenuse) of 18 degrees can be used to find the height
of one triangle in half of the polygon. The hypotenuse was found to be 1.5. This was then
multiplied by cos(18) to find the remaining side, which is the height. Doing this resulted in the
The area of the half decagon is solved in Figure 31. The formula for area of a triangle
was used. This formula is ½(base*height). The base of the triangle from Figure 29 and the height
of the triangle in Figure 30 were multiplied then multiplied by ½. This resulted in the final
product of .66. This number was then multiplied by five, since there were five of these triangles
in the half decagon. The final area of the half decagon was found to be approximately 3.31 ft2.
In Figure 32, the process of finding the area of the whole door is displayed. The
dimensions of the rectangular part of the door is five feet by three feet. The area of the
rectangular part of the door can be found by multiplying base by height, which results in 15. This
area was then added to the area of the half decagon that tops the door, found in Figure 31. The
The dimensions of one window on the tower is displayed. The height of one triangle in
the polygon was about 1.43 ft. The length of one side of the polygon was about .93 ft. The way
Figure 34 shows the total area of the windows. At least two windows were required. To
find the area, the area formula of a triangle was used which is ½(base*height). The base found in
Figure 29 and the height found in Figure 30 were multiplied by each other, then multiplied by
1/2. This product was then multiplied by ten since there are ten of these individual triangles in
one decagon. This resulted in the area of approximately 6.61 ft2 for one decagonal window. This
value was then multiplied by two since there are two windows being built, resulting in the area of
Figure 35 shows the dimensions of one lateral face of the outer prism. The base is also
the length of one side of polygon two, which is approximately 10.78 ft. The height was found to
Hanna – Munoz 18
be approximately 21.57 ft. The way the height was calculated will be explained in the following
figure.
The height was required to be two times the length of one side of polygon two. This
means that 10.78 was multiplied by two to get the final height of the prism to be approximately
21.57 feet. These dimensions of one lateral face will be used in the following figure to calculate
areas.
Figure 37 shows the process of calculating the lateral surface area of the outer prism. To
get the area of one lateral face, 10.78 and 21.57 were multiplied by each other since they were
found to be the base and height of one face in the previous figure. The product of this was found
to be approximately 232.58. This was then multiplied by ten since there are ten lateral faces on
the prism. The total lateral surface area of the prism is now 2325.80 ft2. The areas of windows
and door found in Figure 32 and Figure 34 have to be subtracted from this area. The area of the
two windows is approximately 13.23 ft2. This was added to the area of the door, which is about
18.31 ft2. The sum of the areas is approximately 31.53 ft2. When this was subtracted from
2325.80, the final lateral surface area of the outer prism was found to be approximately 2294.27
ft2.
Hanna – Munoz 19
Part Five
The base of polygon three was used to find the base of one lateral face of the inner prism,
which is approximately 10.13 ft. The height found in Figure 36 was used as the height of this
Volume= Abase*Hprism
V≈ (10(1/2(10.13)(15.59)))*(21.57)
V≈ 17042.09 ft3
Figure 39. Volume of Inner Prism
Figure 39 shows the process of calculating the volume of the inner prism. The area of the
base, which is polygon three (also found in Figure 15), was multiplied by the height of the prism,
which is the height found in Figure 36. When these were multiplied by each other, the resulting
Part Six
Figure 40 displays the dimensions of the outer pyramid. The height of the pyramid
was found to be about 32.35 ft. The slant height of one triangle of the pyramid was found to be
about 36.36 ft. The base of one triangle, which is also the length of one side of polygon two, was
found to be about 10.78 ft. The calculations of the height and slant height will be explained in the
following figures.
that the side length of 10.78 found in Figure 10 was multiplied by three to get the final height of
Θ= Angle Measure
Figure 42 displays the angle that is going to be solved for in the following figure in
The angle indicated in Figure 42 was solved for its measure in this figure. Since Θ is
the reference angle, the opposite side is the height of the pyramid found in Figure 42, which is
32.35 ft. The adjacent side to Θ is 16.59 ft., which was found in Figure 9. The trig function
tangent can be used to solve for Θ, the missing angle measure. Tangent of Θ equals opposite side
divided by adjacent side. This means that tangent of Θ is equal to 32.35 divided by 16.59. The
inverse of tangent was then multiplied by each side of the equation to isolate Θ. This resulted in
The height of one triangle on the outer pyramid is also known as the slant height of
the pyramid. This slant height will be solved in the following figure.
cos(62.84)= adjacent/hypotenuse
cos(62.84)≈ 16.59/h
h*cos(62.84)≈ 16.59
h≈ 16.59/cos(62.84)
h≈ 36.36 ft.
Figure 45. Slant Height of the Outer Pyramid
This figure displays the process of calculating the slant height of the outer pyramid.
The previous figure shows that the reference angle being used is the angle that was solved for in
Figure 43. With the trig function cosine, the adjacent side to the reference angle and the
hypotenuse of the right triangle are used. The adjacent side is 16.59, which was found in Figure
9. The hypotenuse, also known as the slant height, is what is being solved for. The cosine of
62.84° was set equal to 16.59 divided by the hypotenuse. The hypotenuse was multiplied by both
sides to isolate the adjacent side (16.59). This means that the hypotenuse multiplied by the cosine
Hanna – Munoz 23
of 62.84° is equal to 16.59. The cosine of 62.84° is now divided from both sides, to isolate the
hypotenuse. This means that the hypotenuse is equal to 16.59 divided by the cosine of 62.84°.
This results in the hypotenuse being equal to approximately 36.36 ft. Since the hypotenuse is
also the slant height, this means that the slant height is approximately 36.36 ft.
Part Seven
1
Slant Height≈ 36.36 ft.
2 2
Figure 46. Angle Measures and Dimensions of Lateral Face on Outer Pyramid
The slant height of the pyramid is the height of one lateral triangle face of the outer
pyramid. The base was the side length of polygon two found in Figure 10. This base was cut in
half to act as the base within one right triangle. Angle One was found by doubling the angle
found within one right triangle, which came out to be approximately 16.87°. Angle Two was
found within the same right triangle, being approximately 81.56°. The calculations to these
tan(Θ)= opposite/adjacent
tan(Θ)≈ 36.36/5.39
Θ≈ tan-1(36.36/5.39)
Θ≈ 81.59°
Figure 47. Angle Two Measure
The measure of angle two was found and displayed in this figure. The reference angle
in this case is Θ. Since the opposite side and adjacent side to the reference angle are known, the
trig function tangent can be operated. The tangent of Θ is set equal to 36.36 divided by 5.39. The
adjacent side is the base of the triangle divided by two to get the base of a single right triangle.
The inverse of tangent is then multiplied by both sides of the equation to isolate Θ. This means
that Θ is equal to the inverse of tangent multiplied by 36.36 divided by 5.39. The missing angle
tan(Θ)= opposite/adjacent
tan(Θ)≈ 5.39/36.36
Θ≈ tan-1(5.39/36.36)
Θ≈ 8.44°
Figure 48. Half of Measure of Angle One
The process of calculating the measure of angle one is very similar to the process for
angle two. The reference angle is Θ. The opposite and adjacent sides are already known, which
means that the trig function tangent is going to be used. The tangent of Θ is set equal to 5.39
divided by 36.36. The inverse of tangent is then multiplied by both sides of the equation to
isolate Θ. This means that Θ is equal to the inverse of tangent multiplied by 5.39 divided by
Angle 1= 2(8.44)
Angle 1= 16.87°
Figure 49. Measure of Angle One
The figure above shows the final measure of angle one. The previous figure showed
the calculation for only half of this angle since it dealt with only one right triangle out of the two
Hanna – Munoz 25
of them that are in one lateral face of the pyramid. The altitude made to create the two right
triangles bisected angle one so that the angle measure found in the previous figure could be
The slant height of the pyramid is also the height of one triangular lateral face, which
is 36.36 ft., as found in Figure 45. The base is the side length of polygon two, as calculated in
Figure 10. These dimensions will be used to find the lateral surface area in the following figures.
Area= 1/2(base*height)
A≈ 1/2(10.78*36.36)
A≈ 196.05 ft2
Figure 51. Area of One Lateral Face on Outer Pyramid
The area of a triangle is ½(base*height). This formula was used to calculate one
lateral face on the outer pyramid. The height is the slant height of the pyramid, as calculated to
be approximately 36.36 ft. in Figure 45. The base is the side length of polygon two, 10.78 ft.
36.36 and 10.78 were multiplied by each other, then multiplied by 1/2, to get the final area of one
The lateral surface area is the sum of all lateral faces’ areas. Since there are ten lateral
faces according to the polygon, the area of one lateral face (found in previous figure) was
multiplied by ten. This resulted in the final lateral surface area of the outer pyramid to be
Part Eight
Figure 53 displays the dimensions of the inner pyramid. This pyramid is linked with
polygon three. The height was found to be approximately 30.40 ft. The way this was calculated
The height was required to be three times the side length of polygon three. The side
length found in Figure 14 was used. This was multiplied by three to get the height of the inner
Volume= 1/3(Abase)*(Hpyramid)
V≈ 1/3(790.17)*(30.40)
V≈ 8007.56 ft3
Figure 55. Volume of the Inner Pyramid
The figure above displays the process of finding the volume of the inner pyramid.
The area of the base, which is also the area of polygon three, was multiplied by the height of the
pyramid. This means that the area found in Figure 15, 790.17, was multiplied by the height found
in Figure 54, 30.40. This product was then multiplied by 1/3 to get the final volume of the inner
Part Nine
The figure above displays the completed tower. The walls and roof were added to
The total lateral surface area was calculated by adding the lateral surface area of the
outer prism and the lateral surface area of the outer pyramid. The outer prism lateral surface area
of 2325.80 ft2 was taken from Figure 37 and the outer pyramid lateral surface area of 1960.45 ft2
was taken from Figure 52. When these two areas were added, the total lateral surface area of the
The total volume of the tower was calculated by adding the volume of the inner prism
and the inner pyramid together. The inner prism volume of 17042.09 ft3 was taken from Figure
39 and the inner pyramid volume of 8007.56 ft3 was taken from Figure 55. When these two
volumes were added, the total volume of the tower was found to be approximately 25045.65 ft3.
Hanna – Munoz 29
Conclusion:
Now with the tower done there is plenty of room to decorate the interior with anything
that is wanted. The scale model was designed with a Hawaiian hut theme but is able to transform
in to whatever is wanted. The high ceiling gives a very open look while also people are able to
“walk on water”. This tower took a lot of hard work and dedication to create and make perfect.
With the calculations and the math used to build this tower for the measurements and the
costs, there were some issues that were encountered. One of the issues was plugging in the
incorrect numbers, the full substitution of the areas of the polygons. For example when forgetting
one set of parenthesis messes up what is being multiplied. Another issue starting off was having
the original plot size off by three feet so the math did not fit with in those dimensions. There
were also problems with building the tower itself. Creating the footing was difficult to get the ten
sides perfectly symmetrical and even with the other pieces of footing. Also getting the roof was a
challenge because gravity was trying the drag the pieces down as the glue was finishing drying.
The last problem was the builder had a hard time with the hot glue gun and sustained a few
Finally the Hawaiian hut was done and given to the very happy millionaire. The custom
work really makes the tower unique. This work is unlike any other.