Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
WITH
FOCUS ON NUTRITION AND PL QUALITY:
Stretching the balance between
experimental feed and Artemia
Roeland Wouters
D. Grymonpre, C. De Maesschalck,
P. Joos, V. Calabuig, P. Rattayaporn, A. Rekecki,
E. Naessens, G. Rombaut, P. Lavens
Introduction
1. Disease > 2. PL quality & availability > 4. Feed cost > 10. Feed quality
2
Larval shrimp rearing – Nutrition and PL quality
Introduction
1. Feed cost > 2. Disease > 6. PL quality & availability > 9. Feed quality
3
Ecuador
hatcheries
4
Larval shrimp rearing – Nutrition and PL quality
Introduction
Holistic approach
PL
QUALITY
Larval shrimp rearing – Nutrition and PL quality
Introduction
• Survey on PL Quality
E. Werbrouck et al. 2017
Larval shrimp rearing – Nutrition and PL quality
Introduction
• Robust
PL’s:
Why?
– Postlarval quality
and
its
long-‐term
effects
have
grown
in
interest
to
hatchery
and
grow-‐out
farmers
as
the
shrimp
industry
faces
challenges
overcoming
diseases,
while
moving
towards
greater
integration,
genetic
improvement
and
increased
control.
Improved Nutrition
• Best Balance
– Best Balance between live food and formulated feed FRIPPAK Fresh GOLD
• Reduction of Artemia cyst consumption by factor 2
Best
Balance
Relative
performance
(%)
100 Survival
80 Dry
Weight
60
40
20
0
3 1,5 0
Artemia
use
(kg
cysts/Mio
fry)
Larval shrimp rearing – Nutrition and PL quality
Improved Nutrition
Best Balance
%
Artemia replacement
(ar)
in
hatchery
phase
Larval shrimp rearing – Nutrition and PL quality
Improved Nutrition
• Further stretching the balance
– A slow gradual decrease in Artemia consumption statistics demonstrates that hatcheries
world-wide learned to reduce their dependence on live food
– Hatcheries that have implemented Artemia reduction themselves have a stronger believe
in low Artemia consumption protocols
yes no
Do you think that
feeding regimes Americas
with reduced
0 20 40 60 80 100
Artemia
consumption can
produce good SE Asia
postlarvae quality?
Larval shrimp rearing – Nutrition and PL quality
Improved Nutrition
Contribution of Artemia
Effect of Artemia replacement in late PL
– Trial demonstrated the negative effect of stopping Artemia feeding in PL
stages
Growth
800
700
Dry
Weightat
PL10
(µg)
600
500
400
300
200
100
0
Stop
PL8 Stop
PL7 Stop
PL6 Stop
PL5 Stop
PL4 Stop
PL3
Stage
at
wich
Artemia
feeding
stopped
ITARC
C166
Larval shrimp rearing – Nutrition and PL quality
Improved Nutrition
Contribution of Artemia
Artemia nauplii are more efficiently assimilated than formulated feeds
ITARC C244
75%
of
Total
Feeding:
280µg
DM
25% Artemia nauplii contributes more to larval growth and survival than 75% dry feed
Improved Nutrition
Growth
– As
growth
is
mainly
requiring
protein
synthesis,
the
focus
in
the
current
study
was
put
on
protein
nutrition
– Earlier
published
studies
with
protein
hydrolysate
in
diets
for
marine
fish
and
shrimp
larvae
revealed
the
importance
of
amino
acid
balance.
– Presence
of
different
proteases
during
larval
development
suggests
age-‐
specific
digestive
capacities.
Protein Nutrition
Peptide size
Digestibility
6/11/17
Larval shrimp rearing – Nutrition and PL quality
Protein nutrition
Peptide
molecular
weight
distribution
à Free
amino
acids,
dipeptides
and
tripeptides
are
readily
absorbed
by
enterocytes
and
enter
the
organism
at
higher
rates
than
larger
proteins.
Size
Exclusion
Chromatography
(SEC)
SEC-‐screening
of
ingredients
can
clearly
distinguish
three
groups
based
on
protein
size
Larval shrimp rearing – Nutrition and PL quality
Protein nutrition
MW
differences
give
the
opportunity
to
formulate
diets
with
different
protein
profiles
Larval shrimp rearing – Nutrition and PL quality
Protein nutrition
in
vitro
digestibility
assay
for
P.
vannamei larvae
and
PL’s
(pH-‐stat
determination
of
the
degree
of
protein
hydrolysis,
%DH)
Protein nutrition
in vitro protein digestibility with P. vannamei enzyme extract
digestibility
14
13
12
Degree
of
hydrolysis
(%)
11
10
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
casein gelatin fish
meal squid
meal freeze-‐dried
soy
bean
wheat
gluten
brewers
fish meal yeast
Z2 M2 PL3
à Protein
digestibility
increased
during
larval
development
and
reached
maximum
at
Mysis
2
stage,
followed
by
a
decrease
from
Mysis
2
to
PL3
à Vegetable
terrestrial
proteins
were
less
digestible
than
marine
animal
proteins
à Distinction
between
animal
marine
protein
sources
&
effect
of
processing
à Rapid
screening
of
ingredients
for
the
production
of
highly-‐digestible
larval
aquafeeds
Larval shrimp rearing – Nutrition and PL quality
Protein nutrition
Shrimp
trial
with
feed
containing
highly-‐digestible,
low
molecular-‐weight,
water-‐soluble
peptide
source
(EF-‐PQ)
Peptide
MW
distribution
15 à Experimental
feed
(EF)
with
%
of
soluble
protein
Survival
Growth à Increased
survival
and
growth
70 800
ITARC
C236 700
à EF-‐PQ
enabled
drastic
60
reduction
of
Artemia
Survival
Z1-‐PL10
(%)
600
Dry
Weight
PL10
(µg)
50
40
500 consumption
400
30
300
20
200
10 100
0 0 0.5kg
cysts
consumed
per
M
PL10
EF-‐CON_0.5 EF-‐PQ_0.5 EF-‐CON_0.5 EF-‐PQ_0.5
Larval shrimp rearing – Nutrition and PL quality
Improved Nutrition
Growth (individual Dry Weight)
– Innovative feed development was obtained by combining new insights in protein
quality with adapted feed technology.
– This technology was required to control the leaching of low-MW water-soluble
nutrients such as amino acids, di- and tripeptides.
ITARC
C246
1000
900
Protein
Q
Technology
800
700
Dry
Weight
(µg)
600
500
400
300
200
100 1
kg
cysts
0 +
EF-‐A_1 EF-‐B_1 EF-‐C_1 EF_C
+
live
algae
Larval shrimp rearing – Nutrition and PL quality
Trial 1 Trial 2
Repeatedly good survival and good growth results with newly developed
feed EF-C, applying very low Artemia cyst consumption (less than 0.5kg)
and adjusted feeding strategy.
Larval shrimp rearing – Nutrition and PL quality
400 8000
200 2.46kg
cysts 0.45kg 4000
0
COMM_2,46 EF-‐C_0,45
0
Survival Survival COMM_2,46 EF-‐C_0,45
58% 65%
FRY
QUALITY
Larval shrimp rearing – Health and PL quality
Improved Health
• A strong believe in the role of health products
– The survey reflects the strong believe of hatchery managers in the benefit of health
products for producing stronger PL’s and reducing the risk of disease outbreak:
Improved Health
Vibrio suppressors / Increased robustness
Specific phytobiotic mix PL
transport
trial
1000
100
10
Control FIT Control FIT
Postlarvae Water
Larval shrimp rearing – Health and PL quality
Improved Health
Vibrio suppressors / Increased robustness
Specific phytobiotic mix
50 2
40 Control
1
30 FIT
20 0
HSP70 Crustin1
10
Control FIT
Larval shrimp rearing – Health and PL quality
Improved Health
Vibrio suppressors
Applies
selected
plant
extracts
(incl.
Berberis)
to
specifically
suppress
Vibrio
development
during
the
hatching
process
1.E+08 1.E+08
1.E+06 1.E+06
CFU/ml
CFU/ml
1.E+02 1.E+02
1.E+00 1.E+00
MA TCBS MA TCBS
Improved Health
Vibrio suppressors
1.E+05
1.E+04
100
x
reduction
CFU/ml
1.E+03
1.E+02
1.E+01
1.E+00
MA TCBS
Artemia
nauplii
Larval shrimp rearing – Health and PL quality
Improved Health
80
60
40
20
0
Feed
only Feed
+
S-‐PAK
Larval shrimp rearing – Health and PL quality
• Summary
– Growing shrimp industry requires robust / high-quality postlarvae
– PL quality can be promoted through improved larval rearing techniques
– Innovative feeds have been developed based on new feed technology and
continued efforts in the field of ingredient digestibility and protein nutrition
– These new feeds promote survival, growth and PL quality, also under low
Artemia consumption protocols
– Health practices help producing robust and healthy PL’s, hence assist in
reducing mortalities during disease incidence in the farm
Larval shrimp rearing – PL quality & Grow-out performance
Pond survival
67
80 A A
=
control
hatchery
feeding
regime
44
Survival
(%)
An
analysis
of
the
survival
of
hatchery
reared
Penaeus
vannamei,
Boone,
larvae.
H.
Lucien-‐Brun,
A.
Aguilar,
J.A.
Salvador
and
Daniel
O’C
Lee
Larval shrimp rearing – PL quality & Grow-out performance
Juvenile growth
CCT 110
• Summary
– Growing shrimp industry requires robust / high-quality postlarvae
– PL quality can be promoted through improved larval rearing techniques
– Innovative feeds have been developed based on new feed technology and
continued efforts in the field of ingredient digestibility and protein nutrition
– These new feeds promote survival, growth and PL quality, also under low
Artemia consumption protocols
– Health practices help producing robust and healthy PL’s, hence assist in
reducing mortalities during disease incidence in the farm
– Stocking high quality PL’s in grow-out ponds has proven beneficial effect
on survival and growth in the weeks after pond stocking
– Assumed long-term effects of stocking high quality PL are increased crop
yield and cost benefit for the grow-out farmer
Take-away-message
Do not compromise hatchery performance by cutting costs on
necessary feeds, health products and microbial management.
Instead, invest in optimizing PL quality from the start of hatchery and
get higher net return at pond harvest.
Thank you!