Você está na página 1de 37

AN  INTEGRATED  LARVAL  SHRIMP  REARING  APPROACH  

WITH
FOCUS  ON  NUTRITION  AND  PL  QUALITY:
Stretching  the  balance  between
experimental  feed  and  Artemia

UNA PROXIMACIÓN INTEGRAL AL CULTIVO LARVARIO CON ENFOQUE EN LA


NUTRICIÓN Y LA CALIDAD DE LAS POST-­LARVAS:
En  búsqueda  de  un  nuevo  balance  entre  dietas  experimentales  y  Artemia

Roeland  Wouters
D.  Grymonpre,  C.  De  Maesschalck,
P.  Joos,  V.  Calabuig,  P.  Rattayaporn,  A.  Rekecki,
E.  Naessens,  G.  Rombaut,  P.  Lavens

Wednesday  25  October      -­ 12:20  – 13:00


Larval shrimp rearing – Nutrition and PL quality

Introduction

1.  Disease  >  2.  PL  quality  &  availability  >  4.  Feed  cost  >  10.  Feed  quality

2
Larval shrimp rearing – Nutrition and PL quality

Introduction

1.  Feed  cost  >  2.  Disease  >  6.  PL  quality  &  availability  >  9.  Feed  quality

3
Ecuador  hatcheries

4
Larval shrimp rearing – Nutrition and PL quality

Introduction
Holistic approach

PL  QUALITY
Larval shrimp rearing – Nutrition and PL quality

Introduction
• Survey on PL Quality
E. Werbrouck et al. 2017
Larval shrimp rearing – Nutrition and PL quality

Introduction
• Robust  PL’s:  Why?
– Postlarval quality  and  its  long-­‐term  effects  have  grown  in  interest  to  hatchery  and  
grow-­‐out  farmers  as  the  shrimp  industry  faces  challenges  overcoming  diseases,  while  
moving  towards  greater  integration,  genetic  improvement  and  increased  control.  

• Robust  PL’s:  How


– Improved  larval  rearing  techniques
• Nutrition
§ Innovative  feeds  that  promote  survival,  growth  and  long-­‐term  PL  quality
§ Decreased  dependence  on  Artemia cysts
• Health
§ Boost  stress  resistance  and  resilience
§ Microbial  management  /  Reduce  Vibrio  load
Larval shrimp rearing – Nutrition and PL quality

Shrimp hatchery facilities at ITARC


24x  3MT  tanks  

Set1:  60x  175L  tanks   Series  of


P.  vannamei
larval  trials  
(N5-­‐PL10)

Set2:  60x  175L  tanks  


Larval shrimp rearing – Nutrition and PL quality

Improved Nutrition

• Best Balance
– Best Balance between live food and formulated feed FRIPPAK Fresh GOLD
• Reduction of Artemia cyst consumption by factor 2

Possible  Artemia reduction  (with  FRIPPAK  FRESH  Gold):


normal,  decreased  and  zero  Artemia cyst  use

Best
Balance
Relative  performance  (%)

100 Survival
80 Dry  Weight
60
40
20
0
3 1,5 0
Artemia  use  (kg  cysts/Mio  fry)
Larval shrimp rearing – Nutrition and PL quality

Improved Nutrition
Best Balance

Nursery  growth  after  Artemia replacement  


in  the  Hatchery  phase

%  Artemia replacement  
(ar)  in  hatchery  phase
Larval shrimp rearing – Nutrition and PL quality

Improved Nutrition
• Further stretching the balance
– A slow gradual decrease in Artemia consumption statistics demonstrates that hatcheries
world-wide learned to reduce their dependence on live food
– Hatcheries that have implemented Artemia reduction themselves have a stronger believe
in low Artemia consumption protocols

yes no
Do you think that
feeding regimes Americas
with reduced
0 20 40 60 80 100
Artemia
consumption can
produce good SE Asia
postlarvae quality?
Larval shrimp rearing – Nutrition and PL quality

Improved Nutrition
Contribution of Artemia
Effect of Artemia replacement in late PL
– Trial demonstrated the negative effect of stopping Artemia feeding in PL
stages

Growth
800

700
Dry  Weightat  PL10  (µg)

600

500

400

300

200

100

0
Stop  PL8 Stop  PL7 Stop  PL6 Stop  PL5 Stop  PL4 Stop  PL3
Stage  at  wich  Artemia  feeding  stopped
ITARC  C166
Larval shrimp rearing – Nutrition and PL quality

Improved Nutrition
Contribution of Artemia
Artemia nauplii are more efficiently assimilated than formulated feeds

ITARC  C244

75%  of  
Total  Feeding:  
280µg  DM

25% Artemia nauplii contributes more to larval growth and survival than 75% dry feed

Results confirmed by study J. Gambao-Delgado & L. Levay (2009), Aquaculture 297


Larval shrimp rearing – Nutrition and PL quality

Improved Nutrition
Growth
– As  growth  is  mainly  requiring  protein  synthesis,  the  focus  in  the  current  study  
was  put  on    protein  nutrition
– Earlier  published  studies  with  protein  hydrolysate  in  diets  for  marine  fish  and  
shrimp  larvae  revealed  the  importance  of  amino  acid  balance.
– Presence  of  different  proteases  during  larval  development  suggests  age-­‐
specific  digestive  capacities.

Protein  Nutrition

Amino  acid  composition

Peptide size

Digestibility

6/11/17
Larval shrimp rearing – Nutrition and PL quality

Protein nutrition
Peptide  molecular  weight  distribution
à Free  amino  acids,  dipeptides  and  tripeptides  are  readily  absorbed  by  
enterocytes  and  enter  the  organism  at  higher  rates  than  larger  proteins.

Size  Exclusion  
Chromatography  (SEC)  

SEC-­‐screening  of  
ingredients  can  clearly  
distinguish  three  groups  
based  on  protein  size
Larval shrimp rearing – Nutrition and PL quality

Protein nutrition
MW  differences  give  the  opportunity  to  formulate  diets  with  
different  protein  profiles
Larval shrimp rearing – Nutrition and PL quality

Protein nutrition
in  vitro  digestibility  assay  for  P.  vannamei larvae  and  PL’s
(pH-­‐stat  determination  of  the  degree  of  protein  hydrolysis,  %DH)

à Efficient  feed  formulation,  processing  and  feeding  practices


+ suitable  absorption/utilization  of  balanced  amino  acid  pools
à New  in  vitro  protocol  developed  in  collaboration  with  Lemos &  Yasumaru  
(University  of  São  Paulo),  using  enzymes  extracted  from  larval  and  postlarval
P.  vannamei
Larval shrimp rearing – Nutrition and PL quality

Protein nutrition
in vitro protein digestibility with P. vannamei enzyme extract
digestibility
14
13
12
Degree  of  hydrolysis  (%)

11
10
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
casein gelatin fish  meal squid  meal freeze-­‐dried   soy  bean   wheat  gluten   brewers  
fish meal yeast

Z2 M2 PL3

à Protein  digestibility  increased  during  larval  development  and  reached  maximum  at  
Mysis  2  stage,  followed  by  a  decrease  from  Mysis  2  to  PL3
à Vegetable  terrestrial  proteins  were  less  digestible  than  marine  animal  proteins
à Distinction  between  animal  marine  protein  sources  &  effect  of  processing
à Rapid  screening  of  ingredients  for  the  production  of  highly-­‐digestible  larval  aquafeeds
Larval shrimp rearing – Nutrition and PL quality

Protein nutrition
Shrimp  trial  with  feed  containing  highly-­‐digestible,  low  molecular-­‐weight,  
water-­‐soluble  peptide  source  (EF-­‐PQ)
Peptide  MW  distribution
15 à Experimental  feed  (EF)  with  
%  of  soluble  protein

10 inclusion  of  an  ingredient  


selected  on  Protein  Nutrition  /  
5
Protein  Quality  (PQ)
0
EF-­‐CON EF-­‐PQ
>20  kDa 20-­‐10  kDa 10-­‐5  kDa 5-­‐1  kDa <1  kDa

Survival
Growth à Increased  survival  and  growth
70 800
ITARC  C236 700
à EF-­‐PQ  enabled  drastic  
60
reduction  of  Artemia
Survival  Z1-­‐PL10  (%)

600
Dry  Weight  PL10  (µg)

50
40
500 consumption
400
30
300
20
200
10 100
0 0 0.5kg  cysts  consumed  per  M  PL10
EF-­‐CON_0.5 EF-­‐PQ_0.5 EF-­‐CON_0.5 EF-­‐PQ_0.5
Larval shrimp rearing – Nutrition and PL quality

Improved Nutrition
Growth (individual Dry Weight)
– Innovative feed development was obtained by combining new insights in protein
quality with adapted feed technology.
– This technology was required to control the leaching of low-MW water-soluble
nutrients such as amino acids, di- and tripeptides.

ITARC  C246
1000
900
Protein  Q
Technology
800
700
Dry  Weight  (µg)

600
500
400
300
200
100 1  kg  cysts
0 +
EF-­‐A_1 EF-­‐B_1 EF-­‐C_1 EF_C
+
live  algae
Larval shrimp rearing – Nutrition and PL quality

Innovative feed performance

Trial  1 Trial  2

Growth ITARC  17LS01 Growth


800 1000
avg
Dry  Weight  PL10  (µg)

Dry  Weight  PL10  (µg)


603µg
800
600
avg 600
338µg
400
400

200 200 2.35kg  


cysts 0.46kg
2.34kg 0.52kg 0.41kg
0 0
COMM_2,34 COMM_0,52 EF-­‐C_0,41 COMM_2,35 EF-­‐C_0,46
Survival Survival Survival Survival Survival
69% 62% 76% 66% 68%

Repeatedly good survival and good growth results with newly developed
feed EF-C, applying very low Artemia cyst consumption (less than 0.5kg)
and adjusted feeding strategy.
Larval shrimp rearing – Nutrition and PL quality

Innovative feed performance


Follow-up trial in nursery tanks:
Trial  3 both treatments received same feed
during nursery culture
ITARC  17LS03r
1000
Growth
16000
Dry  Weight  PL10  (µg)

Dry  Weight  PL23  (µg)


800
12000
600

400 8000

200 2.46kg  
cysts 0.45kg 4000
0
COMM_2,46 EF-­‐C_0,45
0
Survival Survival COMM_2,46 EF-­‐C_0,45
58% 65%

Good  results  with  newly  developed  feed  


EF-­‐C  are  continued  in  the  nursery  phase
Feed  EF-­‐C  produced  larger/stronger  PL’s
Larval shrimp rearing – Nutrition, Health and PL quality

Improved Nutrition & Health


Holistic approach

FRY  QUALITY
Larval shrimp rearing – Health and PL quality

Improved Health
• A strong believe in the role of health products

– The survey reflects the strong believe of hatchery managers in the benefit of health
products for producing stronger PL’s and reducing the risk of disease outbreak:

Vibrio suppressors, Health booster feeds, Probiotics

Do you think that …

1. microbial management in the


hatchery influences PL quality?

2. there is a link between poor PL


quality and the incidence of disease?
Larval shrimp rearing – Health and PL quality

Improved Health
Vibrio suppressors / Increased robustness
Specific phytobiotic mix PL  transport  trial

Vibrio load  after  24h  transport  (PL10)


1000000
Vibrio  sp.
100000
Vibrio  
10000 parahaemolyticus

1000

100

10
Control FIT Control FIT
Postlarvae Water
Larval shrimp rearing – Health and PL quality

Improved Health
Vibrio suppressors / Increased robustness
Specific phytobiotic mix

PL10  Survival  after  43°C  


temperature  stress
Gene  expression  in  PL10  stage  shrimp
60 3

50 2
40 Control
1
30 FIT
20 0
HSP70 Crustin1
10

0 Upregulation  of  HSP70  RNA  and  Crustin1  RNA


after  1h after  2h

Control FIT
Larval shrimp rearing – Health and PL quality

Improved Health
Vibrio suppressors
Applies  selected  plant  extracts  (incl.  Berberis)  to  specifically  suppress  
Vibrio  development  during  the  hatching  process

Bacterial counts in HATCHING WATER (24h) of GSL cysts

1.E+08 1.E+08

1.E+06 1.E+06

CFU/ml
CFU/ml

1.E+04 1  year  storage 1.E+04

1.E+02 1.E+02

1.E+00 1.E+00
MA TCBS MA TCBS

Not  treated  cysts Not  treated  cysts


Berberis  treatment Berberis  treatment

SPECIFIC action  on  VIBRIO’S Bacterial  reduction  is  STABLE


during  at  least  ONE YEAR
Larval shrimp rearing – Health and PL quality

Improved Health
Vibrio suppressors

Bacterial counts on HATCHED NAUPLII (24h) of GSL cysts

1.E+05

1.E+04
100  x  
reduction
CFU/ml

1.E+03

1.E+02

1.E+01

1.E+00
MA TCBS

Not  treated  cysts


Berberis  treatment

Artemia  nauplii
Larval shrimp rearing – Health and PL quality

Improved Health

Probiotics Health booster feeds


Positive effect on PL5 stage Positive effect on PL10
survival and growth stress resistance

PL10  Survival  (%)  to  a  


salinity  stress  test

Stress  test  survival  (%)


100

80

60

40

20

0
Feed  only Feed  +  S-­‐PAK
Larval shrimp rearing – Health and PL quality

PL quality through improved nutrition and health

• Summary
– Growing shrimp industry requires robust / high-quality postlarvae
– PL quality can be promoted through improved larval rearing techniques
– Innovative feeds have been developed based on new feed technology and
continued efforts in the field of ingredient digestibility and protein nutrition
– These new feeds promote survival, growth and PL quality, also under low
Artemia consumption protocols
– Health practices help producing robust and healthy PL’s, hence assist in
reducing mortalities during disease incidence in the farm
Larval shrimp rearing – PL quality & Grow-out performance

Improved PL quality à Improved grow-out performance

“Long-term stress and handling


stress negatively affected growth,
molting and feed consumption in L.
vannamei juveniles.”
(Mercier et al. 2009)
Higher  survival  to  a  PL  stress  test  
is  associated  to:
• “greater  survival  during  
stocking”
(Fegan  1992;;  Racotta  et  al.  2004)
• “better  survival  and  growth  
during  grow-­out”
(Aquacop  et  al.  1991)
Larval shrimp rearing – PL quality & Grow-out performance

Improved PL quality à Improved grow-out performance

Grow-­‐out  trial  (Ecuador):


• PL’s  originated  from  the  same  hatchery  received  two  different  larval feeding  
regimes  (A  &  B)  à 12  shipments,  8.5  million  PL  à stocked  in  0.3  ha  ponds  at  
the  grow-­‐out  farm  and  harvested  after  45  days

Pond  survival

67
80 A A  =  control  hatchery  feeding  regime
44
Survival  (%)

60 B B  =  regime  with  microencapsulated  larval  feeds  


40
20
0
Hatchery  diet

An  analysis  of  the  survival  of  hatchery  reared  Penaeus  vannamei,  Boone,  larvae.
H.  Lucien-­‐Brun,  A.  Aguilar,  J.A.  Salvador  and  Daniel  O’C  Lee
Larval shrimp rearing – PL quality & Grow-out performance

Improved PL quality à Improved grow-out performance


Experiment  (CENAIM,  Ecuador): Growth increased
...  with  17%  with  PL’s  that  better  resisted  osmotic  stress  test  (OST)
...  with  19%  with  PL’s  that  could  swim  counter-­‐current

Juvenile  growth

Relative  growth  increase  (%)


120

CCT 110

Counter-­‐current  test  (CCT) 100


High  Quality  PL
90 Regular  PL
OSS
CCT
PL  quality  evaluation
Naessens et  al.  1995
Larval shrimp rearing – PL quality & Grow-out performance

Improved PL quality à Improved grow-out performance

• Effect of stocking high quality PL’s in grow-out ponds


Effects in the first month after pond stocking
– improved survival rate and increased growth
– reduced transfer of pathogens to the ponds
– allows a good initial count of the number of PL stocked
– improved control over juvenile stocking densities à more accurate
calculation of feeding quantities
Long-term effects during grow-out
– improved survival rate, increased growth, better FCR, better disease
resistance
– more accurate calculation of feeding quantities
è increased final pond crop yield
Assumed cost benefit of stocking improved PL quality
Hypothetical  cost  benefit  by  stocking  better  quality  postlarvae:
Shrimp  grow-­‐out  pond  (1 ha)   Regular Improved   Difference
stocked  with  1  Mio  PL’s PL  quality PL  quality (%)
(harvest  15  g  shrimp)
Survival  transport  (%) 91 95 +4
Survival  pond  (%) 75 80 +7
Growth  rate  (g/wk) 1,21 1,25 +3
Culture  periods  (days) 89 85 -­‐4
Feed  cost  (USD) 24413 23687 -­‐3
Additional  costs  (USD) 19207 19207 0
Total  cost  (USD) 43620 42888 -­‐2
Cost/kg  shrimp  (USD) 2,84 2,43 -­‐14
Yield/pond  (USD) 76795 88343 +15
Profit/pond  (USD) 33175 45455 +37
Larval shrimp rearing – Health and PL quality

PL quality through improved nutrition and health

• Summary
– Growing shrimp industry requires robust / high-quality postlarvae
– PL quality can be promoted through improved larval rearing techniques
– Innovative feeds have been developed based on new feed technology and
continued efforts in the field of ingredient digestibility and protein nutrition
– These new feeds promote survival, growth and PL quality, also under low
Artemia consumption protocols
– Health practices help producing robust and healthy PL’s, hence assist in
reducing mortalities during disease incidence in the farm
– Stocking high quality PL’s in grow-out ponds has proven beneficial effect
on survival and growth in the weeks after pond stocking
– Assumed long-term effects of stocking high quality PL are increased crop
yield and cost benefit for the grow-out farmer
Take-away-message
Do not compromise hatchery performance by cutting costs on
necessary feeds, health products and microbial management.
Instead, invest in optimizing PL quality from the start of hatchery and
get higher net return at pond harvest.

Thank you!

Você também pode gostar