ACCUPOINT SYSTEMS, INCORPORATED

PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL

NAME: ANTANG, SANNY B. POSITION/ JOB TITLE: DRIVER

DEPT./ SECTION : LOGISTICS RATING PERIOD : APRIL to JUNE 2010

DATE HIRED: DECEMBER 01, 2005 EMPLOYMENT STATUS: REGULAR

NATURE OF REVIEW:

( ◙ ) QUARTERLY ( ) SEMI ANNUAL ( ) PROMOTION ( ) OTHERS/ PLS SPECIFY : ___________

RATING AND WEIGHT SCALE OF APPRAISAL:

1. RATING DEFINITIONS POINT RANGE PERCENTAGE

EXCEPTIONAL PASSED; Employee’s performance is 1.00 – 1.50 100 - 96

and far exceeds the desired results
expected from him.

SUPERIOR PASSED; Employee’s performance 1.51 – 2.50 95 – 86

exceed the desired results expected from
him.

FULLY SUCCESSFUL PASSED; Employee’s performance 2.51 – 3.50 85 – 75

meets the desired results expected from
him.

MINIMALLY SUCCESSFUL FAILED; Employee’s performance did 3.51 – 4.50 74 – 70

not below the desired results expected
from him.

UNSATISFACTORY FAILED; Employee cannot be relied/ 4.51 – 5.00 69 and below

depended upon or shows no interest in
performing his job.

2. WEIGHT PERCENT SHARE

PART I Outcome of employee’s performance in terms 55%

of the major task, objectives, duties and
responsibilities assigned.

PART II Employee’s personal characteristics and behavior 45%

which are essential in the performance of the major
task, objectives, duties and responsibilities.
 Page 1 of 4
PART I – JOB PERFROMANCE FACTORS (55%)

A. QUANTITY (30%) - Consider the volume of work under normal working conditions or
Results produced in terms of quantity within a given period of time.

( ) 1. OUTSTANDING - Significally surpassed above than desired output.

( ) 2. ABOVE AVERAGE - Usually attains higher than the desired output.

( ) 3. AVERAGE - Usually attains desired output.

( ) 4. BELOW AVERAGE - Usually attains lesser than desired output.

( ) 5. POOR - Attains very low of what is expected.

REMARKS: _________________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________________

B. QUALITY (30%) - Consider the accuracy, neatness, errors, wastages, reworks and presentation.

( ) 1. OUTSTANDING - Work exceptionally accurate, free of error and defects, orderly, neat and complete in
details. Work fulfilled it’s maximum purpose.

( ) 2. ABOVE AVERAGE - Work is accurate, rarely commits error and mistakes.

( ) 3. AVERAGE - Work is acceptable and seldom make mistakes.

( ) 4. BELOW AVERAGE - Work seldom meet acceptable quality and standard, rework is always noticeable,
needs to show more concern about the quality of his work.

( ) 5. POOR - Frequently make mistakes of the same nature.

REMARKS: __________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________

C. CONSISTENCY (20%) - Pattern of the ratees performance progress to a given period of time relative to set standard
and goal.

( ) 1. OUTSTANDING - The presence of continuous progress is being observed. Always higher than previous
performance.

( ) 2. ABOVE AVERAGE - Performance progress is above than averagely perceived or recorded.

( ) 3. AVERAGE - Existence of constant performance based on set standard.

( ) 4. BELOW AVERAGE - Performance progress is below tolerable or expected level.

( ) 5. POOR - Performance is unstable and leaned more on unsatisfactory level.

REMARKS: __________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________

D. EFFECTIVENESS (20%) - Overall contribution to the organization of the performance of the rate based on the
department S.O.P. and special assigned task and able to meet target schedule of work volume.

( ) 1. OUTSTANDING - Accomplished special task based on S.O.P. is very significant and useful to department
goal and performance.

( ) 2. ABOVE AVERAGE - Attains significant result of the special task based on S.O.P. to the department goal.

( ) 3. AVERAGE - Performance result of the special task based on S.O.P. meets the desired level of expectations.

( ) 4. BELOW AVERAGE - Performance result of the special task based on S.O.P. meets lesser than the desired
expectations.

( ) 5. POOR - Generally achieves far below than the desired level of expectation based on S.O.P.
REMARKS: __________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________
 Page 2 of 4
PART II – BEHAVIORAL FACTORS (55%)

A. JOB ATTITUDE (30%) - Considering the ratee’s consideration, discipline, flexibility, and willingness to exchange
personal convenience for official duty. Adjust to the current needs of situation.

( ) 1. OUTSTANDING - Highly keen in accepting duties regardless of the nature or the circumstances. Totally
committed to work.

( ) 2. ABOVE AVERAGE - Often willing to sacrifice personal convenience for official duties. Manifest cooperation.

( ) 3. AVERAGE - Shows minimal hesitation in performing assigned task.

( ) 4. BELOW AVERAGE - Always shows resistance to changes or any special assignment, not working to the fullest.

( ) 5. POOR - Shows no interest on the job.

REMARKS: _________________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________________

B. ATTENDANCE (25%) - Considering the number of absences, tardiness and undertime of the ratee. It also pertains to
the commitment of the employee too submit his presence to the workplace with respect to the
given schedule.

( ) 1. OUTSTANDING - Incurred perfect attendance without lates nor undertime.

( ) 2. ABOVE AVERAGE - Seldom makes absences nor undertime.

( ) 3. AVERAGE - Number of absences and tardiness are considerably acceptable with valid reason.

( ) 4. BELOW AVERAGE - make several absences and tardiness without valid reason

( ) 5. POOR - Often absent and always lates.

REMARKS: __________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________

C. DEPENDABILITY (25%) - Considering the ratee’s initiative, sound judgment and resourcefulness in the performance of
his task. Exhibits the capability to follow instructions with minimal or no supervision.

( ) 1. OUTSTANDING - Extremely dependable, can perform function on his own in accordance to given instruction.

( ) 2. ABOVE AVERAGE - Highly reliable and resourceful, completes assignment earlier than the required deadlines.

( ) 3. AVERAGE - Can complete work assignment and meet deadlines. Seldom commit errors.

( ) 4. BELOW AVERAGE - Occasionally dependable. Lacks initiative and awareness

( ) 5. POOR - Unreliable
REMARKS: __________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________

D. WORK KNOWLEDGE (20%) – Considering the knowledge and skills. It includes the knowledge of whole system,
procedures, processes and any other related functions.

( ) 1. OUTSTANDING - Has exceptional knowledge and understanding of the job and well-verse on related works.

( ) 2. ABOVE AVERAGE - Has thorough knowledge and understanding of the job.

( ) 3. AVERAGE - Has adequate knowledge of the job to carry on normal job requirements.

( ) 4. BELOW AVERAGE - Insufficient knowledge and understanding of the job. Needs assistance.

( ) 5. POOR - Inadequate knowledge and understanding of the job. Frequent follow up and checking badly
needed.
REMARKS: __________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________
 Page 3 of 4
A. GENERAL OBSERVATION

STRONG POINTS __________________________________________________________________________________________

__________________________________________________________________________________________

WEAK POINTS __________________________________________________________________________________________

__________________________________________________________________________________________

B. RECOMMENDATION

__________________________________________________________________________________________________________

__________________________________________________________________________________________________________

__________________________________________________________________________________________________________

C. COMMENTS BY RATER’S SUPERIOR

_______________________________________________________________________________________________________

__________________________________________________________________________________________________________

__________________________________________________________________________________________________________

_________________________ ______________________
NAME DATE

_________________________ ______________________
POSITION SIGNATURE

RATING COMPUTATIONS
I. JOB PERFORMANCE FACTORS (55%) II. BEHAVIORAL FACTORS (45%)
WEIGHT X RATING =SCORE WEIGHT X RATING = SCORE
A. 30 X ______ = ______ A. 30 X ______ = _______
B. 30 X ______ = ______ B. 25 X ______ = _______
C. 20 X ______ = ______ C. 25 X ______ = _______
D. 20 X ______ = ______ D. 20 X ______ = _______
TOTAL SCORE = ______ TOTAL SCORE = _______

JOB PERFORMANCE FACTORS X 55% = ______ BEHAVIORAL FACTORS 45% = _______

OVERALL SCORE/ RATING (PART I and II EVALUATION) = _________________

RATING = ________________________

REVIEWED BY: __________________________

DATE
________________________________ __________________________
HUMAN RESOURCE DEPARTMENT SIGNATURE

EMPLOYEE’S COMMENT:
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________

____________________________ __________________________
SIGNATURE DATE

Performance Appraisal Form

Series 2009/ HRD Page 4 of 4