Project Widening and Reconstruction of Anuppur -Jaitpur Road , Gohparu-Rasmohni-Budhar Road,

Pasghari-Deori-Janakpur Road

Subject:Remarks on compliance Report submitted by the contractor on three minor bridges

Ref: GHV/MPRDC/PKG20/March-2017/15 dt 14/03/2018
Sno ICT Comments Compliance by contractor ch.4+480
Ground profile is missing in General We have mentioned the Ground Profile in
1 arrangement Drawings (GAD) GAD Ok
We have shown the HFL value in
2 HFL value not shown in the drawing drawings. Ok
Non Availability of Rate for Crash Barrier
Hand rail has been shown, please in BOQ. Hand Rail has been considered
3 change to crash barrier under the BOQ in Rm. not OK,Crash barrier shall be p
Slab has been thickened at support We have shown dimension details in
location, but Its dimension details are drawings
4 not shown. OK
We have shown dimension of Stone OK, However toe wall des
Details of Stone pitching not shown pitching in drawings considering embedment in roc
clearly, dimension details to be be submitted.
5 mentioned.
Toe wall shall be anchored below scour We have provided design dimensions of
level. Its design dimensions shall be Toe wall in drawings
6 provided OK
We have shown the Rock top level in Geotech report submission is p
drawings. to check rock top levels.

Rock top level shall be shown in the

7 drawings.
In half top plan, after fly wing, a
parapet wall has been shown. Its
8 details may be clearly shown.
In Pier Reinforcement drawing bar
9 LEGEND wrongly presented
Drawing title and shown details are not
10 matching with GAD.
1 Hydrology and Geotech report shall be
submitted
We have done the correction in drawings.
OK
We have done the correction in drawings.
OK
We have done the correction in drawings.
OK
Hydrology calculations are attached with
this letter. Geo-technical investigation has
been done, samples have been collected.
Results are awaited from the laboratory
(will be submitted upon receipt of the test
results).

OK
2 In Pier design note-substructure has We have corrected the design.
been designed for deck width of 8.4m,
hence design to be modified OK
3 In Deck slab design note –Shear The calculation for shear reinforcement in
reinforcement V RDC calculation not slab is show in design note.
shown. OK
4 Pier design shall be checked according Waiting for Geotech report.
to cl.210.6 of IRC-6 for rock strata
Geotech report submission is p
5 Design of stone pitching shall be We will submit design of stone pitching
provided separately. Report submission is pending

New comment after observing Hydrology Report

1 Vertical clearance above HFL in case
of bridge ch.4+480, required is 1.45
m including afflux against available
0.885 m, Design
discharge=308cumecs, hence not
safe.And remaining two bridges are
safe
-Budhar Road,

ch.13+580 ch.21+233

Ok Ok

Ok Ok

not OK,Crash barrier shall be provided.

OK OK
OK, However toe wall design,
considering embedment in rock shall
be submitted.

OK OK
Geotech report submission is pending
o check rock top levels.

OK OK

OK OK

OK OK

OK OK

OK OK

OK OK

Geotech report submission is pending

Report submission is pending