Você está na página 1de 2

ST.

PETER’S COLLEGE
# 042 Sabayle, St., Iligan City
221-5860 or 6247

COLLEGE OF CRIMINOLOGY
OJT/INTERNSHIP PERFORMANCE EVALUATION

Agency Contact Information

AGENCY NAME : CONTACT PERSON:

AGENCY ADDRESS: CELL/TEL. NO.:

Intern’s Information

INTERN’S NAME : DATE STARTED:


JOB TITLE: DATE ENDED:
CELL/TEL. NO.: TOTAL TRAINING HOURS:

Part I: (Please complete the evaluation of the Intern for each period. Please be as accurate as possible in
evaluating the Intern’s progress. Kindly check the appropriate rating box for each item).

RATING
COMPETENCY POOR MARGINAL GOOD VERY EXCELLENT
GOOD
1. Ability to Learn
2. Acceptance of Direction and Responsibility
3. Adaptability
4. Appearance/ Hygiene
5. Meetings of Deadlines
6. Moral and Ethical Values
7. Motivation/Initiative
8. Operation of Equipment
9. Punctuality and Attendance
10. Quality and Accuracy of Work
11. Safety Practices
12. Sensitivity and Concern for Others
13. Overall Rating

Rating Scale Range Value Percentage Equivalent Interpretation


5 4.3 – 5.0 96- 100 Excellent
4 3.5 – 4.2 91 - 95 Very Good
3 2.7 – 3.4 86 - 90 Good
2 1.9 – 2.6 81 - 85 Marginal
1 1.0 – 1.8 80 bellow Poor

COMMENT SECTION
List or explain other concerns so that the Intern can successfully complete or more productive in attaining
learning outcomes/skills.
STRENGTH(S)
WEAKNESS(ES), if any
Are there additional supportive services the workforce system can help with? (Please list)

__________________________________ _____________________________________

Signature over Printed Name of the Evaluator Signature over Printed Name of the Agency Head

Page 1 of 2
Part II: Part I: (Please complete the evaluation of the Intern for each period. Please be as accurate as
possible in evaluating the Intern’s progress. Kindly check the appropriate rating box for each item).

Criteria (5) (4) Very (3) (2) (1) Points


Excellent Good Good Fair Poor
1. Follows Directions and Instructions
 The intern completed the task as directed and
instructed to do so with appropriate procedures.
2. Time Management
 The intern used 100% of the time wisely and
appropriately, and accomplished the assigned
task within the allotted time
3. Organization Coherence
 The intern kept notes and other resources in a
neat, legible, organized and systematic manner
4. Quality and Excellence
 The intern produced best results and quality
output
5. Evidence Learning Outcomes
 The intern documented, and evaluated and
demonstrated the needed competencies, and can
accurately explain and perform the job well.

SCORING PROTOCOL

TOTAL POINTS VERBAL INTERPRETATION


23 points and above Most Acceptable
19 – 22 points Very Acceptable
14 – 18 points Acceptable
8 – 13 points Barely Acceptable
7 and below Unacceptable

COMMENT SECTION
List or explain other concerns so that the Intern can successfully complete or more productive in attaining
learning outcomes/skills.
STRENGTH(S)
WEAKNESS(ES), if any
Are there additional supportive services the workforce system can help with? (Please list)

__________________________________ _____________________________________

Signature over Printed Name of the Evaluator Signature over Printed Name of the Agency Head

Page 2 of 2

Você também pode gostar