Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
1. All sections with Black section header text are required. Section headers with Blue
text are recommended but optional.
2. All Black text shall remain in the document. All Blue text is to be deleted and
replaced with system specific information.
3. For all Spreadsheet validations, replace Business Owner with Spreadsheet Owner
and remove IT as a required approver.
Cause of Identify the appropriate Cause of Change. More than one answer may apply.
change Select CAPA when the change is being triggered by a Corrective and Preventive
Action report.
Select Internal Audit when the change is being triggered by a finding from an
internal audit.
Select External Audit when the change is being triggered by a finding from an
external audit or investigation.
Select Defect Discovery when the change is being triggered by a bug that requires
fixing.
Select Process Improvement when the change is being triggered by changes to the
underlying quality system process that the system is automating.
Select Regulatory Change when the change is being triggered by new or revised
laws, regulations, standards, and/or enforceable guidance that PH is required to
comply with.
Select Other only when none of the above apply, and provide an explanation in the
description of the problem.
Describe the Describe the problem being solved by this change by documenting the issue involved with
problem using the system in its present state. Describe how the system fails to support the current
business process, or how it needs to be adapted to support the new business process. Be
specific. Be succinct.
Describe the Describe the desired system behavior in order to best support the business process.
desired Describe the outcome of the process (or process segment) in question. Employ user story
process format if applicable. Avoid designing the implementation of the solution.
outcome
Justify the Explain why it’s important to implement this change. Link your explanation to the cause of
change change above. If possible, structure your explanation in terms of return on investment.
-------------------- DELETE THIS ENTIRE SECTION WHEN PUBLISHING THE SCR FORM ----------------
Describe the desired process outcome (in user story format if applicable):
Once necessary changes ha
As a result of this change, the following Business Documents Indicate Document Number (If update is required) or Create (for
(Policies, Procedures, Work Instructions, Guidelines, Manuals, etc.) new documents)
will have to be created or updated:
Now in production system for settlement posting there is GLs
maintain corresponding to the line ID 824. Line ID defines, which
category cost and revenue belong to and whether cost can be
capitalized or not.
Once missing entry maintained in the Table in ZZCS_DP90_ACCDET Formatted: Font: Calibri, Font color: Auto
business user able to post pending document which value more
than 4 crores. Formatted: Font: Calibri, Font color: Auto
We need same scenario for the line ID 824 in the MP1 production
system.
Training Title/Training Number Describe training required for user community as a result of this change:
<Document # Revision #>
NA NA
System name or reference Describe the expected impact on other systems/describe the expected change request details
MP1 NA
The following signatures authorize the implementation of the change as described above.
Name Role
Q&R
IT
Business Owner
SECTION II – Qualification
<Document # Revision #> Protocols
Name Role
Q&R
IT
Business Owner
The Installation Qualification (IQ) Protocol was executed in the Qualification environment with X deviations encountered. The
test scripts and results are summarized below:
Status
Test Script # Revision # Run # Deviation # Results
(pass/ fail)
IQ-QA Test Deviations: Defects and test deviations identified during testing were documented on deviation forms and
investigated for cause. The following test deviations were encountered during test execution.
Deviation Status
Description Script # Comments
Number (Open/Closed)
The Operational Qualification (OQ) Protocol was executed in the Qualification environment with X deviations encountered.
The test scripts and results are summarized below:
Status
Test Script # Revision # Run # Deviation # Results
(pass/ fail)
OQ Test Deviations: Defects and test deviations identified during testing were documented on deviation forms and
investigated for cause. The following test deviations were encountered during test execution.
Deviation Status
Description Script # Comments
Number (Open/Closed)
The Performance Qualification (PQ) Protocol was executed in the Qualification environment with X deviations encountered. The test
scripts and results are summarized below:
Status
Test Script # Revision # Run # Deviation # Results
(pass/ fail)
PQ Test Deviations: Defects and test deviations identified during testing were documented on deviation forms and
investigated for cause. The following test deviations were encountered during test execution.
Deviation Status
Description Script # Comments
Number (Open/Closed)
The following signatures approve the test results as described above and the release of the change for testing in the production
environment.
Name Role
Q&R
IT
Business Owner
The Installation Qualification (IQ) Protocol was executed in the Production environment with X deviations encountered. The
test scripts and results are summarized below:
Status
Test Script # Revision # Run # Deviation # Results
(pass/ fail)
IQ-PRD Test Deviations: Defects and test deviations identified during testing were documented on deviation forms and
investigated for cause. The following test deviations were encountered during test execution.
Deviation Status
Description Script # Comments
Number (Open/Closed)
Name Role
Q&R
IT
Business Owner
REVISION HISTORY
Revision Date Author Description