Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
We shall now turn to the case of a simply supported beam with span I
traversed at constant speed c by concentrated force P(t) arbitrarily varying
in time. The calculation will also be carried out for several special cases
and by the boundary and initial conditions (1.2) and (1.3). Eq. (4.1) will
again be solved by the Fourier integral transformation according to
(1.9) and (27.74)
iftOi (4.3)
H (p + cob)2 + cojy) 2i |_ p — ijco p + ija> J
where
-»dt (4.4)
57
Downloaded by [ York University] on [24/09/16]. Copyright © ICE Publishing, all rights reserved.
PART II — ONE-DIMENSIONAL SOLIDS
with the aid of relations (27.5) and (27.21) we get the result
v(x, t) = f - 2 - sin J — [ P(T) sin jar e ^ ' " ^ sin a>'U)(t -z)dz .
j'i iil(o'U) I Jo
In this way we can calculate the deflection of, and stresses in, a beam
subjected to arbitrary force P(t) either specified in advance or obtained,
say, experimentally. The integral of Eq. (4.5) can even be evaluated
numerically.
In what follows we shall discuss several special cases of force P(t).
(4.6)
x
u*l i ~\ "; * v W ^ lJ™) ~ [P ~ V{
2 2
(p + ab) + (o' n 2i (p + j2co2)n+1
2
(4.8)
We shall solve Eq. (4.8) for the special case of force P(t) linearly in-
creasing in time, i.e. for n = 1 in Eq. (4.6) — see Fig. 4.1a. Then (4.8)
gives
V*(j, p) =
58
Downloaded by [ York University] on [24/09/16]. Copyright © ICE Publishing, all rights reserved.
MOVING FORCE ARBITRARILY VARYING IN TIME
a) b)
(4.11)
P*(p) = P - * - . (4.13)
p+d
Substitution of (4.13) in (4.3) leads to the transformed solution
(4.14)
M [(P + «»)2 + <»«] [G» + df + j2co2]
59
Downloaded by [ York University] on [24/09/16]. Copyright © ICE Publishing, all rights reserved.
PART II — ONE-DIMENSIONAL SOLIDS
and the use of (27.45) and (1.9) to the original solution. For wb = 0, for
example, the beam deflection
I d2 + j2co2 - coh, .
—
coU)
{Ji
sin oaa)t +
d2 - fco2 + (o2n _,.
jco
—^ e *"
X'Ct
(4.17)
n=l
I t M v^
»=iAt(p + wbf + aft
(4.18)
60
Downloaded by [ York University] on [24/09/16]. Copyright © ICE Publishing, all rights reserved.
MOVING FORCE ARBITRARILY VARYING IN TIME
Ted
The case is solved analogously also for the impulse function of the
second order.*) To that end, the function H^t) is defined as the general-
ized derivative of the Dirac function 8(t) in the distributive sense
(4.20)
(4.21)
*) The impulse function of the second order, Hx(t), imparts unit displacement to
unit mass (Fig. 4.4). In terms of variable x, Hx(x) denotes a concentrated unit bending
moment. If at point x= a from interval (0, /> function f(x) has the first derivative,
it also holds that
f
Jo
f t (x — a) fix) dx = —
d/(x)
dX
x = a
(4.20a)
61
Downloaded by [ York University] on [24/09/16]. Copyright © ICE Publishing, all rights reserved.
PART II - ONE-DIMENSIONAL SOLIDS
Forces in the form of Eqs. (4.6), (4.11) or (4.12) are used in calculations
of structures exposed to the effects of explosion, pressure waves, etc.
Moving impulses such as those described in Sect. 4.3 can be made to
represent, for example, impacts of flat wheels on large-span railway
bridges (see also Chap. 9).
But the problem in which the theory expounded above has found its
widest application is that relating to impacts of rolling stock wheels on
rail joints on bridge structures [121], [24].*) It differs from the one
just discussed by that the rail joint (Fig. 4.5) is at a fixed point x0 on the
bridge, and the wheels produce in it — in more or less regular time inter-
vals To - impact loads that may be represented by simple impulses. The
load acting on the beam owing to the impacts is then
*) The problem of rail joints is very complicated and the solution given in the
present Section 4.4 is only an approximate approach.
62
Downloaded by [ York University] on [24/09/16]. Copyright © ICE Publishing, all rights reserved.
MOVING FORCE ARBITRARILY VARYING IN TIME
The above equations are written on the assumption that the number of
impacts is large, i.e. JV -> oo; in practice this means a train with a large
number of wheels, which is much longer than the bridge span.
I A c
The transform of force (4.26) can now be summed like a geometric series
[cf. Eq. (27.7)]
£L = —L ; (4.28)
n 0 i. "*~ C
. [(1 - eo">r° cos co'U)T0) sin co'U)t - e°">T° sin a>'U)TQ cos co'U)t] +
0rV °° 1 r
f?
2nnt 4nno3b . 2nnt
. cos 1 sin 11 • (4-29)
To To To JJ
63
Downloaded by [ York University] on [24/09/16]. Copyright © ICE Publishing, all rights reserved.
PART II — ONE-DIMENSIONAL SOLIDS
Eq. (4.29) is the general solution to the problem of a beam with zero
initial conditions (1.3) on which there starts to act an infinite number of
impulses I in regular time intervals To. After a time the beam will evident-
ly be set to vibrate in forced steady-state vibration whose maximum
amplitude
. •£ 2/ jnx . jnx0 1
sin
A = 2J — -— s m • mbTo
j=i fil(o'U) I I (1 - 2e cos co'u)T0 + e2^")"2
(4.30)
derives from the largest possible amplitude of the term in the first brackets
on the right-hand side of Eq. (4.29).
Amplitude (4.30) attains its maximum whenever interval To is equal
to some period of beam free vibration TU) = 2nj(oU) or to an integer
multiple thereof.
It might happen in practice that the train passing over a rail joint
consists of cars with equal wheel bases or of groups of identical cars.
The rail joint is then subjected to so-called group impacts that are apt
to set the bridge structure even to resonant vibration.
Such cases have been observed and given detailed theoretical treatment
in the USSR [121], [24]. The value of impulses / was also determined
empirically as ranging from 1 to 2 kN s, and expressed analytically in
dependence on speed by the formula
/ = 0-01/P} /2 . (4.32)
I is in [Mp s],
a — an empirical constant,
c — speed in [m/s],
Pt — weight of the unsprung mass of the axle in [Mp],
I — span in [m].
64
Downloaded by [ York University] on [24/09/16]. Copyright © ICE Publishing, all rights reserved.
MOVING FORCE ARBITRARILY VARYING IN TIME
In a like manner one can also obtain the amplitude of forced steady-
state vibration in the case of second-order impulses. Then
and the maximum amplitude resulting from (4.27) and (27.29) via the
procedure applied to (4.29) and (4.30) is
A y s in:;in
, = i fil(o'U) I / (1 - 2e°»To cos <o'w T o + e
Wo
)1/2 '
(4.33)
65
Downloaded by [ York University] on [24/09/16]. Copyright © ICE Publishing, all rights reserved.