Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
Assigned Alternate
A. Preliminary Attachment (R-57) DIANALAN LABORDO
1) Grounds (S-1)
2) Requirements (S-3)
3) Manner of Attaching (S-5)
4) Discharge of Attachment (S-5,12,13)
5) Third Party Claim (S-14)
6) Claim for Damages (S-20)
7) Grounds (S-1)
8) Requirements (S-3)
9) Manner of Attaching (S-5)
10) Discharge of Attachment (S-5,12,13)
11) Third Party Claim (S-14)
12) Claim for Damages (S-20)
Cases:
1. Lim Jr. Vs. Lazaro TACCAD TAMAYO
2. Ligon Vs. RTC of Makati TAMAYO CASTRO
3. Mangila Vs. CA CASTRO DIANALAN
4. Chuidian Vs. Sandiganbayan DIANALAN LABORDO
5. Alejandro Ng Wee Vs. Tankiansee LABORDO MACABANGON
6. Torres Vs. Satsatin MACABANGON PAGARA
7. Luzon Dev. Bank Vs. Krishman PAGARA SANCHEZ
8. Northern Luzon Island Co. Vs. Garcia SANCHEZ SERRANO
9. Excellent Quality Apparel Vs. Visayan Surety SERRANO SILVESTRE
10. Watercraft Venture Corp. Vs. Wolfe SILVESTRE AUNG
11. Phil. Airconditioning Center Vs. RCJ Lines AUNG CARITOS
A. Interpleader (R-62)
1) What is an action Interpleader (S-1)
2) Requisites (S-1)
3) Procedure (S-2 to 7)
Cases:
1. Wack-Wack Golf and Country Club vs. Won
2. Eternal Gardens vs. IAC
3. Pasricha vs. Don Luis Dizon Realty
4. Bank of Commerce vs. Planters Dev. Bank
C. Review of Judgments and Final Orders of the COMELEC and COA (R-64)
-The distinctive nature and procedure of this special civil action
Case: Alliance for Nationalism and Democracy vs. COMELEC
########
1) Certiorari (S-1)
a. Grounds
b. Requirements
c. Procedure; Parties and Effects
Cases:
1. Ampil vs. Ombudsman
2. A.L. Ang Network, Inc. vs. Mondejar
3. Maglalang vs. PAGCOR
4. People vs. Castaneda
5. UP Board of Regents vs. Ligot-Teylan
6. Tuazon vs. RD of Caloocan
7. Prov. Of Leyte vs. Energy Dev. Corp.
Cases:
1. City of Manila vs. Serrano CASTRO DIANALAN
2. National Power Corp. vs. CA DIANALAN LABORDO
3. Republic vs. Andaya LABORDO MACABANGON
4. Asia`s Emerging Dragon vs. DOTC MACABANGON PAGARA
5. Abad vs. Fil-Homes Realty PAGARA SANCHEZ
6. NPC vs. YCLA Sugar Dev. Corp. SANCHEZ SERRANO
7. Limkaichong vs. LBP. SERRANO SILVESTRE
Cases:
1. Ramirez vs. Manila Banking Corp. SILVESTRE CARITOS
2. Marquez vs. Alindog CARITOS DAMOCLES
3. Ardiente vs. Provincial Sheriff DAMOCLES MALALUAN-CRUZ
4. LZK Holdings vs. Planters Dev. Bank MALALUAN-CRUZ MEDRANO
5. Goldenway Merchandising Corp. vs. Equitable PCI Bank MEDRANO MENDOZA
6. Solid Builders vs. CBC MENDOZZA MIRANO
7. Robles vs. Yapcinco MIRANO MONCUPA
8. MBTC vs. CPR Promotions and Marketing, inc. MONCUPA AUNG
Cases:
I. Suarez vs. Emboy, Jr. TABINAS AUNG
II. Alconera vs. Pallanan AUNG TACCAD
III. Teodoro vs. Espino TACCAD TAMAYO
IV. Ferrer vs. Rabaca TAMAYO DIANALAN
V. CGR Corp. vs. Treyes DIANALAN LABORDO
VI. Zacarias vs. Anacay LABORDO MACABANGON
VII. Manalang vs .Bacani MACABANGON PAGARA
VIII. Supapo vs. De Jesus PAGARA SANCHE
IX. De la Cruz vs. Hermano SANCHEZ SERRANO
X. Erorita vs. Dumlao SERRANO SILVESTRE
Cases:
1. Yasay vs. Recto SILVESTRE AUNG
2. Sison vs. Caoibes, Jr. AUNG CARITOS
3. Espanol vs. Formoso CARITOS DAMOCLES
4. Marantan vs. Diokno DAMOCLES MALALUAN-CRUZ
5. Capitol Hills Golf and Country Club vs. Sanchez MALALUAN-CRUZ MEDRANO
6. Tormis vs. Paredes MEDRANO MENDOZA
7. Pulumbarit vs. CA MENDOZA MIRANO
8. Balindog vs. CA MIRANO
Cases:
1. Caram vs. Segui, August 5, 2014 DIANALAN LABORDO
2. Vivares et Al. vs. St. Therese College, Sept. 29, 2014 LABORDO MACABANGON
3. Meralco vs. Lim MACABANGON PAGARA
4. Lee vs. Ilagan PAGARA SANCHEZ
Cases:
1. Dolot vs. Paje (Continuing Mandamus) SANCHEZ SERRANO
2. Paje vs. Casino (Writ of Kalikasan) SERRANO SILVESTRE
3. Arigo vs. Swift SILVESTRE AUNG
4. Resident Marine Mammals vs.Angelo Reyes et Al. AUNG CARITOS
5. West Tower Condominium vs. Phil. Ind. Corp. CARITOS DAMOCLES
IV. EVIDENCE
A. PRELIMINARY CONSIDERATION
1. Definition/ Meaning and Scope of E.
2. Kinds and Classifications of E.
3. Axioms of admissibility
a. Relevency
b. Competency
c. Authenticity
d. Offer
4. Kinds of Admissibility
a. Conditional
b. Multiple
c. Curative
Cases:
1. Ong Chia vs. Republic
2. Zulueta vs. CA
3. People vs. Yatar
4. Tating vs. Marcella
5. People vs. Salafranca
6. SCC Chemicals Corp. vs. CA
Cases:
1. LBP vs. Banal
2. People vs. Kulais
3. Laureano vs. CA
4. Maquiling vs. COMELEC
5. People vs. Baharan
6. Republic vs. Sandiganbayan
7. Ligtas vs. People
C. RULES OF ADMISSIBILITY
2. Documentary Evidence
b. Parole Evidence
Cases:
1. Ortanez vs. CA
2. Lapu-Lapu Foundation vs. CA
3. Leovarez vs. Valdez
c. Electronic Evidence
-A. M. 01-7-01-SC, Rules on Electronic Evidence
-R. A. 8792, E-Commerce Law
Cases:
1. Heirs of Sabanpan vs. Comorposa
2. Torres vs. PAGCOR
3. Ang vs. Republic
4. People vs. Enojas
5. Syhunliong vs. Rivera, June 4, 2014
3. Testimonial Evidence
b. Qualifications: “one who can perceive and perceiving can make known his perception”
i. Ability to observe/ Perceive
ii. Ability to Recall/ Remember
iii. Ability to relate/ Communicate
c. Disqualifications:
Case: Marcos vs. Heirs of Andres Navarro
Cases:
1. Alvarez vs. Ramirez
2. People vs. Castaneda
Cases:
1. Razon vs. CA
2. Sunga-Chan vs. Chua
3. Bordalba vs. CA
Cases:
1. Chan vs. Chan.
2. Lacurom vs. Jacoba
3. Samala vs. Valencia
4. Almonte vs. Vasquez
5. Syhunliong vs. Rivera
Discuss Executive Privilege under the doctrines laid down in senate of the Philippines vs. Ermita and Neri vs. Senate Committees.
d. Testimonial Privilege
e. Admissions
-by third parties
-by conspirators
-by Privies
-by silence
Cases:
1. Constantino vs. Heirs of Pedro Constantino, Jr.
2. People vs. Gandia
3. Doldol vs. People
f. Confessions
-judicial vs. extra-judicial
Cases:
g. Conduct Character
Cases:
1. People vs. Santos
2. People vs. Nardo
3. RP vs. Heirs of Alejaga, Sr.
i. Opinion Rule
j. Character Evidence
Case: People vs. Deopita
2. Presumptions
a. Conclusive Presumptions
I. Ibaan Rural Bank vs. CA
II. Alcaraz vs. Tangga-an
III. University of Mindanao vs. PSP (Jan. 11,2016)
b. Disputable Presumptions
I. Rosaroso vs. Soria
II. Heirs of Trazona vs. Heirs of Canada
III. Uy vs. Lacsmana
IV. Diaz vs. People
E. PRESENTATION OF EVIDENCE
Offer of Evidence. Aludos vs. Suerte; (Westmont Investment Corporation vs. Francia jr.)
Tender of Excluded Evidence
Fortune Tabacco Corp. vs. Com of Int. Rev.
F. WEIGHT AND SUFFICIENCY OF EVIDENCE
i. Overwhelming Evidence