Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
GulfWalling FZCO Jebel Ali Free Zone South, P.O. Box 16972 Dubai U.A.E.
P: +971 4 886 4885 F: +971 4 886 4881 E: info@gulfwall.ae W: www.gulfwall.ae
P a g e |2
. GULFWALL
ENGINEERING DESIGN GUIDELINES
1. INTRODUCTION
The technical information contained in this report was compiled by consulting engineers Robert
Bird Group. The information is intended for use by professional structural design engineers as a
guide to the design of buildings using the Gulfwall precast wall system.
All data presented within is based upon results from experimental testing conducted at
Universities within Australia. The guidelines are not intended as a stand alone code of practice
and should be read and interpreted in conjunction with the relevant Australian Standards and
Building Codes including but not limited to:
These guidelines are intended for residential single dwelling construction to a maximum two
storey for unfilled Gulfwall panels and multi-storey residential (more than two storey) for
concrete filled Gulfwall panels.
2. DESIGN PHILOSOPHY
The design capacities given in these guidelines have been calculated based on failure loads
recorded from experimental testing programs (see appendix for relevant reports).
In accordance with AS 3600 – 2001 B4.3, a factor account for variation of test results has been
included in the determination of ultimate capacities. This factor is based on safety index of 3.0
for a confidence level of 90%.
Further, a strength reduction factor φ is applied to determine the design capacity for each of
the cases presented within. The strength reduction factor used is 0.6 for all design capacities.
The structural capacity of a Gulfwall panel can be checked for the specific loading cases and
arrangements presented within these guidelines by the following equation:
S*≤ φR
Where S* is the design action effect due to the design load for strength and φR is the design
capacity.
All capacities presented within are based on Gulfwall panels of width 120mm.
Note that these design guides are intended to be used for information only and for materials,
loading arrangements and geometries outside those described in these guidelines, design
capacities must be checked by a qualified professional engineer. It is the responsibility of the
project design engineer to design and certify individual projects for compliance with relevant
Local Standards.
3. PRODUCT DIMENSIONS
Typical Gulfwall panel section is shown on Figure 1 with an overall panel thickness of 120mm.
All testing and calculated capacities in these guidelines are based on laboratory tests for this
size panels.
4. NOTATION
S* = Design Action Effect
The design axial load capacity of Gulfwall panels is given in Table’s 1 and 2 for panels fixed at
based and pinned at top as shown in Figure 3.
Note: Partial fixity to bottom of wall due to laboratory testing setup – some limited wall
rotation permitted.
Pinned Top, Fixed Bottom Load Capacity (φRN) kN/m length of wall
Eccentricity 0 mm 15 mm 30 mm
Core filled with minimum 32 695 515 515
MPa concrete
Table 1: Design Axial Load Capacity (φRN) of Gulfwall Core Filled with 32MPa Concrete – Pinned
Top and Fixed Bottom.
Pinned Top, Fixed Bottom Load Capacity (φRN) kN/m length of wall
Eccentricity 0 mm 15 mm 30 mm
Hollow core 110 110 100
Table 2: Design Axial Load Capacity (φRN) of Gulfwall Core Unfilled – Pinned Top and Fixed
Bottom
The load capacities above are for panels up to 2850mm in height and include provision for
eccentrically loaded panels as shown.
Design Notes.
Appendix A contains a description of the experimental testing and the experimental report
upon which the capacity calculations are based.
6. BENDING CAPACITY
The design bending capacities of Gulfwall panels are presented in Table 3 and 4 for
unreinforced core filled and unreinforced hollow core panels. The capacities are given per
metre length of wall.
Steel reinforcing can be located centrally in concrete filled cores to improve the out-of-plane
bending capacity of Gulfwall panels. The extra bending capacity gained by steel reinforcing can
simply be added to the bending capacity of the unfilled Gulfwall panels, thus increasing the
panel’s flexural resistance to lateral loads. The extra bending capacity gained through one N12
bar located centrally in one Gulfwall core is given in Table 6 below.
One N12 (maximum) can be located in each core allowing for a total moment capacity increase
of 7.2 kNm/m length of wall, based on four reinforced cores per metre length of wall.
The capacities presented above allow the designer to select the appropriate bending
configuration/capacity for a particular out-of-plane flexural action.
Design Notes.
• No more than one N12 bar per core to be used.
• Concrete for core filling to be minimum32MPa.
• Capacities given are per meter of wall length.
Appendix B contains a description of experimental testing and experimental report upon which
the capacity calculations are based. AS3600 was used to calculate the additional bending
strength of steel reinforced concrete cores.
7. SHEAR CAPACITY
Note: The following shear capacities apply to the application of shear as a point load on the end section
of a wall panel 2830 mm long. Higher shear capacities would be achieved if the load is applied uniformly
over the length of the wall section.
Appendix C contains a description of the experimental testing and the experimental report
upon which the capacity calculations are based.
Out-of-plane Design
Shear Capacity (φROP)
Unfilled Gulfwall Panel (Ribs Parallel to Span) 4.6 kN/m
Unfilled Gulfwall panel (Ribs Perpendicular to 1.4 kN/m
Span)
Table 8: Out-of-plane Design Shear Capacity of Gulfwall.
Appendix D contains a description of the experimental testing and the experimental report
upon which the capacity calculations are based.
TOP PLATE
250
MM
GULFWALL WEB
GULFWALL WEB
Design Notes
• The steel rod must be anchored a minimum distance of 250 mm from the top of the
Gulfwall panel.
• If the uplift force exceeds the weight of the unfilled or filled Gulfwall panel as
appropriate, the top plate must be tied directly to the slab/footing.
Note: The Structural Design Engineer is responsible for the design of the top plate and
associated tie bolt spacings to suit specific project requirements
Appendix E contains a description of the experimental testing and the experimental report
upon which the capacity calculations are based.
Design Note
• Appropriate checks of axial and bending capacity on the Gulfwall panel must be
conducted to account for the load and eccentricity of load transferred from the wall
plate to the wall.
FRL
Core filled panel – 400kN/m working 120 / 120 / 120
load
Table 12: FRL of load-bearing core-filled Gulfwall panels
If Gulfwall panels are core filled with a grout of minimum density 2000kg/m3 and are acting as
non load bearing elements, the FRL is given in Table 13.
FRL
Core filled panel – non-load-bearing - / 240 / 240
The CSIRO report on the fire resistance and Fire Certificates for Dubai and Abu Dhabi of
Gulfwall panels can be found in the GulfWall Technical Details and Standard Sketches or via
www.gulfwall.ae.
A single story residential dwelling is constructed with 2.55 m high Gulfwall panels tied directly
to the top plate. The ultimate wind pressure for uplift is 0.7 kPa and the Gulfwall panels support
a roof load width of 3 m. Calculate the number of roof anchor rods required to resist the wind
uplift forces.
Solution
Uplift force:
S* = 0.7 kPa x 3 m = 2.1 kN/m
Therefore one anchor placed every 2 m maximum will provide a tie down capacity of 2.15 kN/m
which is greater than the design uplift force. The capacity of the Gulfwall panel itself to resist
the uplift force by gravity must also be checked.
The weight of the Gulfwall panel alone is not sufficient to resist the uplift force so either the
Gulfwall must be core filled to increase the gravity force or the top plate tied directly to the
slab/footing.
Note: - All loads to be calculated according to AS 1170.2 – 2002, AS 1170.1 – 2002, AS 1170.2 –
2002.
A 6 m tributary length of Gulfwall, 2.55 m high, forms part of wall in a residential dwelling and
bracing is required perpendicular to the wall to resist the applied ultimate wind pressure of 1.0
kPa. Check that an Gulfwall panel acting as bracing has the in-plane shear capacity to resist the
wind pressure transferred from the external wall.
Solution
Half of the wall height in wind load is taken by transfer to the slab/footing at the bottom edge
of the external panel. The wind load from the top half will be resisted by the in-plane shear
capacity of the Gulfwall bracing wall.
Gulfwall Panel
Tributary width: 6m
Tributary height: 2.55/2 m
Ultimate wind pressure: 1 kPa
φRv > S*, therefore an Gulfwall bracing wall of minimum width 2.5 m has sufficient in-plane
shear capacity to act as bracing in this case.
A two-storey residential dwelling is to use Gulfwall as load bearing walls on both levels. Check
the axial capacity of Gulfwall panels on the ground floor to support the floor above, the walls
over and the roof. The roof load width supported is 3.5m and the floor load width supported is
3 m. The factored ultimate loads are 1.1 kPa (wind, dead and live load) for the roof, 3.4 kPa
(dead and live load) for timber floor construction and 0.65 kPa (self weight) for the walls over.
The height of wall is 2.55 m on each storey and the axial load is applied with a 15 mm
eccentricity from the centre line of the Gulfwall.
Solution
φRN (unfilled) > S*, therefore unfilled Gulfwall panels have sufficient axial capacity.
A 2 m x 1.2 m window opening is required in Gulfwall panel forming part of a 2.55 m high wall
in a residential dwelling as shown in Figure 10. It is calculated that the wall will be subjected to
ultimate wind pressures of 1.0 kPa. Check the Gulfwall panels above and below the window
opening have the sufficient horizontal bending capacity (ribs perpendicular to span) to span
between the panels on the edge of the opening. The capacity of the edge panels to take the
extra load must also be checked.
Solution
First check the capacity of the panel below the opening to span horizontally between the edge
panels:
Wind loads
φR > S* , therefore the panel below the wall has sufficient capacity to span vertically.
By inspection the panel above the wall also has sufficient capacity.
The GulfWall panels on either side of the opening must now be checked for vertical spanning
capacity (ribs parallel to span) for ultimate wind load.
Wind loads
φR > S* , therefore the panels at the edge of the openings have sufficient capacity to span
vertically.
The extra load width of the window opening as well as from the panels above and below must
now be transferred into the edge panels. This can be done by filling the cores of the adjacent
panels and inserting dowels to transfer the load as indicated in Figure 10. At least two dowels
per panel must be placed horizontally (see notes).
Wind loads
This moment can be taken by a single reinforced core (1 N12) at the edge of the opening which
provides an additional bending capacity of 1.8 KNm (Table 6).
Unfilled panels or an alternative method of fixing to the edge panels maybe used given
sufficient detailing is provided to transfer the load. The capacity of the edge panel to take the
additional load must also be checked.
Notes: - All loads to be calculated according to AS 1170.2 – 2002, AS 1170.1 – 2002, AS 1170.2 –
2002.
- Design and detailing of load transfer to edge panels to be conducted by an Engineer.
A Gulfwall panel supporting a roof has a penetration to within 0.7 m of the top plate as shown
in Figure 11. Roof trusses are at 3 m spacings and support a 3.5 m load width and the factored
ultimate load is 1.1 kPa acting on the roof. Check the lintel capacity of the Gulfwall panel above
the opening if the opening is 1.5 m wide.
0.7M
1.5M
Truss spacing: 3 m
Roof load width: 3.5 m
φR> S*, therefore the Gulfwall panel has sufficient capacity to carry the load of the truss on the
top plate above the opening.
Notes: - All loads to be calculated according to AS 1170.0 – 2002, AS 1170.1 – 2002, AS 1170.2 –
2002.
- Gulfwall panels with geometries outside those presented above must be
independently assessed.
- Top plate must be full width of Gulfwall panel.
- Slenderness, flexure and other actions have not been considered in this example and
must be checked.
A wall plate picking up load from a first level timber floor is attached to an Gulfwall panel with
two 12 mm x 150 mm self tapping screw-in anchors. The floor load width is 3.5 m and the
factored ultimate load on the floor is 3.4 kPa. Check the capacity of the wall plate connections
to the Gulfwall panel.
φR> S*, Therefore sets of two anchors located at 1.5 m centres will be sufficient.
APPENDIX A
Gulfwall panels were experimentally tested at the University of Adelaide by axially loading a
series of 1000 x 2850 mm samples as shown in Figure A1. The tests allowed for an eccentricity
(ECC) of the applied axial load of 0, 15 and 20 mm from the centre line of the panels (see Figure
A2).
Eccentricity of
0mm, 15mm & 30mm
Test Machine Platen
Spreader Beam
Dental Paste
Spreader Beam
The Gulfwall panels were loaded at 0, 15 and 30 mm eccentricities both core filled (all cores
filled with minimum 32 MPa concrete) and unfilled. All calculations were carried out in
accordance with engineering principles and AS3600 – 2001 B4.3
APPENDIX B
Experimental tests were conducted at the University of Adelaide to determine the out-of-plane
flexural capacity of Gulfwall panels. A series of 1000 mm wide panels were loaded as shown in
Figure’s B1 and B2 with the ribs parallel and perpendicular to the span respectively as shown.
2500 mm
Figure B1: Out-of-plane Bending Setup - Loading Arrangement for Ribs Perpendicular to Span.
Figure B2: Out-of-plane Bending Setup - Loading Arrangement for Ribs Parallel to Span
All calculations were carried out in accordance with engineering principles and
AS3600 – 2001 B4.3
APPENDIX C
The in-plane design shear capacity (φRV) of Gulfwall has been calculated from the experimental
shear testing of a series of unfilled Gulfwall panels at the University of Newcastle. The panels
were strengthened to resist local crushing by filling the cores in line with the reaction plate at
the bottom with 15 MPa grout and placing timber blocking between the cores in line with the
loading plate at the top. A schematic of the testing apparatus is shown in Figure C1.
GulfWall/Ozwall
All calculations were carried out in accordance with engineering principles and AS3600 – 2001
B4.3
APPENDIX D
The out-of-plane design shear capacity (φROP) of Gulfwall was calculated from experimental
testing conducted at the University of Adelaide. The experimental arrangement for the case of
the ribs parallel to the span and for the case of the ribs perpendicular to the span are shown in
Figure’s D1 and D2 respectively.
Figure D1: Out-of-plane Shear Setup - Loading arrangement for ribs parallel to span
Figure D2: Out-of-plane Shear Setup - Loading arrangement for ribs perpendicular to span
All calculations were carried out in accordance with engineering principles and
AS3600 – 2001 B4.3
APPENDIX E
The capacity of a roof anchor rod was experimentally tested at the University of Adelaide. The
anchor consisted of a 10 mm mild steel rod with a threaded right angled bend at the end which
was inserted through a hole drilled 250 mm down from the top of the Gulfwall panel into the
web of a rib. The anchor failed through bending of the rod which subsequently pulled through
the web. All calculations were carried out in accordance with engineering principles and AS3600
– 2001 B4.3