Ipcrf For t1 t3 2018 Final Revised

Office Performance Commitment ang Review Form
Name of Employee: Name of Rater:

Position: Position:
Review Period Date of Review:
Bureaue/Center/Service/Division:
TO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNING
Weight PERFORMANCE INDICATORS (Quality, Efficiency, Timeliness) ACTUAL RATING

MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE per SCORE
KRA RESULTS
•Master Teacher >Increased MPS by 2% in every grading period 5 = increased by 2% and above
30% 4 = increased by 1.5-1.99%
Year Round 15% 3 = increased by 1.0-1.49%
2 = increased by .5-.99%
1 = increased by .49m and below
>Submitted school forms/reports on time as 5 = Submitted all forms and reports on time
followsLP/DLL/school forms/school reports
during the school year 4 = submitted all forms one day after the due date
Year Round 5% 3 = Submitted all forms two days before the due date
2 = Submitted all forms three days after the due date
1 = Submitted all forms one week after the due date
>Incurred no absences/tardiness/undertime 5 = No absences

during the school year
4 = 1-3 absences/tardiness/undertime
Year Round 5% 3 = 4-5 absences/tardiness/undertime
2 = 6-10 absences/tardiness/undertime
1 = 11 or more absences/tardiness/undertime
>Observed proper dress code daily 5 = observed proper dress code daily
4 = did not observe proper dress code at least thrice a year
3 = did not observe proper dress code atleast five times a year
Year Round 5%
2 = did not observe proper dress coede atleast ten times a year
1 = did not proper dress code atleast eleven or more times a year
Year Round 5%
1 = did not proper dress code atleast eleven or more times a year

KRA RESULTS
•Pupils 15% >Conducted daily reading 5 = conducted daily interventions/enrichment

interventions/enrichments 4 = conducted monthly reading interventions/enrichment
Year Round 5%
3 = conducted quarterly reading interventions/enrichment
2 = conducted by semester reading interventions/enrichment
>Increased academic performance by 2% every 5 = increased by 2% and above

grading period 4 = increased by 1.5-1.99%
Year Round 5% 3 = increased by 1.0-1.49%
2 = increased by .5-.99%
1 = increased by .49m and below
>Decreased drop out rate by 2% from the 5 = decreased drop out rate by 2% and above
baseline 4 = decreased drop out rate by 1.5-1.99
Year Round 5% 3 = decreased drop out rate by 1.0-1.49%
2 = decreased drop out rate by .5-.99
1 = decreased drop out rate by .49 and below
•Curriculum 20% >Produced supplementary instructional 5 = produced of supplementary instructional materials

material at least one per subject area in every 4 = produced of supplementary instructional materials
grading period
Year Round 10% 3 = produced of supplementary instructional materials
2 = produced of supplementary instructional materials
>Identified least mastered skills and 5 = submitted on time the least mastered skills with parallel
constructed 15 to 50 questions every grading questions to all subject being taught
period
4 = submitted 3 days after due date the least mastered skills
with parallel questions to all subject being taught
Year Round 5% 3 = submitted 5 days after the due date the least mastered skills
Year Round 5%
2 = submitted one week after the due date the least mastered
skills with parallel questions to all subject being taught
1 = submitted one monthafter the due date the least mastered
>conducted research at least in school level 5 = submitted complete action research with grade
4 = submitted an action research but lack of one element
5% 3 = submitted an action research but lack of two element
2 = submitted an action research but lack of three element
1 = submitted only action research proposal

KRA RESULTS
•Parents >Conducted atleast four (4) Parents 5 = conducted atleast 4 PTC and participated one GA
involvement and meeting/conferences and participated in one 4 = conducted atleast 3 PTC and participated one GA
community (1) general assembly
linkages 10% Year Round 4% 3 = conducted at least 2 PTC and participated one GA
2 = conducted at least 1 PTC and participated one GA
>involve atleast 50% of parents participation 5 = involved atleast 50% of the parents
during school activities such as brigada 4 = involved at least 40-49% of the parents
Eskwela, General Assembly, Foundation Day,
and other school activities. Year Round 4% 3 = involved at least 30-3.9% of the parents
2 = involved at least 20-29% of the parents
1 = involved at least 19% and below of the parents
>involved stakeholders/NGO in the conduct of 5 = 95-100% involvement of stakeholders/NGO

subject interventions/programs/projects 4 = 85-94% innvolvement of stakeholders/NGO
Year Round 2% 3 = 71-84% involovement of stakeholders/NGO
2 = 51-70% involvement of stakeholders/NGO
1 = 50% and below involvement of stakeholders/Ngo
•Learning >Conducted participated earthquake and fire 5 = 95-100% participation of the pupils
Environment 10% drills at least twice year
Year Round
3%
•Learning >Conducted participated earthquake and fire
Environment 10% drills at least twice year 4 = 85-94%
Year Round
3% 3 = 71-84%
2 = 51-70%
>Provided clean, orderly, well ventilated and 5 = all indicators were met
friendly classroom 4 = one of the indicators were not met
4% 3 = two of the indicators were not met
2 = three of the indicators were not met
1 = four of the indicators were not met
>enforced child protection policy as such no 5 = no complaint filed against the teacher
complaints file against him/her 4 = one complaint filed against the teacher
3% 3 = two complaints filed against the teacher
2 = three complaint filrd against the teacher
1 = four or more complaints filtd against the teacher
>Attended four (4) seminars in a year Year Round 5 = attended 4 or more seminars/trainings
4 = attended 3
35% 3 = attended 2
2 = attended 1
1 = attended one seminar/training but did not finish
>attended all professional meeting and quality 5 = attended all professional meeting and PLC
•Professional professional learning community 4 = did not attend 1
Growth and
Development 10% 4% 3 = did not attend 2
2 = did not attend 3
1 = did not attend 4 or more
5 = subscribed professional magazines/books every quarter with

>Subscribed professional magazine/books and reflection
4 = subscribed professional magazines/books every quarter
submitted reflections with 3 reflection
3% with
2 2 reflection
= subscribed professional magazines/books every quarter
with 1 reflection
with without reflection
KRA RESULTS
•Plus Factor 5% >Coordinatorship/chairmanship Year Round 1%

>Won Contest at least in district level 1%
>Awardee 1%
>Resource Speaker 1%
>Demonstration lesson atleast in district level 1%
* To get the score, the rating is multiplied by the weight assigned OVER ALL
RATING FOR
ACCOMPLIS
HMENTS
DR. BETTY C. CAVO DR. AMELITA B. NUGUIT

Rater Ratee
Office Performance Commitment ang Review Form
Name of Employee: Name of Rater:

Position: Position:
Review Period Date of Review:
Bureaue/Center/Service/Division:
Weight PERFORMANCE INDICATORS (Quality, Efficiency, Timeliness) ACTUAL

MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE per KRA RESULTS RATING
>Increased MPS by 2% in every quarter period 5 = increased NAT MPS BY 2.6% AND ABOVE
I. Instructional
Leadership 4 = increased NAT MPS BY 2.15-2.59
3 = increased NAT MPS BY 2-2.14%
2 = increased NAT MPS BY 1.10-1.99%
1 = increased NAT MPS BY 1.09%
>Prepared SY Instructional supervisory plan 5 = all mechanism are present

that reflects needs and competency based,
objectives (SMART), strategies well-defined, 4 = absence of one mechanism
monitoring and evaluation scheme in place and 3 = absence of two mechanisms
plan was developed with teachers 2 = absence of three mechanisms
1 = only one mechanism is present
>Observed Ten teacher a month 5 = observed 13 teachers with checklist

4 = observed 11 to 12 teachers with checklist
3 = observed 10 teachers with checklist
2 = observed 6-9 teachers with checklist
1 = observed 5 and below teachers with checklist
II. Learning >Disseminated Child Protection Policy and Anti 5 = informed 130% and above with attendance
Environment -bullying laws to 50% the total enrolment 4 = informed 115-129% with attendance
Year Round 5%
3 = informed 100-114% with attendance
2 = informed 51-99% with attendance
1 = informed 50% with attendance
>Conducted Earthquake and fire drills twice a 5 = 2 teachers with AP

year
4 = 2 teachers without AP
Year Round 5% 3 = 1 teacher with AP
2 = teacher without AP
1 = absences
>Decreased drop out rate by 2% from the 5 = decreased drop out rate by 2% and above
baseline
4 = decreased drop out rate by 1.5-1.99
Year Round 5% 3 = decreased drop out rate by 1.0-1.49%
2 = decreased drop out rate by .5-.99
>Decreased drop out rate by 2% from the
baseline
Year Round 5%
1 = decreased drop out rate by .49 and below
>Produced supplementary instructional

material at least one per subject area in every
•Curriculum 20% grading period 5 = produced of supplementary instructional materials
Year Round 10%
>Identified least mastered skills and

constructed 15 to 50 questions every grading 5 = submitted on time the least mastered skills with parallel
period questions to all subject being taught
4 = submitted 3 days after due date the least mastered skills
Year Round 5%
3 = submitted 5 days after the due date the least mastered skills
2 = submitted one week after the due date the least mastered skills
1 = submitted one monthafter the due date the least mastered

>conducted research at least in school level 5 = submitted complete action research with grade
4 = submitted an action research but lack of one element
Year Round 5% 3 = submitted an action research but lack of two element
2 = submitted an action research but lack of three element
1 = submitted only action research proposal
>Introduced at least (1) innovation such as

income generating project, etc. 5 = fully implemented actions with complete supporting documents
4 = fully implement 1 week after due date
Year Round 5%
3 = ongoing inplement
2 = incomplete supporting documents
1 = submitted work plan but not executed aggregiate
•Parents >Conducted atleast four (4) Parents 5 = conducted atleast 4 PTC and participated one GA
involvement and meeting/conferences and participated in one
community (1) general assembly 4 = conducted atleast 3 PTC and participated one GA
linkages 10% Year Round 4% 3 = conducted at least 2 PTC and participated one GA
>involve atleast 50% of parents participation 5 = involved atleast 50% of the parents
during school activities such as brigada
Eskwela, General Assembly, Foundation Day, 4 = involved at least 40-49% of the parents
and other school activities. Year Round 4% 3 = involved at least 30-3.9% of the parents
2 = involved at least 20-29% of the parents
1 = involved at least 19% and below of the parents
>involved stakeholders/NGO in the conduct of 5 = 95-100% involvement of stakeholders/NGO

subject interventions/programs/projects
4 = 85-94% innvolvement of stakeholders/NGO
Year Round 2% 3 = 71-84% involovement of stakeholders/NGO
2 = 51-70% involvement of stakeholders/NGO
1 = 50% and below involvement of stakeholders/Ngo
>Conducted participated earthquake and fire

drills at least twice year 5 = 95-100% participation of the pupils
•Learning
Environment 10% Year Round 4 = 85-94%
3%
3 = 71-84%
2 = 51-70%
>Provided clean, orderly, well ventilated and

friendly classroom 5 = all indicators were met
Year Round 4%
>Provided clean, orderly, well ventilated and
friendly classroom
4 = one of the indicators were not met
Year Round 4%
3 = two of the indicators were not met
2 = three of the indicators were not met
1 = four of the indicators were not met
>enforced child protection policy as such no 5 = no complaint filed against the teacher
complaints file against him/her
4 = one complaint filed against the teacher
Year Round 3% 3 = two complaints filed against the teacher
2 = three complaint filrd against the teacher
1 = four or more complaints filtd against the teacher
>Attended four (4) seminars in a year 5 = attended 4 or more seminars/trainings

4 = attended 3
Year Round 35% 3 = attended 2
2 = attended 1
1 = attended one seminar/training but did not finish
>attended all professional meeting and quality 5 = attended all professional meeting and PLC
•Professional professional learning community 4 = did not attend 1
Growth and
Development 10% Year Round 4% 3 = did not attend 2
2 = did not attend 3
1 = did not attend 4 or more
>Subscribed professional magazine/books and 5 = subscribed professional magazines/books every quarter with
submitted reflections reflection
with 3 reflection
Year Round 3% 3 = subscribed professional magazines/books every quarter

with 2 reflection
with 1 reflection
Year Round 3%

with without reflection

•Plus Factor 5% >Coordinatorship/chairmanship Year Round 1%

>Won Contest at least in district level 1%
>Awardee 1%
>Resource Speaker 1%
>Demonstration lesson atleast in district level 1%
* To get the score, the rating is multiplied by the weight assigned

OVER ALL
RATING FOR
ACCOMPLIS
HMENTS
OVER ALL
RATING FOR
ACCOMPLIS
HMENTS
DR. BETTY C. CAVO DR. AMELITA B. NUGUIT

Rater Ratee
SCORE
SCORE
SCORE
SCORE
DR. AMELITA B. NUGUIT
Ratee
INDIVIDUAL PERFO
Name of Employee: CHARLYN A. COTACTE
Position: Teacher I
Bureau/Center/Service/Division: SD XVIII
Rating Period: SECOND SEMESTER (NOVEMBER-APRIL)
TO BE FILLED IN DURING PLAN
KEY RESULT
MFOs OBJECTIVES TIME LINE Weight per
AREAs KRA
1. Teaching- 1. Prepared daily lesson June to 5

Learning plans/logs of activities March
Process withinthe rating period
40% with: 4
1.1 Complete parts and 5%

description 3
1.2 Approriate, adequate June to 5% 5

and updated instructional March
materials
1
KEY RESULT TIME LINE Weight per
MFOs OBJECTIVES
AREAs KRA
1.3 Higher order June to 5% 5

thinking skills (HOTS) March
developed
4
1.4 Desired learning June to 5% 5

comptencies March
attained based on the
budget of work
4
2. Facilitated learning June to 5% 5

through innovative March
teaching strategies
4
2.1 Child-centered 3
activities
2
1
MFOs OBJECTIVES
AREAs KRA
3. Initiated discipline of June to 5% 5

learners through setting of March
classroom/school rules
and guidelines within the
rating period
No guidance case/issue 4
reported
4. Monitored attendance 5% 5
diversity appreciation,
safe, positive and
motivating environment,
overall physical 4
atmosphere, cleanliness
and orderliness of
classrooms including
proper waste disposal daily 3
4.1 Maintained safety,

orderliness and cleanliness 2
of floors, toilets and proper
waste disposal
MFOs OBJECTIVES
AREAs KRA
4.2 Carried out attendance 5% 5

checking systematically to
lessen abseenteeism
2. Learner's 1. Monitored, evaluated, 5

Outcome and maintained
progress pupils'
within the rating
(30%) periodthrough:
rating period through:
4
1.1 an updated FORMS June to 5%
(Class Record, F138, F137,G March
Grading Sheet)
3
2
MFOs OBJECTIVES
AREAs KRA
1.2 Pupils' portfolio June to 5% 5

March
1.3 Summative/Unit June to 5% 5

Test with tables of March
Specification (TOS)
1
MFOs OBJECTIVES
AREAs KRA
2. Conducted June to 5% 5
remediation/enrichment March
programs to ____ pupils
to improve performance
indicators 4
3. Attained the required June to 5% 5

MPS for Grade Level and March
Learning Areas based on 4
baseline target of
diagnostic test every 3
grading period
2
Diagnostics Test _____
1st Quarter Test _____ 1
2nd Quarter Test _____
3rd Quarter Test _____
4th Quarter Test _____
4. Decrease/Maintained June to 5% 5
failure rate/drop out March
4
1
MFOs OBJECTIVES
AREAs KRA
3. Community 1.Conducted June to 5

Involvement regular/periodic PTA March 5%
(10%) Meetings/Conferences
within the rating period
2. Visited/conferred parents 5
of pupils needing 5%
academic monitoring
follow-up within the
rating period 4
1
MFOs OBJECTIVES
AREAs KRA
4 1. Participated in any 5
Professional training/seminar/ Year Round 5%
Growth workshop
and
Development
(15%) 4
2. Demonstrated/ June to 5
Manifested dedication and March
commitment to work
through: 4
2.1 Punctuality and 5%

Attendance 3
3. Pursued graduate/post- June to 5% 5

graduate studies Marh
4
MFOs OBJECTIVES
AREAs KRA
PLUS Services rendered

FACTOR beyond official time
(5%)
CHARLYN A. COTACTE
Ratee
INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (IPCRF)
Quality Efficiency
All daily lesson plans/olgs prepared 100% of the daily lesson plans/
had complete parts and description. logs was submitted
Had one of the complete parts and 85-99% of the daily lesson plans/
description missing logs was submitted
Had two of the complete parts and 75-84% of the daily lesson plans/
Had three of the complete parts and 51-74% of the daily lesson plans/
Had four or more of the complete 50% and below or no daily lesson
parts and description missing plans/logs was submitted
Used 100% of approriate, adequate Approriate, adequate and updated

and updated instructional materials in intructional materials were 100%
teaching all lessons used in teaching a lesson
Used 85-99% of approriate, adequate Approriate, adequate and updated

and updated instructional materials in intructional materials were 85-99%


No approriate, adequate and updated Approriate, adequate and updated

instructional materials in teaching intructional materials were 50%
all lessons and below used in teaching a lesson
Quality Efficiency
100% developed HOTS in

teaching all lessons daily
NOT MEASURABLE
85-99% developed HOTS in
75-84% developed HOTS in

Seldom used HOTS in

Did not use HOTS in

Attained 100% of the desired 100% of the desired learning

learning competencies based competencies was attained
on the budget of work
Attained 85-99% of the desired 85-99% of the desired learning



Attained 50% and below of the 50% and below of desired

desired learning competencies learning competencies was
based on the budget of work attained
Teaching method and strategies 100% interaction was elicited

elicited 100% interaction from a class from a class
Teaching methods and strategies 85-99% interaction was

elicited 85-99% interaction from a class elicited from a class


50% and below or no interaction was 50% and below or no interaction

elicited from a class was elicited from a class
Quality Efficiency
Pupils were 100% guided in the 100% pupils were guided in the
observation of classroom rules and observation of school/classroom rules
guidelines as evidenced by no and guidelines
guidance report on student discipline
Pupils were 85-99% guided in the 85-99% pupils were guided in the
guidelines as evidenced by 1-2 and guidelines
instances of guidance report on
student discipline
student discipline
student discipline
Pupils were 50% and below guided in 50% and below or pupils were not
the observation of classroom rules and guided in the observation of school/
guidelines as evidenced by 5-6 classroom rules and guidelines
student discipline
Maintained 100% safety, orderliness 100% safety, orderliness and

and cleanliness of floors, toilets and cleanliness of floors, toilets and proper
proper waste disposal waste disposal were maintained
Maintained 85-99% safety, 85-99% safety, orderliness and

orderliness and cleanliness of floors, cleanliness of floors, toilets and proper
toilets andproper waste disposal waste disposal were maintained


Quality Efficiency
Maintained 50% and below safety, 50% and below safety, orderliness and
Attendance checking was systemati- 90-100% of pupils' attendance was

cally carried out as evidenced by 90- evident
100% of pupils' attendance chart or log.
Attendance checking was 85-89% of pupils' attendance was

systematically carried out as evident
evidenced by 85-89% of pupils'
attendance

attendance

attendance
Attendance checking was 75% and below of pupils' attendance

systematically carried out as was evident
evidenced by 75% and below of
pupils' attendance
All forms reflected the bases of 100% of pupils' ratings in all

100% of pupils' ratings in all classess/subject areas handled was
classess/subject areas handled reflected in the class record
Class record reflected the bases of 85-99% of pupils' ratings in all

85-99% of pupils' ratings in all classess/subject areas handled was


Quality Efficiency
Class record reflected the bases of 50% and below of pupils' ratings in all
50% and below of pupils' ratings in all classess/subject areas handled was
Pupils portfolio contained 100% of his 100% pupils' accomplishment are

accomplishment within the rating included in portfolio
period
Pupils portfolio contained

of his accomplishment 85-89%
within the 85-89% pupils' accomplishment are
rating included in portfolio
period
Pupils portfolio contained

of his accomplishment 75-84%
within the 75-84% pupils' accomplishment are
rating included in portfolio
period
Pupils portfolio contained 51-74% 51-74% pupils' accomplishment are

of his accomplishment within the rating included in portfolio
period
Pupils portfolio contained 50% and 50% and below of pupils'

below of his accomplishment within accomplishment are included in
the rating period portfolio
Test question were 100% logically 100 % of the test questions were
sequenced with TOS congruent logically sequenced with TOS congruen
between content and skill tested between content and skills tested
Test question were 85-99% logically 85-99% of the test questions were
Test question were 50% and below 50% and below of the test questions
logically sequenced with TOS congruent were logically sequenced with TOS
between content and skill tested congruent between content and skills
tested
Quality Efficiency
Remediation/enrichment programs is 100% of pupils was offered

offered to a 100% pupils who need remediation/enrichment programs
it
Remediation/enrichment programs is 85-99% of pupils was offered

offered to a 85-99% pupils who need remediation/enrichment programs
it

it

it
Remediation/enrichment programs is 50% and below of pupils was offered

offered to a 50% and below pupils remediation/enrichment programs
who need it
Attained 2 % and above MPS increase Every grading period
Attained 1.76-1.99% MPS increase
Attained 1-1.25% MPS increase
No failure rate/ drop out Maintained 0% failure rate/No failure/

No Drop Out
1 Student failed rate/ drop out by
85-99% 85-99% decreased failure rate/ Drop Out
75-84% 75-84% decreased failure rate/Drop Out
51-74% 51-74% decreased failure rate Drop Out
4 Student failed rate/ drop out by 50% 50% and below decreased failure rate/
Drop Out
Quality Efficiency
100% PTA Meeting with Conducted at least 5 PTA Meetings/

accomplishement and agreement met Conferences with 100%
within the rating period accomplishment with set agreements
meet
85-99% PTA Meetings/Conferences Conducted at least 4 PTA

was conducted producing only set Meetings/Conferences with
agreements and partial
accomplishment within the rating accomplishment producing only set
period agreements and partial
period accomplishment
75-84% PTA Meetings/Conferences Conducted atleast 3 PTA

producing only set agreements within Meetings/Conferences producing
the ratin period only set agreements
PTA Meetings/Conferences with Conducted atleast 2 PTA

minimal result within the rating period Meetings/Conferences with minimal
result
Conducted one (1) PTA Conducted PTA

Meeting/Conferences with minimal Meetings/Conferences
result within the rating period
Accomplished set visits with Accomplished 100% of set visits with

successful intervention within the successful intervention and proper
rating period documentation
Accomplished set visits with partial Accomplished 85-99% of set visits

success in implementation of with partial success in implementation
intervention within the rating period of intervention and proper
documentation
Accomplished set visits with Accomplished 75-84% of set visits

suggested planned intervention with suggested planned intevention
within the rating period and proper documentation
Accomplished set visits with planned Accomplished 51-74% of set visits

intervention within the rating period with planned intervention and proper
documentation
Accomplished the set visits with no Accomplished 50% and below with no
intervention within the rating period intervention and proper
documentation
Quality Efficiency
Submitted outstanding documentation Attended a 3-day national level or 6

of traning/seminar/workshop days regional or 9 days division
attended with pictures and certificates training/workshop seminar.
of attendance and participation
Submitted vs documentation of Attended a 3-day regional level or 6

training/seminar/workshop attended days division training/workshop
with pictures and certificates of seminar.
attendances and participation
Submitted vs documentation of Attended a 3-day division level

training/seminar/workshop attended training/workshop seminar.
with pictures and certificates of
Submitted fair documentation of Attended a 10 day school level

training/seminar/workshop attended training/workshop seminar.
with pictures and certificates of
Submitted poor documentation of Attended 5-day school inset

training/seminar/workshop attended training/workshop seminar on the
with pictures and certificates of school level
Reported and left school 15 minutes Not more than 3 times tardy/under
before and after official time time and not more than 3 days of
absenses
Reported and left school 10 minutes 4-6 times tardy/under time
before and after official time 4-7 days of absences
Reported and left school 5 minutes 7-9 times tardy/under time

before and after official time 8-11 days of absences
Reported and left school on time 9-12 times tardy/under time

within official time 12-15 days of absences
Reported to school after official time more than 13 times tardy/under

and left before or within official time time and more than 16 days of
absences
Graduated/Currently enrolled in Earned graduate/post-graduate
graduate/post-graduate studies degree or 12 units and above
Currently enrolled in graduate post- Earned 9 units

graduate studies
Quality Efficiency
Currently enrolled in graduate post- Earned 3-6 units

graduate studies
Sougth the approval of the Division

Office
Prepared requirement for the study

permit
Approved by:
NELIA A. MACARUBBO
Rater
M (IPCRF)
Name of Rater: NELIA A. MACARUBBO
Position: MT - I
Date of Review: APRIL 10,2018
ACTUAL RESULT
Timeliness RATING SCORE
Q E T Ave
Submitted all daily lesson plans/

logs on time

logs an hour late

logs two hours late

logs three hour late
Did not submit all daily lesson

plans/logs
Used approriate, adequate and

updated instructional materials in

teaching most of the lessons daily

teaching some of the lessons daily
Seldom used approriate, adequate

and updated instructional materials
in teaching all lessons daily
Did not use approriate, adequate

and updated instructional materials
in teaching all lessons daily
ACTUAL RESULT
Q E T Ave
All daily lesson plans/logs
developed 100% HOTS
Attained the desired learning

competencies within the rating
period
Interaction was elicited in all

lessons that require it
Interaction was elicited in most

Interaction was elicited in some

Seldom interaction was elicited

in all lessons that require it
No interaction was elicited in

all lessons that require it
ACTUAL RESULT
Q E T Ave
Pupils were guided in the observation
of school/classroom rules and
guidelines within the rating period
Maintained safety orderliness and

cleanliness of floors, toilets and
proper waste disposal daily
d proper
d proper
d proper
ACTUAL RESULT
Q E T Ave
d proper
Submitted on or before the

scheduled date every grading
period
Submitted 1 day after the

period
Submitted 2 days after the

period
Submitted 3 days after the

period
ACTUAL RESULT
Q E T Ave
Submitted 4-5 days after the
period
Pupils portfolio submitted on or

before the scheduled date every
grading period within the rating period
Pupils portfolio a day after the

period within the rating period
Pupils portfolio a day after the

period within the rating period


within the rating period
Administered before the

scheduled periodical
test
Administered a day after the

period
Administered a day after the

period
Administered 2 day after the

period
Administered 3 day after the

period
ACTUAL RESULT
Q E T Ave
Remediation/enrichment programs
were conducted every grading period
End of school year

ACTUAL RESULT
Q E T Ave
100% PTA Meetings/Conference was
conducted with accomplishment and
agreements meet
85-99% PTA Meetings/Conferences

was conducted producing only set
agreements and partial
accomplishment

producing only set agreements

with minimal result
50% and below or not conducted PTA

with minimal result
100% accomplishment of set visits

with successful intervention and
proper documentation
85-99% accomplishments of set

visits with partial success in
implementation of intervention
and proper documentation
75-84% accomplishments of set

visits with suggested planned
intervention and proper
documentation
51-74% accomplishment of set visits

with planned intervention and
proper documentation
50% and below accomplishment

with no intervention and proper
documentation
ACTUAL RESULT
Q E T Ave
Within the rating period
Daily
Within the rating period

ACTUAL RESULT
Q E T Ave
LORNA A. OJEDA
Principal

Ipcrf For t1 t3 2018 Final Revised

Enviado por

Dados do documento

Título original

Direitos autorais

Formatos disponíveis

Compartilhar este documento

Compartilhar ou incorporar documento

Opções de compartilhamento

Você considera este documento útil?

Este conteúdo é inapropriado?

Direitos autorais:

Formatos disponíveis

Ipcrf For t1 t3 2018 Final Revised

Enviado por

Direitos autorais:

Formatos disponíveis

Office Performance Commitment ang Review Form

Name of Employee: Name of Rater:

Weight PERFORMANCE INDICATORS (Quality, Efficiency, Timeliness) ACTUAL RATING

>Incurred no absences/tardiness/undertime 5 = No absences

Weight PERFORMANCE INDICATORS (Quality, Efficiency, Timeliness) ACTUAL RATING

•Pupils 15% >Conducted daily reading 5 = conducted daily interventions/enrichment

>Increased academic performance by 2% every 5 = increased by 2% and above

•Curriculum 20% >Produced supplementary instructional 5 = produced of supplementary instructional materials

Weight PERFORMANCE INDICATORS (Quality, Efficiency, Timeliness) ACTUAL RATING

>involved stakeholders/NGO in the conduct of 5 = 95-100% involvement of stakeholders/NGO

5 = subscribed professional magazines/books every quarter with

•Plus Factor 5% >Coordinatorship/chairmanship Year Round 1%

>Demonstration lesson atleast in district level 1%

DR. BETTY C. CAVO DR. AMELITA B. NUGUIT

Name of Employee: Name of Rater:

TO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNING

Weight PERFORMANCE INDICATORS (Quality, Efficiency, Timeliness) ACTUAL

>Prepared SY Instructional supervisory plan 5 = all mechanism are present

>Observed Ten teacher a month 5 = observed 13 teachers with checklist

>Conducted Earthquake and fire drills twice a 5 = 2 teachers with AP

1 = decreased drop out rate by .49 and below

>Produced supplementary instructional

>Identified least mastered skills and

1 = submitted one monthafter the due date the least mastered

>Introduced at least (1) innovation such as

>involved stakeholders/NGO in the conduct of 5 = 95-100% involvement of stakeholders/NGO

>Conducted participated earthquake and fire

>Provided clean, orderly, well ventilated and

>Attended four (4) seminars in a year 5 = attended 4 or more seminars/trainings

Year Round 3% 3 = subscribed professional magazines/books every quarter

1 = subscribed professional magazines/books every quarter

Weight PERFORMANCE INDICATORS (Quality, Efficiency, Timeliness) ACTUAL

•Plus Factor 5% >Coordinatorship/chairmanship Year Round 1%

>Demonstration lesson atleast in district level 1%

* To get the score, the rating is multiplied by the weight assigned

DR. BETTY C. CAVO DR. AMELITA B. NUGUIT

1. Teaching- 1. Prepared daily lesson June to 5

1.1 Complete parts and 5%

1.2 Approriate, adequate June to 5% 5

1.3 Higher order June to 5% 5

1.4 Desired learning June to 5% 5

2. Facilitated learning June to 5% 5

3. Initiated discipline of June to 5% 5

4.1 Maintained safety,

4.2 Carried out attendance 5% 5

2. Learner's 1. Monitored, evaluated, 5

1.2 Pupils' portfolio June to 5% 5

1.3 Summative/Unit June to 5% 5

3. Attained the required June to 5% 5

3. Community 1.Conducted June to 5

2.1 Punctuality and 5%

3. Pursued graduate/post- June to 5% 5

PLUS Services rendered

TO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNING

Used 100% of approriate, adequate Approriate, adequate and updated

Used 85-99% of approriate, adequate Approriate, adequate and updated

Used 75-84% of approriate, adequate Approriate, adequate and updated

Used 51-74% of approriate, adequate Approriate, adequate and updated

No approriate, adequate and updated Approriate, adequate and updated

100% developed HOTS in

75-84% developed HOTS in

Seldom used HOTS in

Did not use HOTS in