Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
Teachers: Subject:
PO 4. Demonstrate the relationship between the Earth’s internal convective heat flow and plate tectonics.
Speaking and Listening Standard 4: Present information, findings, and supporting evidence such that
listeners can follow the line of reasoning and the organization, development, and style are appropriate to
task, purpose, and audience.
Thinking and Innovation Work place standards: 3.C Takes action supported by evidence and reasoning to
explain conclusions and accomplish work. ∙ Composes a plan ∙ Constructs a model (visual, symbolic, or
linguistic) ∙ Makes decisions ∙ Uses tools strategically ∙ Argues a case
Objective (Explicit):
● Students will be able to understand the theories behind plate tectonics through discussing the arguments of
Alfred Wegener and Harry Hess.
Students are able to define plate tectonics and explain the theory of plate tectonics with five pieces of
appropriate evidence.
◻ How will you review past learning and make connections to previous lessons?
◻ What skills and content are needed to ultimately master this lesson objective?
◻ How is this objective relevant to students, their lives, and/or the real world?
1
Key vocabulary: Materials:
Opening (state objectives, connect to previous learning, and make relevant to real life)
Summative:
Questions:
Differentiation Strategy
2
Who We Teach: No students to my knowledge with IEPs or 504s.
Where We Teach: The students are predominantly made up of white students with 51 percent of the students
being girls.
How We Teach:
Students will be able to define plate tectonics in a way of their choosing (i.e. verbally, visually, etc.)
This gives students a chance to decide the best way they can show the information they have learned. They have a choice and
it will help create a personal investment in the assignment.
Summative:
Questions:
◻ What is one of wegener’s pieces of evidence and why is it a good piece of evidence for plate movement?
o ask until all four pieces of evidence are discussed
◻ What is one of Hess’s pieces of evidence for his theory and why does it explain the theory?
o ask until all three pieces of evidence are discussed
◻ Activity: ask students to point out examples of plate movement (i.e. hot spot volcano, Himalayan mountains)
3
Differentiation Strategy
How We Teach:
Students will interact with fellow students in groups of 3-4 and then present as many pieces of evidence for one of the theories as they
can. Students will be given extra time if needed. The teacher will be walking around the room to listen to the students and answer any
questions.
Allowing students to partake in group work and giving extra time to those who need it will allow them to further process the information
and for the students to be able to recall and describe the information in their own words, so they will best understand the content.
◻ How will you plan to coach and correct during this ◻ How will students independently practice the knowledge and
practice? skills required by the objective?
◻ How will you provide opportunities for remediation and ◻ How will students be engaged?
extension? ◻ How are students practicing in ways that align to
◻ How will you clearly state and model academic and assessment?
behavioral expectations? ◻ How are students using self-assessment to guide their own
◻ Did you provide enough detail so that another person learning?
could facilitate the practice? ◻ How are you supporting students giving feedback to one
I another?
n
d
e ◻ Ensure that students can discuss the pieces of
evidence for each theory and why they are evidence
p
for the theory
e
n
d
e Summative:
n
t Students will take a quiz in which they have to
P write down all the pieces of evidence for the two
r theories.
a Questions:
c
t ◻ Where on the map is an example of evidence from Wegener’s continental spreading theory? Why is it an example?
i ◻ Where on the map is an example of evidence from Hess’s sea-floor spreading theory? Why is it an example?
◻ Would you be for or against Wegener’s arguments in the early 1900s? Why or why not?
c ◻ Would you be for or against Hess’s arguments in the 1950s? Why or why not?
e
Differentiation Strategy
Students, who need it, will be given extra time to complete the quiz. If need be, they could also have an extra
day to study for the quiz. Students can ask the teacher clarifying questions.
4
◻ How will students summarize and state the significance of what they learned?
◻ Why will students be engaged?