Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
communications is for Red and Minor1 to completely submit to MVP’s demands, as is glibly
stated in its Response: “If the Terry treesitters want to talk with their lawyers, all they have to do
is come down.” Civil contempt is not used for punitive goals (unlike criminal contempt) but to
ensure prospective compliance at which time the civil contempt motion is almost universally
dismissed. See, e.g., Consolidation Coal Company v. Local 1702, United Mine Workers of
America, 683, F.2d 827, 830 (4th Cir. 1982) (“[T]he exercise of civil contempt is to coerce future
behavior.”). MVP is demanding complete submission by the “treesitters” to its legal demands
prior to consultation with counsel, much less the opportunity to be heard by this Court. We
simply ask that Red and Minor be accorded the right of any American citizen – to consult with
counsel in a secure and confidential manner before being forced to make a legal decision.
1
Counsel for MVP complains the Terrys used first names in its motion to differentiate between the parties. As
named in the original Complaint, all five parties have the last name of Terry so the use of first names seems to be a
convenient method for identification.
24970/2/8401914v1
Case 7:17-cv-00492-EKD Document 806 Filed 04/23/18 Page 1 of 3 Pageid#: 30656
As stated in the Terrys’ original motion, Roanoke County Police (“RCP”) provided
Minor with a phone that had been reengineered by the RCP to only be responsive to RCP
personnel and a single phone number associated with counsel in a potential civil case not
associated with this federal case. In order to ensure security and confidentiality, we do not want
to accept a phone that has been reengineered by law enforcement agencies who are pursuing
state criminal charges against Red and Minor.2 The simple, obvious and fastest solution is for
counsel to supply phones to their clients – there is no reason or need for MVP or law
Finally, up until this point, the law enforcement/MVP security details have not allowed
any non-law enforcement officer/MVP personnel to approach within 50+/- feet from the
treehouses, nor have the security details allowed any non-law enforcement officer/MVP
personnel to give any item to Red and Minor. A Court Order is required to loosen this restriction
for counsel.
In accordance with the reasons stated above, the Terrys request the Court to enter an
Order 1) allowing counsel to approach the base of the treehouses; 2) provide Red and Terry with
cell phones and chargers; and, 3) to allow attorney/client materials to be transferred between
Red, Minor and counsel without disclosure to or inspection by law enforcement officers and
MVP.
2
Red and Minor are currently charged with misdemeanor trespass, interference with property rights and obstruction
offenses in Roanoke County.
24970/2/8401914v1
Case 7:17-cv-00492-EKD Document 806 Filed 04/23/18 Page 2 of 3 Pageid#: 30657
Respectfully submitted,
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I hereby certify that on April 23, 2018, I electronically filed the foregoing document with
the Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system which will send notification of such filing to all
counsel of record.
By: /s/Thomas J. Bondurant, Jr.
Of Counsel
24970/2/8401914v1
Case 7:17-cv-00492-EKD Document 806 Filed 04/23/18 Page 3 of 3 Pageid#: 30658