Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
Hannah Murray
Introduction
The main focus of this paper is to discuss the relationship with anxiety and
cognitive performance. There has been lots of disagreement over whether anxiety really
has an effect on an individual’s capability to do certain tasks. There has also been a
performance. However, this paper will determine the effects of anxiety on cognitive
test anxiety and by situational stress (see Eysenck, 1992). It can be conceptualized as “a
alter the event/ object/interpretation that is threatening an existing goal” (Power &
Dalgleish, 1997, pp. 206–207). There has been a wide range of testing on anxiety to
effects of anxiety on someone because it is said that it is associated with how individuals
and shifting. Anxiety is an emotion that can deteriorate your thought process and cloud
your judgment. When it comes to your cognitive function, anxiety can affect a person’s
working memory, organization and inhibition. Having the ability to focus while having
attentional control, which leads to performance deficits in tasks involving the central
executive of the working memory system” (Eysenck et al., 2007). Anxiety impairs
control theory. “Attentional control theory main hypothesis focused on how anxiety has
A., Higgins, T., Gamble, K. M., Cauraugh, J. H., & Janelle, C. M. (2009). ACT explains
how the feeling of fear and worry can interfere with one’s performance level.
Other studies have researched and compared two negative conditions for
example anger and anxiety. According to the article, The Effect of Negative Affect on
Cognition: Anxiety, Not anger, Impairs Executive Function, there is many signs of
evidence that led us to hypothesize that anxiety, but not anger, should impair executive
function (Roskes, Elliot, Nijstad, & De Dreu, 2013). The affects of anxiety and anger can
Running Head: THE AFFECT OF ANXIETY 4
lead to poor decision-making, which can impair a person’s cognitive judgment. This
article concluded that anxiety has more of an effect on functions than anger.
challenging. When a person is overwhelmed with anxiety it can cause them to worry,
which can lead to short-term memory. “According to the processing efficiency theory,
worry has two main effects: (1) a reduction in the storage and processing capacity of the
working memory system available for a concurrent task; and (2) an increment in on-task
effort and activities designed to improve performance” (Michael W. Eysenck & Manuel
G. Calvo (2008). The most important factor when it comes to the processing efficiency
theory is that anxiety typically impairs efficiency more than effectiveness. Effectiveness
means the quality of the task performance, where as efficiency refers to the correlation
between effectiveness of performance and the effort spent doing the task. When
experiencing anxiety a person can have worrisome thoughts that consume their attention
and it tends to affect their cognitive performance. Another effect of anxiety is loss of
motivation. The anxiety takes over their thoughts and a person can start to feel
discouraged leading them worrisome thought that interfere processing and storing
information.
Conclusion
In these articles there is numerous information provided that anxiety does in fact
much that they can only focus on the anxiety itself and nothing else. It can impair a
Running Head: THE AFFECT OF ANXIETY 5
persons’ thought process and judgment. Therefore, meaning that anxiety does indeed
References
Coombes, S. A., Higgins, T., Gamble, K. M., Cauraugh, J. H., & Janelle, C. M. (2009).
Attentional Control Theory: Anxiety, Emotion, and Motor Planning. Journal of Anxiety
Michael W. Eysenck & Manuel G. Calvo (2008) Anxiety and Performance: The Processing
10.1080/02699939208409696
Olatunji, B. O., & Wolitzky-Taylor, K. B. (2009). Anxiety sensitivity and the anxiety disorders:
doi:10.1037/a0017428
Shields, G. S., Moons, W. G., Tewell, C. A., & Yonelinas, A. P. (2016). The effect of negative
affect on cognition: Anxiety, not anger, impairs executive function. Emotion, 16(6), 792-
797. doi:10.1037/emo0000151