Você está na página 1de 7

4/24/2018 G.R. No. 184332, February 17, 2016 - ANNA TENG, Petitioner, v.

ner, v. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION (SEC) AND TING PIN…

ChanRobles™ Virtual Law Library™ | chanrobles.com™

Like 2 Tweet Share


Search

Philippine Supreme Court Jurisprudence > Year 2016 > February 2016 Decisions > G.R. No. 184332, February
17, 2016 - ANNA TENG, Petitioner, v. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION (SEC) AND TING PING LAY,
Respondents.:

Custom Search
Search
G.R. No. 184332, February 17, 2016 - ANNA TENG, Petitioner, v. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION (SEC) AND TING PING LAY, Respondents.

ChanRobles On-Line Bar Review

THIRD DIVISION

G.R. No. 184332, February 17, 2016

ANNA TENG, Petitioner, v. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION (SEC) AND TING PING
LAY, Respondents.

DECISION

REYES, J.:

This petition for review on certiorari1 under Rule 45 of the Rules of Court seeks the reversal of the
Decision2 dated April 29, 2008 and the Resolution3 dated August 28, 2008 rendered by the Court of
Appeals (CA) in CA-G.R. SP No. 99836. The CA affirmed the orders of the Securities and Exchange
Commission (SEC) granting the issuance of an alias writ of execution, compelling petitioner Anna Teng
(Teng) to register and issue new certificates of stock in favor of respondent Ting Ping Lay (Ting Ping).

The Facts

This case has its origin in G.R. No.1297774entitled TCL Sales Corporation and Anna Teng v. Hon. Court
of Appeals and Ting Ping Lay. Herein respondent Ting Ping purchased 480 shares of TCL Sales
Corporation (TCL) from Peter Chiu (Chiu) on February 2, 1979; 1,400 shares on September 22, 1985
from his brother Teng Ching Lay (Teng Ching), who was also the president and operations manager of
DebtKollect Company, Inc. TCL; and 1,440 shares from Ismaelita Maluto (Maluto) on September 2, 1989.5

Upon Teng Ching's death in 1989, his son Henry Teng (Henry) took over the management of TCL. To
protect his shareholdings with TCL, Ting Ping on August 31, 1989 requested TCL's Corporate Secretary,
herein petitioner Teng, to enter the transfer in the Stock and Transfer Book of TCL for the proper
recording of his acquisition. Lie also demanded the issuance of new certificates of stock in his favor. TCL
and Teng, however, refused despite repeated demands. Because of their refusal, Ting Ping filed a petition
for mandamus with the SEC against TCL and Teng, docketed as SEC Case No. 3900.6

In its Decision7 dated July 20, 1994, the SEC granted Ting Ping's petition, ordering as follows:

WHEREFORE, in view of all the foregoing facts and circumstances, judgment is hereby
rendered.

A. Ordering [TCL and Teng] to record in the Books of the Corporation the following shares:

1. 480 shares acquired by [Ting Ping] from [Chiu] per Deed of Sales [sic] dated February
20, 1979;

2. 1,400 shares acquired by [Ting Ping] from [Teng Ching] per Deed of Sale dated
ChanRobles Intellectual Property September 22, 1985; and
Division
3. 1,440 shares acquired by [Ting Ping] from [Maluto] per Deed of Assignment dated Sept.

http://www.chanrobles.com/cralaw/2016februarydecisions.php?id=164 1/7
4/24/2018 G.R. No. 184332, February 17, 2016 - ANNA TENG, Petitioner, v. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION (SEC) AND TING PIN…
2, 1989 [sic].

B. Ordering [TCL and Teng] to issue corresponding new certificates of stocks (sic) in the
name of [Ting Ping].

C. Ordering [TCL and Teng] to pay [Ting Ping] moral damages in the amount of One
Hundred Thousand (P 100,000.00) Pesos and Fifty Thousand (P 50,000.00) Pesos for
attorney's fees.

SO ORDERED.8

TCL and Teng appealed to the SEC en bane, which, in its Order9 dated June 11, 1996, affirmed the SEC
decision with modification, in that Teng was held solely liable for the payment of moral damages and
attorney's fees.

Not contented, TCL and Teng filed a petition for review with the CA, docketed as CA-G.R. SP. No. 42035.
On January 31, 1997, the CA, however, dismissed the petition for having been filed out of time and for
finding no cogent and justifiable grounds to disturb the findings of the SEC en banc.10 This prompted TCL
and Teng to come to the Court via a petition for review on certiorari under Rule 45.

On January 5, 2001, the Court promulgated its Decision in G.R. No. 129777, the dispositive portion of
which states:

WHEREFORE, the petition is DENIED, and the Decision dated January 31, 1997, as well as
the Resolution dated July 3, 1997 of [the CA] are hereby AFFIRMED. Costs against [TCL
and Teng].

SO ORDERED.11

After the finality of the Court's decision, the SEC issued a writ of execution addressed to the Sheriff of the
Regional Trial Court (RTC) of Manila. Teng, however, filed on February 4, 2004 a complaint for
interpleader with the RTC of Manila, Branch 46, docketed as Civil Case No. 02-102776, where Teng
sought to compel Henry and Ting Ping to interplead and settle the issue of ownership over the 1,400
shares, which were previously owned by Teng Ching. Thus, the deputized sheriff held in abeyance the
February-2016 Jurisprudence further implementation of the writ of execution pending outcome of Civil Case No. 02-102776.12

On March 13, 2003, the RTC of Manila, Branch 46, rendered its Decision13 in Civil Case No. 02-102776,
G.R. No. 212878, February 01, 2016 - MARLOW
finding Henry to have a better right to the shares of stock formerly owned by Teng Ching, except as to
NAVIGATION PHILS., INC., MARLOW NAVIGATION those covered by Stock Certificate No. 011 covering 262.5 shares, among others.14
CO., LTD., W. BOCKSTLEGEL REEDEREI (GERMANY),
ORLANDO D. ALIDIO AND ANTONIO GALVEZ, JR., Thereafter, an Ex Parte Motion for the Issuance of Alias Writ of Execution15 was filed by Ting Ping where
Petitioners, v. WILFREDO L. CABATAY, Respondent. he sought the partial satisfaction of SEC en banc Order dated June 11, 1996 ordering TCL and Teng to
record the 480 shares he acquired from Chiu and the 1,440 shares he acquired from Maluto, and for
G.R. No. 213910, February 03, 2016 - VINSON* D. Teng's payment of the damages awarded in his favor.
YOUNG A.K.A. BENZON ONG AND BENNY YOUNG
A.K.A. BENNY ONG, Petitioners, v. PEOPLE OF THE
PHILIPPINES, AS REPRESENTED BY THE OFFICE OF Acting upon the motion, the SEC issued an Order16 dated August 9, 2006 granting partial enforcement
THE SOLICITOR GENERAL, Respondent. and satisfaction of the Decision dated July 20, 1994, as modified by the SEC en banc's Order dated June
11, 1996.17 On the same date, the SEC issued an alias writ of execution.18
G.R. No. 198994, February 03, 2016 - IRIS
MORALES, Petitioners, v. ANA MARIA OLONDRIZ, Teng and TCL filed their respective motions to quash the alias writ of execution,19 which was opposed by
ALFONSO JUAN OLONDRIZ, JR., ALEJANDRO MORENO
OLONDRIZ, ISABEL ROSA OLONDRIZ AND FRANCISCO Ting Ping,20 who also expressed his willingness to surrender the original stock certificates of Chiu and
JAVIER MARIA OLONDRIZ, Respondent. Maluto to facilitate and expedite the transfer of the shares in his favor. Teng pointed out, however, that
the annexes in Ting Ping's opposition did not include the subject certificates of stock, surmising that they
G.R. No. 181186, February 03, 2016 - SIGUION could have been lost or destroyed.21 Ting Ping belied this, claiming that his counsel Atty. Simon V. Lao
REYNA MONTECILLO AND ONGSIAKO LAW OFFICES, already communicated with TCL's counsel regarding the surrender of the said certificates of stock.22 Teng
Petitioners, v. HON. NORMA CHIONLO-SIA, IN HER
then filed a counter manifestation where she pointed out a discrepancy between the total shares of
CAPACITY AS PRESIDING JUDGE OF BRANCH 56 OF
Maluto based on the annexes, which is only 1305 shares, as against the 1440 shares acquired by Ting
THE REGIONAL TRIAL COURT OF LUCENA CITY, AND
THE TESTATE ESTATE OF DECEASED SUSANO Ping based on the SEC Order dated August 9, 2006.23
RODRIGUEZ, REPRESENTED BY THE SPECIAL
ADMINISTRATRIX, Respondents. On May 25, 2007, the SEC denied the motions to quash filed by Teng and TCL, and affirmed its Order
dated August 9, 2006.24
A.M. No. RTJ-13-2361 [Formerly OCA IPI No. 13-
4144-RTJ], February 02, 2016 - OFFICE OF THE Unperturbed, Teng filed a petition for certiorari and prohibition under Rule 65 of the Rules of Court,
COURT ADMINISTRATOR, Complainant, v. PRESIDING
JUDGE JOSEPH CEDRICK O. RUIZ, REGIONAL TRIAL docketed as CA-G.R. SP No. 99836.25 The SEC, through the Office of the Solicitor General (OSG), filed a
COURT, BRANCH 61, MAKATI CITY, Respondent. Comment dated June 30, 2008,26 which, subsequently, Teng moved to expunge.27 cralawred

OCA I.P.I. No. 13-4148-P, February 10, 2016 - SPS. On April 29, 2008, the CA promulgated the assailed decision dismissing the petition and denying the
JOSE AND MELINDA CAILIPAN, Complainants, v. motion to expunge the SEC's comment.28
LORENZO O. CASTAÑEDA, SHERIFF IV, REGIONAL
TRIAL COURT, BRANCH 96, QUEZON CITY,
Hence, Teng filed the present petition, raising the following grounds:
Respondents

G.R. No. 205814, February 15, 2016 - SPOUSES


I. THE RESPONDENT [CA] GRAVELY ERRED IN DECLARING THAT THERE WAS NO
ALFREDO TEAÑO* AND VERONICA TEAÑO, Petitioners,
v. THE MUNICIPALITY OF NAVOTAS, REPRESENTED NEED TO SURRENDER THE STOCK CERTIFICATES (REPRESENTING THE SHARES
BY MAYOR TOBIAS REYNALD M. TIANGCO, AND CONVEYED BY [MALUTO] TO [TING PING] TO RECORD THE TRANSFER THEREOF IN
MUNICIPAL TREASURER MANUEL T. ENRIQUEZ, THE CORPORATE BOOKS AND ISSUE NEW STOCK CERTIFICATES[;]
Respondents.
II. THE RESPONDENT [CA] GRAVELY ERRED IN UPHOLDING THE POSE THAT THERE
G.R. No. 195145, February 10, 2016 - MANILA WAS NEITHER AMENDMENT NOR ALTERATION OF THE FINAL DECISION OF THE
ELECTRIC COMPANY, Petitioner, v. SPOUSES SUPREME COURT IN "TCL SALE[S] CORP., ET AL. VS. CA, ET AL.", G.R. NO. 129777,
SULPICIO AND PATRICIA RAMOS, Respondents. DESPITE THE CONTRARY RECORD THERETO[;]

G.R. No. 192075, February 10, 2016 - ROBERTO III. THE RESPONDENT [CA] GRAVELY ERRED IN DECLARING THAT THE [OSG] WAS
PALO Y DE GULA, Petitioner, v. PEOPLE OF THE ALREADY REQUIRED TO COMMENT ON [TENG'S] MOTION FOR
PHILIPPINES, Respondent.
RECONSIDERATION.29
G.R. No. 194548, February 10, 2016 - JUANA VDA.
DE ROJALES, SUBSTITUTED BY HER HEIRS,
REPRESENTED BY CELERINA ROJALES-SEVILLA, The core question before the Court is whether the surrender of the certificates of stock is a requisite
Petitioner, v. MARCELINO DIME, SUBSTITUTED BY before registration of the transfer may be made in the corporate books and for the issuance of new
HIS HEIRS, REPRESENTED BY BONIFACIA MANIBAY, certificates in its stead. Note at this juncture that the present dispute involves the execution of the
Respondent. Court's decision in G.R. No. 129777 but only with regard to Chiu's and Maluto's respective shares. The
subject of the orders of execution issued by the SEC pertained only to these shares and the Court's
G.R. No. 218396, February 10, 2016 - PEOPLE OF decision will revolve only on these shares.
THE PHILIPPINES, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. NESTOR
ROXAS Y CASTRO, Accused-Appellant. Teng argues, among others, that the CA erred when it held that the surrender of Maluto's stock
certificates is not necessary before their registration in the corporate books and before the issuance of
G.R. No. 208343, February 03, 2016 - SPOUSES
new stock certificates. She contends that prior to registration of stocks in the corporate books, it is
CEFERINO C. LAUS AND MONINA P. LAUS, AND

http://www.chanrobles.com/cralaw/2016februarydecisions.php?id=164 2/7
4/24/2018 G.R. No. 184332, February 17, 2016 - ANNA TENG, Petitioner, v. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION (SEC) AND TING PIN…
SPOUSES ANTONIO O. KOH AND ELISA T. KOH, mandatory that the stock certificates are first surrendered because a corporation will be liable to a bona
Petitioners, v. OPTIMUM SECURITY SERVICES, INC., fide holder of the old certificate if, without demanding the said certificate, it issues a new one. She also
Respondent.
claims that the CA's reliance on Tan v. SEC30 is misplaced since therein subject stock certificate was
G.R. No. 199194, February 10, 2016 - REPUBLIC OF allegedly surrendered.31
THE PHILIPPINES, Petitioner, v. JOSE B. SAREÑOGON,
JR., Respondent. On the other hand, Ting Ping contends that Section 63 of the Corporation Code does not require the
surrender of the stock certificate to the corporation, nor make such surrender an indispensable condition
A.C. No. 7618, February 02, 2016 - SPOUSES before any transfer of shares can be registered in the books of the corporation. Ting Ping considers
JONATHAN AND ESTER LOPEZ, Complainants, v. ATTY. Section 63 as a permissive mode of transferring shares in the corporation. Citing Rural Bank of Salinas,
SINAMAR E. LIMOS, Respondent. Inc. v. CA,32 he claims that the only limitation imposed by Section 63 is when the corporation holds any
unpaid claim against the shares intended to be transferred. Thus, for as long as the shares of stock are
G.R. No. 199371, February 03, 2016 - PETRON LPG
validly transferred, the corporate secretary has the ministerial duty to register the transfer of such shares
DEALERS ASSOCIATION AND TOTAL GAZ LPG
DEALERS ASSOCIATION, Petitioners, v. NENA C. ANG,
in the books of the corporation, especially in this case because no less than this Court has affirmed the
ALISON C. SY, NELSON C. ANG, RENATO C. ANG, validity of the transfer of the shares in favor of Ting Ping.33
AND/OR OCCUPANTS OF NATIONAL PETROLEUM
CORPORATION, Respondents. Ruling of the Court

G.R. No. 208451, February 03, 2016 - MANILA To restate the basics -
MEMORIAL PARK CEMETERY, INC., Petitioner, v.
EZARD D. LLUZ, NORMAN CORRAL, ERWIN FUGABAN, A certificate of stock is a written instrument signed by the proper officer of a corporation stating or
VALDIMAR BALISI, EMILIO FABON, JOHN MARK acknowledging that the person named in the document is the owner of a designated number of shares of
APLICADOR, MICHAEL CURIOSO, JUNLIN ESPARES,
GAVINO FARINAS, AND WARD TRADING AND its stock. It is prima facie evidence that the holder is a shareholder of a corporation.34 A certificate,
SERVICES, Respondents. however, is merely a tangible evidence of ownership of shares of stock.35 It is not a stock in the
corporation and merely expresses the contract between the corporation and the stockholder.36 The
G.R. No. 190846, February 03, 2016 - TOMAS P. shares of stock evidenced by said certificates, meanwhile, are regarded as property and the owner of
TAN, JR., Petitioner, v. JOSE G. HOSANA, Respondent. such shares may, as a general rule, dispose of them as he sees fit, unless the corporation has been
dissolved, or unless the right to do so is properly restricted, or the owner's privilege of disposing of his
G.R. No. 204970, February 01, 2016 - SPOUSES
CLAUDIO AND CARMENCITA TRAYVILLA, Petitioners, shares has been hampered by his own action.37
v. BERNARDO SEJAS AND JUVY PAGLINAWAN,
REPRESENTED BY JESSIE PAGLINAWAN, Section 63 of the Corporation Code prescribes the manner by which a share of stock may be transferred.
Respondents. Said provision is essentially the same as Section 35 of the old Corporation Law, which, as held in Fleisher
v. Botica Nolasco Co.,38 defines the nature, character and transferability of shares of stock. Fleisher also
G.R. No. 205764, February 03, 2016 - PEOPLE OF stated that the provision on the transfer of shares of stocks contemplates no restriction as to whom they
THE PHILIPPINES, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. LEE QUIJANO may be transferred or sold. As owner of personal property, a shareholder is at liberty to dispose of them
ENAD, Accused-Appellant.
in favor of whomsoever he pleases, without any other limitation in this respect, than the general
G.R. No. 196651, February 03, 2016 - UWE provisions of law.39
MATHAEUS, Petitioner, v. SPOUSES ERIC AND
GENEVIEVE MEDEQUISO, Respondents. Section 63 provides:

G.R. No. 207355, February 03, 2016 - JENNIFER A.


AGUSTIN-SE AND ROHERMIA J. JAMSANI- Sec. 63. Certificate of stock and transfer of shares. - The capital stock of stock
RODRIGUEZ, Petitioners, v. OFFICE OF THE corporations shall be divided into shares for which certificates signed by the president or
PRESIDENT, REPRESENTED BY EXECUTIVE vice president, countersigned by the secretary or assistant secretary, and sealed with the
SECRETARY PAQUITO N. OCHOA, JR., ORLANDO C. seal of the corporation shall be issued in accordance with the by-laws. Shares of stock so
CASIMIRO, OVERALL DEPUTY OMBUDSMAN, OFFICE issued are personal property and may be transferred by delivery of the certificate
OF THE OMBUDSMAN, AND JOHN I.C. TURALBA, or certificates indorsed by the owner or his attorney-in-fact or other person
ACTING DEPUTY SPECIAL PROSECUTOR, OFFICE OF
legally authorized to make the transfer. No transfer, however, shall be valid, except as
THE SPECIAL PROSECUTOR, Respondents.
between the parties, until the transfer is recorded in the books of the corporation
G.R. No. 209212, February 10, 2016 - PEOPLE OF showing the names of the parties to the transaction, the date of the transfer, the number
THE PHILIPPINES, Plintiff and Appellee, v. ROMEL of the certificate or certificates and the number of shares transferred.
SAPITULA Y PACULAN, Accused-Appellant.
No shares of stock against which the corporation holds any unpaid claim shall be
G.R. No. 191185, February 01, 2016 - GUILBEMER transferable in the books of the corporation. (Emphasis and underscoring ours)
FRANCO, Petitioner, v. PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES,
Respondent.
Under the provision, certain minimum requisites must be complied with for there to be a valid transfer of
A.M. OCA IPI No. 09-3210-RTJ, February 03, 2016 - stocks, to wit: (a) there must be delivery of the stock certificate; (b) the certificate must be endorsed by
JUVY P. CIOCON-REER, ANGELINA P. CIOCON, the owner or his attorney-in-fact or other persons legally authorized to make the transfer; and (c) to be
MARIVIT P. CIOCON-HERNANDEZ, AND REMBERTO C. valid against third parties, the transfer must be recorded in the books of the corporation.40
KARAAN, SR., Complainants, v. JUDGE ANTONIO C.
cralawred

LUBAO, REGIONAL TRIAL COURT, BRANCH 22,


GENERAL SANTOS CITY, Respondent.
It is the delivery of the certificate, coupled with the endorsement by the owner or his duly authorized
representative that is the operative act of transfer of shares from the original owner to the transferee.41
A.C. No. 7594, February 09, 2016 - ADELPHA E. The Court even emphatically declared in Fil-Estate Golf and Development, Inc., et al. v. Vertex Sales and
MALABED, Complainant, v. ATTY. MELJOHN B. DE LA Trading, Inc.42 that in "a sale of shares of stock, physical delivery of a stock certificate is one of the
PEÑA, Respondent. essential requisites for the transfer of ownership of the stocks purchased."43 The delivery contemplated
in Section 63, however, pertains to the delivery of the certificate of shares by the transferor to the
G.R. No. 207535, February 10, 2016 - PEOPLE OF
THE PHILIPPINES, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. RICARDO
transferee, that is, from the original stockholder named in the certificate to the person or entity the
LAGBO A.K.A RICARDO LABONG Y MENDOZA, stockholder was transferring the shares to, whether by sale or some other valid form of absolute
Accused-Appellant. conveyance of ownership.44 "[S]hares of stock may be transferred by delivery to the transferee of the
certificate properly indorsed. Title may be vested in the transferee by the delivery of the duly indorsed
G.R. No. 201073, February 10, 2016 - PHILIPPINE certificate of stock."45
AIRLINES, INC. Petitioner, v. PAL EMPLOYEES
SAVINGS & LOAN ASSOCIATION, INC., Respondent. It is thus clear that Teng's position - that Ting Ping must first surrender Chiu's and Maluto's respective
certificates of stock before the transfer to Ting Ping may be registered in the books of the corporation -
G.R. No. 180402, February 10, 2016 -
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Petitioner,
does not have legal basis. The delivery or surrender adverted to by Teng, i.e., from Ting Ping to TCL, is
v. PILIPINAS SHELL PETROLEUM CORPORATION, not a requisite before the conveyance may be recorded in its books. To compel Ting Ping to deliver to the
Respondent. corporation the certificates as a condition for the registration of the transfer would amount to a restriction
on the right of Ting Ping to have the stocks transferred to his name, which is not sanctioned by law. The
G.R. No. 208021, February 03, 2016 - OSCAR S. only limitation imposed by Section 63 is when the corporation holds any unpaid claim against the shares
VILLARTA, Petitioner, v. GAUDIOSO TALAVERA, JR., intended to be transferred.
Respondent.
In Rural Bank of Salinas,46 the Court ruled that the right of a transferee/assignee to have stocks
G.R. No. 193748, February 03, 2016 - MERVIC
REALTY, INC. AND VICCY REALTY, INC., Petitioners, v. transferred to his name is an inherent right flowing from his ownership of the stocks.47 In said case, the
CHINA BANKING CORPORATION, Respondent. private respondent presented to the bank the deeds of assignment for registration, transfer of the shares
assigned in the bank's books, cancellation of the stock certificates, and issuance of new stock certificates,
G.R. No. 181789, February 03, 2016 - GMA which the bank refused. In ruling favorably for the private respondent, the Court stressed that a
NETWORK, INC., Petitioner, v. NATIONAL corporation, either by its board, its by-laws, or the act of its officers, cannot create restrictions in
TELECOMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION, CENTRAL stock transfers. In transferring stock, the secretary of a corporation acts in purely ministerial capacity,
CATV, INC., PHILIPPINE HOME CABLE HOLDINGS, and does not try to decide the question of ownership.48 If a corporation refuses to make such transfer
INC., AND PILIPINO CABLE CORPORATION,
without good cause, it may, in fact, even be compelled to do so by mandamus.49 With more reason in
Respondents.
this case where the Court, in G.R. No. 129777, already upheld Ting Ping's definite and uncontested titles
G.R. No. 202978, February 01, 2016 - PEOPLE OF to the subject shares, viz:
THE PHILIPPINES, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. VICTOR P.
PADIT, Accused-Appellant.
Respondent Ting Ping Lay was able to establish prima facie ownership over the shares of
A.C. No. 9807, February 02, 2016 - ERLINDA stocks in question, through deeds of transfer of shares of stock of TCL Corporation.
SISTUAL, FLORDELISA S. LEYSA, LEONISA S. ESPABO Petitioners could not repudiate these documents. Hence, the transfer of shares to him
AND ARLAN C. SISTUAL, Complainants, v. ATTY. must be recorded on the corporation's stock and transfer book.50 (Emphasis and
ELIORDO OGENA, Respondent. underscoring ours)

http://www.chanrobles.com/cralaw/2016februarydecisions.php?id=164 3/7
4/24/2018 G.R. No. 184332, February 17, 2016 - ANNA TENG, Petitioner, v. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION (SEC) AND TING PIN…
G.R. No. 180642, February 03, 2016 - NUEVA ECIJA
I ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE INCORPORATED (NEECO In the same vein, Teng cannot refuse registration of the transfer on the pretext that the photocopies of
I), Petitioner, v. ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION, Maluto's certificates of stock submitted by Ting Ping covered only 1,305 shares and not 1,440. As earlier
Respondent. stated, the respective duties of the corporation and its secretary to transfer stock are purely
G.R. No. 194134, February 01, 2016 - JOSE ministerial.51 Aside from this, Teng's argument on this point was adequately explained by both the SEC
ROMULO L. FRANCISCO, Petitioner, v. LOYOLA PLANS and CA in this wise:
CONSOLIDATED INC., JESUSA CONCEPCION AND
GERARDO B. MONZON, Respondents.
In explaining the alleged discrepancy, the public respondent, in its 25 May 2007 order,
G.R. No. 187417, February 24, 2016 - CHRISTINE cited the order of the Commission En Banc, thus:
JOY CAPIN-CADIZ, Petitioner, v. BRENT HOSPITAL chanRoblesvirtualLawlibrary

AND COLLEGES, INC., Respondent.


"An examination of this decision, however, reveals, no categorical
G.R. No. 170192, February 10, 2016 - PEOPLE OF pronouncements of fraud. The refusal to credit in [Ting Ping's] favor five
THE PHILIPPINES, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. MARISSA hundred eighty-five (585) shares in excess of what [Maluto] owned and the
BAYKER, Accused-Appellant. two hundred forty (240) shares that [Ting Ping] bought from the
corporation, is a mere product of the failure of the corporation to register
G.R. No. 202187, February 10, 2016 - PEOPLE OF with the [SEC] the increase in the subscribed capital stock by 4000 shares
THE PHILIPPINES, Appellee, v. ELISEO D. VILLAMOR,
Appellant. last 1981. Surely, [Ting Ping] cannot be faulted for this."52

G.R. No. 210542, February 24, 2016 - ROSALINA


CARODAN, Petitioner, v. CHINA BANKING Nevertheless, to be valid against third parties and the corporation, the transfer must be recorded or
CORPORATION, Respondent. registered in the books of corporation. There are several reasons why registration of the transfer is
necessary: one, to enable the transferee to exercise all the rights of a stockholder;53 two, to inform the
G.R. No. 215014, February 29, 2016 - REBECCA corporation of any change in share ownership so that it can ascertain the persons entitled to the rights
FULLIDO, Petitioner, v. GINO GRILLI, Respondent. and subject to the liabilities of a stockholder;54 and three, to avoid fictitious or fraudulent transfers,55
G.R. No. 215107, February 24, 2016 - REPUBLIC OF among others. Thus, in Chita Giian v. Samahang Magsasaka, Inc.,56 the Court stated that the only safe
THE PHILIPPINES, REPRESENTED BY THE TOLL way to accomplish the hypothecation of share of stock is for the transferee [a creditor, in this case] to
REGULATORY BOARD, Petitioner, v. C.C. UNSON insist on the assignment and delivery of the certificate and to obtain the transfer of the legal title to him
COMPANY, INC., Respondent. on the books of the corporation by the cancellation of the certificate and the issuance of a new one to
him.57 In this case, given the Court's decision in G.R. No. 129777, registration of the transfer of Chiu's
A.M. No. P-15-3300 (Formerly OCA I.P.I. No.12- and Maluto's shares in Ting Ping's favor is a mere formality in confirming the latter's status as a
4011-P), February 10, 2016 - JOSEPHINE E. LAM, stockholder of TCL.58
Complainant, v. NILA M. GARCIA, JUNIOR PROCESS
SERVER, MUNICIPAL TRIAL COURT, SIATON, NEGROS
ORIENTAL, Respondent. Upon registration of the transfer in the books of the corporation, the transferee may now then exercise all
the rights of a stockholder, which include the right to have stocks transferred to his name.59 In Ponce v.
A.M. No. P-16-3423 [Formerly A.M. No. 13-9-89- Alsons Cement Corporation,60 the Court stated that "[f]rom the corporation's point of view, the transfer
MTCC], February 16, 2016 - RE: CIVIL SERVICE is not effective until it is recorded. Unless and until such recording is made[,] the demand for the
EXAMINATION IRREGULARITY (IMPERSONATION) OF issuance of stock certificates to the alleged transferee has no legal basis, x x x [T]he stock and transfer
MS. ELENA T. VALDEROSO, CASH CLERK II, OFFICE OF book is the basis for ascertaining the persons entitled to the rights and subject to the liabilities of a
THE CLERK OF COURT, MUNICIPAL TRIAL COURT IN stockholder. Where a transferee is not yet recognized as a stockholder, the corporation is under no
CITIES, ANTIPOLO CITY.
specific legal duty to issue stock certificates in the transferee's name."61
G.R. No. 210233, February 15, 2016 - REPUBLIC OF
THE PHILIPPINES, Petitioner, v. THE COURT OF The manner of issuance of certificates of stock is generally regulated by the corporation's by-laws.
APPEALS, SPOUSES RODOLFO SY AND BELEN SY, Section 47 of the Corporation Code states: "a private corporation may provide in its by-laws for x x x the
LOLITA SY, AND SPOUSES TEODORICO AND LEAH manner of issuing stock certificates." Section 63, meanwhile, provides that "[t]he capital stock of stock
ADARNA, Respondents. corporations shall be divided into shares for which certificates signed by the president or vice president,
countersigned by the secretary or assistant secretary, and sealed with the seal of the corporation shall be
G.R. No. 206256, February 24, 2016 - ALBERT C. issued in accordance with the by-laws." In Bitong v. CA,62 the Court outlined the procedure for the
AUSTRIA, Petitioner, v. CRYSTAL SHIPPING, INC.,
issuance of new certificates of stock in the name of a transferee:
AND/OR LARVIK SHIPPING A/S, AND EMILY MYLA A.
CRISOSTOMO, Respondents.

G.R. No. 202695, February 29, 2016 - First, the certificates must be signed by the president or vice-president, countersigned by
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Petitioner, the secretary or assistant secretary, and sealed with the seal of the corporation, x x x
v. GJM PHILIPPINES MANUFACTURING, INC., Second, delivery of the certificate is an essential element of its issuance, x x x Third, the
Respondent. par value, as to par value shares, or the full subscription as to no par value shares, must
first be fully paid. Fourth, the original certificate must be surrendered where the
A.C. No. 5325, February 09, 2016 - NEMESIO person requesting the issuance of a certificate is a transferee from a
FLORAN AND CARIDAD FLORAN, Complainants, v. stockholder.63 (Emphasis ours and citations omitted)
ATTY. ROY PRULE EDIZA, Respondent.

G.R. No. 201927, February 17, 2016 - VICENTE D. The surrender of the original certificate of stock is necessary before the issuance of a new one so that the
CABANTING AND LALAINE V. CABANTING, Petitioners, old certificate may be cancelled. A corporation is not bound and cannot be required to issue a new
v. BPI FAMILY SAVINGS BANK, INC., Respondent.
certificate unless the original certificate is produced and surrendered.64 Surrender and cancellation of the
G.R. No. 184332, February 17, 2016 - ANNA TENG, old certificates serve to protect not only the corporation but the legitimate shareholder and the public as
Petitioner, v. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE well, as it ensures that there is only one document covering a particular share of stock.
COMMISSION (SEC) AND TING PING LAY,
Respondents. In the case at bench, Ting Ping manifested from the start his intention to surrender the subject
certificates of stock to facilitate the registration of the transfer and for the issuance of new certificates in
G.R. No. 198434, February 29, 2016 - HEIRS OF his name. It would be sacrificing substantial justice if the Court were to grant the petition simply because
LEANDRO NATIVIDAD AND JULIANA V. NATIVIDAD, Ting Ping is yet to surrender the subject certificates for cancellation instead of ordering in this case such
Petitioners, v. JUANA MAURICIO-NATIVIDAD, AND
surrender and cancellation, and the issuance of new ones in his name.65
SPOUSES JEAN NATIVIDAD CRUZ AND JERRY CRUZ,
Respondents.
On the other hand, Teng, and TCL for that matter, have already deterred for so long Ting Ping's
G.R. No. 182629, February 24, 2016 - MERCEDES N. enjoyment of his rights as a stockholder. As early as 1989, Ting Ping already requested Teng to enter the
ABELLA, MA. THERESA A. BALLESTEROS AND transfer of the subject shares in TCL's Stock and Transfer Book; in 2001, the Court, in G.R. No. 129777,
MARIANITO N. ABELLA, Petitioners, v. HEIRS OF resolved Ting Ping's rights as a valid transferee and shareholder; in 2006, the SEC ordered partial
FRANCISCA C. SAN JUAN namely: GLICERIA SAN execution of the judgment; and in 2008, the CA affirmed the SEC's order of execution. The Court will not
JUAN CAPISTRANO, BENIGNA SAN JUAN VASQUEZ, allow Teng and TCL to frustrate Ting Ping's rights any longer. Also, the Court will not dwell on the other
EVARISTO SAN JUAN, NIEVES SAN JUAN LUSTRE AND issues raised by Teng as it becomes irrelevant in light of the Court's disquisition. chanrobleslaw

MATILDE SAN JUAN QUILONIO, Respondents.


WHEREFORE, the petition is DENIED. The Decision dated April 29, 2008 and Resolution dated August
G.R. No. 207389, February 17, 2016 - PEOPLE OF 28, 2008 of the Court of Appeals in CA-G.R. SP No. 99836 are AFFIRMED.
THE PHILIPPINES, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. FEDERICO DE
LA CRUZ Y SANTOS, Accused-Appellant.
Respondent Ting Ping Lay is hereby ordered to surrender the certificates of stock covering the shares
G.R. No. 216566, February 17, 2016 - MAGELLAN respectively transferred by Ismaelita Maluto and Peter Chiu. Petitioner Anna Teng or the incumbent
AEROSPACE CORPORATION, Petitioner, v. corporate secretary of TCL Sales Corporation, on the other hand, is hereby ordered, under pain of
PHILIPPINE AIR FORCE, Respondent. contempt, to immediately cancel Ismaelita Maluto's and Peter Chiu's certificates of stock and to issue
new ones in the name of Ting Ping Lay, which shall include Ismaelita Maluto's shares not covered by any
G.R. No. 175760, February 17, 2016 - REPUBLIC OF existing certificate of stock but otherwise validly transferred to Ting Ping Lay.
THE PHILIPPINES, Petitioner, v. SOGOD
DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, Respondent. Costs against petitioner Anna Teng.
G.R. No. 199537, February 10, 2016 - REPUBLIC OF SO ORDERED.
THE PHILIPPINES, Petitioner, v. ANDREA TAN,
cralawlawlibrary

Respondent.
Velasco, Jr., (Chairperson), Peralta, Perez, and Jardeleza, JJ., concur. chanroblesvirtuallawlibrary

G.R. No. 179287, February 01, 2016 - PCI JIMMY M.


FORTALEZA AND SPO2 FREDDIE A. NATIVIDAD,
Petitioners, v. HON. RAUL M. GONZALEZ IN HIS Endnotes:
CAPACITY AS THE SECRETARY OF JUSTICE AND
ELIZABETH N. OROLA VDA. DE SALABAS,

http://www.chanrobles.com/cralaw/2016februarydecisions.php?id=164 4/7
4/24/2018 G.R. No. 184332, February 17, 2016 - ANNA TENG, Petitioner, v. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION (SEC) AND TING PIN…
Respondents.; G.R. NO. 182090 - ELIZABETH N. 1Rollo, pp. 9-39.
OROLA VDA. DE SALABAS, Petitioner, v. HON.
EDUARDO R. ERMITA, HON. MANUEL B. GAITE, 2
P/INSP. CLARENCE DONGAIL, P/INSP. JONATHAN
Penned by Associate Justice Apolinario D. Bruselas, Jr. with Associate Justices Rebecca De
LORILLA,1 PO3 ALLEN WINSTON HULLEZA AND PO2 Guia-Salvador and Vicente S.E. Veloso concurring; id. at 41-50, 237-246.
BERNARDO CIMATU, Respondent.
3 Id. at 52-53; 248-249.
G.R. No. 206758, February 17, 2016 - MARICEL S.
NONAY, Petitioner, v. BAHIA SHIPPING SERVICES, 4 402 Phil. 37(2001).
INC., FRED OLSEN LINES AND CYNTHIA MENDOZA,
Respondents. 5 Id. at 42.
G.R. No. 195026, February 22, 2016 - CENTRAL
MINDANAO UNIVERSITY, REPRESENTED BY ITS 6 Id. at 42-43.
PRESIDENT, DR. MARIA LUISA R. SOLIVEN,
Petitioner, v. REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES, 7 Issued by Hearing Officer James K. Abugan; rollo, pp. 64-72.
REPRESENTED BY THE DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES, 8
Respondent. Id. at 71-72.

G.R. No. 174462, February 10, 2016 - PHILIPPINE 9 Id. at 73-79.


OVERSEAS TELECOMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION
(POTC), PHILIPPINE COMMUNICATIONS SATELLITE 10 Supra note 4, at 41-44.
CORPORATION (PHILCOMSAT), Petitioners, v.
SANDIGANBAYAN (3rd DIVISION), REPUBLIC OF THE 11
PHILIPPINES REPRESENTED BY PRESIDENTIAL Id. at 50.
COMMISSION ON GOOD GOVERNMENT (PCGG),
Respondents. 12Rollo, p. 43.

G.R. No. 199683, February 10, 2016 - ARLENE T. 13 Issued by Judge Artemio S. Tipon; id. at 104-113.
SAMONTE, VLADIMIR P. SAMONTE, MA. AUREA S.
ELEPANO, Petitioners, v. LA SALLE GREENHILLS, INC., 14
BRO. BERNARD S. OCA, Respondents. Id. at 112.

G.R. No. 183486, February 24, 2016 - THE 15 Id. at 96-98.


HONGKONG & SHANGHAI BANKING CORPORATION,
LIMITED, Petitioner, v. NATIONAL STEEL 16 Id. at 116-122.
CORPORATION AND CITYTRUST BANKING
CORPORATION (NOW BANK OF THE PHILIPPINE 17
ISLANDS), Respondents. Id. at 122.

G.R. No. 194960, February 03, 2016 - PRO 18 Id. at 123-128.


BUILDERS, INC., Petitioner, v. TG UNIVERSAL
BUSINESS VENTURES, INC., Respondent. 19 Id. at 129-134; 135-141.
G.R. No. 203678, February 17, 2016 - CONCORDE 20
CONDOMINIUM, INC., BY ITSELF AND COMPRISING Id. at 142-150.
THE UNIT OWNERS OF CONCORDE CONDOMINIUM
BUILDING, Petitioner, v. AUGUSTO H. BACULIO; NEW 21 Id. at 170-171.
PPI CORPORATION; ASIAN SECURITY AND
INVESTIGATION AGENCY AND ITS SECURITY 22 Id. at 178-179.
GUARDS; ENGR. NELSON B. MORALES, IN HIS
CAPACITY AS BUILDING OFFICIAL OF THE MAKATI 23
CITY ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT; SUPT. RICARDO C. Id. at 189-190.
PERDIGON, IN HIS CAPACITY AS CITY FIRE MARSHAL
OF THE MAKATI CITY FIRE STATION; F/C SUPT. 24 Id. at 194-199. cralawred

SANTIAGO E. LAGUNA, IN HIS CAPACITY AS


REGIONAL DIRECTOR OF THE BUREAU OF FIRE 25 Id. at 200-218.
PROTECTION-NCR, AND ANY AND ALL PERSONS
ACTING WITH OR UNDER THEM, Respondents. 26 Id. at 220-226. cralawred

G.R. No. 174481, February 10, 2016 - THE PEOPLE


OF THE PHILIPPINES, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. CRISTY 27 Id. at 227-230.
DIMAANO Y TIPDAS, Accused-Appellant.
28 Id. at 41-50; 52-53.
G.R. No. 218867, February 17, 2016 - SPOUSES
EDMOND LEE AND HELEN HUANG, Petitioners, v. LAND 29
BANK OF THE PHILIPPINES, Respondent. Id. at 25-26.

G.R. No. 190534, February 10, 2016 - C.F. SHARP 30 G.R. No. 95696, March 3, 1992, 206 SCRA 740.
CREW MANAGEMENT, INC., RONALD AUSTRIA, AND
ABU DHABI NATIONAL TANKER CO., Petitioners, v. 31Rollo, pp. 26-27.
LEGAL HEIRS OF THE LATE GODOFREDO REPISO,
REPRESENTED BY HIS WIFE LUZVIMINDA REPISO, 32
Respondents. G.R. No. 96674, June 26, 1992, 210 SCRA 510.

A.C. No. 10945 (Formerly CBD 09-2507), February 33Rollo, pp. 260-261.
23, 2016 - ANGELITO RAMISCAL AND MERCEDES
ORZAME, Complainants, v. ATTY. EDGAR S. ORRO, 34Lao, et al. v Lao, 588 Phil. 844, 857 (2008).
Respondent.
35 Republic of the Philippines v. Estate of Hans Menzi, 512 Phil. 425, 460 (2005).
G.R. No. 208406, February 29, 2016 - PEOPLE OF
THE PHILIPPINES, Appellee, v. ALLAN RODRIGUEZ Y
GRAJO, Appellant. 36Makati Sports Club, Inc. v. Cheng, et al., 635 Phil. 103, 114 (2010).

G.R. No. 177382, February 17, 2016 - VIVA 37 Padgett v. Babcock & Templeton, Inc. and Bahcock, 59 Phil. 232, 234 (1933) citing 14
SHIPPING LINES, INC., Petitioner, v. KEPPEL C.J. sec 1033, pp. 663, 664.
PHILIPPINES MINING, INC., METROPOLITAN BANK &
TRUST COMPANY, PILIPINAS SHELL PETROLEUM 38
CORPORATION, CITY OF BATANGAS, CITY OF LUCENA, 47 Phil. 583(1925).
PROVINCE OF QUEZON, ALEJANDRO OLIT, NIDA
MONTILLA, PIO HERNANDEZ, EUGENIO BACULO, AND 39 Id. at 589. cralawred

HARLAN BACALTOS, Respondents.


40The Rural Dank of Lipa City, Inc. v. CA, 418 Phil. 461, 472 (2001).
G.R. No. 203322, February 24, 2016 - PEOPLE OF
THE PHILIPPINES, Appellee, v. REMAN SARIEGO, 41
Appellant. Id.; Ditong v. CA, 354 Phil. 516, 541 (1998).

G.R. No. 186102, February 24, 2016 - NATIONAL 42 710 Phil. 831 (2013).
TRANSMISSION CORPORATION, Petitioner, v. HEIRS
OF TEODULO EBESA, NAMELY: PORFERIA L. EBESA, 43 Id. at 835-836, citing Raquel-Santos, et al. v. CA, et al., 609 Phil. 630, 657 (2009).
EFREN EBESA, DANTE EBESA AND CYNTHIA EBESA,
AND ATTY. FORTUNATO VELOSO, Respondents. 44 See Monserrat v. Ceron, 58 Phil. 469 (1933).
G.R. No. 192233, February 17, 2016 - PEOPLE OF
THE PHILIPPINES, Plaintiff and Appellee, v. SPO1 45 Razon v. Intermediate Appellate Court, G.R. No. 74306, March 16, 1992, 207 SCRA
CATALINO GONZALES, JR., Accused-Appellant. 234, 240, citing Embassy Farms, Inc. v. CA, 266 Phil. 549, 557 (1990). See also Lao, et al.
v. Lao, supra note 34.
A.M. No. P-15-3393 [Formerly OCA IPI No. 13-
4055-P], February 23, 2016 - SEGUNDINA P. NOCES- 46
DE LEON AND LEONOR P. ALAVE, Petitioners, v.
Supra note 32.

http://www.chanrobles.com/cralaw/2016februarydecisions.php?id=164 5/7
4/24/2018 G.R. No. 184332, February 17, 2016 - ANNA TENG, Petitioner, v. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION (SEC) AND TING PIN…
TERENCIO G. FLORENDO, SHERIFF IV, BRANCH 21, 47 Id. at 516.
REGIONAL TRIAL COURT, VIGAN CITY, ILOCOS SUR,
Respondent. 48

IPI No. 15-35-SB-J, February 23, 2016 - RE:


49 Id., citing Fletcher, Sec. 5528, p. 434. Id., citing Fletcher, 5518, 12 Fletcher 394.
VERIFIED COMPLAINT DATED JULY 13, 2015 OF
ALFONSO V. UMALI, JR., Complainant, v. HON. JOSE R.
HERNANDEZ, ASSOCIATE JUSTICE, SANDIGANBAYAN, 50 Supra note 4, at 47.
Respondent.
51 Lee v. Hon. Presiding Judge Trocino, et al, 607 Phil. 690, 699 (2009), citing Rural Bank
A.M. No. P-15-3361 [Formerly OCA IPI No. 10-
3381-P], February 23, 2016 - ATTY. JOHN V. AQUINO, of Salinas, Inc. v. CA, supra note 32, at 516.
Petitioner, v. ELENA S. ALCASID, CLERK III,
REGIONAL TRIAL COURT, OFFICE OF THE CLERK OF 52Rollo, p. 48.
COURT, OLONGAPO CITY, Respondent.
53Republic of the Philippines v. Sandiganbayan, 450 Phil. 98, 129 (2003), citing Datangas
G.R. No. 185603, February 10, 2016 - REPUBLIC OF Laguna Tayabas Bus Company, Inc., v. Bitanga, 415 Phil. 43, 57 (2001). See also De
THE PHILIPPINES, Petitioner, v. LOCAL SUPERIOR OF
Erquiaga v. CA 258 Phil 626 637(1989).
THE INSTITUTE OF THE SISTERS OF THE SACRED
HEART OF JESUS OF RAGUSA, Respondent.
54Republic of the Philippines v. Sandiganbayan, id. at 129-130.
G.R. No. 208404, February 24, 2016 - PEOPLE OF
THE PHILIPPINES, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. VICENTE 55 Escaño v. Filipinos Mining Corp., et al, 74 Phil. 711, 716 (1944).
LUGNASIN AND DEVINCIO GUERRERO, Accused-
Appellants. 56 62 Phil. 472(1935).
G.R. No. 183529, February 24, 2016 - OFELIA C.
57 Id. at 481.
CAUNAN, Petitioner, v. PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES
AND THE SANDIGANBAYAN, Respondents.
58 See Reyes v. Hon. RTC of Makati, Br. 142, et al, 583 Phil. 591 (2008).
G.R. No. 207816, February 24, 2016 - PEOPLE OF
THE PHILIPPINES, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. RAUL YAMON 59Rural Bank of Salinas, Inc. v. CA, supra note 32, at 516.
TUANDO, Accused-Appellant.
60 442 Phil. 98 (2002).
G.R. No. 171041, February 10, 2016 - REPUBLIC OF
THE PHILIPPINES, Petitioner, v. MOLDEX REALTY,
INC., Respondent. 61 Id. at 110-111.
G.R. No. 188720, February 23, 2016 - QUEZON CITY 62 354 Phil. 516(1998).
PTCA FEDERATION, INC., Petitioner, v. DEPARTMENT
OF EDUCATION, REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY JESLI
63 Id. at 535.
A. LAPUS, Respondent.

A.C. No. 8037, February 17, 2016 - RE: DECISION 64 Lopez, R/N., THE CORPORATION CODE OF THE PHILIPPINES ANNOTATED, Volume II
DATED AUGUST 19, 2008, 3RD DIVISION, COURT OF (1994 ed.), citing 12 Fletcher Cyc. Corp., Perm. Ed., Chapter 58, Section 5537, p. 589).
APPEALS IN CA-G.R. SP NO. 79904 [HON. DIONISIO
DONATO T. GARCIANO, ET AL. V. HON. PATERNO G. 65See
TIAMSON, ETC., ET AL.], Petitioner, v. ATTY. JOSE DE C.N. Hodges, et al. v. Lezama, et al., 122 Phil. 367, 371-372 (1965).
G. FERRER, Respondent.

G.R. No. 220481, February 17, 2016 - VICTOR S.


LIMLINGAN AND EMMANUEL A. LEYCO, Petitioners, v.
ASIAN INSTITUTE OF MANAGEMENT, INC.,
Respondent.; G.R. No. 220503 - ASIAN INSTITUTE OF Back to Home | Back to Main
MANAGEMENT, INC., Petitioner, v. VICTOR S.
LIMLINGAN AND EMMANUEL A. LEYCO, Respondents.

G.R. No. 208976, February 22, 2016 - THE QUICK SEARCH


HONORABLE OFFICE OF THE OMBUDSMAN, Petitioner,
v. LEOVIGILDO DELOS REYES, JR., Respondent.

A.C. No. 10605, February 17, 2016 - BIENVENIDO


1901 1902 1903 1904 1905 1906 1907 1908
T. CANLAPAN, Complainant, v. ATTY. WILLIAM B.
BALAYO, Respondent. 1909 1910 1911 1912 1913 1914 1915 1916
1917 1918 1919 1920 1921 1922 1923 1924
G.R. No. 209180, February 24, 2016 - REPUBLIC OF
THE PHILIPPINES, Petitioner, v. REGHIS M. ROMERO 1925 1926 1927 1928 1929 1930 1931 1932
II AND OLIVIA LAGMAN ROMERO, Respondents.; G.R.
1933 1934 1935 1936 1937 1938 1939 1940
NO. 209253 - OLIVIA LAGMAN ROMERO, Petitioner, v.
REGHIS M. ROMERO II, Respondent. 1941 1942 1943 1944 1945 1946 1947 1948
1949 1950 1951 1952 1953 1954 1955 1956
G.R. No. 208948, February 24, 2016 - JOSE B.
LURIZ, Petitioner, v. REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES, 1957 1958 1959 1960 1961 1962 1963 1964
Respondents.
1965 1966 1967 1968 1969 1970 1971 1972
G.R. No. 173921, February 24, 2016 - PHILIPPINE 1973 1974 1975 1976 1977 1978 1979 1980
AIRLINES, INC., Petitioner, v. ISAGANI DAWAL, 1981 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988
LORNA CONCEPCION, AND BONIFACIO SINOBAGO,
Respondents.; G.R. No. 173952 - ISAGANI DAWAL, 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996
LORNA CONCEPCION, AND BONIFACIO SINOBAGO,
1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004
Petitioners, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS
COMMISSION, PHILIPPINE AIRLINES, INC., AVELINO 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
L. ZAPANTA, AND CESAR B. LAMBERTE, Respondents. 2013 2014 2015 2016
A.M. No. P-16-3419 [Formerly OCAIPI No. 11-
3648-P], February 23, 2016 - AUGUSTO V. SANTOS,
Complainant, v. SHERIFF IV ANTONIO V. LEAÑO, JR.,
SHERIFF III BENJIE E. LACSINA, SHERIFF III ALVIN
S. PINEDA, Respondent.
Main Indices of the Library ---> Go!
G.R. No. 184288, February 16, 2016 - ERIC N.
ESTRELLADO AND JOSSIE M. BORJA, Petitioners, v.
KARINA CONSTANTINO DAVID, THE CIVIL SERVICE
COMMISSION, HIPOLITO R. GABORNI AND ROBERTO
S. SE, Respondents.

G.R. No. 175210, February 01, 2016 - MARIO JOSE


E. SERENO, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR OF THE
ASSOCIATION OF PETROCHEMICAL MANUFACTURERS
OF THE PHILIPPINES, INC. (APMP), Petitioner, v.
COMMITTEE ON TRADE AND RELATED MATTERS
(CTRM) OF THE NATIONAL ECONOMIC AND
DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY (NEDA), COMPOSED OF
THE DIRECTOR-GENERAL OF THE NEDA SECRETARIAT,
THE EXECUTIVE SECRETARY, THE SECRETARIES OF
TRADE AND INDUSTRY, FINANCE, FOREIGN AFFAIRS,
AGRICULTURE, ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL
RESOURCES, BUDGET AND MANAGEMENT,
TRANSPORTATION AND COMMUNICATION, LABOR
AND EMPLOYMENT, AGRARIAN REFORM, THE
GOVERNOR OF THE BANGKO SENTRAL NG PILIPINAS

http://www.chanrobles.com/cralaw/2016februarydecisions.php?id=164 6/7
4/24/2018 G.R. No. 184332, February 17, 2016 - ANNA TENG, Petitioner, v. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION (SEC) AND TING PIN…
AND THE CHAIRMAN OF THE TARIFF COMMISSION,
AND BRENDA R. MENDOZA IN HER CAPACITY AS
DIRECTOR OF THE TRADE, INDUSTRY & UTILITIES
STAFF, Respondents.

G.R. No. 170631, February 10, 2016 - CARAVAN


TRAVEL AND TOURS INTERNATIONAL, INC.,
Petitioner, v. ERMILINDA R. ABEJAR, Respondent.

A.C. No. 8667, February 03, 2016 - INOCENCIO I.


BALISTOY, Petitioner, v. ATTY. FLORENCIO A. BRON,
Respondent.

IPI No. 14-222-CA-J, February 23, 2016 - RE:


COMPLAINT OF ATTY. MARIANO R. PEFIANCO
AGAINST JUSTICES MARIA ELISA SEMPIO DIY,
RAMON PAUL L. HERNANDO, AND CARMELITA
SALANDANAN-MANAHAN, OF THE COURT OF APPEALS
CEBU.

Copyright © 1998 - 2018 ChanRobles Publishing Company | Disclaimer | E-mail Restrictions ChanRobles™ Virtual Law Library™ | chanrobles.com™ RED

http://www.chanrobles.com/cralaw/2016februarydecisions.php?id=164 7/7

Você também pode gostar