Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
SUBMITTED TO:
Table of Contents
Introduction ......................................................................................................................... 3
Conclusion .......................................................................................................................... 9
Bibliography ..................................................................................................................... 10
Figures............................................................................................................................... 11
POL 200: North Korea 3
Introduction
North Korea has in the past and continues to be a hot topic within the news media and
the political realm. This focus is not contained just within the United States either as most of the
free world and many members of the United Nations continue to keep watch of and continue
with dialogue surrounding the question of what to do about North Korea. This hermit nation that
has been ruled by some sort of dictator since 1953 when Kim Il-sung assumed power after the
Korean War ended and North Korea split from its southern neighbor (Gale, 2017), has been in
constant tension with the rest of the world. Following Kim Il-sung, Kim Jong-Il transitioned into
power and now his son, Kim Jong-un is in power and through all these rulers the same form of
communistic rule and dictatorship has been in place over the people of the country as well as the
same behavior of cutting itself off from the rest of the world and being hostile towards it.
Because of this type of political system that has been prevalent in the country since its
founding along with its behavior, there have been a couple of key consequences that have
developed over the years. One of these consequences has been internal and one has been more
outward. I will be discussing both of these consequences in this paper as I believe that both of
them feed into the overall question and potential answer of whether or not there is a path towards
peace between North Korea and the rest of the world. There are many parts to this puzzle of how
and even why to deal with North Korea but I think they all fall into two main categories and their
subsequent consequences.
.
POL 200: North Korea 4
Frist Consequence
The first consequence of North Korea’s behavior and its causes is actually one that is
twofold with the first relating to the people of North Korea and the second relating to the
In relation to the people of North Korea this consequence and causes all go back to the
rather deplorable living conditions that most North Koreans face every day. For most people
living in North Korea, those outside the capital city of Pyongyang, they are faced with constant
hunger and sickness. They also live in a constant state of fear of punishment if they dare to go
against the will of the leaders and so they avoid doing anything that would be seen as going
against the leadership in action or word. Everything that is done by the people is done out of
what they deem as respect and honor to their leaders but to the rest of us appears to be based on
fear of punishment and this is because, in reality, it is out of fear of punishment. However,
something to realize about North Koreans and yet another aspect of this puzzle that makes things
difficult in dealing with North Korea and its leaders is that the people of North Korea really
don’t know any better and those that do are either quiet about it or held up in prison camps (Oh,
2013). So, while for most of us, being in a constant state of hunger or fear or sickness would be
bad and even wrong in some cases, for those living in North Korea it is part of everyday life. But
this aspect of how most people are forced to live in North Korea is part of the puzzle of coming
to a peace with the country, whether or not the people know any better or not. The reason it is
such an important element is because of effort for peace will impact the people and I don’t
anticipate that it will affect them in a good way. Any increased threat that North Korea perceives
will be dealt with and unfortunately, it will likely be at the cost of the people and their wellbeing.
POL 200: North Korea 5
The second part of this first consequence and their causes relate to the ruling family and
how it is structured. The ruling family is just that, it’s a family, otherwise known as a dynasty.
Because of this, there are many intertwining and complex dynamics that are present and virtually
none of them are known to the outside world. But we do know a little bit and we know this by
developments that have occurred since Kim Jong-un has taken power. As is the case in many
dynasties the leader at some point or another feels threatened by a possible challenge to their
authority. Whether this threat is real or just a product of their imagination is beside the point as
leaders of dynasties will act regardless. In the case of Kim Jong-un, he has decided to deal with
any perceived threats with force and in particular in killing those he has felt threatened by. The
killing of his half-brother as well as over twenty others, including his uncle who helped him gain
the power he has now, illustrates this usual normal nature that we see from members of dynasties
when they feel at all threatened. But this very nature is also yet another piece to consider when
dealing with North Korea and possible peace. If Kim Jung-un is willing to kill his own family to
stay in power and get what he wants for sure he will be willing to put the lives of the people of
North Korea and others at risk for the same reason if he feels at all threatened or at a
disadvantaged.
Second Consequence
For the second consequence of North Korea’s behavior, I will turn to outside its borders
and talk about its impact on the greater world, in particular when it comes to its nuclear weapons
program. As virtually everyone in the world outside of North Korea is aware of and in some
cases, continually feels and experiences, the very real danger that is the nuclear weapons
program of North Korea. For years now North Korea has been bent on developing a nuclear
weapon. As of right now too, by many accounts, they appear to be getting closer and closer to
POL 200: North Korea 6
achieving their ambition with the most glaring evidence of this being continued missile tests. The
most recent missile test was back in November of 2017 but it was also North Korea’s most
advanced and furthest traveling missile to date. It flew right over Japan and thankfully landed in
the water on the eastern side of the county but the test did put Japan and the rest of the world on
even greater alert than it already was. Figure 1 below (Times, 2017) shows a map of a series of
projected distances of missiles launched by North Korea over the past several years and as the
figure shows the distance and advancement of the missiles continues to increase and this fact has
been outlined repeatedly in news articles and journal reports (Ji, 2017).
The Outcome
Now with the consequences and causes of North Korea’s behavior outlined, I will now
give my assessment and analysis of what the end game is likely to be for North Korea.
On an overall basis, the world and its leaders do what it does and don’t do for one main
reason: power. When countries go to war against each other or when they come together on some
sort of common ground, both are for the same reason and that reason is related to power, either
achieving more power for themselves and/or attempting to take power from some other country
or people group or even individual. North Korea is no different in this. The actions that we’ve
seen by North Korea leading up to this point and any action we see going forward, either good or
bad, all point back to the country’s desire for greater power and recognition of that power.
Nuclear missile tests continued harsh rhetoric from the ruling party towards America and its
allies as well as the leaders’ propaganda machine within the country and its dislike and bitterness
towards South Korea and its allies are all examples of this desire and effort by North Korea for
POL 200: North Korea 7
power. This bitterness and dislike towards South Korea stem from the Korean War outcome
which was unfavorable towards North Korea both militarily but also ideologically (Bae, 2011).
With this power-hungry nature of North Korea, in my view anyway, being the crux of
what is behind North Korea’s actions and why it has, continues to, and will in the future, do and
say what it will, the question remains why has North Korea decided to go the route it has
especially in terms of its nuclear development and most recently the reaching out towards its
enemies, in particular, the United States (Neuman, 2018)? To assess this question we must turn
China has grown and developed into a nation of vast wealth and power both
economically and politically. Their presence and importance on the world stage has also grown
and become more defined and recognized by the rest of the world, especially over the past
several years. But, this was not always the case. China was not always as powerful or important
on the world stage as it is no. As every other country, the increase in their power and influence
on the world began with several key events in the countries life and, ironically, it was their
development of and testing of its nuclear weaponry turned out to be one of those pivotal events
that occurred on the way to where China is now (Figure 2) (Era, 2014). China completed its first
Atomic bomb test in October of 1964 and this test also came at a time of increased tensions
between Vietnam and the US which China also got involved in by amassing troops on its border
with Vietnam (Relations, 2018). Before this, China as a country was present and was affected by
world events but not until this nuclear bomb test and the years following did they have a
commanding presence on the world stage. This increased presence on the world stage can be
seen in several ways including in the form of the presence of US government officials increasing
POL 200: North Korea 8
with US President Nixon being the first notable US President to visit the country and begin to
normalize relations between the US and China. Other events that helped to solidify China’s
power in the world came during the Carter administration when the “One China Policy” was
acknowledged. Such actions, as well as others, continued to increase and grow in importance
going forward and while China’s nuclear test in 1964 was not the main event that triggered these
events, it certainly had a big impact and helped to bring China to where it is now.
Looking at North Kore, it is not hard to see that this same sort of events is currently being
played out in North Korea. From the country’s nuclear tests to its rhetoric and now with its,
apparent, willingness to talk about denuclearization with the US and others, all this is a very
similar pattern to the path China took to where it’s at now. One can anticipate, therefore, and
with a fairly high conviction level, that North Korea will continue emulating China’s path
towards greater power and influence in the world and will at some point reach the same place in
With all this being said then and with all the reasons and assessments as to why North
Korea is doing what’s it doing and what the likely path forward is for the country, the question
remains, is there peace in the future between North Korea and the rest of the world?
In my opinion, I think the answer is yes but not because it necessarily should happen but
because it will have to happen both for North Korea’s sake but especially for the sake of the rest
of the world. The reality is that North Korea will continue its push towards greater power and a
greater recognition of that power by the rest of the world. They will continue to test and fire
missiles towards its enemies and at some point, in the future, the country will have the ability to
POL 200: North Korea 9
successfully fit a nuclear warhead on its missiles and there will be a test of such a missile as well.
North Korea will also very likely continue rhetoric of wanting to talk with the US and other
countries about stepping back from its nuclear weapons program but remember that it will be, as
will all other actions by North Korea, for the reason of gaining more power in this world. So,
while they may discuss denuclearization or any other form of the word, they will do so with the
aim of gaining whatever they need to gain more power. Therefore, I think there will have to be
peace that is established between North Korea and the rest of the world for if there is no effort on
the world’s part then North Korea will force “peace” to happen and that will not be a good thing!
If North Korea feels like it must force what they deem as “peace” to happen it will be on their
terms and in their own way which as we’ve already seen, would not be a good thing as it would
mean them using weapons to do so as well as other hostile-like actions. So, it would be wise for
the US and its allies to get ahead of North Korea and start the path towards peace in some
capacity but do so in a way that allows North Korea to at least feel like it is gaining the power it
desires.
Conclusion
In conclusion then, taking into consideration all the viewpoints and angles of analysis and
reasoning discussed in this paper, I think the answer to the question in the title is a yes but it is a
soft yes because whether actual peace will happen or not will depend not only on North Korea
but it will depend more so on the US and its allies with a recognition that North Korea is after the
same thing every other nation in this world is after and that is power and a recognition of that
power. So, to bring about peace, the US and its allies must recognize this and approach an
attempt for peace with this viewpoint in mind otherwise whatever peace that comes will not
really be peaceful and the manner it comes will be a dangerous and volatile road indeed.
POL 200: North Korea 10
Bibliography
Bae, I. (2011). People-to-Peaple Dialogue between North and South Korea: Looking Ahead.
Era, T. N. (2014). The Nuclear Era. Retrieved from The Nuclear Era:
http://www.thenuclearera.com/1963-1970.html
http://go.galegroup.com/ps/i.do?p=OVIC&u=mnaswsu&id=GALE%7CPC3010999110&
v=2.1&it=r&sid=summon&authCount=1
Ji, M. H. (2017). Advances in North Korea's missile program and what comes next. Arms
Neuman, S. (2018, April 9). North Korea Ready To Talk About Denuclearization, U.S. Officials
way/2018/04/09/600741594/north-korea-ready-to-talk-about-denuclearization-u-s-
officials-say
Relations, C. o. (2018). U.S. Relations with China: 1949 - 2018. Retrieved from Council on
Times, N. (2017, November 28). North Korea Fires a Ballistic Missile, in a Further Challenge
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/11/28/world/asia/north-korea-missile-test.html
POL 200: North Korea 11
Figures