Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
Glucose Determination
Kurt M. Dubowski*
\MTH THE CURRENT EMPHASIS 0fl more frequent and more intensive
around-the- clock performance of clinical chemical determinations,
there is need for a simple, rapid, reliable, and economical method for
glucose determination that is equally adaptable to routine multiple or
single analyses of any body fluid and is capable of serving as a com-
patible manual stand-by and emergency test method in laboratories
using automatic glucose analysis. Preferably, such a method should
require only a single stable reagent, be adaptable to several of the
common methods of preparing protein-free filtrates which may al-
ready be employed in a given laboratory for other determinations, and
should possess considerable flexibility in its other operating charac-
teristics.
Colorimetric or spectrophotometric methods based upon the con-
densation of glucose with primary aromatic amines in glacial acetic
acid, which probably leads to formation of an equilibrium mixture of
From the Clinical Chemistry and Toxicology Laboratories, University of Florida Teaching
Hospital and Clinics, Gainesville, Fla.
Presented at the Thirteenth Annual Meeting of the American Association of Clinical Chem-
ists, New York, N. Y., August 1961.
The author is indebted to Natalie A. Green and Darcus A. Horsley for technical assistance.
Received for publication July 6, 1961.
*presellt address: Department of Biochemistry, University of Oklahoma School of Medicine,
Oklahoma City 4, OkIa.
215
216 DUBOWSKI CHnica Chemistry
CH3
7L/NHS
Method
Reagents
cals o-toluidine (Eastman Grade, Cat. No. 253) have proved most suit-
able and can be used without further purification.
2. Trichloracetic acid, 3.0% w/v
Equipment
Calibration
Procedure
Experimental
Development of Procedure and Determination of Optimal Conditions
Both 3% w/v and 10% v/v trichloracetic acid filtrates yielded the
same glucose level as the reference method; and deproteinization with
3% w/v trichioracetic acid, which yields an essentially protein-free
filtrate compatible with several other routine clinical chemistry deter-
millatiolls, was therefore selected as the method of choice.
Whole blood deproteillized with 3% w/v trichioracetic acid pro-
duced a filtrate having a pH of 1.3; and trichloracetic acid yielded
slightly greater volumes of protein-free filtrates than the tungstic aci(l
reagents, as also 1lOted by Sunderman et al. (12). The mixtures of
blood and protein precipitants were filtered through Whatman No. 2
filter paper; and control determinations with glucose-free materials
demonstrated that this filter paper did not contribute to the trichlor-
acetic acid filtrates any substances reacting with the o-toluidine re-
agent.
‘.5
400 425 450 475 500 525 550 575 600 625 650 675 700
2000 mg./100 ml.; the absorption maximum at 630 mis preferred for
the general procedure because of the greater sensitivity, the net ab-
sorbance being about 18 per cent greater than at 480 m. On three of
our Coleman Model 6D spectrophotometers, maximal absorbance was
equal between 625 mj.t and 635 mp, and the latter wavelength was
adopted for use with that instrument during the study.
Figure 2 shows a typical calibration curve for the procedure out-
lined above in which the Coleman 6D (“Narrow Band”) Jr. Spectro-
photometer was used at 635 mj; compliance with the Beer-Lambert
relation over the range 0-300 mg. of glucose per 100 ml. of body fluid
is illustrated. Calibration curves prepared simultaneously for three
different Coleman Model 6D instruments in our laboratory were iden-
tical and corresponded to the equation
Body-Fluid-Glucose (mg./100 ml.) = Absorbance635 X 265.
“.5
160
140
120
‘C,
5.5 ‘DO
G80
0.60
0.40
0.20
0
0 I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0
o-TOLUIDINE CONCENTRATION, % v/v
1.60
1.40
120
‘4
1.00
080
0.60
0.40
0.20
0
10 12 14
1.40
Sample Glucose
1.20 MgIIOO ml.
-
-.. 300
-_
too .
“.5
5.5
0
080
‘41 --
‘.5 -__ 200
- - -
060
0.40
PHOTOMETRY
Coleman 60 Sp.ctrophomet.r
0.20 Reagent Blank
19 mm. Round Cuvettes
6.0% V/V o-Toluidine
0 I
0 30 60 90 120 ISO 180
TIME, MINUTES
Fig. 5. Change in absorbance of o-toluidiime reaction mixture with time after heating.
Results
Reproducibility and Recovery Experiments
1 103 +2.8
2 100 -0.2
3 100 -0.2
4 104 +3.8
5 97 -3.2
6 100 -0.2
7 102 +1.8
8 101 +0.8
9 101 +0.8
10 98 -2.2
11 98 -2.2
12 100 -0.2
13 103 +2.8
14 100 -0.2
15 97 -3.2
16 100 -0.2
17 100 -0.2
18 97 -3.2
19 100 -0.2
20 102 +1.8
Mean 100.2 ±1.5
S.D. ±2.0
Specificity Investigations
Duplicate determinations.
tAverage of 20 replicate recovery tests.
cose, are encountered (12, 16, 20). The reaction of nonglucose compo-
nents of blood, cerebrospinal fluid, and urine with the o-toluidine re-
agent was investigated by analysis of random fasting blood serum,
CSF, and urine specimens by the proposed method before and after re-
moval of glucose by yeast fermentation. One milliliter respectively of
serum, cerebrospinal fluid, and urine, each previously analyzed for
glucose by the o-toluidine procedure outlined, was incubated at 37#{176}
for
45 mm. with 0.3 ml. of commercial dry granulated baker’s yeast which
had been repeatedly washed. The ability of the yeast to ferment glu-
cose was established by total removal of glucose from a 210 mg./100 ml.
aqueous standard under the same conditions. Following incubation,
the yeast was removed by centrifugation, and glucose determinations
were performed by subjecting the supernatant body fluid specimens to
the entire o-toluidine procedure outlined. A similar series of experi-
ments with the same specimens, with yeast incubation at 23#{176}
for 45
mm., yielded identical findings. The results shown in Table 4 demon-
Table 4. BLANK VALUES FOR SERUM, CEREBROSPINAL FLUID, AND URINE BY O-TOLUIDINE
METHOD
1 Yeast - 1 1
2 Glucose Std. 210 1 0
3 Serum 174 5 4
4 C.S.F. 118 2 1
S Urine 203 6 5
*Duplicate determinations.
228 DUBOWSKI Clinical Chemistry
Table 5. EFFECT OF SOME COMMON GuJoosE ANALYSIS INTERFERENTS UPON THE O-TOLUIDINE
METHOD
.
1 Arahinose 90 17 0.17
2 Fructose 73 0 0
3 Galactose 173 100 1.00
4 Glucosainiiie HC1 72 0 0
5 Glucuronic acid 93 20 0.20
6 Glycogeit 75 2 0.02
7 Lactose 106 33 0.33
8 Maltose 78 5 0.05
9 Mannitol 73 0 0
10 Mannose 173 100 1.00
11 Urea 70 0 0
12 Xylose 92 19 0.19
8One hundred milligrams of each substance added per 100 ml. of blood, which initially con-
tained 73 mg. glucose per 100 ml.
tDuplieate determinations.
41 82 82 0 92 147 149 2
42 92 90 2 93 135 138 3
43 68 64 4 94 71 70 1
44 76 80 4 95 19 22 3
45 80 78 2 96 89 86 3
46 68 64 4 97 93 88 5
47 94 95 1 98 84 84 0
48 112 116 4 99 124 122 2
49 106 110 4 100 70 70 0
50 96 99 3 Mean ±2.4
51 112 113 1 S.D.8 ±2.9
S.D. = , where d stands for difference between results by the two methods.
N-i
Vol. 8, No. 3, 1962 BODY-FLUID GLUCOSE 231
200
175
“U
150
125
-J
100
75
50
0
25
0
0 25 50 75 100 125 150 175 200
BLOOD GLUCOSE, MG./IOOML.-AUTOANALYZER
25
1330 Fasting
0
0 0 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 PlO 120 30 140 ISO 160 ITO 180 90 200 200300 400 500’500
BLOOD PLASMA GLUCOSE. MG/IOO ML
Fig. 7. Distribution of “fasting” blood plasma glucose levels in 1330 consecutive routine
hospital specimens analyzed by o-toluidine method.
Vol. 8, No. 3, 1962 BODY-FLUID GLUCOSE 233
40
210 CSF.
Specimens
Lu IS
0. 1/ 7
I /
I0
0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100>100
CEREBROSPINAL FLUID GLUCOSE, MG/IOOML.
234 DUBOWSKI Clinical Chemistry
Discussion
Arising out of a need for an adequate manual glucose determination
method compatible with the automated Hoffman procedure, a method
was developed which, in its final form, has these favorable major char-
acteristics: With respect to reliability, it has adequate accuracy, ade-
quate precision, good sensitivity and resolution, good selectivity for
glucose, with low biologic blank values, and freedom from interference
by the most common relevant substances. With respect to practicabili-
ty, it has simplicity and economy, reasonable rapidity of analysis, good
reagent stability, ready commercial availability in pure form of the
single reagent components, adherence to the Beer-Lambert law
throughout a wide range, compatibility with various filtrates, a good
range-and-sensitivity compromise, and comparability of results with
the automated glucose method.
In any analytical method, reliability considerations govern accept-
ability for a specific purpose and situation, while practicability con-
siderations affect the choice among acceptable procedures. The allow-
able error for manual body-fluid-glucose determinations has been pro-
posed variously as from 5.4 to 27.0 per cent by different investigators
(29-al). The proposed method amply meets these requirements, and
its performance appears adequate with respect to the other reliability
criteria listed.
Three of the practicability characteristics would seem to merit brief
discussion. The several adjustments in reagent and reaction mixture
composition and in reaction conditions resulted in a method combining
sufficient sensitivity and chemical resolution to permit adequate dis-
crimination between closely adjacent glucose levels for special clinical
studies, with an adequately wide concentration range to cover approxi-
mately 95 per cent of all fasting blood glucose levels in a single un-
known analysis, without need for dilution of final reaction mixtures or
repetition of the analysis. The exceptionally wide glucose range over
which the Beer-Lambert law is followed further permits the determi-
nation of virtually all physiologic glucose levels in every body material
by simple dilution of the final reaction mixture for levels over 275 mg./
100 ml. Simplicity of test performance and concurrent economy are
combined with reasonable rapidity; and a single determination can be
completed within 20 mm., which makes the procedure practical for
casual and emergency single analyses. For most effective integration
into laboratories employing automated glucose determination by the
Vol. 8, No. 3, 1962 BODY-FLUID GLUCOSE 235
References
1. Jones, J. K. N., and Pridham, J. B., Biochem. J. 58, 288 (1954).
2. Timell, T. E., Glaudemans, C. P. J., and Currie, A. L., Anal. Chem. 28, 1916 (1956).
3. Athanail, 0., and Cabaud, P. 0., J. Lab. Ctin. Med. 51, 321 (1958).
4. Forsell, 0. M., and Palva, I. P., Scand. J. Gun. 4 Lab. Invest. 11, 409 (1959).
5. Fuess, J. T., Manager, Eastman Organic Chemicals Department, Distillation Products
Industries Division, Eastman Kodak Co., personal communication, Mar. 13, 1959.
6. Forsell, 0. M., personal communication, Mar. 13, 1960.
7. Hoffman, W. S., J. Biol. Chem. 120, 51 (1937).
8. Grady, H. J., and Lamar, M. A., Clin. Chem. 5, 542 (1959).
9. Abrahamson, E. M., Am. J. Clin. Path. (Tech Suppl.) 4, 75 (1940).
10. Fohin, 0., and Wu, H., J. Biol. CViem. 38, 81(1919).
11. Somogyi, M., J. Biol. Chem. 160, 69 (1945).
12. Sunderman, F. W., MacFate, R. P., Evans, G. T., and Fuller, J. B., Am. J. Gun. Path.
21, 901 (1951).
13. Ayres, G. H., Anal. Chem. 21, 652 (1949).
14. Archibald, R. M., Anal. C7iem. 22, 639 (1950).
15. Youden, W. J., Statistical Methods for Chemists. Wiley, New York, 1951.
16. Ackerman, I. P., “Diseases of carbohydrate metabolism,” in A Syllabus of Laboratory
Examinations in Clinical
Diagnosis, rev. ed., edited by L. B. Page and P. J. Culver.
Harvard, Cambridge, Mass., 1960, pp. 466-474.
17. Mosenthal, H. 0., Ann. Internal Med. 33, 1175 (1950).
18. Young, N. F., “Glucose,” in Standard Methods of Clinical Chemistry, edited by M. Ruiner,
Academic Press, New York, 1953, vol. 1, pp. 60-64.
19. Folin, 0., and Wu, H., J. Biol. Chem. 41, 367 (1920).
20. Kugelmass, I. N., Biochemistry of Blood in Health and Disease. Thomas, Springfield, Ill.,
1959.
21. Anon., “Blood sugar results (Hand method: Nelson-Somogyi) ;“ information from North-
ern Div., Albert Einstein Medical Center, Philadelphia, 1957; distributed by Technicon
Instruments Corp., Chauncey, N. Y.
22. Anon., “Comparison of Folin-Wu sugar with AutoAnalyzer;” information from Colum-
bia-Presbyterian Medical Center, New York, undated; distributed by Technicon In.
sruinents Corp., Chauncey, N. Y.
23. Hill, J. B., and Kessler, G., J. Lab. Clin. Med. 57, 970 (1961).
24. Nelson, N., J. Biol. Chem. 153, 375 (1944).
25. Reinhold, J. G., “Glucose,” in Standard Methods of Clinical Chemistry, edited by M.
Reiner. Academic Press, New York, 1953, vol. 1, pp. 65-70.
26. Shafer, W. H., Adams, R. P., and Calkins, E., “Extravascular fluids,” in A Syllabus of
Laboratory Examinations in Clinwal Diagnosis, edited by L. B. Page and P. J. Culver.
Harvard, Cambridge, 1960, pp. 265-291.
27. Hoeprich, P. D., and Ward, J. R., Jhe Fluids of the Parenteral Body Cavities. Grune,
New York, 1959.
28. Handbook of Biological Data, edited by W. S. Spector, Saunders, Philadelphia, 1956, p.
57.
29. Henry, R. J., Bcrkman, S., Golub, 0. J., and Segalove, M., Am. J. Gun. Path. 23, 285
(1953).
30. Kingsley, G. R., The Filter 18, 1-9 (1956).
31. Freier, E. F., and Rausch, V. L., Univ. of Minn. Med. Bull. 24, 190 (1958).