Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
DC-18—00821-A
Plaintiffs
mmmwmmmmmmmmfimm
Defendants ~—
14TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT
On April 20, 2018, the Intervenors’ and Defendants’ respective Motions to Dismiss were
called for hearing. The Court, upon consideration of the Pleadings, argument of Counsel and
relevant authority, sustained the Intervenors’ and the Defendants’ Pleas to the Jurisdiction, and
granted the respective Motions to Dismiss for the reasons stated therein. On April 23, 2018, the
Court entered an Order reflecting same, and pursuant to TX.R.CIV.P. 91a invited the parties to
file affidavits supporting or opposing the award of Attorneys’ fees. Defendant Dallas County
Democratic Party (hereinafter referred t0 as the “D.C.D.P."‘) and several intervenors- filed
Affidavits supporting such award; The Plaintiffs have again failed to submit affidavit testimony
or any authority which would support the denial of any Slich award. Therefore, based upon the
.
relevant statutory and case authority, and the uncontroverted evidence submitted by the
sustained. The Motions of the Defendants and Intervenors t0 Dismiss this matter with prejudice
Defendant D.C.D.P. is awarded the sum of Forty-one thousand, seven hundred twenty
five dollars ($41,725.00) from Plaintiffs (jointly and severally) as reimbursement for its
attomeys’ fees as expended. Intervenor The Hon. Margaret Jones-Johnson is awarded the sum of
Nine thousand, eight hundred and seventy-eight dollars and seventeen cents ($9,878.17) from
Plaintiffs (jointly and severally) as reimbursement for her attorneys’ fees as expended.
For all amounts awarded herein, let Execution hereby issue. All relief not specifically
It is so ORDERED.
'
The Court has received of Brent Rubin, representing Intervenor
for consideration the application for attomeys’ fees
Eric Johnson. Rubin’s Intervention was filed pursuant to the Texas Citizens’ Participation Act, which was not
reached by the Court after the issue ofstanding of the Plaintiff was resolved. Therefore, the Court determines that
an award of attorneys’ fees based on this supponing affidavit is not wananted.
SIGNED this Z day 0f .
j Z ,
2018.
:5
PRESIDING JUDGE