Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
c
Numbers are of two kinds, ÷ and . Cardinal numbers (such as Modern English ,
. . .) may function either as nouns or as adjectives:
As noun:
Ordinal numbers (such as Modern English
, ÷ . . .) are always adjectives, and all of
them are declined weak except for 'second', which is always strong:
The cardinal is usually declined as a strong adjective; when it is declined weak ( ) it means
'alone': 'he lay alone'. The cardinals and have their own peculiar inflectional
system, shown in table 9.1.
If you substitute a u for the of , you will get u (u, u , etc.) 'both'.
Cardinals above three occasionally have grammatical endings, but generally are not declined at
all. The numbers thirteen-nineteen are made by adding to the numbers -:
,
, etc. From twenty through the sixties, numbers are in the form
'twenty-one'.
Starting with seventy, Old English prefixes to the expected forms:
'seventy',
'eighty', 'ninety' or 'one hundred',
or 'one hundred and twenty'. These curious forms seem to reflect a number system,
common to all the earliest Germanic languages, in which counting proceeded by twelves and
sixty was a significant number in much the same way that one hundred is now.
For 'first' you may also find , but is not common.
For 'thirteenth' to 'nineteenth', add the element in place of ordinal : for example,
'thirteen'. For 'twentieth' and higher, add , or :
'fiftieth',
'eighty-fifth'.
It is obvious that all Indo-European languages have the general trend of transformation from the
synthetic (or inflectional) stage to the analytic one. At least for the latest 1,000 years this trend
could be observed in all branches of the family.
The level of this analitization process in each single language can be estimated by several
features, their presence or absence in the language. One of them is for sure the declension of the
numerals.
In Proto-Indo-European all numerals, both cardinal and ordinal, were declined, as they derived
on a very ancient stage from nouns or adjectives, originally being a declined part of speech.
There are still language groups within the family with decline their numerals: among them,
Slavic and Baltic are the most typical samples. They practically did not suffer any influence of
the analytic processes. But all other groups seem to have been influenced somehow. Ancient
Italic and -ellenic languages left the declension only for the first four cardinal pronouns (from 1
to 4), the same with ancient Celtic.
The Old English language preserves this system of declension only for three numerals. It is
therefore much easier to learn, though not for English speakers I guess - Modern English lacks
declension at all.
1 is declined just like a strong adjective, can be only singular, but has masculine, neuter and
feminine genders. It is the source of the future indefinite article ' in Modern English. So
' in fact means "one house", here disappeared before a consonant. When at school, many
of us thought that ' derived from and it appeares vice versa.
2 Ô :
Masc. Neut. Fem.
N twegen tú, twá twá
G twégea, twégra
D twæ'm, twám
A twegen tú, twá twá
So the genders have differences only in nominative and accusative cases, and indirect cases
(genitive and dative) have common forms for all three genders. No number can be changed for it,
and originally this numeral was dual, which seems natural.
3 :
Masc. Neut. Fem.
N þríe, þrí, þrý þrío, þréo þrío, þréo
G þríora, þréora
D þrím
A þríe, þrí, þrý þrío, þréo þrío, þréo
A typical -stem noun. Strange is the following: while in the case of "two" the Modern English
lost masculine and neuter forms and picked up the feminine one for use ('two' < Ô ), here we
have another case, when the feminine and neuter were forgotten, and today's comes
directly from the masculine .
And the last is the numeral (both) which is declined the same way as Ô and is
also dual.
Ordinal numerals use the suffix Ô or , etymologically a common Indo-European one (Ô).
Mainly according to Old English texts ordinal numerals were used with the demonstrative
pronoun before them. This is where the definite article in
comes from. To
say "the 22nd", for example, you should combine the following: eit her Ô
Ô (two
and twentieth), or Ô Ô
(second with twenty). So the order is different from the
modern English, but instead closer to Modern German where "the 22nd" sounds like
(two and twenty).
a " #
!
" $ $
%
$
&&
" &&
'
!
( # #"
! $
) *
#+
Indogermanic forms of the decades 20-90 were based on the unit number (1-9) plus a
variant (d)komt- of the word for "10" (*dekmt):
West Germanic
Early Proto- Late Proto-
# Indogermanic Pre-Gothic (Pre-
Germanic Germanic
Old -igh German)
20 *wîkmt *wî-hund * * *
(*wî- < *dwî- "2")
30 *tríkomt *þrí-hand * * *
40 *kwetwrkomt *fedwur-hand * * *
50 *penkwêkomt *fimfê-hand *fimfê-hund * *
60 *s(w)ekskomt *sehs-kand *sehsê-hund * *
70 *septmkomt *seftun-hand *sebuntê-hund *sibun=têhund *sebun=tô(hund)
80 *oktôkomt *ahtô-hand *ahtô-hund *ahtô=têhund *ahtô(hund)
90 *newnkomt *newun-hand *ne(w)un-hund *niun=têhund *niun=tô(hund)
100 *(d)kmtóm *hundan *hund *tehunþ=têhund *hund-tehunþ-tiy
20 through 60:
100:
1000:
®
Note: In the Germanic numeric vocabulary, there are three separate numbering
systems:
1. The dominant one is, as in all Indogermanic languages, the decimal system,
based on 10.
2. In addition, the Babylonian-Assyrian duodecimal system, based on 12, 60 and
120, appears in the pattern changes following the terms for "12" and "60," and
in the absence of a simple word for the decimal "100." This resulted from the
long contact of the Goths with the neighboring Sassanid Persians in the early
centuries of our era (very roughly, 150 -375 C.E.).
3. Finally, the old "dual" form of the numeral for "8" (Gothic "ahtau "), as well as
the etymology of this word (the Proto-Indogermanic root "*ok-" means "point,
tip") indicates an apparently very primitive method of counting on one's
fingertips (without the thumb).
Although most of us do not realize it, the numbering system we use is actually rather
recent ± less than a thousand years old. The ancients used letters for numbers. The
Romans, as you probably already know, used the letters I, V, X, L, C and M in
various arrangements and configurations. The Goths, who developed their own
alphabet from a mixture of runes and Greek letters around 350 C.E., used the Greek
alphanumeric system as the pattern for their own. It was:
Alphabetic Numeric
Note
Character Value
A 1 ahsa "axis, axle"
B 2 bairkan "birch seedling"
G 3 giba "giving; that which is given,
gift, present"
D 4 dags "day"
E 5 aíhvs "horse"
Q 6 qaírþra "lure, bait, decoy"
Z 7 azêti "ease, comfort,
pleasureableness"
- 8 hagl "hail"
Þ 9 þiuþ "(the) good, something good."
The Gothic letter ³thorn´ was
written like the Greek ³psi´, , not
runic þ
I 10 eis "ice"
K 20 kusma "boil, tumefaction, infected
swelling"
L 30 lagus "lake, sea, open water, ocean"
M 40 manna "man, human being"
N 50 nauþs "necessitation, compulsion,
force, constraint; duress"
J 60 jêr "year." Written something like
³G,´ but pronounced as English ³y´
in ³year´ or the ³K´ in ³OK´ when
slurred as ³Ogay.´
U 70 ûrus "urus, aurochs," ÷
!" u
P 80 paírþra "dice cup, dice box, cup for
throwing dice"
i 90 Koppa; used only as a number,
never as a letter
R 100 raida "ride, journey; riding vehicle,
wagon"
S 200 sáuïl sun
T 300 Teiws "Tew, Tyr, Tiu or Ziu,"
before Wodan's time, the highest
divinity, the one-armed god of the
sky and war (and god of "Tue's
day"); = Roman © .
W 400 winja "pasture, grazing meadow."
Written like a capital ³Y´
F 500 faíhu "movable goods,
chattels; property,
possessions; wealth, riches; money"
X 600 Iggws [# $%]
"Ingw," a Germanic demigod,
myhical progenitor of the Anglo-
Frisian Ingwaeones
-v 700 hvaír "cauldron." Written like the
Greek ³theta,´ â
O 800 ôþal "patrimony, ancestral
inheritance"
900 Teiws "Tew" The ] $! Teiws or
Tyr (see "T," above); written as an
upward-pointing arrow. Not used
as a letter.
ÿ
ÿ
!
"
#
$
%
ÿ
&u & '
(
)
* '
+
,-./012345
%
'
+
(
%
$(6
# (
7
ÿ
'
6
89
#
: