MPR April 2018 Jgs Rev1

MONTHLY PROGRESS REPORT
Rev: 01
Date: 6/5/18
APRIL-2018
EMPLOYER / CONTRACTING AUTHORITY:

Government of India
National Highway & Infrastructure Development Corporation Ltd
APRIL – 2018
1.-Physical Progress 34.7 %

2. - Financial Progress 30.5 %
3. - Status of the tunnels and portals. Current progress till date;
(*) First length value the monthly progress, the second one is the existing Chainage for the Face
Excavation Unit.
Main Tunnel Face 1 from Western Portal to Ventilation Cavern: 64 m Ch. 0+ 570, top
heading.
Main Tunnel Face 5 from Western Portal to Ventilation Cavern: 114 m (Benching)
Ch. 0+928, top heading. Ch 0+717 Benching
Escape Tunnel from Western Portal: 122 m Ch. 1+287 , full face
Main Tunnel Face 3 from Ventilation Cavern to Eastern Portal: 105 m Ch. 3+825, top heading.
Main Tunnel Face 2 from Ventilation Cavern to Western Portal: 99 m Ch. 3+199, top heading.
Main Tunnel Face 4 from Eastern Portal 5 m: Ch. 11+024, top heading.
Escape Tunnel from VC Face 2: 61 meters, Ch. 3+295 full face
Escape Tunnel from VC Face 3: 91 meters Ch. 3+695 full-face
Escape Tunnel from Eastern Portal: 61 m Ch. 10+928 full face
On April 24th the ground break between Face1 and Face 5 of Main Tunnel was achieved, in the
Motorable Cross Passage number 1 Section (Ch 560 of MT) .
On April 17th a Site Visit and a meeting with NHIDCL ED, GMT and GM was held at Site and at
SSTL’s Office..
4. - Major pending issues

- SSTL-ITNL : Rock Bolts Reinforcement in MT Segment Ch 0+250 to Ch 0+315 ,
Benching started without the conformity of IE. After 10 meters excavation it was stopped ;
measures reached 96,8 mm for Section Ch 0+260. According to the Convergence
Monitoring Protocol a new reinforcement in the top heading section must be applied.
- SSTL-ITNL : Large water inflow apeeared in ET from EP, and a great cavern in the crown .
Solutions with specific products to seal the holes and fill the gaps were proposed by IE
MPR April -2018 Page 2

( See Annex 1) . Proposed solution by IE for diverting surface water from the slope which
infiltrates into ET .
- SSTL-ITNL : Cracks appeard in the shotcrete of canopy MT in EP.
- SSTL-ITNL : Undercutting sections of ET and MT were noticed in Face 1 (From WP) and –
Face 2 (From VC to WP). See (Annex 2).
- SSTL-ITNL : Outstanding NCRs for lack of dewatering system and also lack of
sedimentation tanks in WP and EP.
- SSTL : Reinforced anchors SDBs 32 mm not resumed in EP.
- SSTL : Work Method Statement for ground brak operations Face 1-Face 5 in MT from WP.
- SSTL : Lack of Survey Marks and temporary drainage in ARs.
- SSTL-ITNL : Safety Incidences.
 Exposed steel in the body of the explosives vehicles instead of wood.
 Poor air quality. CO ppm exceeds the allowable limits, reaching 96 ppm in ET.
 Ventilation System for Escape Tunnel needs to be reinforced, due to the almost 1,3
Km of tunnel excavation. Reinforced blow air system or an exhausted air system
have been proposed to SSTL-ITNL by IE.
- SSTL-ITNL : Master Plan Project Planning new revision is still awaited for March 7th .
Despite of a good quality rock in faces 2 and 3, only 1 cycle is achieved. Also the
wrongdoing for dewatering system in faces 2 MT and ET leads to a slow excavation rates .
Too much time spent on the Main F2 toward the Western and the Escape F2 towards the
Western, because of the accumulation of water in the fronts. A letter was sent to SSTL-
ITNL by IE (See Annex 3).
Although the month rate have been increased for MT up to near 400 meters , the needed
rate of 500 meters to be consistente with the Cmpletion Schedule data has not been
achieved.
- SSTL-ITNL : Corrective measures in frontal slope Eastern Portal after the snowfalls must
be resumed urgently . A letter has been sent to SSTL-ITNL by IE (See Annex 4). The
Inclinometer in EP shows an horizontal displacement of 9 cm.
- SSTL : To Increase excavates rates in MT and ET, Reduce cycle times and increase
production through an efficient blasting scheme which can reduce the scaling time.
Applying plastic pipes for charging as well as review the detonators sequence and the unit

explosive charge .Also new excavation faces must be opened in order to complete the
Completion Schedule Date .
- SSTL : Still doing the blast, with a single cartridge, 40. This IE doesn’t understand the
refusal of the concessionaire to bring more diameter 32 and 25 and thereby be able to
sequence the blasting, obtaining better results and reducing the times of scaling.
-
- SSTL complete slope stabilization frontal slope VP in front of the existing winter season.
Works for Terrtrel Reinforced Soil Wall has been resumed at the end of March, but they
must be finalized as soon as possible.
- SSTL Decantation tank in Western Portal is not working properly.Because of no
calculations IE has proposed a minimum dimensions ( See Annex 5)
- SSTL Drainage for Ventilation Tunnel work units must be implementted. No conduction
and treatment of flow from Ventilation Tunnel.
- SSTL : Approach Road Earthworks Progress is very slow.

- SSTL Close Outstanding NCRs
- Government: Land for Additional Muck Disposal Area
- Government Deployment of Security Forces at Site
- Government; Support for Compensation issues
- Launch CoS for Pedestrian Underpasses ( two units) asked by villagers . A letter from
Deputy Commisioner from Ganderbal District is expected.
5. –Developing of the Construction works

From Appointed Date works are being carried out as per Scope of Work specified in Schedule B,
Project Facility specified in Schedule C in accordance with specifications and standards specified
in Schedule D; where the land free from hindrances & encumbrances made available to
Concessionaries cleared. Concessionaire is carrying out the work in accordance with QAS and
expected standard in accordance with provision of CA.
The Construction is taken up in accordance with the Project Specifications and methodology
adopted for the various processes and type of equipment / machinery

6.- Graphics of the Physical Progress in Tunnels
2000
Egress Tunnel
1600
1200
800
Main Tunnel Heading
Ventilation T.&Cavern
400
Main Tunnel Benching
4/1/17 5/1/17 6/1/17 7/1/17 8/1/17 9/1/17 10/1/17 11/1/17 12/1/17 1/1/18 2/1/18 3/1/18 4/1/18 5/1/18

400,00
350,00
300,00
250,00
200,00 MAIN H
MAIN B
150,00 EGRESS
VENT
100,00
50,00
,00
7. - NCRs
At the beginning of April -18 : 21
At the end of April-18 : 19
Closed in April-18 : 2

TABLE OF CONTENTS
TABLE OF CONTENTS .........................................................................................................................................7
1.‐SUBJECT ...................................................................................................................................................... 10
2.‐SCOPE OF THE REPORT ............................................................................................................................... 12
3.‐TASKS CARRIED OUT DURING APRIL‐2018 .................................................................................................. 18
3.1‐PROJECT REVIEW ...................................................................................................................................... 18
3.2‐MOBILIZATION .......................................................................................................................................... 19
4.‐MAJOR ACTIVITIES PLANNED FOR NEXT MONTH ........................................................................................ 19
5.‐PROJECT REVIEW ........................................................................................................................................ 20
5.1‐ DETAILED DESIGN VUP 11+111 ............................................................................................................... 20
5.2. ‐ REVIEW OF DETAILED DESIGN OF FOUNDATIONS FOR VIADUCT 2+415. ............................................. 20
6.‐IE COMMENTS ON SITE WORKS .................................................................................................................. 21
6.1. ‐ CONSTRUCTION OF REINFORCED EARTH RETAINING STRUCTURE CH 0+120 TO CH 4+531 (APPROACH ROAD)21
6.2. ‐ CONSTRUCTION OF MAJOR BRIDGE MJB 11+181 AT EASTERN PORTAL ........................................................... 32
6.3‐ TUNNEL ISSUES SUMMARY AND TUNNEL EXCAVATION PROGRESS ................................................................... 36
6.4.‐ COMMENTS TO THE WORK UNITS ..................................................................................................................... 40
7. ‐ NCR NO CONFORMITY REPORTS NOT CLOSED .......................................................................................... 41
8. ‐ EXAMPLES CYCLE MONITORING DAILY PROGRESS REPORTS IN ET ........................................................... 42
9.‐SURVEY TASKS ............................................................................................................................................ 46
9.1. ‐ EXCAVATION OF TUNNELS ..................................................................................................................... 46
9.2. ‐ MAIN & EGRESS TUNNEL UPDATED EXCAVATION PLAN ................................................................................................. 48
9.3. MAIN & EGRESS TUNNEL PLAN FOR FACE‐2 & FACE ‐3. ................................................................................................ 53
9.5. ‐ ESCAPE TUNNEL CROSS SECTIONS .......................................................................................................................... 60
9.6. CONVERGENCES BY TAP EXTENSOMETER ................................................................................................ 63
9.6 – CONVERGENCE SECTIONS OF MT FROM SSTL‐ITNL .................................................................................................... 70
10.‐QUALITY CONTROL AND QUALITY ASSURANCE. TESTS DONE IN APRIL‐2018 ........................................... 72
10.1‐SHOTCRETE CORE COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH (PANEL) WEST PORTAL (MAIN TUNNEL) ......................................................... 72
10.2‐SHOTCRETE CORE COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH (PANEL) WEST PORTAL (ESCAPE TUNNEL) ....................................................... 73
10.3‐CORE THICKNESS OF SHOTCRETE (MAIN TUNNEL) ............................................................................................ 74
10.4‐CORE THICKNESS OF SHOTCRETE W.P (ESCAPE TUNNEL) ............................................................................................... 75
10.4‐ PENETROMETER TEST – WEST PORTAL (MAIN TUNNEL‐ALL FACES ) ................................................................................ 75
10.5‐ PENETROMETER TEST – WEST PORTAL (ESCAPE TUNNEL) ............................................................................................. 76
10.6‐ CONCRETE CUBE STRENGTH ..................................................................................................................................... 77
10.7‐ SHOTCRETE SITE CORE STRENGTH (INDIVIDUALS OF FIVE NUMBERS CORE) ...................................................................... 78
10.8‐ GROUTING 1 WESTERN PORTAL – FORE POLE PIPE (MAIN TUNNEL & ESCAPE TUNNEL) ................................................... 78
10.9. ‐ ROCK PULL‐OUT TEST. ‐‐ ...................................................................................................................................... 80
10.10. ‐ AGGREGATE IMPACT VALUE (AIV) ....................................................................................................................... 81
10.11. ‐ ABRASION VALUE OF AGGREGATE ........................................................................................................................ 82
10.12. ‐ AGGREGATE CRUSHING VALUE. ............................................................................................................................ 82
10.13. ‐ FLAKINESS AND ELONGATION TEST (FI & EI) .......................................................................................................... 83
10.14‐ GRADING ANALYSIS CRUSHER DUST ....................................................................................................................... 83
10.15‐ SIZE 20 MM ..................................................................................................................................................... 84
10.16‐ SIZE 10 MM ..................................................................................................................................................... 85
10.17‐ CEMENT TEST. PHYSICAL PROPERTIES. ................................................................................................................... 85
10.18‐ COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH OF CEMENT. .................................................................................................................. 86
11. ‐ GEOLOGICAL MAPPING OF TUNNEL FACE .......................................................................................................... 88
12. ‐ SAFETY................................................................................................................................................................ 96
12.1 –INCIDENTE REPORT SNOWSLIDE (MINOR AVALANCHE) AT EASTERN PORTAL AT THE FRONTAL SLOPE. ........ 96
12.2 – COMPLIANCE RELATED TO EXPOSEED STEEL PARTS IN BODY OF EXPLOSIVES TRANSPORTATION VEHICLES .. 97
13.‐ ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS ................................................................................................................................ 100
ANNEX 1: LETTER TO SSTL : LARGE WATER FLOW IN EXCAVATION FACE 4 OF ET (EASTERN PORTAL) ....................................... 116
ANNEX 2: LETTER TO SSTL UNDERCUTTING SECTIONS ................................................................................................. 118
ANNEX 3: LETTER TO SSTL NO ACHIEVEMENT SECOND CYCLE IN GOOD ROCK TUNNEL EXCAVATION FOR FACES 2 AND 3 ............... 120
ANNEX 4: : LETTER TO SSTL MEASEUREMENTS OF THE EP INCLINOMETER ...................................................................... 122
ANNEX 5: LETTER TO SSTL OUTSTANDING NCR FOR SEDIMENTATION TANKS WP AND EP .................................................... 124
ANNEX 6: : MINUTES OF MEETING APRIL 17TH SITE VISIT NHIDCL ................................................................................... 126
ANNEX 7 : LETTER FROM NHIDCL COS OMITTING HAIRPIN BEND ...................................................................................... 129
ANNEX 8 : LETTER TO SSTL CONVERGENCES CLAY SEGMENT MT CH 250 TO 310 ................................................................. 132
ANNEX 9 : MOM MEETING SSTL‐GRUSAMAR‐IE ON APRIL 5TH AND APRIL 27TH 2018 ......................................................... 134

DOCUMENT AUTHORS
Name Position Task
J.Guivernau Team Leader Tunnel, Portal, Access
J.Ruiz Senior Geotechnical Expert Survey, Tunnel, Portals, Access,
Ventilation
Iñaki Valle Tunnel Excavation Expert Tunnel
Majid Imran Tunnel Engineer Tunnel
Rayees Ahmed Tunnel Engineer Tunnel
Santosh Kr. Singh Material Engineer Quality Assurance/Quality Control
Harish Kumar Hydraulic/Drainage Specialist Culverts
Ifthekar Hussain Highway Engineer Approach Roads
Jugendra Singh Geologist Tunnel
Manzoor Survey Specialist Survey
Javid Sheik Environmental Expert Pollution Control, Environmental
Analysis
DOCUMENT REVISION
Name Date Task

J.Guivernau 7/5/2018 Rev 01
DOCUMENT HISTORY
Date Version Cause
7/5/18 1.0 Initial issue
DOCUMENT DISTRIBUTION

Name Position Organisation
Vijay Kumar General Manager NHIDCL
Rishish Jha Project Manager SSTL
1.-Subject
The scope of the document is the analysis of the technical documents submitted by the Concessionaire for
review, an overview of setting up of construction facilities and a summary of construction activities carried
out during the month of April- 2018.
It is necessary to highlight that a Site Visit from NHIDCL was held, with the attendance of ED, GMT and GM,
and also a meeting in SSTL’s Office The Minutes of Meeting are included in Annex 6.
The solutions proposed by IE in order to reach the targets for the Completion Scheduled Date are as
follows:
1. To open new excavation faces in MT from differents Motorable Cross Passages until to complet a
minimum number of 9. Right now there are only 4 after the ground break between Face 1 and
Face 5.
2. To optimize the time spent in the different NATM activitities in order to achieve the goal of two
completed cycles per day. Right now only 1 cycle per day is achieved.
In another hand, and according to a recommendation from NHIDCL GM in Jammu to NHIDCL ED in Delhi,
the Change of Scope for Omitting the Hairpin Bend in WP ARs was recommended with an estimated cost of
60.187 Crores ( See Annex 7)
Answering the requirement from this IE the complete E&M Design Completed Package Version 3, has been
submitted by SSTL’s Designers and it is under review.
An Environment Impact Assessment Report has been delivered by SSTL and it is also under review by IE.
A Work Method Statement for the different stages in the ground break between Face 1 and Face 1A was
submitted by the Sub Contractor APCO-TITAN JV. However, no detailed explanation for ensuring the right
stiffness of the linings in all the phases was included in this report. Moreover, this IE doesn’t agree to receive
directly reports from the Sub Contractor without the Supervision and the comments from EPC-ITNL,
according to the contractual rules for this procedure.
The list of the main items analyzed is :
I. Because of an unitarelly decision from EPC-ITNL no understandable by this IE, the Subcontractor
APCO-TITAN JV started the benching of the conflictive clay segment of Main Tunnel Ch. 250 to 320.
As IE noticed this on site , a no conformity communication was sent to SSTL and Supervision Team
Grusamar for stooping this benching. However, 10 meters were already excavated at that time. As a
consequence of this the velocity of the convergence increased to 0,45 mm/day according to the ITNL
Monitoring and 0,35 mm/day according to the IE Monitoring.It means a no stabilized scenario for this clay
segment.
II. The convergence in the benching has reached a value of 96 mm according to the IE monitoring
and a value close to 80 mm according to the ITNL Monitoring. As this value is over 80 mm and
also because of the increase of velocity a Reinforced type B or a temporary closed section for the
top heading section must be applied , according to the Contractual document “ Convergence
monitoring and acting protocol”, Chapter 4.2. A letter was sent to SSTL by IE ( See Annex 8).
III. The last readings in the inclinometer of EP which shows an horizontal movement near 90 mm, and
increase of 60 mm movement since December 2017,
According to the Contractual Document : “EP Final Design Slope Monitoring Chapter 17.2.10.Red
Scenario horizontal displacements > 3 cm, as well as the Technical Note from Designer GRU-023.EP
REINFORCEMENT, this IE reminded to SSTL the urgent mobilization of the Frontal Slope Reinforced
work units team ( See Annex 9).
IV. CO (Carbon Monoxide) ppm in ET from WP measured by IE at chainage 560+m of Escape tunnel
CO reading after 1 hour of the blast was higher (96 PPM) than the permissible limits as possible . A NCR
is still outstanding.
V. Highly Turbid water from Eastern Portal is still being directly released into River Sindh. The efforts for
construction of sedimentation tank and other treatment process for this waste water are lacking. The
said activity is breach of Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1974 CHAPTER-V; Section 24
(1) (a) & 25 (1) (a & b).
VI. Convergences for the Motorable Cross Passage MCP-5 have been determined, with allowable
values and speed within the permissible range. MCP-5 horizontal movements are below 10 mm.
VII. Verification Main & Egress Tunnel Updated Excavation plan Western Portal
VIII. Verification for Main & Egress Tunnel Plan For Face-2 & Face -3.(VENTILATION CAVERN).
IX. Verification of Egress Tunnel Plan For Face-4 (EASTERN PORTAL)
X. Verification of Main Tunnel Cross Section Face-1 (CH:- 540 & 558 Face-1)
XI. Verificatio of Main Tunnel Cross Section at CH:-610 & 639 (Face-5)
XII. Verification Egress Tunnel Cross Section at CH:- 1150 & 1226 (Face-1)
XIII. Verification of Main Tunnel Cross Section at CH:-3310 & 3236 (Face-2)
XIV. Verification of Main Tunnel Cross Section at CH:-3751 & 3785(Face-3)
XV. Verification Egress Tunnel Cross Section at CH:-3330 & 3340 (Face-2)
XVI. Verification of Main Tunnel Cross Section at CH :-6412 & 6396 (Face-4)
XVII. Verification of Egress Tunnel Cross Section at CH :-6366 & 6356 (Face-4)
XVIII. Convergence by Tap Extensometer.
XIX. Convergence Velocity calculation by Tape Extensometer.

2.-Scope of the report
The monthly progress report aims to summarize and quantify precisely the activities carried out and human
resources used for the Independent Engineer Services during this period in order to develop their roles and
functions, and identify the difficulties and problems encountered in design, setting up and construction
activities in order to be able to solve the obstacles
This also gives an analysis of these problems and proposed solutions for correction.
Most important issues during April -2018 are:
1. Design Progress :
The main design issues have been as follows. The next list of documents have been received :
th
1. SSTL Designer submitted on April 18 2018, a completed Electrical & Mechanical Package Version 3, now
under revision by IE.
rd
2. SSTL Designer has submitted on April 3 2018 the Final Lining Design in Z-Morh Tunnel.
th
3. SSTL Designer submitted on April 30 a Technical Note for the Feasibility of a third lane (climbing lane) in WP
ARs.
th
4. IE submitted on April 30 Review of the Foundations for Viaduct at Chainage 2+415
th
5. IE submitted on April 27 the Review of the Detailed Design Vehicular Underpass Ch 11+111 Rev-2.
6. Recently IE submitted the Report on Review Final Lining Design in Z-Morh Tunel V1.0
7. Recently IE submitted the Report of Climbing Lane for WP Approach Road Z-Morh Tunnel.
2. Design quality :
o Regarding to the Response for Comments the Final Design in Z-Morh Tunnel, final lining design in only
for 634 meters of main tunnel in five separate intervals (200,125,210,84 and 15 meters ) and in 590 meters
of egress tunnel is not enough to initiate final lining operations.
Final lining is the final stability verification based on observed data. For this purpose real data use is
required, but Tunnel Mapp Facing RMR descriptions, laboratory and in-situ test to determine real rock mass
properties is not included. Also use real well referenced monitoring convergence data for all sections. All
data used must be included and justified properly
In loads considered for final lining ventilation and other suspended equipment is not included. Also niches
required for jet fans have not been considered either in excavation, primary lining and final lining.
o Regarding to the Foundations for the Viaduct Ch 2+415 1. Bearing capacity value taken 43.75 t/m2
for weathered slates blocks in calculations is not consistent with Geotechnical Report from SSTL Designers
for Minor Bridges submitted in 2013 ( recommended value 35 t/m2), as well as for the application of Brinch-
Hansen Formula for the parameters chosen ( , determined value 32 t/m2.
Also the Self Weight load for the new deck option ; Box girders means an increase of the working stress , not
only for the change of the section but also for the thickness of the slab in the composite bridge ( 30 cm
instead of 22 cm)
o Regarding to the Detailed Design for the VUP 11+111 ( In front of the EP) the main comment is that due
to a recent cutting earth works for the construction of the Abutment A1 foundation for the Major Bridge MJB
11+181, the conditions for the foundation of the VUP 11+111 has changed. Nowadays, not a Original
Ground surface with clay material is there, and a fill to reach the proposed elevation is there, which it means
that a different geotechnical parameters for the foundation design must be taken into account.
o Regarding to the Technical Note for the Feasibility of a third lane (climbing lane) in WP ARs., there is an
agreement with SSTL that, according to the analysis through the Highway Capacity Manual, a climbing lane
is needed for the slow traffic. This issue was raised by this IE on 2016 , but in that moment there were
problems for the additional land acquisition of this third lane. However , nowadays it have been overcome.
Project Planning :
 The rates for Main Tunnel Excavation Tunnel 240 meters/ month are below the rates need 450 meters
per day according to the ending dates for top heading tunnel Excavation included in Project Planning
submitted by SSTL on February 3rd 2018.
 In a good rock mass like the rock appeared in Face 2 and Face 3 only 1 cycle is achieved , because
a lack of logistics in pumping, dewatering as well as shortage of resources.
 For the ET, the achieved rate 366 meters/month is closed to the needed 380 meters/month ratio
 Still the resources for critical path activities : Boomer drilling machines, trucks, shotcrete machines,
loaders, must be increased in a 50% percentage in order to achieve this target. Only 1 Boomer has
been arrived at Site on April-2018

These corrections must be included in the Project Planning for achieving a more realistic document than
the existing one. Since the starting excavation days the next table must be considered, (Units in meters) :
MONTH MAIN H MAIN B EGRESS VENT-H VENT-B

may-17 26.0 1.0 90.0 181.0
jun-17 36.5 31.0 71.5 115.0
jul-17 67.5 44.0 104.5 119.0 92.0
ago-17 76.0 24.0 107.0 123.0 123.0
sep-17 55.0 76.0 101.0 15.5 224.5
oct-17 32.0 36.0 107.0
nov-17 62.0 38.0 163.0
dic-17 189.5 131.5
ene-18 183.0 23.0 127.5
feb-18 200.0 141.5 141.5
mar-18 315.0 74.0 274.5
abr-18 239.5 110.0 366.0
In the table can appreciate:
 Effects in productions of incidents occurred between Jul-17 and Nov-17

 Total Tunnel length excavated in a year is:
o 553.5 of Ventilation tunnel plus 43 m of Ventilation Cavern
o 598.5 m of main tunnel plus 895.5 meters of MT heading
o 1805.0 m of Egress tunnel
o 2 Lay-by, two motorable cross passages and two half pedestrian passages.
 Scheduled completion date for excavation is May-2018 and now are pending:
o 4918.0 m of main tunnel heading and 5813.5 m of main tunnel benching
o 4621.5 m of egress tunnel
o 6 more lay-bys
o Complete the two started pedestrian passages and complete 23 additional ones.
 Ratios of excavation to achieve completion date required are about 380 m/month in MT
heading, 450m/month in MT heading and 360 m/month for egress tunnel. Only in egress tunnel
ratio of last month is as per schedule requirements.
Present rock quality are good in WP faces, very good in VT faces, medium in egress tunnel EP face and
bad in MT EP face. Only 140 meters in WP main tunnel, actual 14.5 m in MT EP face and 30 m of Egress
in EP has presented bad rock quality. Probably, based only in a surface survey, a 5%-10% of the MT
pending 5000 m of excavation will have bad or very bad rock. Considering a forced excavation ratio of

1.5 m/day for 375 m, ratios in good rock must be incremented to 975m/month in MT heading and to 910
m/month in Egress.
At reasonable ratios of 350m/month in MT and 400 m/month in egress excavation will be finished in 23
months. At actual ratios at least 28 months will be required with the limitative condition of only will found
375 m of bad rock. More presence of bad quality rocks can delay excavation completion to than 36
months or more.
It means that the tunnel excavation activities , with the existing ratios will be finished on
September-2020 (Optimistic asumption) or May-2021 (Pessimistic Assumption).
Monitoring :
Measures of convergences through extensometer device have been made along for Ventilation Tunnel ,
Escape Tunnel and Main Tunnel by IE Team.
Maximum covergence measured in MT has been 96 mm ( Top Heading Stage Ch 0+260, 60 mm
according to ITNL Survey )
The maximum convergence value for the benching stage measured has been 7 mm ( Benching Stage Ch
0+240).
Maximums convergences measured in ET has been 11 mm in Ch 710 ( Full Section )
Maximum convergence measured in VT has been 32 mm (Ch 0+535 Full Section Stage)
For the ET and VT all the convergence speed values are inside the allowable range, which mean stabilized
sections.
Numerical and graphical results are included in Chapter 9.
For the MT and due to the great value of 96 mm for MT in Clay segment (maximum convergence Scenario
“ B “ is 100 mm according to the Convergence Protocol Document vs 96 mm) a new reinforced measures
have been applied and, according to the variation of their speed, before starting the benching stage,
between Ch 250 to 310
Survey Reports :
The IE Surveys specialist have followed the next irregularities in undercutting sections , included also in
Chapter 10 :
 Egress Tunnel : Ch. 4+633, 4+653, 4+684, 4+712, 4+733 4+755

 Main Tunnel : Ch. 4+638, 4+771, 4+776
.
A NCR was raise by IE because of this ( See Annex 2).

Survey Marks Criterium for ET, especially Vertical Profile must be clarified to this IE, as soon as possible
Safety :
Main Safety issues outstanding are :
1. Excedeeing exceeding the permissible limits of CO (Carbon Monoxide) in Escape Tunnel, Face 1,
96 ppm vs 50 ppm allowed , and a higher value of 170 ppm in VT . It is necessary to highlight that
an exhausted ventilation system is needed in the Ventilation Cavern because this is a location where
all pollution air coming from 4 different faces is concentrated.
2. Allowing workers for entering into the tunnel before the exhausted air has been removed after the
blasting process.
3. The loading of explosives is being carried out while the blasting is being drilled, at the same time.
This beside being extremely dangerous, is expressly prohibited for the Indian Standard IS 4081 (
1986 ) SAFETY CODE FOR BLASTING AND RELATED DRILLING OPERATIONS, point 6.10 “
Loading and drilling shall not be carried out at the same time in the same area.”
4. Many workers are not using masks during shotcrete or scaling operations inside of the tunnel.
5. An explosive storage of 500 kg has been implemented in the Ventilation Cavern , near the corner
between VT and MT Face 2. However , no standard supports such a temporary facility. Because of
this IE raised this issue in the last weekly meeting in fron t of the SSTL-ITNL responsibles who are
committed to give an answer regarding which standard allos this temporary facility.
Escape Tunnel WP (Face 1) :
The total length excavated is 1287 meters, in this month 122 meters have been excavated and the
Support Section section right now SGE-II Bis , Rock Bolts 3 meters lenth pattern 1,5 x 2 m , 20 cm of
Shotcrete thickness, Lattice Girders space = 1,5 meters RMR = 45.
Excavation ratio has been 4,01 meters/day.
Escape Tunnel EP (Face 4)
The total length excavated is 119 mts , in this months 61 meters . Support Section SGE-II-Bis , Rock Bolts
3 meters lenth pattern 1,5 x 2 m , 20 cm of Shotcrete thickness, Lattice Girders space = 1,5 meters .
RMR = 36.
Excavation Ratio has been 2,03 meters/day.
The total length excavated is 198 meters ,61 mts in the month . Support system is SGE-I, Rock Bolts 3
meters lenth pattern 1,5 x 1,5 m, shotcrete thickness = 15 cm
RMR = 75,
Excavation rates is 2,03 meters /day.

The total length excavated is 202 meters , 91 mts in the month . Support system is SGE-I, Rock Bolts 3
meters lenth pattern 1,5 x 1,5 m, shotcrete thickness = 15 cm
RMR = 70
Excavation rate is 3,03 meters/day
Main Tunnel WP (Face 1) :
The total length excavated in top heading is 570 meters, in this month 64 meters have been excavated in
top-heading according to Support System S-II-Bis , Lattice Girders each 1,5 meters, Rock Bolts pattern 1,5
x 1,5 m ; 25 cm of shotcrete, round length 3 meters. RMR =52.
Benching stage started with a length of 10 meters without the conformity by IE . Afterwards it has been
stopped waiting for the stabilization of the convergences in the top-heading segment Ch 250 to 310 .
Excavation ratio has been 2,13 meter/day.
Main Tunnel WP (Face 5) :
The existing Chainage for this face is Ch 928 in top-heading and 717 in benching . The total length
excavation in this month 114 meters for benching.
The total exacavation from the Starting Chainage CH: 0+564 m is 364 meters.
RMR = 47 Support System S-II-Bis , Lattice Girders each 1,5 meters, Rock Bolts pattern 1,5 x 1,5 m ; 25
cm of shotcrete, round length 3 meters
Excavation ratio for benching has been 3,8 meters/day.
Main Tunnel from VC to Eastern Portal (Face 3) :
Total length excavation of 360 meters on April 2018, Excavation ; in the month for top heading has
been 105 meters,Support System S-I . Rock Bolts 4 meters length 2x2 meters, Shotcrete thickness 10 cm
RMR = 72
Existing Chainage for Face Excavation is Ch 3+825.
Excavation rate is 3,5 meters/day.
Main Tunnel from VC to Western Portal (Face 2) :
Total length excavation of 269 meters on April -2018 , in the month for top heading face 99 meters.
Existing Chainage for Face Excavation is Ch 3+295
Support System S-I, RMR = 70.
Excavation rate is 3,3 meters/day
Main Tunnel EP (Face 4)
Total length excavation of 16,5 meters ; in this months 10 meters for top heading.
Support System S-V. Fore poling for 2nd segment umbrella on Soil.
Meetings :
On April 17th , a Site Visit and a meeting with ED, GMT and GM NHIDCL SSTL and IE were held at siote
and at SSTL’s Office . MoM are attached in Annex 6

On April 5th and on April 27th , a meetings with SSTL and IE were held in SSTL’s Office .
Meeting Agendas are included in Annex 9.
3.-Tasks carried out during April-2018
3.1-Project review
The primary scope of work for the Independent Engineer includes (but not limited to) the following:
Review of the Drawings and Documents
Review, inspection and monitoring of Construction Works
Conducting Tests on completion of construction and issuing Completion/ Provisional Certificate
Review, inspection and monitoring of O&M
Review, inspection and monitoring of Divestment Requirements
Determining, as required under the Agreement, the costs of any works or services and/or their
reasonableness;
Determining, as required under the Agreement, the period or any extension thereof, for performing any duty
or obligation;
Assisting the Parties in resolution of disputes
Undertaking all other duties and functions in accordance with the Agreement
According to the scope of the works, during the development period, the Independent Engineer shall
undertake a detailed review of the drawings furnished by the Concessionaire, along with supporting data,
including the geotechnical and hydrological investigations, characteristic of materials for borrow areas and
quarry sites, topographical surveys and traffic surveys.
Classification of comments given by IE is as per the following levels:
“A“ means non-compliance with standards or the boundary conditions coming from DPR
“B“ means potential non-compliance, to be confirmed in Final Design stage, if the design follows the
same Criteria as Criteria chosen in Preliminary Design.
“C“ means recommendations and suggestions from IE, which would improve the design.
Almost all documents reviewed to date contain “A” schedules or are inadequate for construction.
The list of performed documents in December 2017 is shown below:

Table 1 – List of documents performed by IE :
Rev Date Title

th
1 April 24 2018 IE delivered the Report Review of Detailed Design VUP 11+111
th
2 April 30 2018 IE delivered the Report Review of DD Foundations for Viaduct
2+415.
3.2-Mobilization
Mobilization of Quantity surveyor Mr. Manoj Kumawat
3.3.-Follow-up tasks
Several letters addressed to SSTL for different NCRs (Non conformity Reports) were submitted to SSTL,
See Annex 12.
4.-Major activities planned for next month

Main Tunnel Excavation from Face 1 ( WP to VC) Support System S-II.Bis
Main Tunnel Excavation from Face 2 ( VC to WP) Support System S-I
Main Tunnel Excavation from Face 3 ( VC to EP) Support System S-I
Main Tunnel Excavation from Face 4 Support System S-V and fore poling 4th segment.
Reinforced Earth Wall Terra Trel system, Masonry Wall and Soil Nailing works for the slope stabilization of
the Ventilation Tunnel Access Road.
Escape Tunnel Excavation and primary lining in ET (Face 1 WP) according to the Section Type SGE-II
Bis
Escape Tunnel Excavation and primary lining in ET (Face 4 EP) according to the Section Type SGE-II-Bis
Main WP Approach Road-Embankment work and Reinforced Earth Walls Ch. 0 + 120 to Ch. 4+550
Periodic inclinometer measurements for BH1 and BH2 in WP will be monitored weekly through IE Survey
team.

Periodic inclinometer measurements for BH3 will be monitored weekly through IE Survey team, as well as
the 5 targets in the frontal slope and the optical targets over the top cap beams of the micro-piles
5.-Project review
5.1- Detailed Design VUP 11+111

The conclusions are:
 Due to a recent cutting earth works for the construction of the Abutment A1 foundation for the
Major Bridge MJB 11+181, the condition for the foundation of the VUP 11+111 has changed, and
a fill to reach the proposed elevation is needed. The parameters for the foundation soil have
changed : Ballast coefficient and bearing capacity.
 Symmetric earth pressure loads for both walls according to the STAAD analysis is a no realistic
assumption. Standards recommend a minimum difference of 1 meter elevation between both
sides, even a two phases backfill is a common work method statement.
 According to the IRC : 6 -2014 , Seismic Analysis need to be applied when spam length is
greater than 10 meters, which is the case , clear span of box equal to 12,42 meters, and
effective span equal to 13,071 meters. However in the STAAD Model no Seismic Load has been
applied
5.2. - Review of Detailed Design of Foundations for Viaduct 2+415.

The conclusions are:
 The value of the bearing capacity is not consistent with the values included in the Chapter 6.3 “
Open Foundation Recommendations “ of the Report “ IGS/GIL/Z-MORH TUNNEL/BRIDGES “, “
Geotechnical Investigation for bridges on Approaches of Z-Morh Tunnel on NH1D (Srinagar
Sonmarg Gumri Road) in State of J&K, In this report, Sheet 30 of 31, the Net Allowable Bearing
Capacity recommended is 35 t/m2
 The working stresses over the foundations according to the Table “ Stress Check “ for ULS
Pressure, Sheets 50 , 53 and 57 reach values between 35.93 t/m2 and 44.64 t/m2 all of them over
the allowable bearing capacity recommended.
 For the modular deck option finally chosen. the resultant self-weight load transmitted to the
foundations is greater than the alternative used in the Annex which was based in steel girders and
reinforced concrete slab of 22 cm. Modular structure of composite bridge is composed by box
girders spaced 4.05 meters and reinforced concrete slab 30 cm instead of 22 cm.
 Also the launch system for the modular deck will introduce new horizontal loads which were not
considered in the foundations design .

6.-IE Comments on site works
6.1. - CONSTRUCTION OF REINFORCED EARTH RETAINING STRUCTURE CH 0+120 TO CH 4+531

(APPROACH ROAD)
Embankment Layers formed from Chainage as:
0+467 to 0+671 = 1100cum (Supporting Wall).

0+120 to 0+420 = 1000 cum (Main approach Road).
A2 Dumping yard = 2925cum (Main approach Road).
West Portal Abt. = 750 cum (Minor Bridge).
VT. (Access Road) = 825 cum
S. No. Description This Month Total Embankment Total Project Percentage

Quantity Quantity done Up to Embankment Up to March
(M3) APRIL 2018 (Filling ) Quantity 2018 (%)

(M3) M3
1. Embankment 2850 75,550 4,00,000 18.875 %
(filling) Main
approach road and
VT Approach Road

PRESENT STATUS OF GEO‐ TREL WALL QUANTITY (EXECUTED AT SITE)
UPTO APRIL‐2018
S.N. Location / Chainage Description Quantity (sqm)
1
0+120 T0 0+365 (Main
Approach road) Geo-Trel wall 2416,8
2
0+467 To 0+671 (Main

approach road Supporting
wall) Geo-Trel wall 1614,16
3
4+340 To 4+531
( Main approach road) Geo-Trel wall 760,97
4
VT. Access road 1228,94
Geo-Trel wall (Terre Trel wall)
5
A1- Dumping yard Geo- Trel wall 540
6
7
TOTAL QUANTITY IN SQUAR METER 8706,87

PHOTO 1. - EMBANKMENT FIELD DENSITY TEST AT THE MAIN APPROACH ROAD AT CH: 0+320 TO
0+383

PHOTO 2. - AT CH: 0+599 TO 0+671 EMBANKMENT IN PROGRESS AT THE SUPPORTING WALL

PHOTO 3. - AT CH: 4+531 TO 4+550 EMBANKMENTS IN PROGRESS AT WESTERN PORTAL

PHOTO 4. - AT CH: 820 TO 850 EMBANKMENT FILLING IN PROGRESS AT VT ACCESS ROAD

PHOTO 5. - ROLLING IN PROGRESS AT THE A2 DUMPING YARD

PROGRESS OF THE EMBANKMENT LAYERS Progress of the embankment layers (See Cross Sections)


6.2. - CONSTRUCTION OF MAJOR BRIDGE MJB 11+181 AT EASTERN PORTAL
S. No. Date Work Description Of Activity and Quantity

Place
1 2nd April 2018 Abutment A1 Third Lift of 1.2 m high on Intermediate Wall, Total
at Major Quantity = 15 m3 of M35 Concrete Grade
Bridge at
Eastern Portal

2 12nd April Abutment A1 Fist Lift of 1.2 m high on Front Wall, Total Quantity =
2018 at Major 40 m3 of M35 Concrete Grade
Bridge at
Eastern Portal

3 19nd April Abutment A1 Second Lift of 2.3 m high on Intermediate Wall, Total
2018 at Major Quantity = 30.5 m3 of M35 Concrete Grade
Bridge at
Eastern Portal

4 23rd April Abutment A1 Second Lift of 1.2 m high on Front Wall, Total Quantity
2018 at Major = 30 m3 of M35 Concrete Grade
Bridge at
Eastern Portal

6.3- TUNNEL ISSUES SUMMARY AND TUNNEL EXCAVATION PROGRESS

PHOTO 6. - SHOTCRETE IN PROGRESS IN MAIN TUNNEL AT WESTERN PORTAL AT THE BREAK
THROUGH JUNCTION

PHOTO 7. - ROCK BOLTING IN PROGRESS AT EGRESS TUNNEL AT THE WESTERN PORTAL
PHOTO 8. - CHARGING IN PROGRESS AT THE FACE 3 TOWARDS EAST PORTAL FOR THE MAIN
TUNNEL

PHOTO 9. - SHOTCRETE IN PROGRESS IN ET-3 TOWARDS EASTERN PORTAL
PHOTO 10. - 03rd STAGE FOREPOLING IN PROGRESS IN MAIN TUNNEL EASTERN PORTAL

6.4. - COMMENTS TO THE WORK UNITS
 Like in the previous months, continue without completing the work cycles. It is made only the first
layer of shotcrete. This has been commented on several occasions and continue repeating it
 Like in the previous months, the ongoing works are still without the construction of the desiltation
tank and the water coming from the excavation faces falls directly to the Sind River
 In the Ventilation cavern of the V P it still happens the lost work cycles by the lack of machinery
and by the accumulation of water in the fronts toward the W P
 Also lost too much time on the Main F2 toward the Western and the Escape F2 toward the Western,
by the accumulation of water in the fronts.
 In the V P, between the four fronts have been lost 6 days between failures, lack of machinery and
accumulation of water in the fronts of F2 in the Main, and Escape, this means that an advance of 3
m/day/front, would be 72 m forward has not been carried out.
 On April 24th the ground break in MT from WP at Ch 560 communicated the Face 1 with the Face 5
opened through the motorable cross passage.

7. - NCR No Conformity Reports not closed
On April -2018
1. NCR for lack of resources especially trucks in MT and ET Faces 2&3 only 1 cycle completed per day
2. NCR for starting benching stage in MT Excavation from Ch. 250-WP without movements stabilized in top
heading
3. NCR for no resuming and finishing the work units reinforced anchors D32 mm in frontal slope EP
4. NCR for no extended pipe collecting large water flow ET beside view face of right side micro piles
5. NCR for no compliance related to the exposed steel of the interior body inside explosives transportation vehicles.
6. NCR for Lack of Temporary Drainage in ARs Earthworks
7. NCR for Undercutting Sections in ET and MT
Pending from before April-2018
1. Eastern Portal Drainage System not completed

2. Turbidity water outfall from WP to Nalla River.
3. No implementation of a discharge pipe with enough diameter for discharging ditch of EP
4. Releasing water into Sindh River without permission from State Pollution Control Board.
5. Oversize particles in Backfill Reinforced Earth Wall Approach Road.
6. Review of the conditions for the Western Portal Site Access Road.
7. No drainage measures taken in ET groundwater incoming (WP)
8. NCRs for no compliance of Lighting-Dewatering-Ventilation systems in ET vs IS 5878.
9. Outstanding NCR for no completed Primary Lining Cycle in Escape Tunnel.
10. Outstanding NCR for no conduction and treatment of water flow coming from VT VC and MT Face 3
11. NCR for excesive delay on complete reinforcement and lack of quality included in GRU-027.MT-
Reinforcement in S-V under umbrella
12. NCR for no pumps and also no right dewatering in Face 2 MT and ET
13. NCR FOR No Tightening Torque force tables to be applied for nuts in the plate joint between Lattice
Girders to the 4 bolts
14. NCR for exceding limits CCO ppm inside the tunnel vs OSHAS permisible limites
15. VT Access Road slope conditions aggravated because of no closing NCR of no conduction and also
no treatment of water incoming from VT

8. - EXAMPLES CYCLE MONITORING DAILY PROGRESS REPORTS IN ET
DATE 30/4/2018-MAIN TUNNEL
By Blast By Blast By Breaking

Operations Fro Total Total Total
To From To From To Remar
in m Hrs Hrs Hrs
ks
Tunnel
Cycle‐01 Cycle‐02 Cycle‐03
01 Shift change ‐ ‐ ‐
Face 01.00 03.00 2.0
02 pm pm
Breaking/Drilling
03 03.00 04.00 1.0
Charging
pm pm
04.00 04.45 0.45
04 Blasting pm pm
Defuming04.30 04.45 05.10 0.25
05 pm pm
pm
05.10 07.00 1.50
06 Mucking pm pm
Scaling with 07.00 07.30 0.30
pm pm
07 bottom
cleaning
Surveying and 07.30 08.00 0.30
08 pm pm
face mapping
Initial Layer 08.00 09.00 1.0
09 pm pm
Shotcrete
Under pinning ‐ ‐ ‐
10

12.00 01.00 1.0
Swellex Rock Bolt pm pm
11
,S.N, and S.D.R
09.00 12.00 3.0

12 ISHB‐150/2set pm am
Final layer shot 12.00 03.00 3.0
13 am am
creating
15.00
TOTAL Hrs
R M R‐ 45

CYCLE TIME MONIT0RING –ESCAPE TUNNEL- DATE 30/4/2018
Operations By Blast By Blast By Blast Remar

ks
in
From To Total From To Total Fro To Total
Tunnel Hrs Hrs m Hrs
Cycle‐01 Cycle‐02 Cycle ‐03

1 Shift Change ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
2 Face 01.00 02.00 1.0 01.30 03.00 1.30
Breaking/Drilling pm pm am am
3 Charging 02.00 04.00 2.0 03.00 04.00 1.0
pm pm am am
4 Blasting 04.00 05.20 1.20 04.00 04.30 0.30
pm pm am am
5 Defuming 05.20 05.50 0.30 04.30 05.00 0.30
pm pm am am
6 Mucking 05.50 08.00 2.10 05.00 07.00 2.0
pm pm am am
7 Scaling & bottom 08.00 09.00 1.0 07.00 08.00 1.0
cleaning pm pm am am
8 Surveying and 09.00 09.30 0.30 08.00 08.30 0.30

face mapping pm pm am am
9 Initial Layer & 09.30 10.30 1.0 08.30 09.30 1.0

final Shotcrete pm pm am am
1 Swellex, SN and 11.00 01.00 2.0 12.30 01.30 1.0

0 SDR Rock Bolt am pm am am
&Wire mesh
1 Lattice Girder ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
1
1 Final Layer 10.30 12.30 2.0 09.30 12.00 2.30
2 Shotcrete. pm am am pm
1 TOTAL 13.30 11.30
3 Hrs Hrs

R M R‐ 52


CYCLE TIME MONITERING –MAIN TUNNEL FROM VENTILATION CAVERN FACE 3 MAIN TUNNEL
DATE 30/4/2018
First Blast Second Blast Third Blast

Operations Total Fro Total Total
From To To From To Rem
in Hrs m Hrs Hrs arks
Tunnel Cycle‐01 Cycle‐02 Cycle‐03
Heading from Ch: 3625.00
1 Shift
change/Equip ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
ment check
Drilling 08.00 am 10.00 01.30 03.00
2 am 2.0 1.30
am am
10.00 am 12.00 03.00 05.00
3 Charging pm 2.0 2.0
am am
12.00 pm 12.45 05.00 05.10
4 Blasting 0.45 0.10
pm am am
12.45 pm 01.20 05.10 05.40
5 Defuming 0.35 0.30
pm am am
01.20 pm 06.00 05.40 08.00
6 Mucking 4.40 2.20
pm am am
Scaling with 06.00 pm 07.00
pm 08.00 09.00
7 bottom 1.0 1.0
am am
cleaning
Surveying and 07.00 pm 07.30 09.00 09.30
8 pm 0.30 0.30
face mapping am am
Initial Layer 07.30 pm 08.30 09.30 10.30
9 pm 1.0 1.0
Shotcrete am am
10 Rib Erection ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Swellex Rock 08.00 12.00 01.30
11 05.00 am 3.0 1.30
Bolt am am am
12 Wire Mesh ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Final Layer 12.00 10.30 01.00
13 08.30 pm 3.30 2.30
Shotcrete. am am pm
17.00 13.00
TOTAL
Hrs Hrs
RMR‐
13

72

CYCLE TIME MONITERING –MAIN TUNNEL FROM VENTILATION CAVERN FACE 2
DATE 30/4/2018
BY Blast Blast Blast

Operations Total Fro Total Fro Total Re
From To To To
in Hrs m Hrs m Hrs ma
Tunnel Cycle‐01 Cycle‐02 Cycle‐03 rks

Equipment ‐ ‐ ‐
1 check /shift
change
09.30 pm 11.00
2 FACE/Drilling 1.30
pm
11.00 pm 12.30
3 Charging am
1.30
01.10
4 Blasting 12.30 am 0.40
am
01.40
5 Defuming 01.10 am 0.30
am
04.00
6 Mucking 01.40 am 2.20
am
Scaling with
bottom
05.00
7 cleaning& 04.00 am 1.0
am
undercut
Chipping

Surveying and 05.30
8 05.00 am 0.30
face mapping am
Initial Layer 06.30
9 05.30 am 1.0
Shotcrete am
10 Rib Erection ‐ ‐ ‐
Swellex Rock 09.30
11 08.00 pm 1.30
Bolt/SN BOLT pm
12 Wire Mesh ‐ ‐ ‐
Final Layer 09.00
13 06.30 am 2.30
Shotcrete. am
14.00
TOTAL
Hrs
RMR‐
13

70

9.-SURVEY TASKS
9.1. - Excavation of tunnels
1. MAIN TUNNEL :- (Local CH =0.000 Project CH =4+636.570m)
Face 01 (HEADING) LOCAL CH: 0+506 m – 0+570 m = 64 mts.
PROJECT CH: 5+142.570 m – 5+206.570 m = 64 mts.
Face-2 (HEADING) LOCAL CH:- 3+295 m – 3+196 m = 99 mts.
PROJECT CH:- 7+931.570 m – 7+832.570 m = 99 mts.
Face-3 (HEADING) LOCAL CH:- 3+720 m – 3+825 m = 105 mts
PROJECT CH:- 8+356.570 m – 8+461.570 m = 105 mts
Face 04 (HEADING) LOCAL CH: 0+06.5 m – 0+16.5 m = 10 mts.
PROJECT CH: 11+042.131 m – 11+032.131 m = 10 mts.
Face -5, (BENCHING) LOCAL CH 0+603 m – 0+717 m = 114 mts
PROJECT CH: 5+239.570 m – 5+353.570 m = 114 mts
2. ESCAPE TUNNEL :- (Local CH =0.000 Project CH =4+621.370m)
Face 01 (FULL FACE) LOCAL CH: 1+165 m – 1+287 m = 122 mts
PROJECT CH: 5+786.370 m – 5+908.370 m = 122 mts.
Face 02 (FULL FACE) LOCAL CH: 3+356 m – 3+295 m = 61 mts.
PROJECT CH: 7+977.370 m – 7+916.370 m = 61 mts.
Face 03 (FULL FACE) LOCAL CH: 3+604 m – 3+695 m = 91 mts.
PROJECT CH: 8+225.370 m – 8+316.370 m = 91 mts.
Face 04 (FULL FACE) LOCAL CH: 0+058 m – 0+118.5 m = 60.5 mts.
PROJECT CH: 10+989.480 m – 10+928.980 m =60.5 mts.

2. EXCAVATED QUANTITY IN TUNNELS
MAIN CH:- TUNNEL METRE SECTIONAL MEAN LENGTH TOTAL QTY

TUNNEL AREA (SQM) AREA (M) (CUM )
(SQM)

F-1 0+506 - 0+570 67.774+78.255 73.014 64.00 4672.896
F-2
(VT-WP) 3+295 - 3+196 70.689+67.581 69.135 99.00 6844.365
F-3
(VT-EP) 3+720 - 3+825 78.234+83.966 81.100 105.00 8515.500

F-4
(EP-VT) 0+06.5 - 0+016.5 68.304+91.240 79.772 10.00 797.720

F-5 0+603 - 0+717 42.235+39.637 40.936 114 4666.704

TOTAL QUANTITY 25497.185
ESCAPE CH:- LOCAL/GLOBAL SECTIONAL MEAN LENGTH TOTAL QT

TUNNEL AREA (SQM) AREA (M) (CUM)
(SQM)

F-1 1+165 - 1+287 44.665+42.470 43.567 122.00 5315.174

F-2
(VT-WP 3+356 - 3+295 43.739+45.369 44.554 61.00 2717.794
F3
(VT-EP) 3+604 - 3+695 44.369+45.964 45.166 91.00 4110.106

F4
0+058 - 0+118.5 43.784+43.138 43.461 60.5 2629.390
(EP‐VT)

TOTAL QUANTITY 14772.464


9.2. - Main & Egress Tunnel Updated Excavation plan

9.3. Main & Egress Tunnel Plan For Face-2 & Face -3.

9.4. - Egress Tunnel Plan For Face-4 (EASTERN PORTAL)

9.5. - Check of the Cross Sections
Main Tunnel Cross Sections

9.5. - Escape Tunnel Cross Sections

9.6. Convergences by Tap Extensometer
West Portal Main Tunnel (Face - 1).

CONVERGENCE VELOCITY ‐ Main Tunnel ( Western portal) For sections 0+310, 0+420 and 0+495.
Date CHAINAGE(m) DAY 1 VELOCITY DAY 1 DAY 2 VELOCITY DAY 2 DIFFERENCE VELOC DAY 2 ALLOWED NO LESS

TIME INCREASE DAYS Results
MM MM/DAY MM MM/DAY VELOCITY MM/DAY CHECK THAN
STABILIZATION VELOCITY
FROM TO PERCENTAGE %
CO‐23
20‐3‐18 22‐3‐18 MT 0+310 4.1 0.1 2.6 0.19 0.09 2 ‐0.750 90.00 40 Stabilized
22‐3‐18 26‐3‐18 MT 0+310 2.6 0.19 3.2 0.15 ‐0.04 4 0.150 21.05 Not Stabilized
26‐3‐18 14‐4‐18 MT 0+310 3.2 0.15 3.6 0.02 ‐0.13 19 0.021 86.67 Stabilized
14‐4‐18 19‐4‐18 MT 0+310 3.6 0.02 3.5 0.02 0 5 ‐0.020 0.00 Not Stabilized
19‐4‐18 27‐4‐18 MT 0+310 3.5 0.02 3.7 0.03 0.01 8 0.025 50.00 Stabilized
CO‐34
20‐3‐18 22‐3‐18 MT 0+310 21.8 0.13 21.4 0.01 ‐0.12 2 ‐0.200 92.31 Stabilized
22‐3‐18 26‐3‐18 MT 0+310 21.4 0.01 21.5 0.03 0.02 4 0.025 200.00 Stabilized
26‐3‐18 14‐4‐18 MT 0+310 21.5 0.03 22.4 0.05 0.02 19 0.047 66.67 Stabilized
14‐4‐18 19‐4‐18 MT 0+310 22.4 0.05 22.9 0.1 0.05 5 0.100 100.00 Stabilized
19‐4‐18 27‐4‐18 MT 0+310 22.9 0.1 24 0.14 0.04 8 0.138 40.00 Stabilized
CO‐24
22‐3‐18 26‐3‐18 MT 0+310 38.7 0.21 38.7 0 ‐0.21 4 0.000 100.00 Stabilized
26‐3‐18 14‐4‐18 MT 0+310 38.7 0 40.8 0.11 0.11 19 0.111
14‐4‐18 19‐4‐18 MT 0+310 40.8 0.11 40.7 0.02 ‐0.09 5 ‐0.020 81.82 Not Stabilized
19‐4‐18 27‐4‐18 MT 0+310 40.7 0.02 41.3 0.07 0.05 8 0.075 250.00 Stabilized
CO‐23
20‐3‐18 22‐3‐18 MT 0+420 1.1 0.17 0.3 0.4 0.23 2 ‐0.400 135.29 Stabilized
22‐3‐18 26‐3‐18 MT 0+420 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.05 ‐0.35 4 0.050 87.50 Stabilized
26‐3‐18 14‐4‐18 MT 0+420 0.5 0.05 1.6 0.06 0.01 19 0.058 20.00 Not stabilized
14‐4‐18 19‐4‐18 MT 0+420 1.6 0.06 0.9 0.14 0.08 5 ‐0.140 133.33 Stabilized
19‐4‐18 20‐4‐18 MT 0+420 0.9 0.14 0.5 0.4 0.26 1 ‐0.400 185.71 Stabilized
20‐4‐18 27‐4‐18 MT 0+420 0.5 0.4 0.9 0.06 ‐0.34 7 0.057 85.00 Stabilized
CO‐34
20‐3‐18 22‐3‐18 MT 0+420 3.5 1.03 0.8 2.7 0.4 2 ‐1.350 38.83 Not Stabilized
26‐3‐18 14‐4‐18 MT 0+420 3.1 0.1 5.1 0.11 0.1 19 0.105 100.00 Stabilized
14‐4‐18 19‐4‐18 MT 0+420 5.1 0.11 3.3 0.36 0.1 5 ‐0.360 90.91 Stabilized
20‐4‐18 27‐4‐18 MT 0+420 3.1 0.2 3.8 0.1 0.1 7 0.100 50.00 Stabilized
CO‐24
20‐3‐18 22‐3‐18 MT 0+420 2.9 0.43 2.4 0.25 ‐0.18 2 ‐0.250 41.86 Stabilized
22‐3‐18 26‐3‐18 MT 0+420 2.4 0.25 3.9 0.38 0.13 4 0.375 52.00 Stabilized
26‐3‐18 14‐4‐18 MT 0+420 3.9 0.38 7.1 0.17 ‐0.21 19 0.168 55.26 Stabilized
14‐4‐18 19‐4‐18 MT 0+420 7.1 0.17 5.9 2.4 2.23 5 ‐0.240 1311.76 Stabilized
19‐4‐18 20‐4‐18 MT 0+420 5.9 2.4 6.2 0.3 ‐2.1 1 0.300 87.50 Stabilized
CO‐23
19‐4‐18 20‐4‐18 MT 0+495 0 0 0.1 0.1 0.1 1 0.100
CO‐34
19‐4‐18 20‐4‐18 MT 0+495 0 0 0.6 0.6 0.6 1 0.600
20‐4‐18 27‐4‐18 MT 0+495 0.6 0.6 1.9 0.19 ‐0.41 7 0.186 68.33 Stabilized
CO‐24
19‐4‐18 20‐4‐18 MT 0+495 0 0 0.3 0.3 0.3 1 0.300
20‐4‐18 27‐4‐18 MT 0+495 0.3 0.3 0.6 0.04 ‐0.26 7 0.043 86.67 Stabilized

9.4b West Portal Egress Tunnel (Face - 1).

CONVERGENCE VELOCITY ‐ Egress Tunnel ( Western portal) at Ch.0+595, 0+810,0+930,1+030 and 1+130
Date CHAINAGE(m) DIFFERENCE

DAY 1 VELOCITY DAY 1 DAY 2 VELOCITY DAY 2 VELOC DAY 2 ALLOWED NO LESS
TIME INCREASE DAYS Results
MM MM/DAY MM MM/DAY VELOCITY MM/DAY CHECK THAN
STABILIZATION VELOCITY
FROM TO PERCENTAGE %
CO‐13
14‐4‐18 27‐4‐18 ET 0+595 1.5 0 1.3 0.02 0.02 13 ‐0.015
CO‐35
14‐4‐18 27‐4‐18 ET 0+595 1.4 0.01 2.1 0.05 0.04 13 0.054 400.00 Stabilized
CO‐15
14‐4‐18 27‐4‐18 ET 0+595 3.1 0.02 3.3 0.02 0 13 0.015 0.00 Not stabilized
CO‐13
10‐3‐18 15‐3‐18 ET 0+810 0.9 0.03 1 0.02 ‐0.01 5 0.020 33.33 40 Not stabilized
15‐3‐18 26‐3‐18 ET 0+810 1 0.02 1.1 0.01 ‐0.01 11 0.009 50.00 Stabilized
CO‐35
10‐3‐18 15‐3‐18 ET 0+810 1.8 0.03 1.9 0.02 ‐0.01 5 0.020 33.33 Not stabilized
15‐3‐18 26‐3‐18 ET 0+810 1.9 0.02 2.5 0.05 0.03 11 0.055 150.00 Stabilized
26‐3‐18 30‐3‐18 ET 0+810 2.5 0.05 2.6 0.03 ‐0.02 4 0.025 40.00 Stabilized
30‐3‐18 14‐4‐18 ET 0+810 2.6 0.03 2.6 0 ‐0.03 15 0.000 100.00 Stabilized
CO‐15
26‐3‐18 30‐3‐18 ET 0+810 1.8 0.05 2.1 0.08 0.03 4 0.075 60.00 Stabilized
30‐3‐18 14‐4‐18 ET 0+810 2.1 0.08 2.3 0.01 ‐0.07 15 0.013 87.50 Stabilized
CO‐13
15‐3‐18 26‐3‐18 ET 0+930 2.1 0.08 2.7 0.05 ‐0.03 11 0.055 37.50 Not stabilized
26‐3‐18 30‐3‐18 ET 0+930 2.7 0.05 2.5 0.05 0 4 ‐0.050 0.00 Not stabilized
30‐3‐18 14‐4‐18 ET 0+930 2.5 0.05 2.6 0.01 ‐0.04 15 0.007 80.00 Stabilized
14‐4‐18 27‐4‐18 ET 0+930 2.6 0.01 2.8 0.02 0.01 13 0.015 100.00 Stabilized
CO‐35
15‐3‐18 26‐3‐18 ET 0+930 0.5 0.02 0.8 0.03 0.01 11 0.027 50.00 Stabilized
26‐3‐18 30‐3‐18 ET 0+930 0.8 0.03 0.8 0 ‐0.03 4 0.000 100.00 Stabilized
30‐3‐18 14‐4‐18 ET 0+930 0.8 0 0.9 0.01 0.01 15 0.007
14‐4‐18 27‐4‐18 ET 0+930 0.9 0.01 1.1 0.02 0.01 13 0.015 100.00 Stabilized
CO‐15
15‐3‐18 26‐3‐18 ET 0+930 2 0.04 1.9 0.01 ‐0.03 11 ‐0.009 75.00 Stabilized
26‐3‐18 30‐3‐18 ET 0+930 1.9 0.01 1.8 0.03 0.02 4 ‐0.025 200.00 Stabilized
30‐3‐18 14‐4‐18 ET 0+930 1.8 0.03 2.4 0.04 0.01 15 0.040 33.33 Not stabilized
14‐4‐18 27‐4‐18 ET 0+930 2.4 0.04 1.4 0.08 0.04 13 ‐0.077 100.00 Stabilized
CO‐13
30‐3‐18 14‐4‐18 ET 1+030 0.6 0.13 0.8 0.4 0.27 15 0.0133 207.69 Stabilized
14‐4‐18 20‐4‐18 ET 1+030 0.4 0.27 0.9 0.02 ‐0.25 6 0.0833 92.59 Stabilized
20‐4‐18 27‐4‐18 ET 1+030 0.9 0.02 1.6 0.1 0.08 7 0.1000 400.00 Stabilized
CO‐35
26‐3‐18 30‐3‐18 ET 1+030 0.3 0.01 0.5 0.05 0.04 4 0.0500 400.00 Stabilized
30‐3‐18 14‐4‐18 ET 1+030 0.5 0.05 0.4 0.01 ‐0.04 15 ‐0.0067 80.00 Stabilized
14‐4‐18 20‐4‐18 ET 1+030 0.5 0.05 0.4 0 ‐0.05 6 ‐0.0167 100.00 Stabilized
20‐4‐18 27‐4‐18 ET 1+030 0.4 0 0.8 0.06 0.06 7 0.0571
CO‐15
26‐3‐18 30‐3‐18 ET 1+030 0.3 0.01 0.4 0.03 0.02 4 0.0250 200.00 Stabilized
30‐3‐18 14‐4‐18 ET 1+030 0.4 0.03 0.4 0 ‐0.03 15 0.0000 100.00 Stabilized
14‐4‐18 20‐4‐18 ET 1+030 0.4 0 0.8 0.07 0.07 6 0.0667
20‐4‐18 27‐4‐18 ET 1+030 0.8 0.07 1.9 0.16 0.09 7 0.1571 128.57 Stabilized
CO‐13
19‐4‐18 20‐4‐18 ET 1+130 0 0 0.3 0.3 0.3 1 0.3000
20‐4‐18 27‐4‐18 ET 1+130 0.3 0.3 0.8 0.07 ‐0.23 7 0.0714 76.67 Stabilized
CO‐35
19‐4‐18 20‐4‐18 ET 1+130 0 0 0.1 0.1 0.1 1 0.1000
20‐4‐18 27‐4‐18 ET 1+130 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.03 ‐0.07 7 0.0000 70.00 Stabilized
CO‐35
19‐4‐18 20‐4‐18 ET 1+130 0 0 0.1 0.1 0.1 1 0.1000
20‐4‐18 27‐4‐18 ET 1+130 0.1 0.1 1.1 0.14 0.04 7 0.1429 40.00 Stabilized

9.6 – Convergence Sections of MT from SSTL-ITNL

10.-Quality Control and Quality Assurance. Tests done in April-2018
10.1-Shotcrete Core Compressive Strength (Panel) West Portal (Main Tunnel)
Date of Type of Average Comp. Strength (M Pa) Results Chainage

Casting Shotcrete
1Days 3Days 7Days 28Days From To
26.03.18 PFRS 27.03.18 29.03.18 02.04.18 23.04.18 Pass (In Meter)F‐3
16.27 21.22 34.85 43.21 3696.0 3699.0
16.46 21.01 35.80 37.61 280.0 315.0
15.48 20.00 36.24 44.29 907.9 909.4
15.93 20.10 35.82 45.32 3347.0 3341.0
15.35 21.31 34.56 45.20 880.70 881.67
25.04.18 PFRS 26.04.18 28.04.18 02.05.18 23.05.18 Awaited (In Meter)F‐3
15.13 20.06 34.12 - 3802.0 3805.0
19.21 22.56 35.03 - 3244.0 3238.0
20.29 25.51 35.36 - 6401.0 6400.0
16.51 22.91 36.38 - 542.0 543.0
15.27 20.77 37.02 - 3373.0 3380.0
15.68 20.24 35.93 - 625.70 627.10
15.94 20.99 36.18 - 3285.70 3290.0
15.37 21.10 36.30 - 3292.0 3295.0
15.31 20.61 35.43 42.15 506.0 508.0
14.83 23.33 36.00 42.48 450.7 452.2
16.29 22.31 36.20 42.73 3616.0 3620.0

10.2-Shotcrete Core Compressive Strength (Panel) West Portal (Escape Tunnel)
Date of Type of Average Comp. Strength (M Pa) Results Chainage

Casting Shotcrete
1Days 3Days 7Days 28Days From To
27.04.18 PFRS 28.04.18 30.04.18 04.05.18 25.05.18 Awaited VT ET (F-2)
15.11 20.85 - - 3302.0 3304.0
24.04.18 PFRS 25.04.18 27.04.18 01.05.18 22.05.18 Awaited WP (F-1)
15.36 22.28 33.57 - 1252.15 1255.5
17.10 22.16 35.22 - 3652.0 3658.0
19.04.18 PFRS 20.04.18 22.04.18 26.04.18 07.05.18 Awaited EP (F-4)
17.42 22.41 34.85 - 6312.0 6313.0
09.04.18 PFRS 10.04.18 12.04.18 16.04.18 07.05.18 Awaited EP (F-4)
15.67 22.81 36.19 - 6335.0 6336.0
15.04 20.94 37.20 - 3618.0 3624.0
05.04.18 PFRS 06.04.18 08.04.18 12.04.18 03.05.18 Awaited WP (F-1)
15.40 21.08 35.32 - 1176.0 1182.0
17.03.18 PFRS 18.03.18 20.03.18 24.03.18 14.04.18 Pass WP (F-1)
15.32 19.87 36.05 44.92 1102.15 1106.5
14.03.18 PFRS 15.03.18 17.03.18 21.03.18 11.04.18 Pass VT-ET(F-3)
15.36 19.39 34.70 45.02 3540.0 3548.0
10.03.18 PFRS 11.03.18 13.03.18 17.03.18 07.04.18 Pass VT-ET(F-2)
16.01 20.74 31.36 44.77 3443.0 3447.0
08.03.18 PFRS 09.03.18 11.03.18 15.03.18 05.04.18 Pass WP (F-1)
15.84 22.79 33.36 45.25 1066.50 1068.50
23.03.18 PFRS 24.03.18 26.03.18 30.03.18 20.04.18 Pass VT-ET(F-2)
15.34 20.80 34.68 45.41 3408.0 3414.0

10.3-CORE THICKNESS OF SHOTCRETE (MAIN TUNNEL)
Sr. No. Date Location Chainage of Observed Required Remarks

Shotcrete Thickness Thickness (mm)
Core (mm)
1 28.04.18 EP MT(F-4) 11.5(RHS) 420 300 OK
2 28.04.18 EP MT (F-4) 13.5(RHS) 350 300 OK
3 28.04.18 EP MT (F-4) 13.5(RHS) 400 300 OK
4 27.04.18 VT MT (F-3) 3800 (LHS) 165 100 OK
5 27.04.18 VT MT (F-3) 3800 (LHS) 155 100 OK
6 27.04.18 VT MT (F-3) 3800 (LHS) 160 100 OK
7 27.04.18 VT MT (F-3) 3800 (LHS) 160 100 OK
8 27.04.18 VT MT (F-3) 3800 (RHS) 155 100 OK
9 18.04.18 WP MT (F‐1) 460.0(LHS) 300 250 OK
10 18.04.18 WP MT (F‐1) 460.0(LHS) 280 250 OK
11 18.04.18 WP MT (F‐1) 490.0(RHS) 350 250 OK
12 18.04.18 WP MT (F‐1) 460.0(RHS) 275 250 OK
13 18.04.18 WP MT (F‐1) 520.0(LHS) 310 250 OK
14 18.04.18 WP MT (F‐1) 460.0(LHS) 285 250 OK
15 13.04.18 WP (MT (F-5) 591.0(RHS) 200 150 OK
16 13.04.18 WP (MT (F-5) 591.0(RHS) 195 150 OK
17 13.04.18 WP (MT (F-5) 610.0(LHS) 210 150 OK
18 13.04.18 WP (MT (F-5) 610.0(LHS) 200 150 OK

10.4-Core Thickness of Shotcrete W.P (Escape Tunnel)
Sr. No. Date Location Chainage of Observed Required Remarks

Shotcrete Thickness Thickness (mm)
Core (mm)
1 27.04.18 VT -ET(F-3) 3657.0(RHS) 160 150.0 OK
2 27.04.18 VT -ET(F-3) 3657.0(RHS) 180 150.0 OK
3 27.04.18 VT -ET(F-3) 3664.0(LHS) 170 150.0 OK
4 27.04.18 VT -ET(F-3) 3664.0(LHS) 175 150.0 OK

5 24.04.18 EP-ET(F-4) 71.0(LHS) 440 200 OK
6 24.04.18 EP-ET(F-4) 72.0(LHS) 300 200 OK
7 24.04.18 EP-ET(F-4) 78.0(LHS) 450 200 OK
8 13.04.18 WP ET (F-1) 1152.0(LHS) 300 200 OK
9 13.04.18 WP ET (F-1) 1152.0(LHS) 300 200 OK
10 13.04.18 WP ET (F-1) 1175.0(LHS) 300 200 OK
11 13.04.18 WP ET (F-1) 1175.0(LHS) 260 200 OK
10.4- Penetrometer Test – West Portal (Main Tunnel-All faces )
Date of Time in Average Comp. Required Chainage Results

Casting Minutes Strength (M Pa) Comp. Strength From To
25.04.18 6 0.202 0.20 3802.0 3805.0 VT-MT (F-3)
10 0.255 0.25 PASS
30 0.354 0.35
60 0.513 0.50
19.04.18 6 0.212 0.20 3244.0 3238.0 VT-MT (F-2)
10 0.250 0.25 PASS
30 0.363 0.35
60 0.521 0.50
19.04.18 6 0.212 0.20 6401.0 6400.0 EP-MT (F-4)
10 0.260 0.25 PASS
30 0.361 0.35
60 0.517 0.50
17.04.18 6 0.214 0.20 542.0 543.0 WP-MT (F-1)

10 0.259 0.25 PASS
30 0.358 0.35
60 0.516 0.50
06.04.18 6 0.209 0.20 625.0 627.10 WP-MT (F-5)
10 0.252 0.25 PASS
30 0.361 0.35
60 0.515 0.50
04.04.18 6 0.201 0.20 3785.0 3790.0 VT-MT (F-2)
10 0.251 0.25 PASS
30 0.353 0.35
60 0.502 0.50
03.04.18 6 0.200 0.20 3292.0 3295.0 VT-MT (F-2)
10 0.263 0.25 PASS
30 0.368 0.35
60 0.521 0.50
02.04.18 6 0.203 0.20 506.0 508.0 WP-MT (F-1)
10 0.260 0.25 PASS
30 0.360 0.35
60 0.503 0.50
10.5- Penetrometer Test – West Portal (Escape Tunnel)
Date of Time in Average Comp. Required Chainage Results

Casting Minutes Strength(MPa) Comp. From To
Strength
24.04.18 6 0.201 0.20 1252.15 1255.5 WP ET (F-1)
10 0.264 0.25 PASS
30 0.367 0.35
60 0.512 0.50
19.04.18 6 0.206 0.20 6313.0 6312.0 EP ET (F-4)
10 0.251 0.25 PASS
30 0.361 0.35
60 0.575 0.50
09.04.18 6 0.202 0.20 6335.0 6334.0 EP ET (F-4)
10 0.277 0.25 PASS
30 0.367 0.35
60 0.514 0.50
08.04.18 6 0.209 0.20 3618.0 3624.0 VT ET (F-3)
10 0.251 0.25 PASS
30 0.361 0.35
60 0.516 0.50

07.04.18 6 0.210 0.20 3373.0 3380.0 VT ET (F-2)
10 0.260 0.25 PASS
30 0.360 0.35
60 0.510 0.50
05.04.18 6 0.202 0.20 1176.0 1182.0 WP ET (F-1)
10 0.252 0.25 PASS
30 0.352 0.35
60 0.507 0.50
27.04.18 6 0.207 0.20 3304.0 3302.0 VT ET (F-2)
10 0.251 0.25 PASS
30 0.361 0.35
60 0.516 0.50
10.6- Concrete Cube Strength
Date of Grade of Test Results Test Results Results Location

Casting Concrete (7 Days) (28 Days)
Date Strength Date Strength
(MPa) (MPa) From To
24.03.18 M15/A20 31.03.18 22.36 21.04.18 29.82 Pass MAR PCC Ch:
0+374 – 0+383
23.03.18 M15/A20 30.03.18 23.48 20.04.18 31.82 Pass MAR PCC Ch:
0+268 -0+292
22.03.18 M15/A20 23.03.18 21.44 19.04.18 31.76 Pass MAR PCC
Ch:0+600 – 0+625
21.03.18 M15/A20 28.03.18 21.04 18.04.18 28.32 Pass MAR PCC Ch:
0+625 – 0+650
20.03.18 M15/A20 27.03.18 22.22 17.04.18 30.19 Pass Wall Concrete Ch:
4+531 – 4+550
20.03.18 M15/A20 27.03.18 21.90 17.04.18 30.34 Pass RE Wall PCC
20.03.18 M15/A20 27.03.18 22.07 17.04.18 28.17 Pass RE Wall Concrete
Ch: 0+656 –
0+615
03.04.18 M35/A20 10.04.18 35.04 01.05.18 54.58 Pass Bridge A-1
02.04.18 M35/A20 09.04.18 35.17 30.04.18 54.16 Pass Bridge A-1
30.03.18 M25/A20 06.04.18 25.30 27.04.18 36.76 Pass Box Culvert (MAR)
26.03.18 M25/A20 02.04.18 23.64 23.4.18 36.96 Pass Box Culvert (MAR)
06.04.18 M35/A20 06.04.18 37.19 13.04.18 43.22 Pass RE Panel
29.03.18 M35/A20 05.04.18 32.56 26.04.18 44.70 Pass RE Panel

10.7- Shotcrete Site Core Strength (Individuals of Five Numbers Core)
In‐Situ Core Grade of Test Results (28 Days) Results Location

Date Concrete Date Strength
(MPa)
29.03.18 M-30/A10 26.04.18 32.72 Pass WP ET(F‐1)Ch:1152.0(LHS)
16.03.18 M-30/A10 13.04.18 37.73 Pass WP ET (F‐1) Ch: 1101.0
16.03.18 M-30/A10 13.04.18 37.89 Pass VT ET(F‐3) Ch:3588.0
13.03.18 M-30/A10 10.04.18 38.66 Pass VT ET (F‐2) Ch: 3442.0 –
3447.0
13.03.18 M-30/A10 10.04.18 38.35 Pass VT ET(F-3) Ch:3550.0
06.03.18 M-30/A10 03.04.18 38.19 Pass WP ET(F‐1) Ch: 1063.0
05.03.18 M-30/A10 02.04.18 37.96 Pass VT MT (F‐2) Ch: 3388.0
10.8- Grouting 1 Western Portal – Fore pole Pipe (Main Tunnel & Escape Tunnel)
Date of Test Results(7 Days) Test Results(28 Days) Results Location

Casting Date Strength Date Strength From To
(MPa) (MPa)
20.04.18 27.04.18 32.90 17.05.18 - Awaited WP MT (F-1) Ch: 545.5
17.04.18 24.04.18 31.91 15.05.18 - Awaited EP MT (F-4) Ch:9.0(Forepole)
08.04.18 15.04.18 33.10 05.05.18 - Awaited WP MT (F-1) Ch: 633.0
06.04.18 13.04.18 34.13 04.05.18 - Awaited EP MT (F-4 SD) Ch 9.0
04.04.18 11.04.18 32.65 04.05.18 - Awaited VT MT (F-2) Ch : 3284.0 (SN)
03.04.18 10.04.18 34.93 01.05.18 - Awaited WP MT (F-1) Ch: 508.0 (SN)
02.04.18 09.04.18 35.44 30.04.18 44.24 Pass VT MT (F-2) Ch: 3292.0(SN)
24.03.18 31.03.18 34.53 21.04.18 44.97 Pass WP MT (F-5) Ch: 922.0 (SN)
22.03.18 29.03.18 34.77 19.04.18 43.69 Pass VT MT (F-2) Ch: 3326 (SN)
20.03.18 27.03.18 34.16 17.04.18 43.68 Pass WP MT (F-1) Ch: 484.0 (SN)
13.03.18 20.03.18 64.13 10.04.18 42.72 Pass VT MT (F-2) Ch: 3360.0(SN)
13.03.18 20.03.18 33.70 10.04.18 43.74 Pass WP MT (F-1) Ch: 469.2 (SN)
08.03.18 15.03.18 33.70 05.04.18 43.08 Pass WP MT (F-5) Ch: 872.0 (SN)
07.03.18 14.03.18 35.56 04.04.18 43.92 Pass WP MT (F-1) Ch: 452.5 (SN)
06.03.18 13.03.18 36.00 03.04.18 44.41 Pass VT MT (F-2) Ch: 3389.5.0(SN)
05.03.18 12.03.18 35.98 02.04.18 43.98 Pass WP MT (F-1) Ch: 447.7 (SN)
Date of Test Results(7 Days) Test Results(28 Days) Results Location

Casting
Date Strength Date Strength From To
(MPa) (MPa)
21.04.18 28.04.18 31.88 18.05.18 - Awaited EP ET(F-4) Ch:102.0 (SD)
05.04.18 12.04.18 35.45 03.05.18 - Awaited WP ET (F-1) Ch:1178.15(SN)
24.03.18 01.04.18 34.40 22.04.18 46.41 Pass VT ET (F-3) Ch: 3568.0(SN)
23.03.18 30.03.18 35.50 20.04.18 44.56 Pass WP ET (F-1)Ch: 1126.5 (SN)
12.03.18 19.03.18 35.82 09.04.18 44.18 Pass VT ET (F-3) Ch: 3534.0 (SN)
09.03.18 16.03.18 35.62 06.04.18 44.97 Pass VT ET (F-2) Ch: 3444.0 (SN)
06.03.18 13.03.18 35.60 03.04.18 44.38 Pass WP ET (F-1)Ch: 1058.0 (SN)

10.9. - Rock Pull-Out Test. --
Date of Chainage In Meter/Location Type Length Max. Disp.(MM) Result

Testing Rock of Rock Load
Bolt Bolt (M) Applied
(T)
02.04.18 WP MT F-1 ( Ch:506.6-10’OC) Swellex 4.0 16.0 12.0 Pass

06.04.18 VT ET F-3 ( Ch:3595.5-10’OC) Swellex 3.0 16.0 11.0 Pass
10.04.18 WP MT F-5 ( Ch:598.0-3’OC) SN 4.0 16.0 13.0 Pass
10.04.18 WP MT F-5 ( Ch:608.0-7’OC) SN 6.0 16.0 54.0 Fail
10.04.18 WP MT F-5 ( Ch:599.5-4’OC) SN 4.0 16.0 17.0 Pass
11.04.18 WP MT F-1 ( Ch:524.5.0-5’OC) Swellex 4.0 16.0 28.0 Pass

11.04.18 WP MT F-1( Ch:527.5.0-10’OC) Swellex 4.0 16.0 16.0 Pass
24.04.18 WP MT F-1( Ch:555.0-9’OC) Swellex 6.0 16.0 20.0 Pass
30.04.18 EP ET F- 4 (Ch: 112.5- 2’OC) Swellex 3.0 16.0 13.0 Pass
30.04.18 EP ET F- 4 (Ch: 101.0- 7’OC) SD 6.0 19.0 19.0 Pass
30.04.18 EP ET F- 4 (Ch: 102.0- 7’OC) SD 6.0 19.0 21.0 Pass
10.10. - Aggregate Impact Value (AIV)
Source of Type of Result

Date of Testing Sample Location
Material Material %
25.04.18 Apco Crusher Plant V.T Tunnel Muck 20 mm 12.35

10.11. - Abrasion Value of Aggregate
Abrasion
Date of Sample Source of Type of Value of
Aggregate Results Remarks
Testing Location Material Material
25.04.18 Apco Crusher V.T Tunnel 20 mm 12.08 Pass Conforming

Plant Muck IS
2386/383
25.04.18 Apco Crusher V.T Tunnel 10 mm 14.10 Pass
Plant Muck

Plant Muck IS
2386/383
Plant Muck
10.12. - Aggregate Crushing Value.
Crushing
Date of Sample Source of Type of Value of
Aggregate Results Remarks

Plant Muck IS

25.04.18 Apco Crusher V.T Tunnel 10 mm 12.11 Pass 2386/383
Plant Muck

Plant Muck IS
2386/383
Plant Muck
10.13. - Flakiness and Elongation Test (FI & EI)
Date of Sample Source of Type of Flakiness Elongation Results Remarks

25.04.18 Apco V.T 20 mm 11.82 9.82 Pass
Crusher Tunnel
Plant Muck Conforming IS
25.04.18 Apco V.T 10 mm 10.69 9.30 Pass 2386/383
Crusher Tunnel
Plant Muck
09.04.18 Apco V.T 20 mm 11.87 10.02 Pass
Crusher Tunnel
Plant Muck Conforming IS
09.04.18 Apco V.T 10 mm 11.06 9.49 Pass 2386/383
Crusher Tunnel
Plant Muck
10.14- Grading Analysis Crusher Dust
Date of Sample Source FM Dust Results Remarks

Testing Location of Content
Material (%)
25.04.18 A5 V.T 2.74 11.30 Pass Conforming IS 2720
(Batching Tunnel Part-4

Plant Muck
Location)
14.04.18 A5 V.T 2.77 11.10 Pass Conforming IS
(Batching Tunnel 2386/383
Plant Muck
Location)
09.04.18 A5 V.T 2.76 12.60 Pass Conforming IS
(Batching Tunnel 2386/383
Plant Muck
Location)
10.15- Size 20 mm
Sampling Date of Sample Source Sieve % Specified Remarks

Date Testing Location of Size(mm) Passing Limits
Material
24.04.18 25.04.18 A5 25.0 100 100
(Batching V.T 20.0 96.35 85-100

Plant Tunnel
Location) Muck 10.0 9.68 0-20 Conforming
IS
4.75 1.61 0-5 2386/383
A5 25.0 100 100
08.04.18 09.04.18 (Batching V.T 20.0 94.89 85-100

Plant Tunnel
Location) Muck 10.0 10.17 0-20
4.75 1.50 0-5

10.16- Size 10 mm
Sampling Date of Sample Source Sieve % Specified Remarks

Date Testing Location of Size(mm) Passing Limits
Material
24.04.18 25.04.18 A5 12.5 100 100
(Batching V.T 10.0 94.45 85-100

Plant Tunnel
Location) Muck 4.75 14.00 0-20 Conforming
IS
2.36 1.57 0-5 2386/383
A5 12.5 100 100
08.04.18 09.04.18 (Batching V.T 10.0 93.80 85-100

Plant Tunnel
Location) Muck 4.75 12.95 0-20
2.36 1.06 0-5
10.17- Cement Test. Physical Properties.
Date of Grade & Source Standard Initial Final Fineness Soundness

Testing Consistency Setting Setting
53 OPC, ACC Time(Min) Time(Min)
Week Month Year
‐ - - - - - - - -
53 OPC, Ambuja
05.04.18 13 03 18 28.5 160 285 1.68 1.01
53 OPC, Ultratech

18.04.18 13 03 2018 27.5 175 315 1.48 1.02
Conforming IS 4031 –Part-I,III,IV,V and IS 8112
10.18- Compressive Strength of Cement.
Date of Date of Average Compressive Minimum Compressive

Casting Testing(28 Days) Strength (MPa) Strength (Limits)
ACC –OPC -53 Grade –IS 12269
Ambuja –OPC -53 Grade –IS 12269

05.04.18 02.05.18 Awaited 53.00
Ultratech-OPC -53 Grade-IS 12269
29.03.18 26.04.18 58.94 53.00
10.19‐ Field Density Approach Roads
Test Layer Number Chainage Average Result

Date Compaction
19.04.18 22nd Layer (Embk‐backfill) 0+830 ‐0+850 98.96 Pass
19.04.18 14th Layer (Embk‐backfill) 4+531 – 4+550 98.13 Pass
09.04.18 13th Layer (Embk‐backfill) 0+599 – 0+671 96.29 Pass
04.04.18 11st Layer ( Embk‐backfill) 0+593 ‐ 0+671 97.84 Pass

03.04.18 03rd Layer ( Embk‐backfill) 0+272 – 0+308 97.84 Pass
27.04.18 11th Layer( VT RE Wall) 820 ‐ 830 98.16 Pass
12.03.18 24th Layer( VT RE Wall) 830 ‐ 850 98.42 Pass

11. - GEOLOGICAL MAPPING OF TUNNEL FACE
MAIN TUNNEL
Face 1

Face 2

Face 3

Face 4

ESCAPE TUNNEL Face 1

Face 2

Face 3

Face 4

12. - SAFETY
12.1 –INCIDENTE REPORT SNOWSLIDE (MINOR AVALANCHE) AT EASTERN PORTAL AT THE

FRONTAL SLOPE.

12.2 – COMPLIANCE RELATED TO EXPOSEED STEEL PARTS IN BODY OF EXPLOSIVES
TRANSPORTATION VEHICLES

13.- ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS
Chapter-1
1. AMBIENT AIR:
As per reports submitted Concentrations of NO2, SO2 and Co, SPM and RSPM have been
recorded slightly higher during March;2018 monitoring compared to December;2017
Environment monitoring from all the regularly monitored sampling station Viz; batching plant
(A5), Ventilation Portal, Western Portal and Eastern portal. Further all the recorded
concentrations of the samples during April-2018 are very lower compared to permissible limits
set by Indian standards.
Permisable Limits
Ambient Air
Batching Plant‐ December‐2017
250
Ventilation Tunnel‐ December‐
2017
200 Western Portal‐December‐2017
Concentration
Crusher Plant‐December‐2017
150
Batching Plant‐March2018
100
50
0
SO2 NO2 CO SPM RSPM
Parameater
Graph-1: Ambient Air

1. AMBIENT NOISE:
As per submitted reports; Environment Monitoring readings for Ambient Noise during April-2018
monitoring has been recorded slightly higher compared to December;2017 monitoring from all
the sampling locations except for Western portal (Day); where Ambient Noise monitoring
readings are slightly lower than the numerical of Ambient Noise recorded during
December;2017 Environment Monitoring.
Ambient Noise
Eastern Portal- March2018
Crusher plant-March2018
West portal- March2018
NOISE NIGHT
Ventilation Tunnel- March2018
Parameater
Batching Plant- March2018

Crusher Plant-December-2017
Western Portal-December-2017
NOISE DAY
Ventilation Tunnel- December-2017
Batching Plant-December-2017
permisable limits
0 5 1015
20253035
40455055
60 65 70 75
Concentration
Graph-2: Ambient Noise

2. DG NOISE:
Only three (4) DG sets have been monitored for the noise levels; however as per consent order
issued by J&K state Pollution Control Board-Kashmir, dated 28/06/2016; 11 DG sets are
running at site. As per your submitted report noise levels for 600 KV- western portal and 500 KV
Eastern portal DG sets are slightly higher than December;2017 readings. Further all the
analysed numerical for March; 2018 Environment Monitoring are good below the permissible
limits set by Indian Standards

DG Noise 500KV- Ventilation Tunnel- March2018
500KV- Eastern Portal- March2018
600KV-Western Portal- March2018
320KV- Batching plant- March2018
NOISE (dB) 500KV-Ventilation Portal- December-2017
500KV-West portal- December-2017
320KV-A5 Site December-2017
Permisable Limit
0 5 10 15
20 25 30 35 40 45 50
55 60 65 70
75
Concentration
Graph-3: DG Noise
3. WASTE WATER:
(a) Crusher & Batching Plant Sedimentation Tanks:
As per your submitted reports; Concentrations for TDS, TSS and COD has been recorded
higher compared to December; 2017 readings from the locations Sedimentation tank inlet
Crusher plant and Sedimentation Tank inlet batching plant. The concentrations of TSS,
TDS and COD are also recorded slightly higher at the location crusher plant and COD has
also been recorded from Batching plant location, when compared with the analysed
readings from December; 2017 Environment monitoring. Further all the recorded
parameters are well below the permissible limits set by Indian Standards.

2250 Crusher & Batching Plant‐ Sedimentation Tanks Permisable Limit
2000 Sedimentation Tank Inlet
1750 Cresher Plant December‐2017
Sedimentation Tank Outlet
1500 Cresher Plant‐December 2017
Concentration
Sedimentation Tank inlet
1250 Batching Plant‐December2017
Sedimentatio tank inlet‐
1000
Crusher Plant‐ March2018
750 Sedimentation Tank Outlet‐
Crusher Plant March2018
500 Sedimentatio Tank Inlet‐
Batching Plant March2018
250 Sedimentation Tank Outlet‐
0 Batching Plant‐ March2018
Sedimentation Tank outlet‐
Ventilation Portal March 2018
Sedimentation Tank Inlet‐
Ventilation Portal‐ March2018
Parameater
Graph-4: Waste Water- Crusher& Batching Plant

(b) Ventilation & Western Tunnel - Sedimentation Tanks:
As per your submitted reports, the concentrations of TDS, COD at inlet of Ventilation and
Western Tunnel sedimentation tank are recorded slightly higher than December; 2017
recorded readings; however, are good below the permissible limits set by Indian Standards.
The concentrations TDS and COD are recorded slightly higher than December; 2016
readings at Batching Plant also TSS and TDS are also recorded higher than December;
2016 readings. However, all the readings for Ventilation and Western portal are good below
the permissible limits set by Indian Standards.

2250 Ventilation Portal & Western Portal‐ Sedimentation Tank
2000 Permisable Limit
1750
Sedimentation Tank Inlet VT‐
Concentration
1500 December2017
1250 Sedimentation Tank Outlet VT‐
December 2017
1000 Sedimentation Tank Outlet
750 Western Portal‐ December2017
500 Sedimentation Tank Inlet‐ Western
Portal‐ December‐2017
250 Sedimentation Tank outlet
0 Ventilation Portal‐March2018
Sedimentation tank Inlet‐
ventilation Portal March2018
Parameater Sedimentation Tank Inlet‐ Western
Portal‐March2018
Sedimentation Tank Outlet‐
Ventilation Portal‐ March2018
Graph-5: Waste Water- Ventilation & Western Tunnel

4. Drinking Water:
As per submitted Environment Monitoring report; TDS, Total Hardness and Total Alkalinity has
been recorded higher from the monitoring locations i.e. Workers mess and office when
compared to December;2017 monitoring numerical; further Calcium and Total Alkalinity has
been recorded higher compared to December; 2017 Environmental monitoring readings.
However, concentrations of all the analysed parameters are good below the permissible limits
set by Indian standards.

2100 water from workera & Officers Mess & Office
2000
1900 Permisable limits
1800
1700 Workers Mess‐December‐2017
1600
1500 Office‐December2017
1400
Concentration
1300 Officers Mess‐ December 2017
1200
1100 Workers Mess‐ March2018
1000
900 Office‐ March 2018
800
700 Officers Mess‐ March2018
600
500
400
300
200
100
0
Anionic…
Phenolic…
Residual Free…
Boron
Magnesium
Colour
TDS
Calcium
Chloride
Sulphate
Copper
Fluoride
Zinc
Turbidity
Total Hardness
Total Alkalinity
Parameater
Graph-6: Drinking Water- Workers and Officers Mess

5. SURFACE (RIVER) WATER:
6. As per reports submitted; All the parameters analysed for surface water quality are well below
the permissible limits set by Indian Standards. Parameters like TDS & Total Hardness is
showing slightly increase in the water samples taken from River Sindh when compared with the
numerical of the water samples taken during December;217 monitoring; however, all the
readings are good below the prescribed limits set by Indian Standards.

River Sindh Samples Permisable Limits
2400 Sindh River VT Site‐December2017
2200
2000 Sindh River A5 Site‐ December 2017
1800
1600 Sindh Rivere Near VT‐ March 2018
1400
Concentrations
Sindh River Near A5 Site‐ March2018
1200
1000
800
600
400
200
0
Parameater
Graph-7: SURFACE (RIVER) WATER

7. TUNNEL WATER:
Three parameters pH, Sodium and chloride are necessary while studying the effects of Quality
of water on the steel; out of these three parameters pH & sodium has not been analysed; due to
reasons better known to Client. All the parameters analysed from the water samples taken from
the Tunnel at chainage at RD-300mtr. Are good below the permissible limits set by Indian
Standards? Further the analysed parameters from tunnel water are not giving good outlook of
the nature of water coming through the tunnels as desired parameters have not been
determined. In the case of Chloride, the numerical are throwing down graph compared to
December; 2017 numerical; further the numerical for calcium are increasing significantly from
the December; 2017 Monitoring’s.

2100 Water Samples From Inside Tunnel
2000
1900 Permisable limits
1800
1700 RD650 mtr. December2017
1600
1500
1400 RD300 mtr. March2018
Concentrations
1300
1200
1100
1000
900
800
700
600
500
400
300
200
100
0
Parameaters
Graph-8: Ground Water from Tunnel

Chapter-2
Work Skilled:
1. Ventilation Duct Installation at Eastern Portal
Ventilation Duct installed for Eastern Portal; which is necessary as per as per Concession
agreement, Chapter: 6.7.2; Page 558; Para; 02.

Plate.1: Ventilation
Duct Installation at EP initiated
2. Water Samples collected by IE

Eleven (11) water samples have been taken from Ventilation, Western and Eastern Portal from
Sedimentation tanks in‐let, middle, out‐let and mixing points and from River Sindh. Samples will be
analyzed for Physio‐Chemical analysis. The details of sampling locations are as under.
1. From Inlet of Sedimentation Tank‐ Western Portal
2. From Centre (Inside) of Tank – Western Portal
3. From Out‐let of Sedimentation Tank‐ Western Portal
4. From Mixing point of Tunnel water with River Sindh‐ Western Portal
5. From River Sindh near Batching Plant
6. From Inlet of Sedimentation Tank‐ Ventilation Portal
7. From Centre of the Sedimentation Tank‐I (Ventilation Portal)
8. From Centre of the Sedimentation Tank‐ii (Ventilation Portal)
9. From Mixing of Tunnel Water with River Sindh (Ventilation Portal)
10. From Eastern Portal – Before Catchment area of the Project (Eastern Portal)
11. Drinking Water of Hotel Kullan
12. From Eastern Portal (Tunnel Water)
13. From Mixing point of Water ‐ Tunnel water with River Sindh – Eastern Portal

Plate:4. Waste Water Samples collected by IE
Chapter-3
Instant Gas Monitoring from Tunnels (Measurements below permissible limits):
Location Parameter Readings Permissible limits Remarks
Recorded
Oxygen 20.7% >19%
VENTILATION Carbon Dioxide (CO2) 900ppm <5000 ppm (0.5000%) From
Tunnel Carbon Monoxide (CO) 13ppm <50 ppm (0.0050%) Tunnel
(Up-to Cavern) Ammonia (NH3) 0ppm 100 ppm Middle
Methane 0ppm <1000 ppm (0.1000%)
NO2 1ppm <5 ppm (0.0005%)
Oxygen 20.8% >19%
Carbon Dioxide (CO2) 1200ppm <5000 ppm (0.5000%) From
WESTERN Carbon Monoxide (CO) 51ppm <50 ppm (0.0050%) Tunnel
PORTAL (ET) Ammonia (NH3) 0ppm 100 ppm Face
NO2 0.3ppm <5 ppm (0.0005%)
Oxygen 20.9% >19%
WESTERN Carbon Dioxide (CO2) 500ppm <5000 ppm (0.5000%)
PORTAL (MT) Carbon Monoxide (CO) 14ppm <50 ppm (0.0050%) From
Ammonia (NH3) 0ppm 100 ppm Tunnel
Methane 0ppm <1000 ppm (0.1000%) Face
NO2 0.3ppm <5 ppm (0.0005%)
Oxygen 20.9% >19%
WESTERN Carbon Dioxide (CO2) 700ppm <5000 ppm (0.5000%) From
PORTAL Carbon Monoxide (CO) 9ppm <50 ppm (0.0050%) Tunnel
(Face-F5) Ammonia (NH3) 0ppm 100 ppm Face
NO2 0.3ppm <5 ppm (0.0005%)
VENTILATION Oxygen 20.8% >19%

Tunnel Carbon Dioxide (CO2) 1200ppm <5000 ppm (0.5000%) From
(Face- F2) Carbon Monoxide (CO) 4ppm <50 ppm (0.0050%) Tunnel
Ammonia (NH3) 0ppm 100 ppm Face
NO2 1.0ppm <5 ppm (0.0005%)
NO2 0.2ppm <5 ppm (0.0005%)
(Escape Carbon Monoxide (CO) 4ppm <50 ppm (0.0050%) Tunnel
Towards Ammonia (NH3) 0ppm 100 ppm Face
Western) Methane 0ppm <1000 ppm (0.1000%)
NO2 0.7ppm <5 ppm (0.0005%)
Towards Face
Ammonia (NH3) 0ppm 100 ppm
Eastern)
NO2 0.2ppm <5 ppm (0.0005%)
Location Parameter Readings Permissible limits Remarks

Recorded
Oxygen 20.6% >19%
VENTILATION Carbon Dioxide (CO2) 1300ppm <5000 ppm (0.5000%) From
Tunnel Carbon Monoxide (CO) 170ppm <50 ppm (0.0050%) Tunnel
(Up-to Cavern) Ammonia (NH3) 0ppm 100 ppm Middle
Methane (CH4) 0ppm <1000 ppm (0.1000%)
NO2 0.2ppm <5 ppm (0.0005%)
Oxygen 20.9% >19%
Carbon Dioxide (CO2) 500ppm <5000 ppm (0.5000%) From
WESTERN Carbon Monoxide (CO) 0ppm <50 ppm (0.0050%) Tunnel
PORTAL (ET) Ammonia (NH3) 0ppm 100 ppm Face
NO2 0.3ppm <5 ppm (0.0005%)
Oxygen 20.8% >19%
WESTERN Carbon Dioxide (CO2) 600ppm <5000 ppm (0.5000%)
PORTAL (MT) Carbon Monoxide (CO) 5ppm <50 ppm (0.0050%) From
Ammonia (NH3) 0ppm 100 ppm Tunnel
Methane 0ppm <1000 ppm (0.1000%) Face
NO2 0.1ppm <5 ppm (0.0005%)
Oxygen 20.8% >19%
WESTERN Carbon Dioxide (CO2) -ppm <5000 ppm (0.5000%) From
PORTAL Carbon Monoxide (CO) -ppm <50 ppm (0.0050%) Tunnel

(Face-F5) Ammonia (NH3) -ppm 100 ppm Face
Methane -ppm <1000 ppm (0.1000%)
NO2 -ppm <5 ppm (0.0005%)
NO2 0.6ppm <5 ppm (0.0005%)
NO2 0.5ppm <5 ppm (0.0005%)
Western) Methane 0ppm <1000 ppm (0.1000%)
NO2 0.7ppm <5 ppm (0.0005%)
Eastern)
NO2 0.3ppm <5 ppm (0.0005%)

Chapter-4
Major Site Observations:
1. Oil drums are not being handled/stacked properly
Oil drums are not being handled & stored properly throughout the site locations thus is clear breach of
waste management plan of the project- which states at Chapter-7; having separate storage of oil &
grease further chapter-3 of waste management plan encourages for segregation of hazardous waste.
Further the said activity is also the breach of waste management plan Page 5 & page 8. Chemical
(ACCELERATOR) was noticed at various corners of the site. Concrete embankment area (Chemical
storage area) has to be raised; to stay steer clear from leakages if any and contamination of soil and
harm to human health. Further pointing out that this particular chemical can cause damage to central
nervous system (if swallowed) and is irritating to eyes, skin and respiratory system.

Plate: 1. Oil drums are not being handled/stacked properly
2.Work for Geotrel wall not being commenced for Dumping yard A3 and A6
Dumping of Much in dumping yard A3 and A6 is going on continual; however, Geotrel wall for the same
has neither been initiated nor planned yet. The said wall is very important; from environment point of
view; will prevent runoff of dumped muck into adjacent River Sindh. The said wall is obligatory for
dumping yards as recommended by Environment Management Plan (EMP) of the project: PP: 103;
Chapter: 1; section 1.1; line: 6&7 and Work Method Statement of Muck Disposal: PP: 9&10; Ref. No.
SSTL/PRJ/TEC/IE/137 and Forest clearance from Division forest officer Sindh Forest Division
Ganderbal (Government of Jammu and Kashmir); PP: 2; section: 5; line: 11-18.

Plate:2. Geotrel wall for Dumping yard A3 and A6
3.Water being Released into River Sindh

Water coming from different portals of the Tunnels is being released directly into River Sindh. The said
syndrome is ruthlessly going‐on despite numerous letters, objections and submitting minimum dimensions
for the sedimentation tank through letter Ref. no. 258/EPTISA/IE/SSTL/2018 on 7th April; 2018. The said
waters are highly turbid and could be carrying dangerous bushel of cement, admixture and accelerator as
same is mainly being used inside the tunnel.

Plate:3. Water being Released into River Sindh- Eastern, Western and Ventilation Portal

4.Improper Waste Management & Handling
Waste is not being managed & handled properly at Ventilation Portal; hence is breach of solid waste
management plan of Z-Morh project; which clearly states at Chapter-3line -5 and chapter-4: the waste
(garbage, refuse, sludge or any other waste) generated from the project area has to be segregated,
collected in different color-coded dust-bins at source and disposed-off through approved waste hauler.
The said act is also breach of Solid Waste Management Rules, 2016- section-4; subsection (a). It is
also breach of Indian Municipal Waste (Management & Handling) Rules, 27th September 1999 later
revised on 5th April; 2016.
Plate:4. Improper Waste Management & Handling

ANNEX 1: Letter to SSTL : Large water flow in Excavation Face 4 of ET (Eastern Portal)

ANNEX 2: Letter to SSTL Undercutting Sections

ANNEX 3: Letter to SSTL No achievement second cycle in good rock Tunnel excavation for Faces 2
and 3

ANNEX 4: : Letter to SSTL Measeurements of the EP Inclinometer

ANNEX 5: Letter to SSTL Outstanding NCR for Sedimentation tanks WP and EP

ANNEX 6: : Minutes of Meeting April 17th Site Visit NHIDCL

ANNEX 7 : Letter from NHIDCL CoS Omitting Hairpin Bend

ANNEX 8 : Letter to SSTL Convergences Clay Segment MT Ch 250 to 310

ANNEX 9 : MoM Meeting SSTL-Grusamar-IE on April 5th and April 27th 2018

1D April -2018
MPR Page 141

MPR April 2018 Jgs Rev1

Enviado por

Dados do documento

Título original

Direitos autorais

Formatos disponíveis

Compartilhar este documento

Compartilhar ou incorporar documento

Opções de compartilhamento

Você considera este documento útil?

Este conteúdo é inapropriado?

Direitos autorais:

Formatos disponíveis

MPR April 2018 Jgs Rev1

Enviado por

Direitos autorais:

Formatos disponíveis

MONTHLY PROGRESS REPORT

EMPLOYER / CONTRACTING AUTHORITY:

1.-Physical Progress 34.7 %

4. - Major pending issues

MPR April -2018 Page 2

MPR April -2018 Page 3

- SSTL : Approach Road Earthworks Progress is very slow.

5. –Developing of the Construction works

MPR April -2018 Page 4

Main Tunnel Benching

MPR April -2018 Page 5

MPR April -2018 Page 6

MPR April -2018 Page 8

Name Date Task

MPR April -2018 Page 9

MPR April -2018 Page 11

Most important issues during April -2018 are:

MPR April -2018 Page 13

MONTH MAIN H MAIN B EGRESS VENT-H VENT-B

In the table can appreciate:

 Effects in productions of incidents occurred between Jul-17 and Nov-17

MPR April -2018 Page 14

 Egress Tunnel : Ch. 4+633, 4+653, 4+684, 4+712, 4+733 4+755

MPR April -2018 Page 15

Escape Tunnel WP (Face 1) :

Escape Tunnel EP (Face 4)

Escape Tunnel EP (Face 2)

MPR April -2018 Page 16

Main Tunnel WP (Face 1) :

Main Tunnel WP (Face 5) :

Main Tunnel from VC to Eastern Portal (Face 3) :

Main Tunnel from VC to Western Portal (Face 2) :

Main Tunnel EP (Face 4)

MPR April -2018 Page 17

3.-Tasks carried out during April-2018

Classification of comments given by IE is as per the following levels:

The list of performed documents in December 2017 is shown below:

MPR April -2018 Page 18

Rev Date Title

4.-Major activities planned for next month

MPR April -2018 Page 19

5.1- Detailed Design VUP 11+111

5.2. - Review of Detailed Design of Foundations for Viaduct 2+415.

MPR April -2018 Page 20

6.1. - CONSTRUCTION OF REINFORCED EARTH RETAINING STRUCTURE CH 0+120 TO CH 4+531

Embankment Layers formed from Chainage as:

0+467 to 0+671 = 1100cum (Supporting Wall).

S. No. Description This Month Total Embankment Total Project Percentage

(M3) APRIL 2018 (Filling ) Quantity 2018 (%)

MPR April -2018 Page 21

0+467 To 0+671 (Main

MPR April -2018 Page 22

MPR April -2018 Page 23

MPR April -2018 Page 24

MPR April -2018 Page 25

MPR April -2018 Page 26

MPR April -2018 Page 27

MPR April -2018 Page 31

S. No. Date Work Description Of Activity and Quantity

MPR April -2018 Page 32

MPR April -2018 Page 33

MPR April -2018 Page 34

MPR April -2018 Page 35