Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
Results:
This is from tree A. You can see not all my samples grew. My East sample grew the best and
there was a secondary fungus growing in my sample. (Sample is from out front of school).
This is from tree B. you can see clearly here that my samples from North and West grew close
together but never touched. This means that they are two different strains of the blight fungus.
(Sample is from out front of school).
This is tree C. A secondary fungus has grown, but you can see that all my samples grew more
fungus. Nothing grew close together enough to show whether they are different types of the
blight fungus. (Sample is from out front of school).
This is tree A from my Chestnut orchid sample, here you can see the small dots and the trail of
liquid from my northern sample and the eastern and western sample.
This is tree B from the chestnut orchid, this one grew the most fungus and I believe has a
secondary fungus.
This is tree C from the chestnut orchid. What really interested me about this sample is the bright
red fungus growing from the southern sample. Not sure what it is but it’s really cool.
Discussion:
So looking at my results there was at least one tree that showed there was vegetative
compatible fungus growing in our trees. That was tree B, from the front of our school. The
sample that I took from the northern side and the sample that I took from the western side grew
close together but never touched. This thin line between the two growing fungi meant that there
is more than one type or strain of the blight fungus growing in one tree. When looking at my
samples from the chestnut orchid in the back of the school you can see that tree C has a bright
red spot by the southern sample. Not sure what exactly it is but looks very interesting. Tree A
from the Chestnut orchid looked like water got into my sample, or some type of liquid formed at
my north, east and western samples. Not sure what this is either but it yet again looks interesting.
Tree b was the one that grew the most fungus from the orchid. It had possibly a secondary
fungus which may have been the reason for the copious amount of fungi in the petri dish.
Sources of error could be cross contamination from not sterilizing all my tools properly. I could
also have cross contaminated my samples when I was taking the samples from the trees. I could
have forgotten to sterilize the borer when I moved to the next spot or tree. Ways to improve the
investigation could be disposable tools that way you could throw away after one use that way
you wouldn’t have to sterilize over and over after each sample was taken.
Conclusion:
From my experiment I found that more than one type of fungus can grow in one tree.
Tree B from the sample I took out front of the school proved that when the fungus grew close
together but never touched each other. Tree C from the orchid sample grew a bright red fungus
which I thought was interesting. Tree A from that set of samples looked like water had gotten in
the petri dish or some type of liquid fungus grew. Some future areas of investigation could
include testing these samples even further to see what kind of strain of the blight fungus they are.
Another way you could further the investigation is to see how the fungus effects other trees and
how they tolerate it.
References:
“The American Chestnut Tree.” About the Tree, www.acf.org/the-american-chestnut/.