TEST REPORT | No. VIT-S-7940-11 | 8 November 2011 —/— Determination of surface flammability and smoke and toxic products according to IMO FTPC Part 5 Coating system: Penguard Tie Coat 100 Penguard Express Hardtop XP Requested by: Jotun AS Wir \VIT EXPERT SERVICES LTD\VIT EXPERT SERVICES LTD Requested by Jotun AS P.O. Box 2021 3248 Sandefjord, Norway Order 27 October 2011 / Ingvild G. Sageng Contact person YVIT Expert Services Ltd Expert Jussi Rautiainen Kivimiehentie 4, Espoo, P.O. Box 1001, FI-02044 V’ Tel. + 358 20 722 4809, Email: jussi.rautiainen@vtt ; Finland Assignment Determination of surface flammability of a coated steel panel Product ‘The customer gave following information about the tested coating system: Penguard Tie Coat 100, 30 um DFT, polyamine cured epoxy tie coat, Penguard Express, 145 pm DFT, epoxy coating Hardtop XP, 50 im DFT, polyurethane topcoat, Manufacturer: Jotun AS ‘The system was applied 5...7 October 2011. Sample Date of delivery: 28 October 2011 Type of sample: test specimens of the product on 2,0 mm thick steel panel Size of specimen: 155 mm x 800 mm x about 2 mm The sample was chosen and test specimens were made by the customer. Date of test 7 November 2011 The test specimens were conditioned to constant mass at a temperature of 23.£2°C and arelative humidity of 50 10%. Test method IMO FTPC Part 5 - Test for surface flammability Description of the test method and requirements are given in Appendix 1. ° wy bee FINAS Se Teton is ne ane ‘The use of the name of VIT Expert Services Ld or the name Technical Research Centre of Finland (VTT) in any other form in advertising or ‘Publication in part of this report only permissible with written authorisation from VTT Expert Services LtdTT EXPERT SERVICES LTD Test details Three specimens were tested. A pilot flame with acetylene gas and air was used. Test results The following table gives the times to reach different positions and the ‘maximum distance of flame spread on the centreline of the test specimen: Distance from the | Test 1 Test 2 Test 3 hot end of the Time Time Time test specimen 6) @) () Ignition 04 90 289 50mm 94 90 289 100mm 4. 90 150 mm 95 92 200 mm. 97 115 250 mm 122 174 Maximum 280 mm 250 mm 50mm distance End of test at 444s at 380s at 519s Other observations: No material fell down during the test Wy S Tae encom treaty “The test results relate only tothe sample tested. ‘The use of the name of VTT Expert Services Ld or the name Technical Research Centre of Finland (VT) in any other form in advertising oF ‘publication in pat ofthis report is only permissible wth writen authorisation from VIT Expert Services Lt\VIT EXPERT SERVICES LTD ‘The measured heat for ignition and heat for sustained burning (Q.s) values are presented in the following table. Test 1 Test 2 Test3 Mean D Qe Qh Qu Qe (mm) MJ/m? Min? M3/in™ MJ/m? 150 448 * 433 * “ 200 407 4,83 250 449. ‘Average heat for sustained burning 435 4,58 > 1s > 3,48 when D < 400 mm D = Distance from the hot end of the test specimen. * = Heat for ignition values are the values at the 150 mm position, ++ = Heat for sustained burning (Qus) could not be determined, because the position of furthest flame propagation was not at least 30 mm over the 150 mm station. at wy, 0 fe FINAS hae Tent cenmonee trea “The test results relate only tothe sample tested. ‘The use of the name of VIT Expert Services Lid ofthe name Technicel Research Centre of Finland (VTT) in any other form in advertising or Publication in part ofthis report is only permissible with written authorisation from VTT Expert Services LisvwiIT TT EXPERT SERVICES LTD TEST REPORT NO VIT-S-7940-11 All the fire characteristics of the tested material are presented in the following table: ceiling lining according to IMO FTPC Part 5 CFE QW Q Q kWim? My/m’ MS kW Test 1 32,9 4,35 0,065 0,529 Test2 368 4,58 0,034 0,355 Test3 50,5 >1s 0,002 0,064 Mean 40,1 >3,48 0,03 0,32 Criteria for bulkhead, wall and ceiling linings | 2 20,0 215 <0,7 <40 according to IMO FTPC Part 5 Classification as a bulkhead , wall and pass pass pass pass Rate of heat release in test 1...3 is presented in Appendix 2. CFE = critical flux at extinguishment Qu = heat for sustained burning Q = total heat release Q = < Finas peak heat release rate “The test results relate ony tothe sample teste. 46) The use of the name of VIT Expert Services Ltd or the name Technical Research Centre of Finland (VT) in any other form in advertising or ‘ublcation in pat ofthis report fs only permissible with written authorisation from VTT Expert Servicns Liawir \VIT EXPERT SERVICES LTD TEST REPORT NO VIT-S-7940-11 38) Note Classification APPENDICES DISTRIPUTION se Fi According to IMO FTPC Annex 2 (IMO Resolution MSC.61 (67) Annex 2) surface materials with both the total heat release (Q) of not more than 0,2 MJ and the peak heat release rate (Q,) of not more than 1,0 kW determined in accordance with resolution A.653(16) are considered to comply with the requirements of IMO FTPC Part 2 - Smoke and toxicity test - without further testing. The results relate only to the behaviour of the test specimens of a product under the particular conditions of the test; they are not intended to be the sole criterion for assessing the potential fire hazard of the product in use. ‘The tested coating system Penguard Tie Coat 100 (thickness < 30 pm) + Penguard Express (thickness < 145 pm) + Hartop XP (thickness < 50 um) on the 2,0 mm thick steel panel met the requirements for low flame spread for bulkhead, wall and ceiling linings according to IMO FTPC Part 5 (IMO Resolution MSC.61(67) Part 5). According to test results the tested coating system on the 2,0 mm thick steel panel, described above, meets the criteria for smoke and toxicity for materials used as the surface of bulkheads, linings or ceilings given by IMO PTPC Part 2 (IMO Resolution MSC.61(67) Part 2) without further testing. Approval of the product may be obtained only on application to the appropriate ‘Administration. Espoo, 8 November 2011 Cer = am ‘Tiia Ryyndinen Gri esisinen ‘Team Manager Expert Appendix 1, Description of the test method and criteria (IMO FTPC, Part 5) Appendix 2, Rate of heat release results Customer Original (2) Archive Original “CS enmcse ‘The test results relate only tothe sample tested. “The use of the name of VT Expert Services Ltd or the name Technical Research Centre of Finlans (VTT) In any other form in advertising or publication in pert ofthis report is ony permissible with witen authorisation rom VIT Expert Services Lt,V5 ‘TEST REPORT NO VIT-S-7940-11 1a \VIT EXPERT SERVICES LTD ‘Appendix 1 DESCRIPTION OF THE METHOD IMO FTPC Part 5 - (IMO Resolution MSC.61(67) Annex 1 Part 5) Test for surface flammability ‘The test procedure and evaluation shall be in accordance with IMO Resolution A.653(16) Recommendation on Improved Fire Test Procedures for Surface Flammability of Bulkhead, Ceiling and Deck Finish Materials Specimens Size: 155*2 mm x 800 mm. Amount: 10 pes. Materials and composites of normal thickness 50 mm or less are attached, by means of an adhesive if appropriate, to the substrate to which they will be attached in practice, Over SO mm thick specimens shall be reduced to the thickness of 50*3 mm by cutting away the unexposed face. Before test the specimens should be conditioned to constant moisture content at a temperature of 23 + 2°C and a relative humidity of 50 + 10 %. Test procedure The specimen is inserted to the test apparatus in a vertical position so that its longer side is horizontal. The specimen is exposed to an exact defined heat radiation caused by burning the mixture of methane gas and air in a radiation panel. The highest intensity of heat radiation at the nearest end of the specimen is 50,5 kW/m? and it decreases from this value towards the other end according to a defined curve. During the test the time of ignition, spread of flame, extinguishment of flame and heat for sustained burning are measured. Criteria Materials giving average values for all the surface flammability criteria not exceeding those listed below, are considered to meet the requirement for low flame spread. Bulkhead, wall and ceiling linings: Floor coverings: CFE 2 20,0 kW/m? CFE 2 7,0 kW/m? Que = 1,5 Mim? Qe = 0,25 Min? Q <0,7MI Q << 2,0MI Q < 40kW Qp <10,0kW where CFE = critical flux at extinguishment Qs = heat for sustained burning Q = total heat release Qp = peak heat release rate 62.2006 “The use of the name of VIT Expert Services Lid or the name Technical Research Centre of Finland (VTT) in any other frm in advertising of ‘publication in part of his report is oly permissible with written authorisation from VTT Expert Services LidMurr \VIT EXPERT SERVICES LTD ‘TEST REPORT NO VIT-S-7940-11 1a Appendix 2 HEAT RELEASE RATE (kW) HEAT RELEASE RATE (kW) HEAT RELEASE RATE (kW) TEST 1 4 3 2 af — ° 0 120 240-360 480600 TIME (s) TEST 2 4 3 24 1 0 —— ° 120 240-360 480 600 TIME (s) TEST3 4 3 2 1 - 0 0 120 240-360 480600 TIME (s) “The use ofthe name of the VIT Expert Services Lid or the name Technical Research Gerire of Finland (VT) in any cher fom ir acverieng publication in part of this repor is only permissible with written authorisation from VTT Expert Services Lid