Name of Employee:

MICHELLE A. CALIMBAS Name of Rater:

Position:
MASTER TEACHER I Position:

District, School: I-C OLD CABALAN INTEGRATED SCHOOL Date of Review:

Rating Period: June 2017 to March 2018

To be filled in during planning To be filled in during evaluation

Weight Performance Indicators
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Actual Results
per KRA (Quality, Efficiency, Timeliness)

Basic Education Services 25%

1.  Attended relevant trainings to enhance

5- attended one international level training or 64 hours
one’s skill and knowledge about the June 2017-
1.  Professional 10% of combined school/district/division level trainings or Participated in the ff:
newest trends in education with proper March 2018
seminars.
documentations.
4- attended one national level training or 56 hours of
International Seminar on School Leaders
Growth and Development combined school/district/division level trainings or
and Management
seminars
3- attended one regional level training or 48 hours of
K-12 Seminar for K to 12 Basic Education
MOV: combined school/district/division level trainings or
Curriculum
seminars
Certicate of participation, certtificate
2- attended 40 hours of combined
of appearance, memos, program,
school/district/division level trainings or seminars
pictures, travel order
1-attended 32 hours of combined
school/district/division level trainings or
seminars.
2. Served as demo teacher/resource 5- Served as demo teacher and four (4) other 1. Demo-Teacher on October 21, 2017 at O
10%
speaker/ facilitator/ or chairman/member assigned tasks Cabalan Integrated School
of Technical Working Group (TWG) at the 4- Served as demo teacher and three (3) other 2. Served as Research Presenter -
school, district or division level within the assigned tasks ___________________Oct. 17-18,2017
rating period.
June 2017- 3- Served as demo teacher and two (2) other assigned
MOV: 3. Research Presenter - Nov. 7-8,2017
March 2018 tasks
Certicates, program/matrix, pictures,
2- Served as demo teacher and one (1) assigned
memos, designation, action plan, 4. Speaker duuring the MID-year Empre Se
task
acomplishment report
5. Technical Assistance During the Enco
1- Served as demo teacher
of BOSY for Private School.
6. Vice-Chairman-school Checking
Committee
7. Chairman on Early Registration
 3. Completed an Action Research that will
help in strengthening skills in the subject 5- completed an action research relevant in (Learning
taught. (can be CBAR, BERF or Non- Area), submitted and approved by the Division Office.
BERF) (5%0

4- completed an action research relevant in (Learning

Area), for approval in the Division Office.

Completed the Action Research/ Research

Proposal entitled
June 2017- 3- completed an action research proposal in (Learning __________________________________
5% Area), approved by the Division Office.
March 2018 ____________________________ and
approved by the Division Office/School Prin
on (date)
2- completed a classroom-based action research
MOV: relevant in (Learning Area), approved in the School
Level.

Research proposal/ project, 1- completed an action research proposal for

accomplishment report, pictures checking in the school level.

Weight Performance Indicators

MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Actual Results
per KRA (Quality, Efficiency, Timeliness)
2. Instructional
35%
Competence
1. Raised pupils’/ students’ achievement 5- Increased 3% achievement level of ___ pupils /
level by 3% MPS / GSA in every subject For elementary, for classes handled
students in every subject area handled
area handled every grading period (in the 4- Increased 2.5% achievement level of ___ pupils /
elementary/specific subject being handled Achieved the following:
students in every subject area handled
in the secondary)
3- Increased 2% achievement level of ___ pupils /
June 2017- Gr. Q1-GSA
15% students in every subject area handled
March 2018
2- Increased 1.5% achievement level of ___ pupils / VI-2
MOVs: Grading Sheets, Report Card 80
students in every subject area handled MAPEH

1- Increased 1% and below achievement level of ___

VI-2 TLE 79
pupils / students in every subject area handled .

VI-5
78
ENGLISH
VI-6
ENGLISH

2. Achieved 100% passing rate for
pupils/students and made them attain a
final rating of 75% and above in subjects
handled at the end of school year.
MOV:
Grading Sheets, Report Card, Form March 2018
137, SF 5,
3. Prepared lesson logs, and school
forms/records ( f-2, f-5, item analysis, class
records) regularly and submit them on the
given schedule with complete and correct
entries
3. Instructional
Supervision
1.           Supervised Grade
_______teachers with post conference
within a year.
MOV:
Daily Lesson Log (DLLs)
Accomplished STAR form
Pictures
2. Evaluated performance of Grade _____
teachers following the RPMS cycle twice a
year.
VI-6
MAPEH
79
5-100% of pupils handled passed; Subject Q1
10% 4- 95%- 99% of pupils handled passed;
June 2017 3- 90%-94% of pupils handled passed;
2- 85-89% of pupils handled passed;
1- 80-84% of pupils handled
5-Prepared lesson logs 9-10 times every quarter, class
records quarterly and school forms regularly and
Submitted on time:
submitted them on scheduled time with complete and
correct entries.
4- Prepared lesson logs 7-8 times every quarter, class Q1- 10 lesson logs, item analysis, class
records …. and F-138
3- Prepared lesson logs 5-6 times every quarter, class
June 2017 Q2- 9 lesson logs, item analysis, class
10% record quarterly and school forms regularly with 1 day
March 2018 and F-138
late submission…….
2- Prepared lesson logs 3-4 times every quarter, class
Q3- 8 lesson logs, item analysis, class
record quarterly and school forms regularly with 2-3
and F-138
days late submission….
1- Prepared lesson logs 1-2 times every quarter, class
Q4- 8 lesson logs, item analysis, class reco
record quarterly and school forms regularly with 4-5
137 F-138, F-2 and F-5.
days late submission……
35%
No. of Tea- No. of Tea-
5- 100% of Grade ______teachers were supervised
chers in chers
two or four times within a year; Sch./ Dept. Super-vised
4- 87%- 99% of Grade ______teachers were
15 8
supervised two or four times within a year;
3- 74% - 86% of Grade ______teachers were
3
June 2017- supervised two or four times within a year;
15%
March 2018 2- 61%- 73% of Grade ______teachers were
2
supervised two or four times within a year;
1-60% and below of Grade ______teachers were
2
observed two or four times within a year.
5- Evaluated 100% of Grade _____ teachers following
the RPMS cycle;
 2. Evaluated performance of Grade _____
teachers following the RPMS cycle twice a
4- Evaluated 87% -99% of Grade _____ teachers ..
year.
June 2017- 3- Evaluated 74%- 86% of Grade _____teachers .. Evaluated RPMS of (no). of teachers o
10%
March 2018 2- Evaluated 61%- 73% of Grade _____teachers (actual no.) or ______%.
MOV
following the RPMS cycle;
1-Evaluated 60% and below of Grade _____teachers
IPCRF of Teachers I - III
following the RPMS cycle.
3. Conducted mentoring/ coaching
5- 5 teacher mentoring/ coaching sessions were
activities with Grade ______ teachers Mentored the ff. teachers:
conducted;
within the school year.
4- 4 teacher mentoring/ coaching sessions were
MOV: 1. Rhea Guardian
conducted;
June 2017-
Coaching & Mentoring Form, TA 10% 3- 3 teacher mentoring/ coaching sessions were
March 2018 2. Lea Cawagas
targets and pictures conducted;
2- 2 teacher mentoring/ coaching sessions were
3. Kristine D. Castillo
conducted;
1- 1teacher mentoring/ coaching session was
4. Nonie Ortega
conducted.
5-participated in 5 different community activities or outreach 
Participated and attended community outreach  programs in a year (Coastal clean-up, Riverth, Tree Planting, 
programs with complete documentations. Feeding, Clean-up, etc.).
4-participated in 4 different community activities or outreach 
Alay-lakad
programs in a year.
3-participated in 3 different community activities or outreach 
PLUS FACTOR MRP-Fun Run
programs in a year.
2- participated in 2 community activity or outreach program 
Lantern Parade
in a year.
1- participated in 1 community activity or outreach program 
City Fiesta Parade
in a year.

OVERALL RATING FOR ACCOMPLISHM

* To get the score, the rating is multiplied by the weight assigned.

Rater: Ratee: Approving Authority

______________________________ ______________________________
 of Rater:

n:

f Review:

ring evaluation

Actual Results Q E T Ave. Score

5 5 5 5 0.5
e ff:

minar on School Leadership

t

K to 12 Basic Education

on October 21, 2017 at Old 5 5 5 5 0.5

ed School
earch Presenter -
_____Oct. 17-18,2017
enter - Nov. 7-8,2017

ng the MID-year Empre Seminar

ssistance During the Encoding

rivate School.
man-school Checking

n Early Registration
 0 0 0 0 0

ction Research/ Research

________________________
______________ and
Division Office/School Principal

Q E T Ave. Score
Actual Results

5 5 5 5 0.75
for classes handled

owing:

Q2 GSA % Increase

85 5

83 4

80 2

0
 0

82.66667 4
Q4 5 5 5 5 0.5

4 4 4 4 0.4
ubmitted on time:

gs, item analysis, class record

gs, item analysis, class record

gs, item analysis, class record

, item analysis, class record, F-

and F-5.

#DIV/0! #DIV/0!
Frequency
of Super-
vision

twice

4 times

thrice

5 5 5 5 0.5
 5 5 5 5 0.5

4 4 4 4 0.4
eachers:

tillo

5 5 5 5 0.25

NG FOR ACCOMPLISHMENTS

ority
To be filled in during planning

Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline
per KRA
Basic
Education 25%
Services 1. Attended relevant
trainings to enhance June
1.   one’s skill and 2017-
knowledge about the 10%
Professional March
newest trends in 2018
education with proper
documentations.

Growth and

Development
2. Served as demo
teacher/resource 10%
speaker/ facilitator/ or June
Certicates,
chairman/member of 2017-
MOV:
program/matrix, March
pictures, memos, 2018
designation, action
plan, acomplishment
report
3. Completed an Action
Research that will help
in strengthening skills in
the subject taught. (can
be CBAR, BERF or
Non-BERF) (5%0

June
2017-
5%
March
2018
 MOV:
Research proposal/
project,
accomplishment report,
pictures
Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline
2. per KRA
Instructional 35%
Competence 1. Raised pupils’/
students’ achievement
level by 3% MPS / GSA
in every subject area
handled every grading
period.
June
2017-
15%
March
2018

MOVs: Grading Sheets,

Report Card
2. Achieved 100%
passing rate for
pupils/students and
made them attained a
final rating of 75% and 10%
above
MOV: in subjects June
handled at the end of 2017
Grading
school year.Sheets, March
Report Card, Form 2018
137, SF 5,

3. Prepared lesson
logs, and school
forms/records ( f-2, f-5,
item analysis, class
records) regularly and
submit them on the
given schedule with
complete and correct
entries
 complete and correct
entries
June
2017
10%
March
2018

3.
Instructional 35%
Supervision

1.           Supervised
teachers with post
conference within a
year.

MOV:

Daily Lesson Log June

(DLLs) 2017-
15%
March
2018
 2017-
15%
March
Accomplished STAR 2018
form

Pictures

2. Evaluated
performance of Five 5
teachers following the
RPMS cycle twice a June
year. 2017-
10%
March
2018
MOV

IPCRF of Teachers
I - III
3. Conducted
mentoring/ coaching
activities with Five (5)
teachers within the
school year.

MOV:
June
2017-
10%
 June
2017-
Coaching & 10%
March
Mentoring Form, TA 2018
targets and pictures

June
PLUS 2017-
5%
FACTOR March
2018

* To get the score, the rating is multiplied by the weight assigned.

Rater: Ratee:
___ MARINA G. DENIEGA,Ed.D. MARICEL L. ANDRADE
 To be filled in during evaluation
Performance Indicators
Actual Results Q E T
(Quality, Efficiency, Timeliness)

Attended one (1) International Seminar 5 5 5

in Educational Management with the
5- attended one international level training or theme "Developing Managerial Skills
64 hours of combined school/district/division and the Role and Responsibilities of
level trainings or seminars. Educational Managers"

4- attended one national level training or 56

hours of combined school/district/division
level trainings or seminars
with the following documents:
Cerificate of Participation
3- attended one regional level training or 48 Certificate of Appearance
hours of combined school/district/division Travel Order
level trainings or seminars DepEd Advisory
Program
2- attended 40 hours of combined Narrative Report
school/district/division level trainings or Pictures
seminars
1-attended 32 hours of combined
school/district/division level trainings or
seminars.
Served as School Demonstration 4 4 4
5- Served as demo teacher and four (4)
Teacher and with four (4) other assigned
other assigned tasks
4- Served as demo teacher and three (3) tasks such as:
1. Chairman-DISLAC on the Preparation
other assigned
3- Served tasksteacher and two (2) other
as demo of DLL (April 2017
2. Resource Speaker-SLAC (Oct. 2017)
assigned tasks
2- Served as demo teacher and one (1) 3. Presenter-SMEA/GAD (December
assigned task 2017)
1- Served as demo teacher
2 2 2

5- completed an action research relevant in

(Learning Area), submitted and approved by
the Division Office.

Completed a classroom-based action

research approved in the School Level
4- completed an action research relevant in entitled : "Cooperative Learning among
(Learning Area), for approval in the Division Grade 5 Pupils: Basis for the
Office. Construction of Effective Instructional
3- completed an action research proposal in Materials in English Subject"
(Learning Area), approved by the Division
Office.
2- completed a classroom-based action
research relevant in (Learning Area),
approved in the School Level.
1- completed an action research proposal
for checking in the school level.
Performance Indicators Q E T
Actual Results
(Quality, Efficiency, Timeliness)

5- Increased 3% achievement level of Grade 5 5 5

5 pupils / students in every subject area
handled
4- Increased 2.5% achievement level of
Grade 5 pupils / students in every subject Achieved the following:
area handled
3- Increased 2% achievement level of Grade
Q1- Q4
5 pupils / students in every subject area Gr. % Increase
GSA GSA
handled

2- Increased 1.5% achievement level of Engli

Grade 5 pupils / students in every subject sh 84 88 4
area handled 5-1
1- Increased 1% and below achievement Engli
level of Grade 5 pupils / students in every sh 78 81 3
subject area handled . 5-2
 Engli
sh 77 81 4
5-3

ESP 89 92 3
5-1
ESP 83 85 2
5-2
ESP
5-3 82 85 3

82 85 3
5-100% of pupils handled passed; 5 5 5
4- 95%- 99% of pupils handled passed;
3- 90%-94% of pupils handled passed; 100% of Grade 5pupils handled in
English and ESP subjects passed at the
2- 85-89% of pupils handled passed; end of the school year.

1- 80-84% of pupils handled

5-Prepared lesson logs 9-10 times every 5 5 5
quarter, class records quarterly and school
forms regularly and submitted them on Submitted on time the following:
scheduled time with complete and correct
entries.
4- Prepared lesson logs 7-8 times every Q1- 10 lesson logs, item analysis, class
quarter, class records …. record and F-138
3- Prepared lesson logs 5-6 times every
quarter, class record quarterly and school Q2- 9 lesson logs, item analysis, class
forms regularly with 1 day late record and F-138
submission…….
2- Prepared lesson logs 3-4 times every
quarter, class record quarterly and school Q3- 8 lesson logs, item analysis, class
forms regularly with 2-3 days late record and F-138
submission….
1- Prepared lesson logs 1-2 times every
quarter, class record quarterly and school Q4- 8 lesson logs, item analysis, class
forms regularly with 4-5 days late record, F-137 F-138, F-2 and F-5.
submission……

Eight (8) teachers were supervised with 4 4 4

5- Ten (10) teachers were supervised within post conference within a year.
a year;
With the following documents:
4-Eight (8) teachers were supervised within a Daily Lesson Log
year; (DLLs)
3- Six (6) teachers were supervised within a Accomplished STAR Form
year; Pictures
 Pictures
2- Four (4) teachers were supervised within
a year;
1-Two (2) teachers were observed within a
year.

5- Evaluated 100% of Five (5) teachers 5 5 5

following the RPMS cycle;
4- Evaluated 87% -99% of Five (5)
teachers ..
Evaluated RPMS of Five (5) teachers
3- Evaluated 74%- 86% of Five (5)
out of 5 or 100% of teachers were
teachers ..
evaluated.
2- Evaluated 61%- 73% of Five (5) teachers
following the RPMS cycle;
1-Evaluated 60% and below of Five (5)
teachers following the RPMS cycle.
5 5 5

5- 5 teacher mentoring/ coaching sessions

Mentored the ff. teachers:
were conducted;

4- 4 teacher mentoring/ coaching sessions

were conducted;
3- 3 teacher mentoring/ coaching sessions
were conducted;

2- 2 teacher mentoring/ coaching sessions

were conducted;
1- 1teacher mentoring/ coaching session was
conducted.

5 5 5
Awarded as Outstanding Master Teacher
Outstanding Master Teacher
in the Division last October 4, 2018

OVERALL RATING FOR

ACCOMPLISHMENTS

Approving Authority
BERNADETTE F. TAMAYO,CESO VI
Schools Division Superintendenr
Ave. Score

5 0.5
4 0.4

2 0.1
Ave. Score

5 0.75
5 0.5

5 0.5
4 0.6
5 0.5

5 0.5
5 0.25

4.6
E T Ave. Score

5 5 5 0.25

4.8