Você está na página 1de 7

Desalination 278 (2011) 84–90

Contents lists available at ScienceDirect

Desalination
j o u r n a l h o m e p a g e : w w w. e l s ev i e r. c o m / l o c a t e / d e s a l

Removal of rhodamine B by ozone-based advanced oxidation process


Bai Cuiping a, c, Xiong Xianfeng b, Gong Wenqi a,⁎, Feng Dexin c,⁎, Xian Mo c, Ge Zhongxue b, Xu Nian a
a
School of Resources and Environmental Engineering, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan 430070, PR China
b
Xi'an Modern Chemistry Research Institute, Xi'an 710065, PR China
c
Key Lab of Biofuels, Qingdao Institute of Bioenergy and Bioprocess Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Qingdao 266101, PR China

a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t

Article history: The oxidation of rhodamine B in aqueous solution by conventional ozone process and the advanced ozone-
Received 18 January 2011 based oxidation processes was investigated. The reaction conditions such as ozone dosage, initial
Received in revised form 22 April 2011 concentration of the dye and pH in ozone process were optimized. The decolorization rate of rhodamine B
Accepted 3 May 2011
increased with the ozone dosage but decreased with the initial concentration of rhodamine B. Three oxidative
Available online 6 June 2011
processes including UV/ozone, US/ozone and ozone systems were assessed to select the most appropriate
Keywords:
oxidative process in terms of rhodamine B aqueous solution treatment and special emphasis was laid on the
Rhodamine B effect of reaction pH in the three methods. It was found that in all the three methods, the acid condition can
Ozonation promote the oxidation process. The UV/ozone process was the best ozone-based oxidization process, with the
Catalytic ozonation decolorization efficiency of 99.78% and COD removal rate of 47.43% after 15 min treatment. The pseudo-first
order kinetics was found to fit all the ozone-based processes, with regard to the decoloration and degradation
reactions.
© 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

1. Introduction the dye effluent, but also it can convert biorefractory dyes in
wastewater into biodegradable organism [8]. It has been successfully
In textile industry, more and more dyes and pigments are used to used in the degradation of dye wastewater such as reactive X-3B dye
color the products. In recent years, it is estimated that more than [9] and reactive black 5 dye aqueous solution [10]. In addition, many
100,000 dyes are available commercially [1] and their global catalysts are used in combination with ozone to enhance the
production exceeds 800,000 tons per year [2]. Dye-containing oxidation process. As valid catalysts, ultraviolet and ultrasonic have
wastewater as an important source of environmental contamination been used to produce more hydroxyl radical, which can improve the
has aroused more attention because most of the dyes molecules have degradation effect of organism pollution [11–13]. On the other hand,
complicated structures and they are photolytically stable, which the combination of ozone and ultraviolet or ultrasonic cannot cause
render them resistant toward conventional biochemical decomposi- secondary pollution such as chemical sludge and the reaction process
tion [3,4]. To protect environment from being damaged by the dye is easy to control. They are efficient and eco-friendly advanced
wastewater, the applications of some physical and chemical methods oxidation method in wastewater treatment.
have been reported. Rhodamine B is an important dye, which is widely used in textile
Tradition physical and chemical techniques have been used in dye industry for dyeing silk, wool, jute leather and cotton. It may cause
wastewater treatment such as absorption by active carbon, coagula- carcinogenic and teratogenic effects on public health [14]. Few
tion by chemical agents, and oxidation by Fenton and hypochlorite methods were studied to remove it from wastewater; Libanori et al.
methods [5]. However, these methods have high operational costs, [15] used TiO2-coated activated carbon catalyst; Wang et al. [16]
need long reaction time and contain the secondary pollution, since reported its degradation by using swirling jet-induced cavitations
solid wastes would be produced in these processes, which can bring combined with H2O2; Chang et al. [17] also reported its removal by fly
another environmental problem of sludge treatment and disposal [6]. ash adsorption with Fenton pre-oxidation. However, problems
Therefore, an affordable and easy-operated control technology correspondent with these methods exist such as secondary pollution,
without the formation of sludge is needed [7]. high operational costs and long reaction time. Until now, there is no
Ozone and hydroxyl radicals generated in the dye aqueous literature that reports about the removal of rhodamine B by ozone and
solution are able to quickly break the carbon–carbon bond in the the comparison with UV/ozone and US/ozone.
aromatic rings. Moreover, ozone is not only effective in decolorizing The purpose of this study was to obtain the appropriate
degradation parameters of rhodamine B by ozone system, such as
⁎ Corresponding authors. Tel.: + 86 27 87372102; fax: + 86 27 87882128.
ozone dosage, pH and initial concentration of dye solution. A
E-mail addresses: gongwenqi@yahoo.com.cn (G. Wenqi), fengdx@qibebt.ac.cn comparative study was carried out with the aim of investigating the
(F. Dexin). effect of UV/ozone, US/ozone and ozone processes on the

0011-9164/$ – see front matter © 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.desal.2011.05.009
B. Cuiping et al. / Desalination 278 (2011) 84–90 85

decolorization and COD removal of rhodamine B in aqueous solution. 2.3. Analytical methods
The decolorization process was analyzed by UV-VIS spectra from the
absorbance variation in the 290–800 nm range. A simple pseudo-first- The pH value of the solutions was measured by using a digital pH
order kinetic was proposed, which was in agreement with the meter (Sartorius, Germany). The UV-VIS spectra of rhodamine B
experimental data. solution was recorded in the range from 290 nm to 800 nm using a
Cary 50 UV-VIS spectrophotometer (Varian, USA), showing that the
2. Materials and methods maximum absorbance wavelength of rhodamine B was 554 nm. Thus,
the concentration of rhodamine B versus time can be determined by
2.1. Materials measuring the absorption intensity at 554 nm. A calibration curve was
obtained by using the standard rhodamine B solution with the known
Rhodamine B was supplied by Shanghai Chemical reagent Ltd. Co. concentrations before the measurement. COD determination was
(Shanghai, China) and used without further purification. The solution conducted with the digestion system and COD determinator. (Lianhua
pH was adjusted by using 0.1 M HCl or NaOH aqueous solution. The COD determinator Ltd. Co., China). The reaction products of
peroxide test was supplied by Merck KGaA. (Darmstadt, Germany) rhodamine B were detected by GC-MS. Electron impact mass spectra
and used to test the residual hydrogen peroxide in the solution. were obtained with an Agilent Trace GC 5975C system coupled to a
Distilled water was used throughout. The molecular structure of the quadrupole detector. The GC was equipped with an ion source
dye is showing in Fig. 1. temperature of 220 °C and EI ionization at 70 eV.

2.2. Methods 3. Results and discussion

2.2.1. Ozone 3.1. Effect of the rhodamine B initial concentration


Ozone was generated from air by using an ozone generator with
input rate of 5 g/h. The applied ozone dosage was controlled by a The effect of the initial concentration of rhodamine B on the dye
flowrator (Yinhuan Flowrator Ltd. Co., China) which had the decolorization by ozone was investigated in the range from 50 to
measuring range from 50 to 250 ml/min. The ozonation of 100 ml 200 mg/l. The results are shown in Fig. 2. It is apparent that the
dye solution was performed in a batch reactor, which was made of decolorization rate of rhodamine B decreased with the increase of the
Pyrex glass with the dimensions of 8.0 cm diameter and 13.5 cm tall. It initial concentration. After 10 min treatment, the decolorization rate
was used to facilitate the operation of all the ozone-based oxidation decreased from 97.67% to 72.8% when the initial concentration of
processes. The reactor included input/output port for ozone gas rhodamine B increased from 50 mg/l to 200 mg/l. At a certain
stream. Ozone was introduced through a porous fritted diffuser that temperature, the ozone concentration in wastewater is constant, so
can produce fairly fine bubbles. The excess ozone at the outlet was the amount of HO⋅ radicals in the system would be constant under the
adsorbed by sequential 10% KI solution. same conditions [2,18]. The high concentration of rhodamine B would
consume more HO· radical, so the effect would be reduced with the
2.2.2. US/ozone increase of the initial rhodamine B concentration.
The equipment was identical with the ozone system. The
ultrasonic experiments were performed on a Kunshan KQ-300GVDV 3.2. Effect of ozone dosage
ultrasonic cleaner (Kunshan Ultrasonic Ltd. Co., China) with frequen-
cies of 20 kHz, 45 kHz and 80 kHz. The above batch reactor was The ozone dosage played an important role in the decolorization of
located in the cleaning bath and the surface of reactants was slightly rhodamine B. A range of the ozone dosage from 10 ml/min to 40 ml/
lower than the level of water in the cleaning bath. The temperature of min was studied and the results are presented in Fig. 3. It is clear that
the water bath was kept at 25 °C by the addition or removal of water. the decolorization rate of rhodamine B was enhanced with the
increase of the ozone dosage. The increase of ozone dosage from
2.2.3. UV/ozone 10 ml/min to 30 ml/min lead to an increase of the decolorization rate
The equipment was identical with the ozone system. In the from 72.6% to 92.15%. However, higher ozone dosage made the
ultraviolet light based process, a low pressure portable UV lamp (WD- decolorization rate increase very slightly. The reason for this
9403E) with an output frequency of 50 Hz was placed above the batch phenomenon is that ozone can transfer from gas phase to liquid
reactor and the UV lamp power can be chosen as 8 W, 16 W and 32 W.
The distance between the UV lamp and the batch reactor was about
1 cm. The UV lamp housing was centered into the reactor. The
wavelength of the UV was 254 nm. A black box placed outside the
reactor was employed to minimize any penetration of UV light when a
UV-enhanced facility was operated.

Fig. 2. Effect of the initial concentration of rhodamine B on the dye decolorization by


Fig. 1. Molecular structure of Rhodamine B. ozonation. PH = 3, applied ozone dosage = 30 ml/min.
86 B. Cuiping et al. / Desalination 278 (2011) 84–90

3.4. Decolorization of rhodamine B by US/ozone

The ozonation reaction pathway strongly depends on the


characteristics of the wastewater, such as initial pH, initiators and
promoters in the reacting medium. Ultrasonic is an important assisted
method in the ozone process. The enhancement of organic compound
degradation via the coupling of ultrasound and ozone has been
investigated previously [13,22]. The different frequencies of ultrasonic
were studied to investigate its effect on the decolorization of
rhodamine B. Fig. 5 showed that the decolorization rate of rhodamine
B was improved with the increase of the frequencies of ultrasonic and
the decolorization rates were 89.02%, 94.05% and 95.24% after 10 min
respectively in frequency of 20 kHz, 45 kHz and 80 kHz. The results
showed that the high frequency of ultrasonic could improve the
decolorization rate. This trend was similar with many literatures
[11,22]. The reason is that the rate of formation of hydrogen peroxide
would be higher and more violent and quicker collapse of the cavities
Fig. 3. Effect of zone dosage on the dye decolorization of rhodamine B. PH = 3, [RhB] = at higher frequencies of ultrasonic [22]. However the improving
100 mg/l. efficiency of ultrasonic will enhance very little, after the frequency up
to a specific value. The pH value ranged from 3 to 10 was researched to
phase and generate HO⋅ radicals [7,11,19]. Increasing the ozone investigate the US/ozone oxidation reaction pathways of rhodamine
dosage can get more HO⋅ radicals and enhance the decolorization rate B. The results are presented in Fig. 6, where it was shown that a higher
of rhodamine B. When the ozone concentration in the liquid phase is decolorization was presented in acid condition than in alkaline
saturated, an excess ozone dosage cannot enhance the decolorization condition and the decolorization rates of rhodamine B were 94.05%
of rhodamine B since the solubility of ozone is constant at a certain and 84.2% respectively at pH = 3 and pH = 10 after 10 min. The trend
temperature and a higher than optimum dose means that the is similar with the single ozone effect that acid condition is more
concentrations of hydroxyl free radicals and ozone in solution are favorable for the decolorization of rhodamine B. However, higher
close to invariant [7]. decolorization efficiencies were discovered in US/ozone system than
in single ozone, which indicated that the ultrasonic can enhance the
3.3. Effect of initial pH decolorization rate at both pH. The reason for this phenomenon is due
to the generation of hydroxyl radical from ozone coupling with
The effect of the initial pH on the decolorization of rhodamine is an ultrasonic and the color removal could be simply achieved via both
important parameter in ozone process. In general, ozone oxidation reaction pathways of ozone. Ozone coupling with ultrasonic can lead
pathways include direct oxidation by ozone and radical oxidation by to a variety of radical formation reaction as shown in Eqs. (1)–(6) [22].
HO⋅ radical. Direct oxidation is more selective and predominates
Þ
ÞÞ
under acidic conditions [20], while radical oxidation is less selective H2 O· → HO2 · + O· + HO· ð1Þ
and predominates under basic conditions [7]. A range of pH from 2 to
10 was investigated in the reaction. The results were shown in Fig. 4. It
was found that the removal of rhodamine B increased with the HO2 ⋅ þ H⋅→H2 O2 ð2Þ
decrease of pH. The pH value increased from 2 to 10, and the
decolorization rate of rhodamine B decreased from 85.64% to 77.73%
after 10 min. The reason that the decolorization rate in acid condition
2HO⋅→H2 O2 ð3Þ
is better than in alkali condition is that high pH in the solution leads to
the creation of more free radical scavengers (i.e. CO32−, HCO3−, etc.)
derived from mineralization of organic material, resulting in a
decrease in the concentration of HO⋅ radical [11,21]. H2 O2 þ O3 →HO2 ⋅ þ HO⋅ þ O2 ð4Þ

Fig. 4. Effect of pH on the dye decolorization of rhodamine B. [RhB] = 100 mg/l, applied Fig. 5. Effect of different frequencies of ultrasonic on the dye decolorization of
ozone dosage = 30 ml/min. rhodamine B. [RhB] = 100 mg/l, pH = 3, applied ozone dosage = 30 ml/min.
B. Cuiping et al. / Desalination 278 (2011) 84–90 87

Fig. 6. Effect of pH on the dye decolorization of rhodamine B in US/ozone. [RhB] = Fig. 8. Effect of pH on the dye decolorization of rhodamine B in UV/ozone. [RhB] =
100 mg/l, applied ozone dosage = 30 ml/min, applied ultrasonic frequency = 45 kHz. 100 mg/l, applied ozone dosage = 30 ml/min, applied ultraviolet power = 16 W.

respectively. It had the same results with single ozone and US/ozone
processes that acid condition was optimized. However, higher
HO2 ⋅ þ O3 →HO⋅ þ 2O2 ð5Þ decolorization efficiencies were discovered in UV/ozone process. At
pH = 3, the decolorization rates of rhodamine B were 86.86%, 94.05%
and 97.76% respectively in ozone process, US/ozone process and UV/
HO⋅ þ O3 →HO2 ⋅ þ O2 ð6Þ ozone process during 10 min. UV/ozone process was the most
favorable for the decolorization of rhodamine B among three methods
and the decolorization can reach 99.78% after 15 min. The reason for
this phenomenon is that the ozone coupling with the UV light can
3.5. Decolorization of rhodamine B by UV/ozone produce more hydroxyl radicals than in the case of only indirect
ozonation and also color removal was via both reaction pathways of
UV light is an initiator which can promote the transfer of ozone to ozone [25]. According to the reaction pathway, one molecule ozone
more hydroxyl radicals and enhance the degradation of the pollutants. produce two hydroxyl radicals in the UV/ozone process, which is two
This result has been proved in many literatures [3,23,24]. The power times than that in US/ozone.
of UV lamp in 8 W, 16 W and 32 W was researched to investigate its
1
effect on the decolorizaton of rhodamine B. Fig. 7 showed that the O3 þ hν→Oð DÞ þ O2 ð7Þ
decolorization rate of rhodamine B was very similar in the three
power and the decolorization rates were 97.45%, 97.76% and 97.76%
respectively in power of 8 W, 16 W and 32 W after 10 min. It proved 1
Oð DÞ þ H2 O→H2 O2 ðhotÞ ð8Þ
that the power of UV lamp has less effect on the decolorization of
rhodamine B in UV/ozone process. To illustrate the effect of pH in the
UV/ozone treatment and the reaction pathway of the system, the pH
was adjusted to 3, 7 and 10, respectively. The results were presented H2 O2 ðhotÞ→2⋅OH ð9Þ
in Fig. 8. It is apparent that the decolorization rate of rhodamine B
decreased with the increase of the initial pH. About 97.76% and 88.35%
decolorization at 10 min were observed at pH = 3 and pH = 10, H2 O2 ðhotÞ→H2 O2 ð10Þ

H2 O2 þ hν→2⋅OH ð11Þ

3.6. The UV-visible absorption spectra analysis

In order to investigate the change in the molecule of rhodamine B


with the reaction time in the three methods, UV-VIS spectra changes
in the dye solution were observed and the corresponding spectra are
shown in Fig. 9. It is showed that the characteristic absorption peak of
rhodamine B in solution had two bands; the main band was in the
visible region, with its maximum absorption at 554 nm, and the other
band in the ultraviolet region located at 350 nm. The characteristic
absorption peak is attributed to the dye chromophore structure. In the
three systems, there were the same phenomena that the absorption
Fig. 7. Effect of different power of ultraviolet on the dye decolorization of rhodamine B intensity of rhodamine B in solution became weaker along with the
in US/ozone. [RhB] = 100 mg/l, pH = 3, applied ozone dosage = 30 ml/min. reaction time. It can be explained that the aromatic ring structures of
88 B. Cuiping et al. / Desalination 278 (2011) 84–90

the initiator of the ozonation and the degradation rates were better
than that in the single ozone degradation. On the other hand, the
efficiency of ultraviolet catalysis was better than that of ultrasonic.

3.7. Comparison of COD removal in ozone, US/ozone and UV/ozone

It is known that complete decolorization of rhodamine B does not


mean that it is completely mineralized. In order to know the
mineralization degree of rhodamine B by the three methods, COD
was investigated during the reaction. During the ozone oxidation
reaction, small value of H2O2 could be found, which probably had an
effect on the COD. The concentration of H2O2 was detected with
peroxide test after the oxidation reaction and the data were about
5 mg/l. On the other hand, the standard solution of H2O2 (5 mg/l) was
detected for COD as about 0 mg/l, which was the same as the distilled
water, so the effect of H2O2 on COD was ignored. The results of COD
are shown in Fig. 10 and Table 1. Fig. 10 showed that after 15 min
treatment, the COD removal effect was 35.72%, 42.97% and 47.43% in
ozone, US/ozone and UV/ozone process, respectively. It is apparently
found that rhodamine B was not mineralized completely in these
three processes. Ultrasonic and UV light can improve the COD removal
effect. This result proves that single ozone process can produce
hydroxyl radical, but the production efficiency of hydroxyl radical is
less than that of catalytic processes. It demonstrated that single ozone
treatment showed a limited mineralization of organic compound in
the dye solution [26,27]. However, promoted by ultrasonic and UV
light, ozone can generate more hydroxyl radical and get better
degradation effect, since the hydroxyl radical is a very powerful
oxidizing agent which can deal with organic compounds until
mineralized [27,28].
Table 1 showed the decolorization efficiency and the COD removal
efficiency of rhodamine B after 10 min treatment. It showed the same
trend between the decolorization efficiencies and the COD removal
efficiencies in the three processes. However, the decolorization
efficiency was much higher than the corresponding COD removal
efficiency. The COD removal efficiencies were only 21.43%, 32.14% and
39.72% in the three processes, while the corresponding decolorization
efficiencies were 86.86%, 94.05% and 97.76% after 10 min. The reason
is probably that the chromophore has been destructed completely,
but the organic pollutant has been oxidized to micromolecule
pollutants, which have not been oxidized to CO2 and H2O. By the
detection of GC-MS, the reaction products of rhodamine B were
mainly formic acid (M = 46), acetic acid (M = 60) and N, N-
diethylformamide (M = 101) in this ozonation process, which can
be biodegraded [8]. In ozone-based oxidation, the removal efficiency

Fig. 9. UV-VIS spectra changes of rhodamine B with three methods after different
reaction time (A) UV/ozone, (B) US/ozone, (C) ozone.

rhodamine B molecules were destructed in the ozonation. However,


there were some differences in the reaction rate of rhodamine B. In
the UV/ozone process, the absorption peak quickly diminished and
disappeared in 20 min and the decolorization rate was the highest in
the three processes during the same reaction time. The second one
was the US/ozone process and the single ozonation was the last one.
The absorption peak of rhodamine B at 350 nm had the same trend
with the 554 nm. These results were in agreement with the above
outcomes and further proved that the ultraviolet and ultrasonic were Fig. 10. COD removal of rhodamine B during three ozonation processes.
B. Cuiping et al. / Desalination 278 (2011) 84–90 89

Table 1 ozone-based process is suitable for the treatment of dye wastewater.


Comparison of decolorization and COD removal of rhodamine B (10 min treatment). It is environmentally friendly since no toxic reagents and secondary
process Decolorization efficiency (%) COD removal efficiency (%) pollution could be found. Among these methods, the UV/ozone
system is most effective and less expensive than convention
Ozone 86.86 21.43
US/ozone 94.05 32.14 processes.
UV/ozone 97.76 39.72

Acknowledgements
of COD had been largely enhanced and the reaction time was much
This research was financially supported by the National Natural
shorter than that of the other methods reported before [15–17].
Science Foundation project (No. 20872075) and Hubei Key Laboratory
of Pollutant Analysis and Reuse Technology Open Fund Project (No.
3.8. The reaction kinetic study on ozone-based processes
KY2010G19).
The degradation and decolorization kinetics of rhodamine B in
aqueous solution were investigated, using ozone-based processes References
under various optimum conditions. The pseudo-first-order kinetic
[1] J.W. Lee, S.P. Choi, R. Thiruvenkatachari, W.G. Shim, H. Moon, Evaluation of the
Eq. (12) was employed to compare the effect of reaction in the three performance of adsorption and coagulation processes for the maximum removal
ozonation processes. of reactive dyes, Dyes and Pigm. 69 (2006) 196–203.
[2] C. Bouasla, M.E. Samar, F. Ismail, Degradation of methyl violet 6B dye by the
Fenton process, Desalination 254 (2010) 35–41.
lnðC0 = C Þ = kt ð12Þ
[3] M.G. Helander, Z.B. Wang, M.T. Greiner, Z.W. Liu, K. Lian, Z.H. Lu, The effect of UV
ozone treatment on poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene): poly(styrenesulfonate),
Where C0 is the initial concentration of rhodamine B and C is the Appl. Phys. Lett. 95 (2009) 1–3.
[4] N. Daneshvar, M.A. Behnajady, M.K.A. Mohammadi, M.S.S. Dorraji, UV/H2O2
concentration of rhodamine B at time t, k is the degradation rate treatment of Rhodamine B in aqueous solution: influence of operational
constant, and t is the degradation time. The calculated kinetic parameters and kinetic modeling, Desalination 230 (2008) 16–26.
parameters of degradation and decolorization using different ozone [5] S.G. Schrank, J.N.R. dos Santos, D.S. Souza, E.E.S. Souza, Decolourisation effects of
Vat Green 01 textile dye and textile wastewater using H2O2/UVprocess,
process are listed in Table 2. J. Photochem. Photobiol. A 186 (2007) 125–129.
From Table 2, it is shown that the decolorization and degradation [6] A. Aleboyeh, H. Aleboyeh, Y. Moussa, Decolorisation of acid blue 74 by ultraviolet/
reaction obeyed the pseudo-first order kinetics. The calculated H2O2, Environ. Chem. Lett. 1 (2003) 161–164.
[7] W. Chu, C.W. Ma, Quantitative prediction of direct and indirect dye ozonation
Kdecolorization and Kdegradation of rhodamine B were the highest in UV/ kinetics, Water Res. 34 (2000) 3153–3160.
ozone processes and the lowest in single ozone processes. It was [8] F. Gokcen, T.A. Ozbelge, Pre-ozonation of aqueous azo dye (Acid Red-151)
concluded that the UV/ozone process was the most efficient and the followed by activated sludge process, Chem. Eng. J. 123 (2006) 109–115.
[9] X.C. Ruan, M.Y. Liu, Q.F. Zeng, Y.H. Ding, Degradation and decolorization of
ozone process was the least efficient. These results are consistent with
reactive red X-3B aqueous solution by ozone integrated with internal micro-
the discussion concerning the decolorization and degradation of electrolysis, Sep. Purif. Technol. 74 (2010) 195–201.
rhodamine B in the previous section. [10] P. Colindres, H. Yee-Madeira, E. Reguera, Removal of Reactive Black 5 from
aqueous solution by ozone for water reuse in textile dyeing processes,
Desalination 258 (2010) 154–158.
4. Conclusions [11] S. Song, Z.W. Liu, Z.Q. He, Y. Li, J.M. Chen, C.L. Li, Degradation of the biocide 4-
chloro-3,5-dimethylphenol in aqueous medium with ozone in combination with
The treatment of rhodamine B in aqueous solution has been ultraviolet irradiation: operating conditions influence and mechanism, Chemo-
sphere 77 (2009) 1043–1051.
investigated by ozone-based processes. Under the optimum condi- [12] W. Yue, P.J. Yao, Y.A. Wei, H.T. Mo, Synergetic effect of ozone and ultrasonic
tions, the decolorization rate of rhodamine B increased with the ozone radiation on degradation of chitosan, Polym. Degrad. Stab. 93 (2008) 1814–1821.
dosage, but decreased with the initial concentration of rhodamine B in [13] V.O. Abramov, O.V. Abramov, A.E. Gekhman, V.M. Kuznetsov, G.J. Price, Ultrasonic
intensification of ozone and electrochemical destruction of 1,3-dinitrobenzene
the ozone process. The decolorization rate was more efficient in acid and 2,4-dinitrotoluene, Ultrason. Sonochem. 13 (2006) 303–307.
medium in all ozone-based methods. Rhodamine B decolorization and [14] V.K. Gupta, Suhas, Application of low-cost adsorbents for dye removal—a review,
its COD removal efficiencies were in the decreasing order of UV/ J. Environ. Manage. 90 (2009) 2313–2342.
[15] R. Libanori, T.R. Giraldi, E. Longo, E.R. Leite, C. Ribeiro, Effect of TiO2 surface
ozone N US/ozone N ozone and UV/ozone was the best ozone-based modification in Rhodamine B photodegradation, J. Sol-Gel Sci. Technol. 49 (2009)
oxidization process. The decolorization of rhodamine B in ozone- 95–100.
based processes was much higher than that in COD removal efficiency. [16] X.K. Wang, J.G. Wang, P.Q. Guo, W.L. Guo, C. Wang, Degradation of rhodamine B in
aqueous solution by using swirling jet-induced cavitation combined with H2O2,
And GC-MS spectra showed that the reaction products were mainly
J. Hazard. Mater. 169 (2009) 486–491.
formic acid, acetic acid and N,N-diethylformamide. By analysis of the [17] S.H. Chang, K.S. Wang, H.C. Li, M.Y. Wey, J.D. Chou, Enhancement of Rhodamine B
UV-VIS spectra, the reaction rate in UV/ozone was faster than in the removal by low-cost fly ash sorption with Fenton pre-oxidation, J. Hazard. Mater.
other processes, and US/ozone was the second one. The catalyst in 172 (2009) 1131–1136.
[18] H. Zhang, L.J. Duan, D.B. Zhang, Absorption kinetics of ozone in water with
ozonation reaction can enhance the efficiency of decolorization and ultrasonic radiation, Ultrason. Sonochem. 14 (2007) 552–556.
degradation of rhodamine B. The UV/ozone process was the optimum [19] F.J. Benitez, J. Beltranheredia, T. Gonzalez, Kinetics of the reaction between ozone
candidate for dye degradation in wastewater treatment and this study and Mcpa, Water Res. 25 (1991) 1345–1349.
[20] Y. Ku, W. Wang, Y.S. Shen, Reaction behaviors of decomposition of monocroto-
provided a new method for the effective degradation of dyes in phos in aqueous solution by UV and UV/O3 processes, J. Hazard. Mater. 72 (2000)
wastewater. The decolorization and degradation reaction obeyed the 25–37.
pseudo-first order kinetics in all ozone-based processes. Finally, [21] I.A. Alaton, I.A. Balcioglu, D.W. Bahnemann, Advanced oxidation of a reactive
dyebath effluent: comparison of O3, H2O2/UV-C and TiO2/UV-A processes, Water
Res. 36 (2002) 1143–1154.
[22] R. Chand, N.H. Ince, P.R. Gogate, D.H. Bremner, Phenol degradation using 20, 300
Table 2 and 520 kHz ultrasonic reactors with hydrogen peroxide, ozone and zero valent
Pseudo-first order rate constants for decolorization and degradation of rhodamine B in metals, Sep. Purif. Technol. 67 (2009) 103–109.
ozone-based processes. [23] M.S. Lucas, J.A. Peres, G.L. Puma, Treatment of winery wastewater by ozone-based
advanced oxidation processes (O3, O3/UV and O3/UV/H2O2) in a pilot-scale bubble
Process Kdecolorization (min−1) R2 Kdegradation (min−1) R2 column reactor and process economics, Sep. Purif. Technol. 72 (2010) 235–241.
Ozone 0.5214 0.9955 0.0712 0.9648 [24] V.V. Goncharuk, V.F. Vakulenko, Y.O. Shvadchina, A.N. Sova, T.N. Sitnichenko,
US/ozone 0.6789 0.9895 0.0847 0.9628 Impact of hydrogen peroxide on the destruction degree of fulvic acids and organic
impurities of river water by ozone, UV radiation, and O3/UV treatment, J. Water
UV/ozone 0.7487 0.9961 0.0943 0.9088
Chem. Technol. 31 (2009) 81–91.
90 B. Cuiping et al. / Desalination 278 (2011) 84–90

[25] E. Reisz, W. Schmidt, H.P. Schuchmann, C. von Sonntag, Photolysis of ozone in [27] J. Zhang, K.H. Lee, L.Z. Cui, T.S. Jeong, Degradation of methylene blue in aqueous
aqueous solutions in the presence of tertiary butanol, Environ. Sci. Technol. 37 solution by ozone-based processes, J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 15 (2009) 185–189.
(2003) 1941–1948. [28] L. Guzzella, D. Feretti, S. Monarca, Advanced oxidation and adsorption
[26] C.A.K. Gouvea, F. Wypych, S.G. Moraes, N. Duran, N. Nagata, P. Peralta-Zamora, technologies for organic micropollutant removal from lake water used as
Semiconductor-assisted photocatalytic degradation of reactive dyes in aqueous drinking-water supply, Water Res. 36 (2002) 4307–4318.
solution, Chemosphere 40 (2000) 433–440.

Você também pode gostar