Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
TECHNICAL REPORT 1
PROPOSAL : ENERGY
CONSERVATION MODEL
PREPARED BY:
ANIS BALQIS BINTI ZULKEFLI (MPP171095)
REBECCA ABIMAJE JOSHUA (MPP171066)
SITI SARAH BINTI BAHAROM (MPP172025)
LECTERUR:
DR. HASNAH BINTI MOHAMED
DR. RAFEIZAH BINTI MOHD ZULKIFLI
SUBMISSION DATE:
18th APRIL 2018
TABLE OF CONTENTS
3. METHODOLOGY....................................................................................... 8
4. ANALYSIS ............................................................................................... 14
6. CONCLUSION ......................................................................................... 19
7. REFERENCE ........................................................................................... 19
8. APPENDIX ............................................................................................... 22
1
PROPOSAL: ENERGY CONSERVATION (EC) MODEL
1. PROBLEM BACKGROUND
1.1 Introduction
Physics is an interesting subject that consists of theories, rules and
principles that explains the phenomena in life. This field have huge
contributions in developing better environment. The understanding about our
nature through physics had improved the system such that the study about
energy helps us to find alternative solution to consume more energy by using
wave, wind and solar rather than using fossil fuel that will soon become extinct.
Even the creation and motion of airplane can be best described by Physics.
There is more function of physics that can be explored in achieving better life.
All these contributions prove how important it is for us to learn Physics.
In Malaysia, Physics subject can be learned in formal class starting from
the age of 16 years old until higher education. Physics subject is compulsory to
secondary school students in science stream. This assists the students to
master the fundamental science. Form four students who are taking Physics
subject are beneficiaries as they are taught the fundamental of Physics which is
the basic knowledge that will help the students to master the basics in Physics.
Inability to comprehend this subject will lead to failure to understand next level
of Physics study. This will also become an obstacle to students that have
passion in Physics to pursue their study in higher level. Saleh (2014) did a
research study on the motivation of Form Four Physics students. Based on the
research, he found that Physics students have less interest in Physics due to its
learning activities. This explains the phenomenon that leads to the question of
why students are avoiding Physics courses in higher education. The study also
found that Physics education system is still lacking and less effective.
In this 21st century, lots of intervention had been made to improve
educational system. Teaching and learning process has become more effective
by developing higher order thinking skills among students and providing lifelong
learning. This is to fulfil the National Education Philosophy that wants to
develop the potential of individuals in a holistic and integrated manner
(MOE, 2018). From this, the elements of innovations play a significant role in
2
improving teaching and learning process. A Lot of innovations product had
been produced to provide better understanding.
3
proposing to solve the problem through innovation product. Reason has been
that, evidence has proved the effectiveness of innovation in improving teaching
and learning process.
4
misconception between energy conversion and energy conservation law is
proven by Bezen, Bayrak & Aykutlu (2016). Rachniyom, Toedtanya &
Wuttiprom (2017) stated that students had misconception and cannot imagine
the change of potential energy, kinetic energy and the law of conservation of
energy. The arising question is how to help students distinguish these two
terms. In order to make vivid comparative between these two, the proposed
product aim to clarify the difference between both terms to solve the
misconception among the students.
Mathematical technique is another problem that is found to affect
Physics students. The reason behind this is because the understanding of
Physics concept required students to do some calculations. It also aids the
explanation of the Physics theory. The applications of calculations enhance the
higher order thinking skills among Physics students to apply their Physics
knowledge and skills. A research conducted by Pinsky and Galili (2014) found
that mathematics skills positively correlate with students’ performance in
physics class and exams. In the subtopic energy, the students do not master
the application of the calculation for both kinetic energy and potential energy.
This is due to the complexity face by students to comprehend energy has been
discussed in the first problem.
During conversion (transformation) of energy, example from potential
energy to kinetic energy, the equivalent involved in calculating total energy is
mgh = ½mv2; where m = mass, g = gravitational force, h = height, and v =
velocity (displacement/time). While during transfer of energy (kinetic energy to
kinetic energy), the equivalent is ½ mv2 = ½ mv2. To make these clear, students
that have difficulty in understanding kinetic energy and potential energy are
unable to master the application of the calculation in kinetic and potential
energy.
2. LITERATURE REVIEW
5
students’ perceptions generally indicates physics to be a hard subject. Science
practice skills are the basis for scientific review which provides the most
effective methods for helping students to understand science concepts.
Dalaklioğu, S., Demirci, N. & Şekercioğlu, A (2015), stated that students
have many problems with applying or connecting relationship between the
conservation of energy and momentum in any given situation. The findings
showed that students have failed to recognize the importance of energy and
momentum and they have difficulties in qualitatively interpreting the basic
principles related to energy and momentum and in applying them in physical
situations.
Identification of concepts about energy may take the forms of
misconceptions, alternative concepts, or previous knowledge, hence quick
assessment by teachers is required. If not, students may have
misunderstandings of the phenomena of physics which may affect teaching and
learning in the area in future (Dalaklioğu, S., Demirci, N. & Şekercioğlu, A.,
2015). Physics education researchers agree that using lectures or traditional
teaching only for instruction does not correct majority of students’
misconceptions. The instructional pattern considered to inspire students in
physics and correct misconceptions is Interactive Lecture Demonstrations (ILD)
Interactive lesson demonstration involves students in activities that challenge
their previous understanding of a core concept. The activities may be a
classroom experiment, a survey, a simulation, or fieldtrip. This instruction
provides interaction between students and teacher and student and student.
The demonstration instruction can predict the outcome; students can explain to
themselves a set of possible outcomes and experience the demonstration.
Rachniyom, S. et al., 2017 used simple experimental activities to develop
work and energy concept. Hence, the participants’ misconception about the
change of potential energy, kinetic energy and the law of conservation of
energy was cleared. The use of ILD in the research stimulated the students’
understanding of the concept and their reasoning skills were enhanced.
Consequently, the students were able to describe the relationship between
gravitational potential energy and kinetic energy. The findings indicated the
change of energy from one form to another. The learning was meaningful and
the knowledge easy to retain and remember, because the students performed
6
their own experiments, and they were able to visualize the changes in the forms
of energy.
Energy concepts are highly abstract and often counterintuitive,
misconceptions about energy can be particularly persistent and difficult to test.
The study analysed how students’ misconceptions are identify and how Rasch
modelling and option probability curves can be used to generate full visual
representations of changes in students’ thinking (Herrmann-Abell & DeBoer,
2016). It was revealed by Ergin and Sarı (2013) that students would be more
motivated when classes are conducted with different teaching methods and to
have more meaningful learning.
Teachers understood constructivist learning approach to be appropriate
for teaching energy since energy can be connected to daily life, experiments
can be conducted, simulations can be used, and field trips can be planned with
the approach (Bezen, et al. 2016)
7
Curriculum Development Council and Hong Kong Examination and
Assessment Authority (2015) stated that “Teaching as inquiry” is one of the
approaches to learning, supported by many educators who see that knowledge
is best shaped through the effort and activity of learner which is more of
student-centred approach. It supports the use of learning activities which
include simple problem-solving tasks that need various cognitive abilities and
inquiry-based experiments which include testing of hypotheses, work
procedures design, data collection, calculations and conclusions.
3. METHODOLOGY
8
Figure 1: The 6 Phases in DBR
Phase 1: Focus
In this stage, we brainstorm the targeted audience, topic and scope of the
project. From our discussion, we have outlined these main problems (Figure 2)
in current Malaysian school setting:
9
Phase 2: Understanding
In this stage, we investigated the problems using empirical methods such
as market survey and secondary sources (literature review) to determine the
domains, contexts and existing solutions available. We conducted a function
analysis to have a good picture of possible approaches to solve the problem.
Then we drew out the possible solution for the three main causes explained
earlier. After that, we listed out all the available products in the market and
analysed the strengths and weaknesses of the product from the aspect of the
main problem. We also discussed on the feasibility of the solution so that the
targeted product that we are proposing will have the practical characteristics in
terms of economically and usability because the uniqueness of the products will
determine the success in the marketplace. The propose product should provide
excellent value of money spent and well operation (Anil Mital, 2014). The result
from this survey will be explained in details during the analysis part.
Our main domains for the project is developing a teaching and learning
aid to promote effective learning activity. In the first place we designed the
solution for the teachers’ use purpose only, but after presenting our draft, we
got the idea to make it more flexible usability. So our propose product will have
two functions which is teaching aid and learning apparatus. Teacher can make
suit the function with the cognitive level of the students.
Phase 3: Define
In the define phase, we set goals of our projects by firstly outlined the
Gantt Chart Table as illustrated in Figure 3 so that we can always keep track
on our project progress to meet the dateline stated. After going through all the
development process roughly, we allocate the main task in order to make sure
all the due date are being followed and monitored thoroughly. We divided the
task into two main tasks which are the theoretical and technical task. Anis will
be in charge of detailing the literature to support the problems and solution
being discussed. While Rebecca will be in charge of the quality control for both
theoretical and technical such as ensuring product test to align between both
sections are being monitored. Sarah will be in charge of the technical part of
the product including design and appropriate materials to be used. The
allocation of task can be illustrated as in Figure 4.
10
We also determined the name for our proposed product which is
EC Model. The EC represent energy conservation. We do hope with this
catchy name, it will be marketable.
EC Model
Project's
Theoretical Technical
Phase 4: Conceive
In the conceive phase, firstly we sketched out the first draft of proposed
product (Figure 5) to be presented during the proposal presentation. The EC
Model consists of two main part; Part 1: the energy conversion/transformation
and Part 2: the energy transfer. In Part 1, the water tank will act as the source
of providing forces to the potential energy. The water will go through only one
water outlet at a time (3 different heights are provided to apply the manipulation
of the potential energy formula). The water drops will hit the turbine; hence the
potential energy coming from the water will then be transformed into kinetic
energy through the movement of the turbine blade. This rotation will be
changed to electrical energy by the dynamo attached on the turbine and then
light up the LED. The brightness of the LED will depends on the speed of
turbine rotation. This function is additional to the topic.
Currently we are in this stage; we are planning to use morphological chart
as a tool to determine the best design of each part in the EC Model.
11
Figure 5: Original Draft of EC Model
Phase 5: Build
In the build phase, we implement the sketch into real product. We are
planning to build a prototype first so that we can test the appropriate size
needed for our EC Model. Theoretically we can assume, but we do have to test
in order to get the best in practical. Before we start developing the product,
firstly we have to determine the suitable material proposed during the conceive
phase. Then we make a little survey on the price of the material so that we can
roughly calculate the cost of developing EC Model. We are also planning
together with the other group to book the lab on the same date. In order to
make it more realistic, we are conducting this phase simultaneously with the
technical test so that the error can be reduced in the exact time.
Phase 6: Test
This phase consist of two main part; the first part will be the technical test
which include evaluation of the efficacy of the targeted design, such as, we are
assuming the amount of water in the water tank will be enough to supply
energy to light up the LED, so if this test fails, we have to recalculate the
12
needed amount of water. A list of technical test will be described in detail during
these phases. The second parts will be the educational objective test. We are
planning to take physic teacher/physic training teacher (undergraduate student)
to be our respondent to conduct a formative test to evaluate our EC Model.
Problem Analysis
Phase 2: Understand
function analysis
literature review
market survey
Phase 3: Define
Solution
project progress
Phase 4: Conceive
morphological chart
Phase 5: Build
material search
13
STAGES : TASK \ WEEK 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
development
Phase 6: Test
Functionality/Technical
formative assessment
4. ANALYSIS
4.1.1 Approaches
14
calculation formula. Teacher can conduct a problem based learning in order to
achieve the students mastery. For example, students can be asked to examine
the effect of the height in the total potential energy.
Figure 6 summarizes all the possible solutions for our three main root
problem due to the student difficulty in conducting an activity to demonstrate
conservation of energy law. The suggested solutions are based from the
constructivist learning approach that was said to be the appropriate method for
teaching energy since energy can be connected to daily life, experiments can
be conducted, simulations can be used, and field trips can be planned with the
approach (Bezen, et al. 2016).
15
educational sciences in Malaysia base in Kuala Lumpur. They have
supply more than 2000 teaching aid item for physics, chemistry and
biology in universities, colleges and schools since 1973.
16
Product Features Weakness
17
5. DISCUSSION AND SUGGESTION
Misconception Application
Energy
Conservation of of
Model
Energy Law calculation
EC MODEL
18
6. CONCLUSION
7. REFERENCE
Agarwal, A., Garg, N. K. and Jain, A. (2014). "Quality assurance for Product
development using Agile," 2014 International Conference on Reliability
Optimization and Information Technology (ICROIT), Faridabad, 2014, pp. 44-
47.
Anil Mital, Anoop Desai, Anand Subramanian & Aashi Mital (2014). Product
Development: A Structured Approach to Consumer Product Development,
Design, and Manufacture. United Kingdom: Elsevier.
Anthony E. Kelly, Richard A. Lesh & John Y. Baek (2014). Handbook of Design
Research Methods in Education: Innovations in Science, Technology,
Engineering, and Mathematics Learning and Teaching. New York: Routledge.
Bezen, S., Bayrak, C., & Aykutlu, I. (2016). Physics teachers’ views on teaching the
concept of energy. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 64, 109-124.
19
Easterday, M. W., Lewis, D. R. and Gerber, E. M. (2016). Design-Based Research
Process: Problems, Phases, and Applications. ICLS 2014 Proceedings. Pg
317-324
Kapucu, S. (2016). Identification Of The Physics Subjects That Are Liked/ Disliked
And Why These Subjects Are Liked/Disliked By Student Teachers. Journal of
Theory and Practice in Education, 12(4), 827-843.
Kelly A. E., Lesh, R. A. & Baek J. Y. (2014). Handbook of Design Research Methods
in Education: Innovations in Science, Technology, Engineering, and
Mathematics Learning and Teaching. New York: Routledge.
OECD. (2016). The Power of Digital Technologies and Skills. Innovating Education
and Educating for Innovation.
Organization for Economic and Community Development (OECD) 2015. PISA 2015.
Science Framework. Retrieved from https://www.oecd.org / pisa /pisa products.
Peter Serdyukov, (2017) "Innovation in education: what works, what doesn’t, and
what to do about it? Journal of Research in Innovative Teaching & Learning,
Vol. 10 Issue:1, pp.4-33, https:// doi.org/10.1108/JRIT-10-2016-0007
20
Pinsky, L. V. & Galili, I. (2014). The Need to Clarify the Relationship between
Physics and Mathematics in Science Curriculum: Cultural Knowledge as
Possible Framework. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, 611-616.
Rachniyom, A., Toedtanya, K., & Wuttiprom, S. (2017). Development of the Concept
of Energy Conservation using Simple Experiments for Grade 10 Students.
Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1-5.
Sadler, P. M., Sonnert, G., Coyle, H. P., Cook-Smith, N., & Miller, J. L. (2013). The
influence of teachers’ knowledge on student learning in middle school physical
classrooms. American Educational Research Journal, 50(5),
1020-1049.
21
8. APPENDIX
22
23