Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
In the beginning of time,/ there were three powerful gods who lived in the universe:/
Bathala was the caretaker of the earth;/ Ulilang Kaluluwa (Orphaned Spirit),/ a huge serpent
who lived in the clouds; /and Galang (Wandering spirit), /the winged god who loves to travel./
These three gods did not know each other./ Bathala often dreamt of creating mortals/ but the
empty earth stops him from doing so./ UlilangKaluluwa /who was equally lonely as Bathala,/
liked to visit places and the earth was his favorite./ One day, the two gods met./ Ulilang
Kaluluwa, seeing another god rivaling him,/ was not pleased.
He challenged Bathala/ to a fight to decide/ who would be the ruler of the universe./
After three days and three nights,/ Ulilang Kaluluwa was slain by Bathala./ Instead of giving
him a proper burial,/ Bathala burned the snake's remains./ A few years later,/ the third god,/
Galang Kaluluwa,/ wandered into Bathala's home./ He welcomed the winged god/ with much
kindness/ and even invited him to live in his kingdom./ They became true friends/ and were
very happy for many years/. Galang Kaluluwa became very ill/.
Before he died./ he instructed Bathala/ to bury him on the spot where Ulilang
Kaluluwa’s body was burned./ Bathala did exactly as he was told./ Out of the grave of the two
dead gods,/ it grew a tall tree with a big round nut,/ which is the coconut tree./ Bathala took
the nut and husked it./ He noticed that the inner skin was hard./ The nut itself/ reminded him
of Galang Kaluluwa’s head/. It had two eyes,/ a flat nose,/ and a round mouth./ Its leaves
looked so much like the wings of his dear winged friend./ But the trunk was hard and ugly,/
like the body of his enemy,/ the snake Ulilang Kaluluwa./ Bathala realized/ that he was ready
to create the creatures/ he wanted with him on earth/. He created the vegetation,/ animals,/
and the first man/ and woman./
Situation no. 1
One day, the two gods met./ Ulilang Kaluluwa, seeing another god rivaling him,/ was not
pleased. He challenged Bathala/ to a fight to decide/who would be the ruler of the universe./
After three days and three nights,/
Ulilang Kaluluwa: Are you the most powerful god in the universe?
Ulilang Kaluluwa: I will not allow you to be the most powerful god in the universe. Whoever
you are, I challenged you to a fight to decide who would be the ruler of the Universe.
Situation no. 2
After three days and three nights, Ulilang Kaluluwa was slain by Bathala. Instead of giving him
a proper burial, Bathala burned the snake's remains.
Situation no. 3
A few years later, the third god, Galang Kaluluwa, wandered into Bathala's home./ He
welcomed the winged god/ with much kindness/ and even invited him to live in his kingdom./
They became true friends/ and were very happy for many years/.
Galang kaluluwa: I was lost. And I couldn’t find the way back home.
Bathala: I can help you. And you are highly welcomed to live in my kingdom.
Situation no. 4
Galang Kaluluwa became very ill. Before he died. he instructed Bathala/ to bury him on the
spot where Ulilang Kaluluwa’s body was burned. Bathala did exactly as he was told. Out of the
grave of the two dead gods, it grew a tall tree with a big round nut, which is the coconut tree.
Galang Kaluluwa: My friend, before I’ll die, I need you to bury me on the spot where Ulilang
Kaluluwa’s body was burned.
Situation no. 5
Bathala took the nut and husked it. He noticed that the inner skin was hard. The nut itself
reminded him of Galang Kaluluwa’s head. It had two eyes, a flat nose, and a round mouth. Its
leaves looked so much like the wings of his dear winged friend. But the trunk was hard and
ugly, like the body of his enemy, the snake Ulilang Kaluluwa. Bathala realized that he was
ready to create the creatures he wanted with him on earth. He created the vegetation,
animals, and the first man and woman.
Bathala: Why is this so hard? Oh, it reminds me of my friend Galang kaluluwa. There are two
eyes, a flat nose, and even a round mouth. The leaves are like the wings of my dear winged
friend. But why is the trunk so hard and ugly? It’s like the body of my enemy, the snake,
Ulilang kaluluwa.
(Stand in front) From now on, I am ready to create creatures and I want them to be with me.
Let the vegetation, animals, first man and woman, reproduce.
The ball had ended, the girls were sent upstairs to sleep, while the guest from Europe who were feeling bad for they
want to party some more went out to finish their drink and have some more fun in that tropical country. At the girls
room Anastasia was telling the girls that witches were abroad for it was a night of divination, night of lovers, and those
who cared might peer in a mirror and would there behold the face of whoever it was they were fated to marry. One girl
told Anastasia to stop and get out of the room and told her that she is a witch, but another girl said that Anastasia is a
maga and was born on Christmas Eve. One girl is very eager and much interested on Anastasia’s story and want
Anastasia to tell her everything, so Anastasia for tell to the girls what to do. That she must go to a mirror close her eyes
and say, “mirror mirror show to me him whose woman I will be”, then Anastasia continued that if all goes right then her
lover will appear above her left shoulder and if it does not go right she will see the devil.
Agueda walked to the hall down to the sala bravely. The girls have not able to stop her and in their facing the mirror, she
whispered the incantation. Agueda felt different and after a while, she has a company.
Then she heard her little child talk that she almost forgets was in her lap. The child asks if what did she saw, if she saw
the devil. Then she told her child that yes she saw the devil, it was smiling at her. The devil has a scar in its face like what
his father has but the difference is that of the devil is a mark of sin while that of his father is a sign of honor. Agueda
continued that the devil has mustache too but unlike to that of his husband that smells of tobacco and is gray, that of
the devil is so black and elegant. Agueda told her child that if she does not want to see a devil, she must stop her habbit
of always looking at the mirror.
“Charms Like Yours have no need for a candle, faire one” Badoy Monitiya told Agueda then mockingly told her how vain
she is that even in the middle of the night she is looking at her face. Agueda got mad and was about to walk away, but
Badoy stop her and told her that she cannot go upstairs until she will dance with him. For during the ball Agueda has not
dance the polka with him. Forcefully Agueda refuses and then the two got into a talk fight. After a while Agueda
piteously cried and Badoy felt sorry for it and ask forgiveness. He told Agueda that he would let her go upstairs if she will
forgive him, but instead of forgiving Badoy, she bit his knucklesand fled upstairs.
Filled with pain, Badoy did not know what to do, If he will call his mother to let know what happened or he himself will
go upstairs to the girls room and drag Agueda out of the house. Then it came to him how Agueda looks, those curves
and that pretty face. Feeling the pain consciousness came that he must take revenge. Later he realize, he want to see,
touch and hear her harsh voice. Then it came to his mind that he is madly deeply in love with her, yet he must let her
pay.
One May Night Don Badoy Monitiya walks home not even caring to remember what happened years ago. He walks to
the hall and as he glanced at the mirror, he suddenly felt something. A familiar sense, then he called the ghostly figure in
front the mirror then saw that it was his grandson. Voltaire told his grandpa what the boys in school told him of how he
could see his future wife. Don Badoy led his grandson into a seat, and then they talked. He told him about the witch he
saw when he was about his age and was so vain that he wants to see himself dieing because of drunkenness. Voltaire
ask how awful the witch look like, then he told his grandson that the witch he saw was a hell so very beautiful lad and
how that witch ate his heart and drank his blood. Voltaire told his grandpa what his mother told him, about the story of
his grandma who as well is eager to see her lover but then saw the devil. At the very moment Don Badoy realized, that
was so long ago. Now she was dead, perished, that she were at last at peace and that her body was free from the brutal
pranks of the earth from the trap of a May Night, from a snare of summer. Don Badoy went up to the window and with
tears, reminisce that old love.
VII. Theme “Magical Relism”- Is a genre of fiction that occurs when elements of the magical
world start to blend or mix with the real world. “The theme centers on intense remorse
caused by wrong decisions. Like believing in superstitions.”
CHARACTERISTICS
1. Human understanding and interpretation: Data analysis shows an individual’s mental, social,
and spiritual understanding of the world. Hence, through their worldviews, you come to know what
kind of human being he or she is, including his or her values, beliefs, likes, and dislikes.
2. Active, powerful, and forceful: A lot of changes occur continuously in every stage of a qualitative
research. As you go through the research process, you find the need to amend or rephrase interview
questions and consider varied ways of getting answers, like shifting from mere speculating to
traveling to places for data gathering.
3. Multiple research approaches and methods: Qualitative research allows you to approach or
plan your study in varied ways. You are free to combine this with qualitative research and use all
gathered data and analysis techniques.
5. Contextualization: A qualitative research involves all variables, factors, or conditions affecting the
study. Your goal here is to understand human behavior.
6. Diversified data in real-life situation: A qualitative researcher prefers collecting data in a natural
setting like observing people as they live and work, analyzing photographs or videos as they
genuinely appear tom people, and looking at classrooms unchanged or adjusted to people’s
intentional observations.
7. Abounds with words and visual: Words, words, and more words come in big quantity in this kind
of research. Data gathering through interviews or library reading, as well as the presentation of data
analysis results, is done verbally. In some cases, it resorts to quoting some respondent’s answer.
8. Internal analysis: Here, you examine the data yielded by the internal traits of the subject
individuals (i. e., emotional, mental, spiritual characteristics). You study people’s perception or views
about your topic not the effects of their physical existence on your study.
ADVANTAGES
DISADVANTAGES
QUANTITATIVE
1. Hypothesis testing
2. Variables
3. Measuring the instrument before the actual project starts
4. Numeric data, precise, exact measurements
5. Standardized procedure, repetition
6. Analysis: statistical methods, charts and tables
7. Results: chart, tables and facts
8. Validity: statistical test
QUALITATIVE
Unique case orientation -- assumes that each case is special and unique; the first level of
analysis is being true to, respecting, and capturing the details of the individual cases being
studied; cross-case analysis follows from and depends upon the quality of individual case
studies.
Inductive analysis -- immersion in the details and specifics of the data to discover important
patterns, themes, and inter-relationships; begins by exploring, then confirming findings, guided
by analytical principles rather than rules.
Holistic perspective -- the whole phenomenon under study is understood as a complex
system that is more than the sum of its parts; the focus is on complex interdependencies and
system dynamics that cannot be reduced in any meaningful way to linear, cause and effect
relationships and/or a few discrete variables.
Context sensitive -- places findings in a social, historical, and temporal context; researcher is
careful about [even dubious of] the possibility or meaningfulness of generalizations across time
and space; emphasizes careful comparative case analyses and extrapolating patterns for
possible transferability and adaptation in new settings.
Voice, perspective, and reflexivity -- the qualitative methodologist owns and is reflective
about her or his own voice and perspective; a credible voice conveys authenticity and
trustworthiness; complete objectivity being impossible and pure subjectivity undermining
credibility.
Qualitative researchers use their own eyes, ears, and intelligence to collect in-depth perceptions and
descriptions of targeted populations, places, and events. Their findings are collected through a variety
of methods, and often, a researcher will use at least two or several of the following while conducting a
qualitative study.
Direct observation: With direct observation, a researcher studies people as they go about their
daily lives without participating or interfering.
Open-ended surveys: While many surveys are designed to generate quantitative data, many
are also designed with open-ended questions that allow for the generation and analysis of
qualitative data.
Focus group: In a focus group, a researcher engages a small group of participants in a
conversation designed to generate data relevant to the research question.
Context: Keeping things in context is a cardinal principle of qualitative analysis because methods,
results and conclusions of qualitative analysis are context-dependent. Therefore, they must be carefully
reported in reference to certain situations, certain people and certain time periods, as well as the
purpose for which the data are applicable.
Credibility: In order to establish researcher credibility, it is essential that a qualitative report include
information about the researcher that could have affected data collection, analysis, interpretation and
conclusions. Such information includes the personal connections that the researcher has with the
participants, the topic and the situation or context. The job of the researcher is to maintain intellectual
rigor as she does her best to make sense of all the information collected. The researcher engages in
immersion as she returns to the data again and again to see if categories, themes, constructs,
explanations, interpretations and conclusions make sense and really reflect the nature of the
phenomenon being investigated. Credibility requires that the researcher engage three activities (the
numbered bullet points are within this credibility bullet point):
1. Prolonged engagement: The researcher must spend enough time in the research context to become
sufficiently familiar with all aspects of the context and to identify contextual factors that influence the
phenomenon of interest, as well as to establish trust from and rapport with the participants.
2. Persistent observation: Such observation allows the researcher to identify and focus on the most
relevant characteristics of the situation or context.
3. Triangulation: Triangulation most commonly refers to the use of multiple and different sources of data. It
is a strategy for reducing systematic bias in the data and involves checking findings against different
sources and perspectives. The process guards the researcher from being accused that the findings are
simply a result of a single method, a single source or the single researcher's personal bias.
Intellectual Integrity: To demonstrate intellectual integrity and lend credibility to the findings of a study,
it is important to search for negative cases or disconfirming evidence that does not fit the general
patterns that have been identified. This may include identifying alternative themes and explanations to
findings, inductively looking for other ways to organize the data and logically thinking about other
explanations and then examining whether those possibilities can be supported by the data. In
qualitative research, steps are taken to challenge such bias through an active and conscientious search
using the following techniques (two bullet points within intellectual integrity):
1. A self-reflexive journal: The researcher adopts an attitude of skepticism and documents her
perspective, guiding ideas and personal thoughts throughout the research process.
2. Participant checks: In this ongoing process, the data, analytic categories or themes, interpretations and
conclusions are reviewed by the participants from whom the data are collected so that they have an
opportunity to correct errors of fact and to challenge interpretations that to them seem incorrect. The
researcher also uses follow-up questions based on the need for clarification and greater depth of
understanding.
Transferability: Transferability may be thought of as being somewhat analogous to the external validity
or generalizability of traditional quantitative methods. While qualitative findings are not generalizable,
the qualitative researcher provides the necessary database from which anyone interested in making a
transfer to their context of interest can make transferability judgments and decisions.
Dependability may be determined through an audit with the "auditor" or peer reviewer examining the
process of the research inquiry and the product, namely the data, findings, interpretations and
recommendations. The review confirms that the results, finding, and conclusions, are supported by the
data and is internally coherent and establishes the confirmability.
Confirmability: An audit trail along with triangulation and the keeping of a reflexive journal are
techniques for establishing confirmability. The audit trail includes the complete set of records and
documents that are produced and accumulated during the research process. This includes, but is not
limited to, all the raw data, written summaries and analyses, the records of analysis, findings and
conclusions, final reports, any notes on methodology, trustworthiness and any reflexive journals. The
audit trail is reviewed by an independent researcher or peer de-briefer for feedback on the
conceptualization and processes of the research.