The post‐2014 scenario — continuing uncertainties – The Express T... http://tribune.com.pk/story/512881/the‐post‐2014‐scenario‐cont...

The post-2014 scenario — continuing uncertainties

More cooperation between Islamabad, Kabul would be most welcome, but developments so far
haven't minimised confusion.
By Tariq FatemiPublished: February 26, 2013

During his State of the Union address on February 12, President Barack Obama sought to remove the impression of any vacillation
as regards the US intention to withdraw its combat troops from Afghanistan. He explained that the US would ensure a phased
withdrawal, meant to halve the number of American troops within a year’s time, reducing the present force of roughly 66,000 by
34,000. The remainder would then make a rather hasty retreat between October 2014 and the start of 2015, with a possible
residual force of several thousand staying on in a training and support capacity.

This reiteration of American resolve has been welcomed widely, but none more so than in the US, where anti-war sentiments and
an unending fiscal crisis have made continued military involvement in Afghanistan hugely unpopular. At the same time, the
prospect of foreign combat troops leaving Afghanistan rather ‘precipitously’ and in circumstances shrouded in uncertainty, has
given rise to great concern.

It is, therefore, no surprise that there is for the first time, an air of urgency and anxiety. While most states favour an end to foreign
troop presence in Afghanistan, nearly all are apprehensive about what this would mean for peace in that country and the region.
Nato defence ministers, in their meeting in Brussels last week, tried to dispel these fears by giving the assurance that the
organisation would not ‘abandon’ Afghanistan. But there was no clarity on what this meant, with the German defence minister
acknowledging that “many difficult questions would need to be answered before this issue could be settled”. Unofficially, they
spoke of their disappointment with the US determination to keep its participation in training missions of Afghans to the
minimum, which according to the President’s special assistant, General Douglas Lute, would mean no more than 10,000 troops.
And yet, the US has also indicated that it favours an Afghan force of 350,000, which would mean that the planned budget of $4
billion would be inadequate, necessitating greater contribution by Nato member states at a time when European leaders have
promised disengagement from Afghanistan and reduced defence expenditure.

With US/Nato troop departure on the anvil, there is evidence of increasing anxiety in Pakistan, too. With the elected government
having ceded policymaking on this issue to the military, the latter has been highlighting the importance of giving Pakistan a role
commensurate with its sacrifices in anti-terrorism efforts, while giving assurances of its willingness to make a genuine
contribution to the peace process in Afghanistan. Army chief General Ashfaq Parvez Kayani’s public declaration that ending
domestic extremism is the priority, rather than confronting India or trying to exert influence on Afghanistan, represents a positive
development.

But what exactly can Pakistan do? Does it have the kind of influence on the Taliban, which has been ascribed to it? Most unlikely,
given the track record of past efforts. Moreover, with visible expansion in the Taliban influence and activities, there is fear that
militants on both sides of the Durand Line, could pool their resources and enhance their operations in both countries. If this
frightening prospect leads to more cooperation between Islamabad and Kabul, it would be most welcome. But developments, so
far, have not minimised continuing confusion and uncertainty. The much-heralded peace process remains stalled even on
procedural matters, with the US refusing to make even symbolic gestures, and Hamid Karzai, though not a candidate in the 2014
presidential elections, desperate to ensure that a fellow Pashtun loyal to him wins, so as to retain influence.

The recent Chequers Summit confirmed the huge challenges confronting any initiative to promote a negotiated peace settlement
in Afghanistan. But this realisation should spur all sides to redouble their efforts because a failure to do so would be a truly
frightening prospect.

Published in The Express Tribune, February 27th, 2013.

Follow @etribune on Twitter, become a fan on Facebook Like 201k

Related Stories

1 of 2 2/27/2013 9:30 AM
The post‐2014 scenario — continuing uncertainties – The Express T... http://tribune.com.pk/story/512881/the‐post‐2014‐scenario‐cont...

26 Feb 2013 US special forces told to leave key Afghan province

23 Feb 2013 Spurned by Afghanistan, Pakistan to contact Interpol over

Maulvi Faqir
26 Feb 2013US imposes sanctions on Mullah Nazir's militant group

This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, redistributed or derived from.
Unless otherwise stated, all content is copyrighted © 2013 The Express Tribune News Network.
Technical feedback? webmaster@tribune.com.pk

2 of 2 2/27/2013 9:30 AM