Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
VICTORIA UNIVERSITY
COLLEGE OF BUSINESS
Submitted by:
DISCLOSURE OF LEASING
GROUP ASSIGNEMENT 1
BAO2202: FINANCIAL ACOUNTING
The public listed corporations are abided by numerous legal obligations listed and set out in
Corporations Act 2001. Additionally, these companies are also obligated to adapt to reporting
obligations which include preparations of the annual financial reports which must be
prepared in accordance with Australian Standards. The body called AASB; Australian
Accounting Standards Board has set out the rules and regulations that must be abided by the
corporations operating in Australia. These regulations are established to make the companies
provide comprehensible and transparent information in the general purpose financial reports
in order to provide the potential information users with accurate information. This in turn will
In the report, the financial reports of Qantas and BHP Billiton are examined and analysed in
accordance with the Australian Financial Reporting Standards. This report focuses on four
key sections of the annual financial reports of the two companies including disclosure of the
lease, liabilities, intangible assets and revenue. The report highlights the extent of the
compliance of these sections with the Reporting Standards, as well as, provides necessary
GROUP ASSIGNEMENT 2
BAO2202: FINANCIAL ACOUNTING
To comply with the recently issued IFRS 16, Australian Accounting Standard Board has
issued AASB 16, which has an effective date as January 2019. This will replace the current
lease accounting practices of AASB 117- leases. As airline industry and mining companies,
Qantas and BHP, it is expecting a bigger change over the lease accounting treatments
(Sinclair and Ridley, 2016). It can be identified in Qantas’s 2016 annual report, a note on the
standard changes and minor description of the impact on it. But there is no any inclusion
about the AASB 16 in BHP’s latest available annual report, 2015. Therefore, both these
companies are still using the accounting practices of AASB 117 for their leasing treatment.
Both companies’ financial statements are indicating highly proportionate use of lease assets
in their operations. As per the AASB provisions for operating and finance leases, there
Under the accounts of Qantas, there is a lease rental of $461million. This has shown under
the face income statement indicates Qantas has $461million of operating assets. AASB 117
requires operating lease rental to straightway recognize under the income statement, which
has correctly done by Qantas. Also, there are notes in Qantas about the future minimum
lease payment, sublease payments, arrangement or special terms of lease agreements. They
have categorized those as aircraft/ engine and non-aircraft/ engine. In BHP, they haven’t
shown the operating lease expenses in the face of income statement instead they have
GROUP ASSIGNEMENT 3
BAO2202: FINANCIAL ACOUNTING
detailed under the notes to the operating expenses in their note 3. In 2015 y/e, they have $636
million worth of operating leases. In BHP, there is a breakdown for future lease commitments
as required by the standard but despite to Qantas, BHP has not shown the product categorizes
where they have obtained the operating leases or sublease payments, arrangement or special
terms either not shown completely or disclose at a very minimum level. Operating leases
accounting treatments are very much important to business since it directly and indirectly
affecting for the business profits after the taxes. Here, it indicates as a result of operating
leases rentals cut-off through the income statements, its impact on the business (Ross et al.
2004). Due to the same reason, most of the stakeholders are asking proper disclosure over the
In finance, lease accounting treatments are different to operating leases under the AASB 117.
As the lessee BHP and Qantas need to identify assets and liabilities based on the fair value
based (Sinclair and Ridley, 2016). In BHP, there is a $436 million finance leases identified
and most of the leases are here mineral lands they have acquired. They have divided the
leases assets as current and noncurrent assets based on the duration they should could have
acquired. The finance lease’s interest portion has rightly taken in to the finance expenses in
BHP’s 2015 income statement. Also carrying amounts of each finance leases recognized
no mention about the calculation of fair value of assets/ liabilities. It is required under the
AASB 117, to mention the rate used to calculate the fair/ present values to recognize as the
balance sheet items. On the other hand, Qantas’s financial statement there is a $1,469 million
worth of finance leases. Same to BHP, Qantas too identified the finance lease assets/
breakdown under the balance sheet note to show net carrying values of the finance leases in
Qantas. Despite to operating leases categorization of aircraft/ engine and non-aircraft/ engine,
in finance leases Qantas has recognized in a one heading (there is no classification). Also to
depreciate the finance lease assets, common depreciation methods have used by Qantas as
provision of AASB 138, it has disclosed in their depreciation note. Same to BHP, there is no
disclosure about the fair value measurement for Qantas. Either present value rate used or
Both BHP’s and Qantas’s financial statements can’t identify any leases they have provided as
lessors. In AASB 117, there should have different accounting treatments and disclosure need
Since BHP and Qantas from different industries, there are general differences in disclosures
for operating and finance leases in their financial statements (Gibson, 2013). BHP should
have not disclosed sub leases and leases expenses for the periods as required by the standard.
The arrangements for different lease agreements weren’t described by both the
companies. Those disclosures are required in AASB 16 as well. Therefore, once they
reported operating leases in future financial statements, need to provide such disclosures for
required stakeholders.
Finance leases, which is expecting to deeper disclosures under the AASB 16 than AASB 117,
especially the fair value calculations (King, 2016). Here, both the companies have not
disclosed about the rate and criteria used to take the fair value are questionable. This is an
GROUP ASSIGNEMENT 5
BAO2202: FINANCIAL ACOUNTING
area where companies can manipulate the figures with different estimates as AASB 117
seems not consistent enough over the companies (Sinclair and Ridley, 2016). But under the
AASB 16, has bridged this gap with compulsory disclosures as now all leases now should be
shown as balance sheet item (King, 2016). Therefore, it is required both the companies to
improve their disclosures for fair value calculations in their future leases disclosures. Also in
future annul reports before 2019, of both these companies; it is recommended to show the
possible impact as a note with the changes of leases standard since it has predicted that both
airline and mining companies will affect largely with this change.
GROUP ASSIGNEMENT 6
BAO2202: FINANCIAL ACOUNTING
DISCLOSURE OF LIABILITIES
With the overall sum of the entity in which it can be realistically repay at the final stage of
Whereas measuring Provision, the overall should be acknowledgment as the best estimation
of thought which need it to set the current requirement at the end of the reporting phase.
Measuring Contingent Liability clarify that the total of the requirement cannot be measured
Recognition of liability show that it is possible that running out of resource will result in the
settlement of modern compulsion. It show the total of settlement will take place, which be
able to be measured regularly. Liability illustrate suitable materiality level that supposed to
set below so
dissimilarity might take place on the initial of a liability, but it's not likely for a firm to
subtract tax at some cost of an asset in the firm. This accounting method is for provisional
GROUP ASSIGNEMENT 7
BAO2202: FINANCIAL ACOUNTING
difference based on the transaction that will finally initial recognize a liability. If the
organization agreement, recognized several accounting lose or gain the corporation identify a
few delayed tax liability which occur as of the deferring tax expense or income in the profit
or loss summary.
if the agreement is not a business understanding than it will not have an effect on neither
accounting income nor taxable profits and entity would be not present to exception which
offer a deferred the tax liability to be familiar with the tax that would be acknowledged for
the taxable rage along with differences that is predictable to the point that the deferred tax
liability approach to pass from the first acknowledgement of liability in transaction which
isn't a industry understanding and a point where the time of transaction result in neither the
accounting profit or the tax profit, this adjustment would compose the financial statement less
obvious. therefore the standard doesn't approve a exacting entity to distinguish succeeding
Provision that is contain an entity which have a present obligation that could result in a past
event. it's to be expected that provision has a loss of resource on behalf of the economic
reimbursement which is required to settle with the obligation. it have a reliable estimate
Contingent Liabilities are not acknowledged in the financial statements since it must be initial
expose in term of the note to the financial statements. it's not predictable that contingent
liability contain a loss of capital representing the economic benefit that will be necessary to
GROUP ASSIGNEMENT 8
BAO2202: FINANCIAL ACOUNTING
The economic principles of assets and liabilities representation all organization of the
potential currency flow. The majority are undecided but a few of these subject of contractual
In differentiate of entry value viewpoint it's establish that on a sure examination of the
this clarify that it's not an economic examination, except it present a position where its
realistic intended for those who desire to place financial price on the firm.
These firms observe that since contingent liability cannot be recognized in the financial
statement. It’s not identifiable as it must initial assemble the release in the notes of the
financial statement. Contingent Liabilities in obtain in industry agreement state Qantas and
BHP are facing an unexpected liabilities occur from the expectations gaining and disposals of
and community liability maintain. The provision such as liabilities are based on self-
regulating actuarial measurement, which show the statistics, sum and stage of assert. its
Imbursement include injury which happen before the balance sheet date, other than anywhere
the maintain be to inform following the reporting date. Provision reduction employ the
GROUP ASSIGNEMENT 9
BAO2202: FINANCIAL ACOUNTING
A. The carry forward The carrying quantity from the beginning and end of the given period
B. Supplementary provision have in any given period, with adding to obtain provision
all through at the final phase of the economic period, the organization have best salaried best.
1
GROUP ASSIGNEMENT
0
BAO2202: FINANCIAL ACOUNTING
Disclosure of intangible assets is an essential requirement for the profit making entities in
accordance with Australian Accounting Standards Board. The section 138 of AASB sets out
the objective, definition and requirements in a comprehended manner. This section of the
report illustrates the compliance of Qantas and BHP Billiton with the AASB.
AASB 138
For profit making entities, the accounting standard 138 is applicable to all the annual
reporting periods commencing on or after 1 July 2013. The purpose of this standard to
“prescribe the accounting treatment for intangible assets that are not dealt with specifically in
Analysis compares and discusses BHP and Qantas intangible asset disclosures
Annual report for the year 2016 of both the companies illustrate that the two companies
present the intangible assets in a comprehended manner in the financial reports (BHP Billiton
2016), (Qantas 2016). The two companies meet the objective of the standard and provide
The AASB 138 provides a series of disclosure requirements for the companies. One of them
was disclosure of useful lives as finite or infinite, and if it is finite, then utilisation of
amortisation rates. Qantas and BHP Billiton both comply with this rule as the two companies
have provided the amortisation rates in the intangible asset. Additionally, the accumulated
amortisation is carried at the beginning and end of the period (BHP Billiton 2016), (Qantas
2016).
1
GROUP ASSIGNEMENT
1
BAO2202: FINANCIAL ACOUNTING
In addition, if the asset has infinite useful life, then the entities must provide the depiction of
the asset accompanied by the factors that determined the asset has infinite useful life in their
financial report (AASB 2016). It is crucial for them to present the carrying amount and
residual amortization period in their financial reports. When examined the annual report of
BHP Billiton, it is inferred that the company has provided all the necessary components
mentioned above in a clear and transparent manner, thus it complies with this provision. In
the financial report, the company explains the Goodwill as an intangible asset with infinite
useful life and provides information regarding the same (BHP Billiton 2016). However, the
financial report of Qantas presents the mere figures for the Goodwill without presenting any
explanations about the factors associated and its fair value which is questionable. Thus, this
Furthermore, according to AASB 136, it is essential for the entities to disclose statistics
regarding impaired intangible assets. BHP Billiton’s annual report for the year 2016 identifies
the impaired intangible assets for the year and discloses it in the financial report separately.
This provides the potential users with transparent statistics relating to impaired assets (BHP
Billiton 2016). On the other hand, impaired intangible assets are classified in “others” in the
financial report of Qantas which includes foreign exchange movements, non-cash additions
and impairments of intangible assets as described in the notes under the intangible assets
column. Despite the disclosure, the statistics and information is not transparent in this case as
it is unknown about the exact amount of intangible assets being impaired (Qantas 2016).
1
GROUP ASSIGNEMENT
2
BAO2202: FINANCIAL ACOUNTING
Both the industries have provided the information relating to the intangible assets taking in
consideration the standard, however, they have not justified to the rules and regulations
mentioned in accordance with the AASB standard 138. The two companies have defined and
recognised the intangible assets according the standard, but they lacked the disclosure of the
same. Firstly, when evaluating and analysing the financial reports of BHP Billiton, it is
inferred that the company has presented its disclosure in an effective manner and in
compliance with the standard (BHP Billiton 2016). Though, it can present the fair value of
the intangible assets with infinite life in more descriptive style. Similarly, the financial report
of Qantas can be improved if they provide impaired intangible assets separately which will
provide a transparent statistic (Qantas 2016). Along with that, it can also provide explanation
about intangible assets with infinite life. These changes may help the user to understand the
report and the financial performance and position of the company in an improved way
(AASB 2016).
1
GROUP ASSIGNEMENT
3
BAO2202: FINANCIAL ACOUNTING
DISCLOSURE OF REVENUE
Australian Accounting Standard Board has been in the process of issuing Accounting
standards for the professional Accountants and corporate so that they can be guided properly
how to deal with accounting treatments of accounting related matters. AASB has prescribed
the treatment also for the revenue issuing a full flash standard AASB 118 which covers Sale
of Good, Interest, Royalties and Dividends and also Rendering Services .We will here review
most recent financial reports of two Australian based firms (Qantas and BHP Billiton) from
different industries. Our main is to analyze, compare and discuss both firms’ disclosures of
revenue to explore both firms’ compliance with relevant Australian accounting standard.
While some recommendations will be made at the end of each section regarding the
improvement of accounting information being analyzed that can ultimately help in the
ANALYSIS
Qantas
Qantas has prepared all its financial statements according to the Australian accounting
standards and International financial reporting standards, its revenue has been recognized
under the criteria of revenue recognition being prescribed by Australian accounting standard
The criterion of revenue recognition under the new Australian accounting standard 15 has
been fulfilled
Revenue arisen from providing services is one of the aspects of the Scope to which AAS is
1
GROUP ASSIGNEMENT
4
BAO2202: FINANCIAL ACOUNTING
BHP Billiton
BHP Billiton has complied with international financial reporting standards and Australian
accounting standards preparing its financial reports and UK companies Act 2006, Australian
Corporation Act 2001 as well. (BHP Billiton, 2016). In its revenue section it has disclose the
Somehow it is following and old Australian accounting standard related to revenue which
might be still in practice while its revenue recognition criteria is the part of newly issued
Both firms Qantas and BHP Billiton have complied with the AASB, Qantas revenue
disclosures are not so explanatory so that it makes analysis slightly challengeable, therefore it
needs to improve its transparency disclosing every section of the revenue. BHP Billiton is
somehow doing good, disclosing some of the relevant information regarding revenue
recognition principles and measurement prescription, while it can improve its disclosures
DISCUSSION
Qantas
Qantas’ revenue comes from net passenger and freight services and other income as well. Net
passengers and freight revenue comes from two main regions, 1) net passengers and freight
revenue from Australia 2) net passenger and freight revenue from overseas. Third part of the
revenue that is other income slightly seems debatable. Net passenger and freight revenue is
attributed to a geographic region based on the point of sale and where not directly available,
1
GROUP ASSIGNEMENT
5
BAO2202: FINANCIAL ACOUNTING
BHP Billiton
BHP Billiton Revenue mainly comes from its sale of products, it is a mining company
involves in the mining of gold, petroleum, iron etc. the revenue has been recognized under
the criteria of AASB 118 as per the Compliance statement in the reports. Its revenue is
disclosed by the company on geographical basis, sale of good and rendering services.
Its customers are located across the globe and that is why it has classified and disclosed the
revenue from each geographical region. Its customers from china contribute the largest
proportion of its overall revenue. It has disclosed all its revenue from each region separately.
BHP Billiton has recognized its revenue under the specific criteria given by IFRS and AASB
“Revenue is recognized when the risk and rewards of ownership of the goods have passed to
the buyer based on agreed delivery terms and it can be measured reliably. Depending on
customer terms this can be based on issuance of a bill of lading or when delivery is
completed as per the agreement with the Group’s customers” ( AASB 2010).
Both of the firms have given sufficient and adequate information about the revenue and its
recognition somehow, while Qantas has not disclosed revenue properly coming from each of
the sub-class of other income, the information about other income might not be sufficient to
use it in decision making by statement of financial users. It needs to consider every aspect of
1
GROUP ASSIGNEMENT
6
BAO2202: FINANCIAL ACOUNTING
revenue, its recognition criteria (how it has recognized the revenue), measurement (how it has
Same id for the BHP Billiton it has somehow disclosed the revenue related information
comparatively more than Qantas, however it can improve the transparency of information in
various ways such that the decision makers may be able to exercise their judgment about the
COMPARISON
Qantas BHP Billiton
It uses AASB and A-IFRS for the It uses AASB and IFRS for the
presentation and preparation of preparation and presentation of its
financial statements and also for the financial statements.
revenue disclosures. Its revenue disclosures are made
Its revenue measurement prescription comparatively more transparent than
and recognition criteria has not that of Qantas.
mentioned by the company itself in its It uses the old AASB guidance
report. regarding the measurement of revenue
Qantas other income is also included as while it has adopted the IFRS as well,
part of revenue while revenue should recognizing its revenue on the basis of
be only that comes from sale of goods, new IFRS 15 and new AASB 15 as
rendering services. well while AASB 118 is still active
until January 2018.
(AASB 2016)
Both firms need to improve its transparency in its financial reports in the form of
overall revenue.
Both firms should state in their reports the specific accounting treatments and
measurement
It might be more better to state in the disclosure note “ revenue has been measured
and recognized according to the principles of AASB and IFRS, all the revenue is
1
GROUP ASSIGNEMENT
7
BAO2202: FINANCIAL ACOUNTING
complied with the principles and treatments of AASB”. Explaining each section of
revenue in full detail will be more useful for the decision makers.
In concise, it is evident from the report that the rules and guidelines outlined by the AASB is
an indispensable requirement for the public corporations as this obligates the companies to
present the information in clear and transparent manner in their general purpose financial
report. When analysing the financial reports of BHP Billiton and Qantas, it is established that
the two companies have provided the necessary information that is outlined in AASB.
However, the information and statistics can be presented in superior manner and with more
explanation that can provide its potential users with a well detailed information, which in turn
1
GROUP ASSIGNEMENT
8
BAO2202: FINANCIAL ACOUNTING
REFERENCES
<http://www.aasb.gov.au/admin/file/content105/c9/AASB118_07-04_COMPoct10_01-
11.pdf>
standards.aspx>
http://www.aasb.gov.au/admin/file/content105/c9/AASB138_08-15_COMPoct15_01-
18.pdf>
BHP Billiton 2016, BHP Billiton annual report for the year ended 30 June 2016, viewed 15
suite>
King A 2016, Lease accounting standards will shift debt back to companies, Australian
<http://www.afr.com/business/accounting/new-accounting-standards-will-shift-debt-back-to-
companies-20160113-gm4xqm>
Qantas 2016, Qantas annual report for the year ended 30 June 2016, viewed 10 September
2016
<http://www.qantas.com.au/infodetail/about/corporateGovernance/2016AnnualReport.pdf>
1
GROUP ASSIGNEMENT
9
BAO2202: FINANCIAL ACOUNTING
Sinclair S & Ridley C 2016, Special gaap report AASB 16, viewed 15 September, 2016
<http://gaap.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/GAAP-Consulting-Special-GAAP-Report-
AASB-16-Leases.pdf>
Lennard, A 2003,"Liabilities and how to account for them", Balance Sheet, Vol. 11 Iss 1 pp.
2
GROUP ASSIGNEMENT
0