Você está na página 1de 5

Numerical analysis of impact events in a centrifugal impact pin mill

C. Labra, J. Y. Ooi, J. F. Chen, and J. Sun

Citation: AIP Conference Proceedings 1542, 935 (2013); doi: 10.1063/1.4812086


View online: https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4812086
View Table of Contents: http://aip.scitation.org/toc/apc/1542/1
Published by the American Institute of Physics
Numerical Analysis of Impact Events in a Centrifugal
Impact Pin Mill
C. Labra∗ , J. Y. Ooi∗ , J.F. Chen∗,† and J. Sun∗

Institute for Infrastructure & Environment, School of Engineering, University of Edinburgh, UK

School of Planning, Architecture and Civil Engineering, Queen’s University Belfast, North Ireland, UK

Abstract. Milling is an important operation in many industries, such as mining and pharmaceutical. Although the comminu-
tion process during milling has been extensively studied, the material fragmentation mechanisms in a mill are still not well
understood partly because of the lack of an understanding on the local stressing and dynamic information under operational
conditions in mills.
This paper presents a DEM simulation of particle dynamics and impact events in a centrifugal impact pin mill. The main
focus is the statistical characteristics of the dominant stressing modes during the milling process. The frequency, velocity and
force of the different impact events between particles and mill components, or between particles, are analysed.
Keywords: Milling, Discrete elements, Comminution
PACS: 81.20.Wk, 07.05.Tp, 79.20.Ap, 81.05.Rm

INTRODUCTION MODELLING OF IMPACT PIN MILL


Milling is a common unit operation deployed in many Impact mills are one of the most popular types of mill-
industrial sectors for particle size reduction. Although s for fine and intermediate grinding [5, 6]. Their differ-
its importance has been recognised for many years, ent mechanical designs give different grinding perfor-
it is still known to be highly inefficient in terms of mances. Typical impact mills include high-speed rotat-
energy consumption, and its optimization in design ing disk, hammer, axial flow and annular. Rotating disk
and operation remains very challenging largely due to mills have pins or blades on each disk, with one of the
the lack of scientific understanding of the complex disks rotates at high speeds up to about 150 m/s.
mechanisms involved. A high-speed rotating disk pin mill generates consid-
Considerable amount of work has been conducted to erable impact between the solids and pins. They are com-
date on measuring and characterising the grinding char- monly used for fine grinding applications.
acteristics of particulate solids. Examples include sin- This paper presents a study in which an impact pin
gle particle measurements on impact, crushing charac- mill was modelled using the DEM. The simulations were
teristics [1, 2] and bulk measurements on attrition, shear performed assuming vacuum condition and rigid parti-
and compression [3, 4]. Whilst these measurements have cles. More complex models including particle breakage
provided useful scientific insights relating the milling and/or fluid coupling will be considered in the future.
characteristics to the mechanical properties and particle
breakage mechanisms as a result of the loading condi-
tions induced in these tests, it is not at all clear how The discrete element method
these loading conditions relate to what actually happens
in a typical milling operation. Since particle breakage is The DEM method is widely recognized as a suitable
highly sensitive to both the nature of the stressing mod- tool for modelling materials such as rocks, soils, and
e and the strain rate imposed on the particles in a mil- mineral ores [7]. The DEM assumes that the granular ma-
l, the relevance of these tests is not clear. This paper terial can be represented as a collection of rigid particles
describes a numerical study using the discrete element interacting with each other in the normal and tangential
method (DEM) to evaluate the stressing events that pre- directions at the contact points. Material deformation is
vail in an impact pin milling operation which can then be assumed to be concentrated at the contact points. Dif-
used to establish material grindability in the context of ferent contact models have been proposed to represent
these stressing events. different contact behaviour [8, 9, 10]. In this study, a for-
mulation for spherical elements following the original as-
sumptions presented by Cundall and Strack [11] is used,
considering a linear elastic contact model with a constant

Powders and Grains 2013


AIP Conf. Proc. 1542, 935-938 (2013); doi: 10.1063/1.4812086
© 2013 AIP Publishing LLC 978-0-7354-1166-1/$30.00

935
stiffness [12]. A Velocity Verlet algorithm is used for the
time integration scheme [13, 14].

Impact pin mill model


The centrifugal impact mill modelled in this study is
a pin mill from Hosokawa Micron Ltd. The mill is 200
mm in diameter and consists of five rings of pins. The
pins are 3 mm in diameter and 15 mm in length. In the
actual mill the pin spacing reduces outwards considering
the reduction of particle size. As the DEM model in
this study considers rigid particles without breakage, the
pin spacing is kept constant at about 7 mm (∼3 particle
diameters) in all rings. Three rings of pins are fixed to the
rotary bottom plate which rotates at a speed of 1000 rpm,
FIGURE 1. DEM model of an impact pin mill after 1 s
while the other two rings of pins are fixed to the static top
operation time
plate, where the particle inlet is located. The numerical
model is shown in Figure 1.
The model consists of 6400 spherical particles, which
pected that the particle-pin impact is the dominant event.
have a diameter varying between 1.16 and 1.20 mm
following a normal distribution. The particle density is
TABLE 1. Statistics of particle impact events
ρ = 1000 kg/m3 . All the contacts are assumed to have a
normal contact stiffness kn = 106 N/m, tangential contact Parameter Values
stiffness ks = 0.1 kn , and Coulomb friction coefficient No. of particles 1342
μ = 0.5. Max. No. of impacts per particle 269
At the start of the simulation, the particles are intro- Min. No. of impacts per particle 4
duced in the mill through the central inlet at an initial Mean No. of impacts per particle 56
Mean No. of particle-pin impacts 50
velocity of 10 m/s. Once inside the mill, they are accel- Mean No. of particle-particle impacts 3
erated by the centrifugal forces and launched towards the Mean normal impact force (N) 19.50
impact zone consisting of alternate rotating and static pin stdev normal impact force (N) 15.97
rings. The particles that have passed through the impact Mean relative impact velocity (m/s) 4.73
zone are re-introduced to the inlet with the same initial stdev relative impact velocity (m/s) 3.93
conditions so all conditions remain constant at the steady Mean pass time (s) 0.088
stdev pass time (s) 0.051
state which was reached after 0.2 seconds from the s-
tart. This paper reports selected results for a simulation
conducted for 1.2 seconds of mill operation time. The
mass rate at the steady state was found to be 80 kg per To allow for a better comparison of the impact events
hour. A sample of the simulation performed is depicted in the analysis, the time for each particle was initialised at
in Figure 1. t = 0 at the first particle-pin impact event. The pass time
shown in Table 1 and plotted hereafter thus represents the
time required for the particles to pass through the impact
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION zone.
Figure 2 shows that the average impact normal force
During the 1.2s of the simulated milling process, a sam- increases initially and becomes almost constant very
ple size of 1342 particles and all the pins has been tracked shortly after that, except a few impacts with higher
to record the impact events. The impact events for parti- impact forces for a few when the particles have been
cles and pins are analysed separately, allowing the study resident in the impact zone for an extended period of time
of their behaviour individually. (0.4 - 0.5 s). The impact frequency reduces exponentially
During the simulation, a total of 75748 impacts were in the impact zone over time (Figure 3), showing that the
recorded for all the tracked particles. Table 1 shows the great majority of impacts occur in a range of 0.2 s.
statistics of these impacts, of which 88% are particle-pin The number of impacts per particle also reduces
impacts, 5% particle-particle impact and the remaining exponentially as the impact velocity (and thus the impact
7% are impacts with the mill discs. This shows as ex- force) increases (Figure 4). As particle breakage does not

936
of pins, the main statistical parameters are presented in
Table 2.
It is seen that the number of impacts reduces almost
linearly from the inner Ring 1 to the outer Ring 5, except
for the innermost ring which registered a smaller number
of impacts than the next Ring 2, probably because the
particle velocity is still relatively low before the first
impact with a pin in the first ring.
The distribution of the particle-pin impact force and
velocity over the pins is almost uniform. The frequency
of the impact normal force and velocity for each ring of
pins are shown in Figures 5 and 6.
FIGURE 2. Evolution of average impact normal force when
particles pass through the impact zone

FIGURE 5. Distribution of normal impact normal force in


each ring of pins

FIGURE 3. Particle impact frequency vs particle pass time


through the impact zone

usually occur under low impact force/velocity, and mod-


ification to the mill design to alter this distribution to re-
duce the number of low velocity impact would be bene-
ficial.

FIGURE 6. Distribution of relative impact velocity in each


ring of pins
For the impact normal force, the results show that a
significant proportion of the impacts have almost negli-
gible values which will not lead to any significant par-
ticle breakage. This is particularly true for the first (in-
nermost) ring of pins. The distribution becomes progres-
sively flatter for the outer rings (Figure 5). The same phe-
nomenon applies to the impact velocity (Figure 6).
Other interesting results are found comparing the
FIGURE 4. Frequency vs magnitude of the impact velocity
of the particles number and distribution of the impacts between the dif-
ferent pin rings. The first and second inner pin rings have
For the impact events recorded in the different rings similar number and distribution of impacts, but after the

937
TABLE 2. Statistics of impact events in different rings of pins
Parameter Ring 1 Ring 2 Ring 3 Ring 4 Ring 5
No. of pins 60 66 72 76 80
Max. No. of impacts per pin 6101 6915 4858 3229 1315
Min. No. of impacts per pin 5289 6010 4273 2817 1119
Mean No. of impacts per pin 5639 6386 4564 3026 1212
stdev No. of impacts per pin 149.1 178.1 116.1 91.4 45.2
Mean normal impact force (N) 14.95 19.63 23.43 27.00 28.52
stdev normal impact force (N) 12.88 14.05 16.27 17.64 18.15
Mean relative impact velocity (m/s) 3.51 4.62 5.51 6.35 6.69
stdev relative impact velocity (m/s) 3.15 3.47 4.02 4.37 4.53

second layer the number of impacts reduces significant- 2. M. Meier, E. John, D. Wieckhusen, W. Wirth, and
ly, indicating that the outer rings of pins may not be as W. Peukert, European Journal of Pharmaceutical
effective in reducing the particle size as the inner rings. Sciences 34, 45–55 (2008).
3. M. Ghadiri, Z. Ning, S. Kenter, and E. Puik, Chemical
The results presented here are all in the normal impact
Engineering Science 55, 5445–5456 (2000).
direction. Further investigation is being undertaken to 4. G. Mucsi, Chemical Engineering Research and Design
investigate the characteristics in the tangential direction, 86, 395–400 (2008), ISSN 0263-8762.
the resultant impact velocity and force as well as other 5. T. Yokoyama, and Y. Inoue, “Chapter 10 Selection of Fine
quantities which can shed more lights into the particle Grinding Mills,” in Particle Breakage, edited by M. G.
dynamics and impact characteristics in the mill. Agba D. Salman, and M. J. Hounslow, Elsevier Science
B.V., 2007, vol. 12 of Handbook of Powder Technology,
pp. 487–508.
6. L. Vogel, and W. Peukert, Powder Technology 129,
CONCLUSIONS 101–110 (2003).
7. M. S. Powell, and A. T. McBride, Minerals Engineering
This paper has presented a DEM analysis of a centrifugal 19, 1013–1021 (2006).
impact pin mill. The impact events have been analysed 8. H. Hertz, Journal für die reine und angewandte
with a focus on the characteristics of the impact event, Mathematik 92, 156–171 (1882).
9. S. Ji, and H. H. Shen, J. Engrg. Mech. 132, 1252–1259
force and velocity which can be used to characterise (2006).
the mill function. This is a preliminary study aiming 10. S. Luding, Granular Matter 10, 235–246 (2008).
to develop an understanding of the particle dynamics in 11. P. Cundall, and O. Strack, Geotechnique 29, 47–65
the milling process. It has been shown that the particles (1979).
are under the effect of multiple impacts with different 12. J. Rojek, C. Labra, O. Su, and E. Oñate, Int. J. of Solids
objects during the process and the pins on the outer and Structures 49, 1497–1517 (2012).
13. K. Bathe, and E. Wilson, Numerical Methods in Finite
rings are not as effective as those in the inner rings for Element Analysis, Prentice Hall, 1976.
the mill configuration studied. The significance of these 14. H. Kruggel-Emden, M. Sturma, S. Wirtza, and
findings will be further investigated considering particle V. Scherera, Computers & Chemical Engineering
breakage in the simulation, leading to a deeper scientific 32, 2263–2279 (2008).
understanding of the grindability of granular solids.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The authors gratefully acknowledge the support of the
European Community under the Marie Curie Initial
Training Network, the support of the International Fine
Particles Research Institute and useful discussion from
Hosokawa Micron Ltd.

REFERENCES
1. S. Antonyuk, M. Khanal, J. Tomas, S. Heinrich, and
L. Mörl, Chemical Engineering and Processing: Process
Intensification 45, 838–856 (2006).

938

Você também pode gostar