Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
Chapter 3
DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION FEATURES
IMPORTANT TO SEISMIC PERFORMANCE
• Stable foundations,
• Continuous load paths,
• Adequate stiffness and strength,
• Regularity,
• Redundancy,
• Ductility and toughness, and
• Ruggedness.
In areas of highest seismic risk (i.e., where the strongest earthquakes may occur)
and for the most important structures in those areas, the Provisions requires
inclusion of all of these features in the design and construction of buildings and
other structures. In areas of lower seismic risk and for less important structures,
the Provisions permits some of these features to be neglected if the structures
are designed stronger. This chapter presents a brief overview of these important
features of seismic design.
CHAPTER 3 35
EARTHQUAKE-RESISTANT DESIGN CONCEPTS
ture is not torn apart by the differential ground displacements. A continuous mat
is an effective foundation system to resist such displacements. When individual
pier or spread footing foundations are used, it is important to provide reinforced
concrete grade beams between the individual foundations so that the foundations
move as an integral unit.
Figure 16 Collapse of a tilt-up building in the 1971 San Fernando earthquake (photo by P. Yanev).
36 CHAPTER 3
EARTHQUAKE-RESISTANT DESIGN CONCEPTS
Figure 17 Houses in Watsonville, California, that fell off their foundations in the 1989 Loma Prieta
earthquake.
CHAPTER 3 37
EARTHQUAKE-RESISTANT DESIGN CONCEPTS
38 CHAPTER 3
EARTHQUAKE-RESISTANT DESIGN CONCEPTS
This six-story structure had several types of irregularity including end shear walls Figure 19 Imperial County
that stopped below the second floor and a first story with less strength and stiff- Services Building, El
ness than the stories above. As a result, earthquake energy dissipation and dam- Centro, California (pho-
age were concentrated in the first story columns, a condition that could not be tocourtesy of USGS). The
repaired and required demolition of the building after the earthquake. In a more photo on the right shows
severe earthquake, this type of damage could have caused the building to collapse. the crushed columns at
the base of the building.
3.5 Redundancy
As noted above, for economic reasons the NEHRP Recommended Seismic Provi-
sions reflects a design philosophy that anticipates damage to buildings and other
structures as a result of strong earthquake shaking. If all of a structure’s strength
and resistance is concentrated in only one or a few elements, the structure will
not have any residual strength if these elements are seriously damaged and it
could collapse. If a structure is redundant, a relatively large number of elements
participate in providing a structure’s strength and, if only a few are badly dam-
aged, the remaining elements may have adequate residual strength to prevent col-
lapse. This can be thought of as not putting all of your earthquake-resistant eggs
in one basket.
CHAPTER 3 39
EARTHQUAKE-RESISTANT DESIGN CONCEPTS
In masonry and concrete structures, steel is used in the form of reinforcing bars
that are placed integrally with the masonry and concrete. When reinforced ma-
sonry and concrete elements are loaded in bending or shear, the steel reinforcing
bars will yield in tension and continue to carry load, thus protecting the masonry
and concrete from failure. In wood structures, steel fasteners (typically nails,
bolts, and straps) bind the pieces of wood together. When the wood is loaded in
shear or bending, these steel connectors yield and protect the wood from splitting
and crushing. In steel structures, ductility is achieved by proportioning the struc-
tural members with sufficient thickness to prevent local buckling, by bracing the
members to prevent them from twisting, and by joining the members together
using connections that are stronger than the members themselves so the structure
does not pull apart. In structures of all types, ductility and toughness are achieved
by proportioning the structure so that some members can yield to protect the rest
of the structure from damage.
The measures used to achieve ductility and toughness in structural elements are
unique to each construction material and to each type of structural system. The
building codes specify the measures to use to provide ductility and toughness
40 CHAPTER 3
EARTHQUAKE-RESISTANT DESIGN CONCEPTS
through reference to the various materials industry design standards (e.g., ACI
318, AISC 341, TMS 402), each of which contain detailed requirements for ob-
taining structural ductility.
3.7 Ruggedness
Ruggedness is a property of some mechanical and electrical equipment and other
nonstructural building components that permits these items to remain functional
after experiencing strong shaking. A rugged piece of equipment will have ad-
equate structural strength and will be composed of components that do not lose
their ability to properly perform their intended functions when shaken. For ex-
ample, some types of electrical control equipment employ mercury type switches
to activate certain operations. In strong shaking, the mercury, being liquid, can
flow and trigger electrical shutdowns. Such equipment would not be considered
rugged as opposed to equipment with mechanical or solid state switches. Simi-
larly, some computer equipment is intentionally constructed with slide-out boards
and cards. If these boards or cards can be dislodged by shaking and fall out of
the equipment, the equipment would not be considered rugged unless the cards
were provided with locking mechanisms that would prevent them from becoming
dislodged during shaking. Ruggedness of equipment usually can be demonstrated
only by subjecting the equipment to shaking, either in a real earthquake or using
special laboratory devices (called shake tables) that simulate the shaking induced
by earthquakes.
CHAPTER 3 41