Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
LIMITED
BY
SCHOOL OF BUSINESS
KABARAK UNIVERSITY
NOVEMBER 2008
DECLARATION
This research proposal is our original work and has not been presented for the award of a
degree in any other university/institution or for any other purpose.
This proposal has been submitted for examination with my approval as the university
supervisor.
This project could never been achieved if not for the guidance and support of the
following person: Foremost, a lot of gratitude to our supervisor Dr Zakayo lecturer in the
School of Business, Kabarak University for his guidance and support and availability
throughout the study.
Same regards also goes to Safaricom (K) Ltd and its sales people in Nakuru municipality
for their invaluable support during the data collection period. Also a lot of gratitude goes
to our parents for paying our school fees and support through the course and also
Kabarak University for giving us an opportunity to enroll in Bachelor of Commerce.
Lastly we cannot forget our dear friends, classmates and everyone whose encouragement,
positive critics and ideas made this project work a success. Your concern and love
inspired us in a big way and our lives are enriched through you all. May the love and
blessings of our almighty God abide with you.
DEDICATION
This proposal is dedicated to our families, relatives, sponsor(s) and all well-wishers who
have worked tirelessly to ensure that our requirements are met.
ABSTRACT
There is a need to know what motivates the sales force. Studies have been done on what
motivates the sales force and it has been found out that different incentives affect the performance
of salespeople. Safaricom Ltd is the leading mobile network operator in East Africa. This study
was conducted through a case study organization, Safaricom (K) Ltd. The main objective of the
study was to assess the effects of commission as an incentive on the motivation of salesperson in
Safaricom (K) Ltd. The study uses primary data obtained through the questionnaires provided to
Safaricom (K) Ltd sales people Nakuru Municipality.
Chapter one gives the background information about Safaricom (K) Ltd, problem statement,
objectives of the study stating on what the research intends to achieve, research questions to
guide the researchers, significance of the research.
Chapter two entails study done in the past on sales incentive plan, and procedure on designing of
commission programs and how they affect sales people performance. It also includes summary
and gaps to be filled by the study and the conceptual framework which indicates the variables
relationship.
Chapter three gives a preamble to the research design and methodology to be adopted, the
research design, the target population of 150 sales people of Safaricom (K) Ltd in Nakuru
Municipality employees, where the sample of 45 employees was obtained using convenience
sampling. Data was collected using questionnaire method and analyzed using descriptive
statistics.
Chapter four gives the results and analysis of the data presented by use of both quantitative and
qualitative analysis in form of frequency tables, pie charts and bar charts. The findings show that
the commissions paid had differential effects on factors of motivation on the sales people. I.e.
improved efficiency and effectiveness due to the company’s reputation, increased competition
from other firms, no timely change in the organization products, job insecurity, not satisfied with
present salary packages and their ability to feel motivated to wok had not improved. Some
factors of motivation were influenced positively, others negatively.
Chapter five presents in depth discussion on the findings and gives recommendation on how
Safaricom (K) Ltd can manage their sales force employees, sales people perceptions and attitude
on the commission paid, improve employee motivation to enhance high performance of the sales
force and also provides conclusions on the study, critiques of this type of study and suggestions
for future research.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
DECLARATION............................................................................................................................................2
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT.............................................................................................................................3
DEDICATION................................................................................................................................................4
TABLE OF CONTENTS...............................................................................................................................6
CHAPTER ONE.............................................................................................................................................9
INTRODUCTION..........................................................................................................................................9
LITERATURE REVIEW............................................................................................................................13
3.1 INTRODUCTION........................................................................................................................................22
3.2 RESEARCH DESIGN..................................................................................................................................22
3.3 TARGET POPULATION................................................................................................................................22
3.5 DATA COLLECTION PROCEDURES...............................................................................................................23
3.6 DATA ANALYSIS PROCEDURES..................................................................................................................23
CHAPTER FOUR........................................................................................................................................24
APPENDIX 1: QUESTIONAIRE...............................................................................................................63
INTRODUCTION
1. To find out the different types of commissions available at Safaricom (K) Ltd.
2. To find out the effects of commissions on the performance of salespeople in
Safaricom (K) Ltd.
3. To establish whether the commission plan used motivates the sales people in
Safaricom (K) Ltd.
LITERATURE REVIEW
Conceptual Framework
The model of the study is determined in figure 2.1. It shows the independent variables;
the types of commission plans, their effects on performance of sales people, commission
as an incentive. The dependent variable is motivation of sales people. If the commission
paid is perceived as being fair the result can be increased performance in terms of
employee innovativeness, discipline, efficiency among others. Also if the commission
payment is perceived to be unfairly conducted by the sales people it can result in reduced
performance, lack of motivation, job insecurity and lack of morale and cooperation
among others.
Figure 2:1: Conceptual Framework
Affects
Commission effects on
performance
Commission as an
incentive tool
3.1 Introduction
This chapter gives a preamble to the methodology adopted and used in this study; it
describes the study design, target population, sample design, data collection procedure
(instruments), and data analysis method.
4.0 Introduction.
This chapter presents the results of the data collected and further discusses these findings.
It is divided into quantitative and qualitative analysis corresponding with the sections
found in the questionnaires. The tables and figures in this chapter are derived from the
findings of the study.
Permission to do the research was obtained from the sales people of Safaricom (K) Ltd.
In most cases, access was granted and the relevant sales people were also approached to
fill in questionnaire and identify other selected sales people. The participants were then
requested to fill in the questionnaire. The participants who did not have enough time out
of work were allowed to complete the questionnaire at home.
The instrument used in the research was pre-tested to improve their validity and
reliability basing on the objectives of the study. Questionnaires were edited as soon as
they were received to ensure completeness. Filling in questionnaires was voluntary and
participants were assured of anonymity and confidentiality.
Table 1 indicates that the respondents was well constituted since it included 555 male and
45% female
Table 2 indicates that 41% of the respondents were aged between 20-29 years old, 23%
aged between 30-39 and 40-49 and 13% were aged between 50-59 years old
Table 4 indicates that 55% of the respondents were married, 41% were single and 4%
were divorced
Figure 5: Demographic Information about the Sample (Marital status)
Source: Research Data (2009)
Table 5 indicates that 50% of the respondents had been sales people of Safaricom (K) Ltd
for less than or equal to 3 years, 27% for 3-5 years and 23% for 5-10 years
Table 6 indicates that 76% of the respondents agreed that the commission paid to sales
people by the organization were meant to remove unqualified people from the sales job
while 4% felt it was to a little or no extent while 10% were average on the issue
Figure 8: Respondents perception on the commissions paid- to remove unqualified
people from the sales job
Table 6 indicates that 44% of the respondents agreed that the commission paid to sales
people by the organization were meant to establish effective structure for service delivery
while 36% felt it was to a little or no extent while 20% were average on the issue
Figure 9: Respondents perception on the commissions paid- to establish effective
structure for service delivery
Table 6 indicates that 22% of the respondents agreed that the commission paid to sales
people by the organization were meant to cut down expenses while 8% felt it was to a
little or no extent while 70% were average on the issue
Figure 10: Respondents perception on the commissions paid- to cut down expenses
Table 6 indicates that 66% of the respondents agreed that the commission paid to sales
people by the organization were meant to motivate its work force to work harder and
retain them while 14% felt it was to a little or no extent while 20% were average on the
issue
Figure 11: Respondents perception on the commissions paid- to motivate its work
force to work harder and retain them
Table 6 indicates that 82% of the respondents agreed that the commission paid to sales
people by the organization were meant to ensure fair compensation for amount of
products sold while 12% felt it was to a little or no extent while 6% were average on the
issue
Figure 12: Respondents perception on the commissions paid- to ensure fair
compensation for amount of products sold
Table 6 indicates that 46% of the respondents agreed that the commission paid to sales
people by the organization were meant to remove poor performers for performance
improvement while 28% felt it was to a little or no extent while 26% were average on the
issue
Figure 13: Respondents perception on the commissions paid- to remove poor
performers for performance improvement
Table 6 indicates that 62% of the respondents agreed that the commission paid to sales
people by the organization were meant to create employment while 30% felt it was to a
little or no extent while 8% were average on the issue
Figure 14: Respondents perception on the commissions paid- to create employment
Table 6 indicates that 88% of the respondents agreed that the commission paid to sales
people by the organization were meant to create room for better working conditions while
12% were average on the issue
Figure 15: Respondents perception on the commissions paid- to create room for
better working conditions
Table 6 indicates that all the respondents agreed that the commission paid to sales people
by the organization were meant to ensure hard work and dedication to duty
Figure 15: Respondents perception on the commissions paid- to ensure hard work
and dedication to duty
Table 8 indicates that 72% of the respondents agreed that the organization used Sales
Incentive Plan aimed to motivate and compensate sales people to meet goals over a
specific period of time in its commission arrangement while 10% were average on the
issue and 8% felt it was to a little or no extent
Figure 16: Respondent perception on the types of commissions paid in the
organization- Sales Incentive Plan
Table 8 indicates that 90% of the respondents agreed that the organization used Sales
Commission which is a variation on piece rates and bonuses or pay calculated as a
percentage of sales in remunerating its sales people while 10 felt it was to a little extent
Figure 18: Respondent perception on the types of commissions paid in the
organization- Sales Commission
Table 8 indicates that 10% of the respondents agreed that the organization used salary
plus commission in remunerating its sales people while 90% felt it was to a little extent
this is probably due to sales manager who got this kind of compensation against the other
sales people
Figure 19: Respondent perception on the types of commissions paid in the
organization- salary plus commission
Table 8 indicates that 10% of the respondents agreed that the organization used Salary
plus commission and bonuses in remunerating its sales people while 90% felt it was to a
little extent this is probably due to sales manager who got this kind of compensation
against the other sales people
Figure 20: Respondent perception on the types of commissions paid in the
organization- Salary plus commission and bonuses
Table 8 indicates that 36% of the respondents agreed that the organization used
Combination plan for both individual and group sales bonus programs in remunerating its
sales people while 20% were average on the issue and 44% felt it was to a little or no
extent
Figure 21: Respondent perception on the types of commissions paid in the
organization- Combination plan
Table 8 indicates that 76% of the respondents agreed that the organization used to pay a
retainer salary at first months of the sales job then start paying commission only after the
duration in remunerating its sales people while 12% were average on the issue and 12%
felt it was to a little or no extent
Figure 22: Respondent perception on the types of commissions paid in the
organization- Retainer salary at first months
Table 9 indicates that 58% of the respondents felt that the commission paid had increased
their job performance generally while 30% felt that the commission had no effect to their
job performance and 12% felt that it had actually reduced their job performance
Figure 23: Impact of commission paid has affected on individual performance- job
performance generally
Table 9 indicates that 64% of the respondents felt that the commission paid had increased
the Number of sales people remaining on duty all the time while 16% felt that the
commission had no effect and 20% felt that it had actually reduced the Number of sales
people remaining on duty all the time
Figure 25: Impact of commission paid has affected on individual performance-
Number of sales people remaining on duty all the time
Table 9 indicates that 52% of the respondents felt that the commission paid had increased
the Number of Sales people working for two or more competing firms of Safaricom (K)
Ltd while 20% felt that the commission had no effect and 28% felt that it had actually
reduced the Sales people working for two or more competing firms of Safaricom (K) Ltd
Figure 26: Impact of commission paid has affected on individual performance-
Number of Sales people working for two or more competing firms of Safaricom (K)
Ltd
Table 9 indicates that 50% of the respondents felt that the commission paid had increased
their Efficiency and effectiveness while 36% felt that the commission had no effect and
14% felt that it had actually reduced their Efficiency and effectiveness
Figure 27: Impact of commission paid has affected on individual performance-
Efficiency and effectiveness
Table 9 indicates that 64% of the respondents felt that the commission paid had increased
their Personal responsibility while 16% felt that the commission had no effect and 20%
felt that it had actually reduced their Personal responsibility
Figure 28: Impact of commission paid has affected on individual performance-
Personal responsibility
Table 9 indicates that 60% of the respondents felt that the commission paid had increased
their personal discipline while 10% felt that the commission had no effect and 30% felt
that it had actually reduced their personal discipline
Figure 29: Impact of commission paid has affected on individual performance-
personal discipline
Table 9 indicates that 54% of the respondents felt that the commission paid had increased
their personal accountability while 16% felt that the commission had no effect and 30%
felt that it had actually reduced their personal accountability
Figure 30: Impact of commission paid has affected on individual performance-
personal accountability
Table 9 indicates that 36% of the respondents felt that the commission paid had increased
their Loyalty to your boss while 30% felt that the commission had no effect and 34% felt
that it had actually reduced their Loyalty to your boss
Figure 31: Impact of commission paid has affected on individual performance-
Loyalty to your boss
Table 10: Respondents perception on how different motivators affect their performance
(N=44)
Statement Great Some Average Little No
extent extent extent extent
Salary 45 25 30 0 0
Bonus pay 40 40 20 0 0
Awards 50 25 25 0 0
Commissions 24 20 20 16 20
Table 10 indicates that 70% of the respondents agreed that they were to great extent
motivated by salary while 30% were average on the issue
Figure 32: Respondents perception on how different motivators affect their performance-
salary
Table 10 indicates that 80% of the respondents agreed that they were to great extent
motivated by Bonus pay while 20% were average on the issue
Figure 33: Respondents perception on how different motivators affect their performance-
Bonus pay
Table 10 indicates that 75% of the respondents agreed that they were to great extent
motivated by Awards given for outstanding performance while 25% were average on the
issue
Figure 34: Respondents perception on how different motivators affect their performance-
Awards given
Table 10 indicates that 44% of the respondents agreed that they were to great extent
motivated by Commissions while 20% were average on the issue and 36% felt it was to a
little or no extent
Figure 35: Respondents perception on how different motivators affect their performance-
Commissions
Table 11 indicates that 70% of the respondents felt that their wok life had improved in
terms of job motivation due to commission paid, while 12% agreed there was no effect on
the issue and 18% felt it had reduced their job motivation
Figure 36: Perception on effects of commission on respondent work life- job
motivation
Table 11 indicates that 50% of the respondents felt that their wok life had improved in
terms of Morale and teamwork due to commission paid, while 15% agreed there was no
effect on the issue and 35% felt it had reduced their Morale and teamwork
Figure 37: Perception on effects of commission on respondent work life- Morale and
teamwork
Table 11 indicates that 50% of the respondents felt that their wok life had improved in
terms of Job satisfaction due to commission paid, while 10% agreed there was no effect
on the issue and 30% felt it had reduced their Job satisfaction
Figure 38: Perception on effects of commission on respondent work life- Job
satisfaction
Table 11 indicates that 30% of the respondents felt that their wok life had improved in
terms of Organization commitment due to commission paid, while 10% agreed there was
no effect on the issue and 60% felt it had reduced their Organization commitment
Figure 39: Perception on effects of commission on respondent work life-
Organization commitment
Table 11 indicates that 50% of the respondents felt that their wok life had improved in
terms of Efficiency and effectiveness due to commission paid, while 36% agreed there
was no effect on the issue and 14% felt it had reduced their Efficiency and effectiveness
Figure 40: Perception on effects of commission on respondent work life- Efficiency
and effectiveness
Table 11 indicates that 64% of the respondents felt that their wok life had improved in
terms of Personal responsibility due to commission paid, while 16% agreed there was no
effect on the issue and 20% felt it had reduced their Personal responsibility
Figure 41: Perception on effects of commission on respondent work life- Personal
responsibility
Table 11 indicates that 60% of the respondents felt that their wok life had improved in
terms of personal discipline due to commission paid, while 10% agreed there was no
effect on the issue and 30% felt it had reduced their personal discipline
Figure 42: Perception on effects of commission on respondent work life- personal
discipline
Table 11 indicates that 54% of the respondents felt that their wok life had improved in
terms of personal accountability due to commission paid, while 16% agreed there was no
effect on the issue and 30% felt it had reduced their personal accountability
Figure 43: Perception on effects of commission on respondent work life- personal
accountability
Table 11 indicates that 36% of the respondents felt that their wok life had improved in
terms of Loyalty to their Organization due to commission paid, while 30% agreed there
was no effect on the issue and 34% felt it had reduced their Loyalty to their Organization
Figure 44: Perception on effects of commission on respondent work life- Loyalty to
their Organization
Table 12: Safaricom (K) Ltd pay- package need for revision (N=44)
Variable Category Frequency of %
responses
Yes 40 90
No 4 10
Source: Research Data (2009)
Table 12 indicates that 90% of the respondents felt that the Safaricom (K) ltd pay
package needs further revision while 10% felt it was adequate probably it may be the
sales managers’ perception against the sales people
Figure 45: Safaricom (K) Ltd pay- package need for revision
Table 13: Factors that Impede the Performance of the sales people in Safaricom (K)
Ltd (N=44)
Factor Yes (%) No (%)
Inadequate funding to look for new clients 80 20
Lack of motivation 66 34
Unrealistic high targets that lead to frustration 60 40
lack of advertisement tools like brochures to give 50 50
potential customers
Economic depression facing the market 65 35
No job security 82 18
Poor training of the sales people by the organization 75 25
Financial constraints, bureaucracy, lack of transparency 70 30
in the organization
Competition from other firms who offer more attractive 85 15
products
Poor management style e.g. grievance handling 65 35
procedure
Low morale due to poor products development 55 45
Lack of confidence by customers due to poor 68 32
performance of the company’s shares
Only working for survival 72 28
Long delays of salary and commission payments 12 88
Constant interruption of the company’s network e.g. 78 22
Mpesa service
Source: Research Data (2009)
Table 13 indicates that 80% of the respondents felt that factors that impede performance
of their sales job was due to inadequate funding to look for new clients, 66% felt it was
due to Lack of motivation, 60% due to Unrealistic high targets that lead to frustration,
50% due to lack of advertisement tools like brochures to give potential customers, 65%
felt it was due to Economic depression facing the market, 82% felt it was due to no job
security, 75% due to Poor training of the sales people by the organization, 70% due to
Financial constraints, bureaucracy, lack of transparency in the organization, 85% due to
Competition from other firms who offer more attractive products, 65% due to Poor
management style e.g. grievance handling procedure, 55% due to Low morale due to
poor products development, 68% due to Lack of confidence by customers due to poor
performance of the company’s shares, 72% Only working for survival, 12% felt it was
due to Long delays of salary and commission payments and 78% felt it was due to
Constant interruption of the company’s network e.g. Mpesa service
Figure 46: Factors that Impede the Performance of the sales people in Safaricom
(K) Ltd
Source: Research Data (2009)
This research was done to establish Safaricom (K) Ltd different types of commissions it
pays to its salespeople, to find out the effects of commissions on the performance of
salespeople and to establish whether the commission plan used motivates the sales
people. The results indicated that commission as an incentive had both positive and
negative effects on the factors in question. The results tend to show that the effects of
commission as an incentive on the sales force depend of the factors under consideration.
In addition, present research considered both short and long-term effects of commission
paid.
The fact that negative perceptions stem from the way the commission plan was designed
and implemented is unquestionable. This is because the commission programmes used
by the organization include Sales Incentive Plan which is used to motivate and
compensate sales people to meet goals over a specific period of time. This time bound
plan has disadvantage in that it has an element of uncertainty especially after that period
expires, hence job insecurity creeps in. also the organization doesn’t offer Straight Salary
which is used when serving and retaining existing accounts and to protect the income of
new sales representatives for a period of time while they are building up their sales
clientele. This has an advantage in that majority of the sales people need some capital at
the beginning of the job to cater for e.g. travelling expenses. Lack of this plan in
designing the commission by the organization demoralizes the new sales people hence
affect their perception of the organization. The organization uses Sales Commission
which is calculated as a percentage of sales. This type has a big disadvantage in that at
the beginning for one to make good sales, a sales person need to have a wide customer
base which takes time to build. Thus at the beginning one earns little commission due to
poor sales. Also the use of salary plus commission and also Salary plus commission and
bonuses should be encouraged because this applies to the sales managers only in the
organization who reap the commission through the sales force in the region he is
representing. This often de-motivates the sales people to work harder as they perceive
their effort benefit the managers.
Another method in calculation of commission paid should be Combination plan for both
individual and group sales bonus programs. This will encourage group sales and through
team work it improves the morale of the team members. Another method used is retainer
at first months then commission only which is a good plan although only for a short
period. This is because the sales people in this organization sale services to people and
also through one prospect to another they are also marketing the organization. This
marketing aspect is not compensated because the commission is based on sales volume
alone. The recommendation here is that the retainer pay should remain constant in the
working life of the sales person
Since such negative perceptions about commission paid are likely to have a serious
impact on the performance of the sales person, the sales Managers should be sensitive to
employee perceptions and work on them through seminars, counseling and public
relations. Managers should study the negative perceptions with the view of changing
them. These perceptions should also be noted by those who want to an effective pay
package for sales people. Normally, tactics in handling compensation plans are important
here. These include the involvement of the stakeholders in the process of formulating
these compensation schemes, and giving information. Participation in decision-making
ensures commitment to the remuneration package offered and forms a good incentive for
their performance. The stakeholders should be given a chance to suggest how pay plans
should be implemented. The rationale and criteria of commission plans to be used as
incentive to sales person should be explained early in the process through improved
public relations. This is how organizational motivation and effectiveness can be better
managed.
Safaricom (K) Ltd should embark on operative and management training. Particularly,
the sales managers should be trained in motivational procedures, performance appraisal
and other aspects of human resource management. Results regarding organizational
goals, mission and values are also supportive of compensation plans. The improvement in
knowledge about these factors is likely to be translated into motivated work force and a
fair compensation plan.
Another aspect of quality of work life assessed was job insecurity. A high percentage of
respondents reported job insecurity. This was due to the fact that the targets set are too
high and unrealistic. The rationale and criteria for target set were not clear. Personnel
decisions were largely subjective since they don’t involve the sales people in setting the
sales targets. In addition, the public relations function, as suggested earlier, should be
improved to explain the importance of sales force in the organization and how to air their
views.
Regarding occupational attitudes, the majority of the respondents reported no change in
motivation and morale, job satisfaction and organizational commitment. A majority of
participants reported these attitudes to be poor. This implies that, regarding these
attitudes, the situation in the Safaricom (K) Ltd is still bad. It is hoped that if the
recommendations of this study are implemented, positive changes in these attitudes will
result.
Most of the participants reported that commission effect as being average on their Morale
and teamwork, Efficiency and effectiveness, Personal responsibility, discipline and
accountability. Loyalty to the organization had reduced as majority opted to combine
selling even competitors products to enhance their pay. Furthermore, a majority reported
dissatisfaction with current salary packages hence need for its revision. In order to
improve individual performance, Safaricom (K) Ltd should provide a living wage i.e.
adequate funding for sales people to look for new clients, motivation, realistic targets
which are achievable in the competitive industry, advertisement material to its sales
people like brochures, job security, training, participative decision making style,
competitive products, morale, reward creative ideas, make their shares gain value and
also improve their network to avoid frequent interruption and failures.
The ranked importance of motivational factors of sales people at the Safaricom (K) Ltd
provides useful information for the organizations director and employees. Knowing how
to use this information in motivating sales people is complex. The strategy for motivating
sales people depends on which motivation theories are used as a reference point. If
Hertzberg's theory is followed, management should begin by focusing on pay and job
security (hygiene factors) before focusing on interesting work and full appreciation of
work done (motivator factors). If Adams' equity theory is followed, management should
begin by focusing on areas where there may be perceived inequities (pay and full
appreciation of work done) before focusing on interesting work and job security. If
Vroom's theory is followed, management should begin by focusing on rewarding (pay
and interesting work) sales people effort in achieving organizational goals and objectives.
Regardless of which theory is followed, interesting work and sales people pay appear to
be important links to higher motivation of sales people. Options such as job enlargement,
job enrichment, promotions, internal and external stipends, monetary, and non-monetary
compensation should be considered. Job enlargement can be used (by managers) to make
work more interesting (for sales people) by increasing the number and variety of
activities performed. Job enrichment can used to make work more interesting and
increase pay by adding higher level responsibilities to a job and providing monetary
compensation (raise or stipend) to sales people for accepting this responsibility. These are
just two examples of an infinite number of methods to increase motivation of sales people
at the Safaricom (K) Ltd. The key to motivating sales people is to know what motivates
them and designing a motivation program based on those needs.
The rationale and criteria for compensation and motivational plans should be made clear
right at the beginning. Managers should take caution not to use remuneration packages,
as opportunities to punish employees they think are uncooperative or disobedient. Rather
they should be objective in applying the criteria for pay. The process of compensation
and incentive plans should be made as transparent as possible. The above measures
coupled with increased skills in performance evaluation should reduce the problem of job
insecurity. Existence of these problems further shows that some of the strategies for
compensation as incentive did not work as hoped. Commission used as incentive in the
organization had positive effects on some indicators of sales force performance and had
negative effects on others.
Environmental stability at the time of research is also important. Events the economic
depression facing the world at the time of the research should be well considered. The
researcher must be able to sense effects that are caused commission paid from those that
happen due to other factors like economic recession like one faced during the time of the
research.
5.5 Conclusion
Compensation plans is significant for all the stakeholders. It has different meanings to
the various stakeholders. Commissions paid can be a harm or loss, threat or challenge.
Harm or loss would concern those commission plans which are poorly implemented.
Threat refers to potential harm or loss. This can be seen in the light of the perception of
the sales force on the compensation plan. Some will remain under fear of job insecurity.
Challenge refers to opportunities for growth, masterly or gain. Compensation plan
therefore, is both an opportunity and challenge to organizational development and to the
stakeholders. It is challenging to plan, implement and manage compensation schemes
and its effects as incentives to the sales force. However, good commission schemes
offers an opportunity to put right what had gone wrong with the Safaricom (K) Ltd in
motivating its sales people. This stimulates organizational growth and development.
Commission as an incentive to the sales force has different outcomes depending on the
timing, that is, whether the short term or long term impacts are the ones in question. The
long-term effects will be realized only if a supportive compensation scheme develops.
Therefore, a follow-up study on the development of a new compensation scheme for sales
people in the Safaricom (K) Ltd is recommended. This will show if a new commission
scheme which act as incentive and favourable of higher organizational performance has
been created.
REFERENCES
Armstrong (2001). Human Resource Management Practice, 18th Edition, Kogan Page
Ltd.
Bohlander G. (2002), Managing Human Resource, 12th Edition, Western College
Publishing, United States
Cole G.A. (2002). Personnel And Human Resource Management, 5th Edition, Biddles
Ltd, New Delhi.
Dessler Gray. (2005), Human Resource Management, 10 edition, Darling Kindersley Pvt
Ltd India.
Gerhart B, et al, (2007). Fundaments of Human Resource Management, 2nd Edition, Tata
McGraw Hill Publishing Company, New Delhi
Internet www.merifield.com,,
www.daniweb.comwww.fistfultalent.comwww.wikipedia.comwww.maritz.com(www.wi
kipedia.org/wiki/safaricom)
APPENDIX 1: QUESTIONAIRE
THE IMPACT OF COMMISSION AS AN INCENTIVE ON THE MOTIVATION
OF CREDIT VENDORS
( A CASE OF SAFARICOM COMPANY (K) LTD)
Information collected from this questionnaire will be handled with high confidentiality
and will strictly be used for academic purposes by the researchers.
SECTION A
What is your gender? Male Female
How long have you worked as a sales person in Safaricom (K) ltd? (Tick as appropriate)
Statement 1 2 3 4 5
To reduce the number of sales people
Remove unqualified people in the sales job
1. How do you think the commission paid has affected your job performance basing
on the following areas (Tick as appropriate)
Statement 1 2 3 4 5
Punctuality to workplace
personal discipline
personal accountability
Salary
Bonus pay
Awards
Commissions
2. To what extent do you think are the effects of commission on you on the following
areas?
Statement 1 2 3 4 5
Job motivation
Job satisfaction
Organization commitment
Personal responsibility
personal discipline
personal accountability
Do you think the pay package of Safaricom (K) Ltd needs further revision?
Yes No
If yes, explain......................................................................................................................
...............................................................................................................................................
.........................................................................................................................
In the table below which factors do you think Impede the Performance of the sales people
in Safaricom (K) Ltd?
Factor Yes No
Inadequate funding to look for new clients
Lack of motivation
Unrealistic high targets that lead to frustration
lack of advertisement tools like brochures to give
potential customers
Economic depression facing the market
No job security
Poor training of the sales people by the organization
Financial constraints, bureaucracy, lack of transparency
in the organization
Competition from other firms who offer more attractive
products
Poor management style e.g. grievance handling
procedure
Low morale due to poor products development
Lack of confidence by customers due to poor
performance of the company’s shares
Only working for survival
Long delays of salary and commission payments
Constant interruption of the company’s network e.g.
Mpesa service
What other comments do you have regarding this study and may not have been covered?
...............................................................................................................................................
...............................................................................................................................................
...............................................................................................................................................
...............................................................................................................................................
....
THANK YOU AND GOD BLESS YOU FOR YOUR TIME
APPENDIX I: PROPOSED BUDGET
2 Stationery Ksh.1,500
5 Subsistence Ksh.2,500
6 Miscellaneous Ksh.1,000
Total Ksh.10,000
APPENDIX II: WORK SCHEDULE
Year 2008/2009
Proposal Writing
Proposal Defense
Data Collection
Data Analysis