Escolar Documentos
Profissional Documentos
Cultura Documentos
Chapter 1
Introduction
1.1. Definition of wireless geophones:
- Wireless: no lines (network or power).
- Wireless Sensor Network: network of individual sensors connected to transmit data.
through nodes, or motes, which function as tiny radio transmission devices.
- Practical application, however requires a low power, low complexity, low data rate
compliant RF device.
- Those small devices are named sensor nodes, and are deployed within a special
area to monitor a physical phenomenon.
1
Wireless Geophones
Working with seismic cables is painful. Now you can eliminate them by replacing
these cables with a wireless mesh network. This seismic system will cost less to buy,
but more important, it will greatly reduce the logistics effort, and manpower required to
conduct a seismic survey. Lowering the environmental impact will open new areas to
exploration.
The RF transceivers are low power, so the range is limited, but each unit acts as a
radio relay so that data from distant modules is handed across the network until it
reaches the base station. Normal geophone spacings are well within the range of
transmission, but the total areal extent of the array can be theoretically unlimited.
Since the data is digital, there is no degradation in data quality as the information is
passed from station to station.
2
Wireless Geophones
3
Wireless Geophones
Chapter 2
Wireless procedures
2: Fig2.
s Type
of
Sens
or
s Node
2.3.
Motes:
4
Wireless Geophones
- Low Cost
- Monitor Sensor Data
- Components on the MICAz mote: Fig2.3: Motes figure
.Istrumentation: 2.4
Data
:Existing Instrumentation .2.4.1 Logger
Senso
r
Fig2.4: Wired geophones array
Data
Logger
Senso
Wireless Geophones
Senso
r
Fig2.6: Wireless beside wired array
6
Wireless Geophones
- WINS NG 2.0
- Development platform used in
DARPA SensIT
- SH-4 processor @ 167 MHz
7
Wireless Geophones
8
Wireless Geophones
001/01
Flash RAM Processor nrehtE
te
Address/Data Bus
raludoM
regamI regamI rossecorperP
secafretnI latigiD dna sseleriW
eludoM ecafretnI ecafretnI
-Multi FR FR
golanA latigiD
lennahC DSP GPS medoM medoM
tnorF O/I
rosneS Preprocessor 2 1
dnE
ecafretnI
9
Wireless Geophones
F
i
g
2
.
1
: 5
C
o
m
p
l
e
x
d
e
p
l
o
y
m
e
t n
l
o
gistics
10
Wireless Geophones
Tx Rx
time
Fig2.17: Radio energy management
- During operation, the required performance is often less than the peak performance
the radio is designed for.
- How do we take advantage of this observation, in both the sender and the receiver?
Tx: Sender
Rx: Receiver
Incoming Outgoing
Channel
information information
Tx Rx
Eelec E RF Eelec
Chapter 3
Applications of wireless geophones
11
Wireless Geophones
:pursued at CENS)
12
Wireless Geophones
- Science
- Technology/Applications
Fig3.5: Building damage
Fig3.6: Bridge
damage
Fig3.7:
Building
damage
13
Wireless Geophones
14
Wireless Geophones
Science -
- Understand intermedia contaminant transport and fate in real systems.
- Identify risky situations before they become exposures , Subterranean
deployment.
- Multiple modalities (e.g., pH, redox
conditions, etc.).
- Micro sizes for some applications (e.g.,
pesticide transport in plant roots).
- Tracking contaminant “fronts”.
- At-node interpretation of potential for risk
(in field deployment).
- marine contaminants.
- Dispersal enormously can be damage to
the environment.
- Groundwater contaminants. Fig3.10: Subsurface contamination
15
Wireless Geophones
- Nitrates in groundwater.
- Application
- Wastewater used for irrigating alfalfa.
- Wastewater has nitrates, nutrients for alfalfa.
- Over-irrigation can lead to nitrates in ground-water.
- Need monitoring system, wells can be expensive.
- Pilot study of sensor network to monitoring nitrate levels.
16
Wireless Geophones
- Human life.
- Industries (fisheries and tourism).
- Causes poorly understood, mostly because.
- Measurement of these phenomena can be complex and time consuming.
- Sensor networks can help.
- Measure, predict, mitigate.
:Lab-Scale Experimentation -
- Build a tank testbed in which to study the factors that affect micro-organism growth.
- Actuation is a central part of this.
- Can’t expect to deploy at density we need.
- Mobile sensors can help sample at high frequency
Initial study: Tethered-
- Thermocline detection robot
sample
collectors
Fig3.16: Experimentation
:Application Scenario .3.1.6
17
Wireless Geophones
Ecological / Health
Agricultural
Precision farming
- Microsensors.
- Signal Processing.
18
Wireless Geophones
Science
- Remote sensing can enable global assessment of ecosystem.
- Understand response of wild populations (plants and animals) to habitats over time.
- Develop in situ observation of species and ecosystem dynamics.
Techniques
- Data acquisition of physical and chemical properties, at various spatial and temporal
scales, appropriate to the ecosystem, species and habitat.
- Automatic identification of organisms (current techniques involve close-range human
observation).
19
Wireless Geophones
.Bird studies by High School Science classes (New Roads and Buckley Schools) -
Fig3.22: Virtual
field observations Fig3.23: Avian monitoring
20
Wireless Geophones
21
Wireless Geophones
-.Clustered architecture
.Weather-resistant housing design -
-.Sensors: Light, temperature, pressure, humidity
.Landslides: 3.4
- A landslide is an event where a block of earthen mass slides downhill covering the
area underneath with dirt and debris.
- Landslides are a major geologic hazard.
22
Wireless Geophones
23
Wireless Geophones
24
Wireless Geophones
- Determine which sensors are above and below the slip surface.
Based on constraints.
25
Wireless Geophones
Water transmission and distribution pipes deteriorate naturally with time and
eventually develop leaks. The amount of lost water due to leakage can be significant,
reaching levels as high as 50% of production for some systems.
Leaks waste both money and a precious natural resource, and they create a
public health risk. Water system operators invest significantly in finding and fixing
leaks. Unfortunately,significant resources are wasted when leaks are not found
or inaccurately located.
F
i
g
3
.
3
: 6
W
i
r
e
l
e
s
s
s
e
nsors uses in leak detection
26
Wireless Geophones
- Sound waves are sent into the earth, then reflect off various
geological structures. Signals come from miles below.
Fig3.37: Seismic
imaging
27
Wireless Geophones
28
Wireless Geophones
29
Wireless Geophones
30
Wireless Geophones
31
Wireless Geophones
Fig3.48: One of our two-component stations. The blue Pelican Case contains the wireless
sensor network node and hardware interface board. The external antenna is mounted on the
PVC pole to reduce ground effects. A microphone is taped to the PVC pole and a single
seismometer is buried nearby.
Sensor networks are currently a very active area of research. The richness of
existing and potential applications from commercial agriculture and geology to
security and navigation has stimulated significant attention to their capabilities for
monitoring various underground conditions. In particular, agriculture uses
underground sensors to monitor soil conditions such as water and mineral content
32
Wireless Geophones
33
Wireless Geophones
34
Wireless Geophones
forward WUSN sensor data to a central receiving point (in this case, the golf course
maintenance building).
35
Wireless Geophones
36
Wireless Geophones
Fig3.55: Instrumentation
Fig3.56: General schematic of the seismic monitoring system using Data acquisition Blocks
1 and 2 at the Piers 1 and 2, off-structure Central Recording System and wireless
communication technology (Wireless IP Cloud)
37
Wireless Geophones
Chapter 4
The Future of Land Seismic
If we can eliminate cables for onshore acquisition, our industry stands poised
to unlock the Holy Grail of land seismic imaging – cost-effective, fully sampled, full-
wave surveys. The opportunities and challenges that exist onshore require a
fundamental rethink to land imaging. In this article, we explore the limitations of
today’s cable-based recording systems and hypothesize the benefts that might
result if a new generation of cableless imaging systems were available to the
industry.
38
Wireless Geophones
Cables serve multiple purposes, though the primary one is to transmit data on a
real-time basis from the sensors to the central recording system. While the ability to view
all shot records in real time may provide some comfort in quality-controlling the
acquisition process, the cost to provide this capability is signifcant in terms of operational
effciency, HSE and image quality. At least six major downsides result from the use of
cable-based recording systems.
39
Wireless Geophones
Increased HSE risk. Every individual in the feld represents a potential health and
safety liability for both the contractor and the oil & gas company. So, cables also drive up
health and safety risks. Moreover, the process of moving heavy cables, especially in
mountainous areas or other diffcult terrain, is a hazardous operation.
Cable repair and maintenance downtime. In our recent work with seismic contractors,
we have discovered that up to 50% of operational time is spent on cable troubleshooting.
This has a direct impact on costs (one of the seismic crews we studied spent nearly US
$1,000 a day repairing cables). The even bigger impact is on productivity, with only 50%
of the time spent on actual acquisition. In effect, the cables can cause any seismic survey
to be only about half as effcient as it could be.
40
Wireless Geophones
While many geophysicists we’ve interviewed see the ideal survey design as having
upwards of 50,000 stations, cable-based systems make this goal operationally
impractical. As a result, cables force compromises in fnal image quality.
With the advent of higher station count recording systems and improved acquisition
economics in the late 1990s, many basins were re-shot with wider azimuths and longer
offsets. Stations were often added, but line intervals were also spread out. Sometimes the
group interval was reduced, but this did not significantly help to improve the spatial
resolution of the primary objective. The problem of effectively imaging only a narrow time
window in the seismic section was not solved.
41
Wireless Geophones
Our analysis of velocity error profiles in many imaging settings indicates that errors
can often be substantial in deeper sections because there is not enough offset available
while, in the shallow section, errors can be highly variable since there often is
inconsistent offset coverage from bin to bin. Interpreting in the deep or shallow sections
using legacy data often means the geophysicist is relying on potentially poor-quality
amplitudes. Amplitudes showing up on the seismic data may have nothing to do with the
reservoir and everything to do with artifacts of how the data was acquired and
processed.
None of this addresses the other aspect of undersampling, which is that we have
not effectively reduced the bin size; therefore, subtle features in the reservoir are not
imaged any better than with the previous generation of seismic except for the noise
reduction higher fold provides and for the upside delivered by wide-azimuth attributes.
To properly image all horizons in this basin, the geophysicist needs a new
generation of seismic data with full-sampling of the subsurface. Delivering this requires
dramatically higher station counts and a land acquisition system that removes cable-
based spacing constraints.
There are three radio implementations of modern land acquisition systems. The
first uses multiple receiver channels which are connected to a common field acquisition
unit. Each field acquisition unit utilizes radio telemetry to communicate to a recording
truck. The radio link provides command and control from the central station to the field
units, while the data is stored locally.
42
Wireless Geophones
43
Wireless Geophones
In the diagram, a single data acquisition station is connected to a single 3-C digital
MEMS sensor. The digital MEMS sensors would measure true 3-D particle motion and
record the full seismic wavefield with unsurpassed vector fidelity. As single-point
receivers, they would be less susceptible to the intra-array statics problems of
geophones and record the broadest bandwidth that the Earth returns. In addition, they
would allow additional cables associated with receiver arrays to be removed from the
system.
Data recording would occur at the station level, with local storage in solid state
memory. Intelligent QC features would automatically notify the operator of trace
problems and when the condition of feld electronics exceeds user-defined limits. The
QC system would send back key attributes of selected traces to ensure the spread was
functioning as planned. By eliminating the need to transmit all data in nearly real time,
power requirements and bandwidth constraints are greatly reduced.
Each field acquisition unit would operate autonomously, thereby eliminating single
points of failure that are present in cable-based systems and allowing stations to be
undisturbed once deployed until they are moved to the next stage of the survey. The field
acquisition units would also have embedded GPS (global positioning system) features to
determine their position with a high degree of accuracy and with a reduced need for
surveying expenditures and cycle time.
44
Wireless Geophones
Image quality could be further enhanced if 3-C digital sensors were used to
acquire a broader frequency spectrum of refected seismic energy, record both
compressional (P) wave and shear (S) wave data, and mitigate intra-array statics issues
associated with traditional geophone receiver arrays.
A key beneft of a cableless architecture is operational productivity. Once the cables
are gone, the weight of the entire system goes down dramatically. Our best estimate is
that the weight could be reduced by 80%. In addition, eliminating the cables would mean
greater reliability of the entire land acquisition network and less downtime for
troubleshooting and cable repair. Detailed models that we have developed of the
conventional operational process suggest that a typical 3,000-station survey could be
performed at approximately 80-85% of the operational cost if an ideal cableless system
was used. The improvements with a cableless system are even more dramatic as
station counts increase. Compared to conventional recording systems, a cableless
system could acquire 12,500 stations worth of data at approximately 50-60% of the
operational cost.
Finally, HSE performance should improve. Once the cables are gone, we would
expect fewer incidents during deployment. Total weight is substantially decreased. The
need to move heavy cables is reduced. And fewer personnel are needed to troubleshoot
and repair cables. In addition, less acquisition equipment results in a reduced
environmental footprint. Cable lines wouldn’t need to be cut, nor would surface ground
cover be subject to cable deployment operations. Lastly, the number of support vehicles
could possibly be reduced, resulting in fewer emissions, fuel spills and collateral
damage in the areas adjacent to the acquisition operations.
45
Wireless Geophones
Fig4.4: Vibtech has carried out tests with NASA in the USA and in Antarctica
46
Wireless Geophones
Fi
g4
.5:
Sy
st
e
m
st
an
d-
al
one RAU Fig4.6: Acquisition in the Australian bush
Chapter 5
Advantages & disadvantages of wireless geophones
47
Wireless Geophones
5.1 Advantages:
Going Wireless .5.1.1
Wireless will be in high demand, because both operators and contractors will see
the benefits,” he predicts.
A full-wave seismic recording platform that integrates the latest GPS, data
storage and power technologies into a cableless architecture that supports high-station
counts for enhanced spatial sampling.
48
Wireless Geophones
The biggest advantage in the Barnett Shale is flexibility. The ability to move
around quickly and get in among subdivisions is key, that is our forte. We are the
niche specialty 3-D seismic shooter in the Barnett Shale play. The speed of
deployment, flexibility, scalability, fast data transfer and smaller crews add to
incredible flexibility and efficiency. Plus, we have the ability to see the system on
screen in a central control unit(CCU) to make sure everything is working properly and
QC data during acquisition. We can even change design configurations on the fly.
By working with the flexibility the system offers, we hope contractors and
operators can start thinking about data quality rather than survey logistics,” he
remarks. “It is ideal for high-channel count recording.
Increased Productivity:
49
Wireless Geophones
The reduced size and weight make the self-contained field units easy to
deploy in difficult environments. “The Ultra G4 system will record three channels
continuously for up to 80 hours, making it ideal for multicomponent reservoir mon-
itoring and well fracturing applications using both active and passive seismic ac-
quisition.
Fig5.2: Its IT 3-D recording
system in 2002, followed up by
the UnITe Cellular Seismic™
system this year based on the
same wireless platform. IT is
configured with a four-channel
remote acquisition unit and
hybrid radio/cable telemetry to
create a data structure using
miniature cell phone tower-like
repeaters to transmit to a central
control unit within the shot cycle,
while UnITe uses a GPS-enabled
single-channel base unit and real-
time radio telemetry to eliminate cables.
50
Wireless Geophones
Cost-Effective Option:
The system uses analog geophones, with the data signal digitized at the box
the recording truck. “For our customers’ bread and butter land geophysical appli-
cations, the newest and most advanced analog-to-digital ARIES system is the most
cost-effective option.
In fact, we can acquire 3-D today using ARIES at a lower delivered price than in
the past because the system is so user friendly and so much faster, especially in
shallower gas plays.
Improved cost efficiencies and operational productivity give the contractor
better margins and the operator lower costs. “The operator gets higher productivity
with ARIES, which translates into less cost per square mile of data acquired.
We are simply able to get more shots in a day using this system.
51
Wireless Geophones
F
i
g
5
.
: 4
“
T
h
e
N
”etwork is the Sensor
-Distributed and large-scale, connected to other networks such as like the Internet,But
different from previous networks.
– Physical instead of virtual.
– Resource constrained.
– Real-time control loops instead of interactive human loop.
:Challenges .5.1.5
52
Wireless Geophones
Power reduction
- State-of-the art electronics
Lower costs
- Wireless communication & data storage
- System in Package
Integrated GPS
Increased sensitivity
- Deeper, higher fidelity data
Smaller size
- Multilayer packaging
- Embedded electronics
- Reservoir monitoring
- Directional drilling
- Inertial guidance of drill head
- Vibration & position sensing Fig5.6: Energy expansion
53
Wireless Geophones
digital sensor
54
Wireless Geophones
• Exploration
– Improved seismic imaging for more reliable hydrocarbon identification and recovery.
– Reduced environmental impact from operations.
– Improved operational capability and efficiency, especially in remote or deep water
applications.
Fig9: Extraction&Recovery
• Refining / Transport
5.2. Disadvantages:
55
Wireless Geophones
Conclusion
The flexibility now offered by cable free systems offers explo-rationists
unlimited scope to deploy sensors in an unrestrained manner, without the
need to consider the constraints of the traditional seismic grid. These
systems completely eliminate cables without compromising the real-time
recording of the data. This also brings a real advance in the logistics of land
and transition zone surveys, allowing system users to concentrate on data
quality, not logistics, whilst enjoying enormous HSE benefits, thus improving
the future prospects of our industry.
56
Wireless Geophones
REFERENCES
57
Wireless Geophones
Jason Hill, Robert Szewczyk, Alec Woo, Seth Hollar, David Culler, and
Kristofer Pister,2000, System architecture directions for networked
sensors. In ASPLOS.
Jim Hollis and Marty Williams and Scott Hoenmans, June 2006. " The Future of
Land Seismic.
John Flavell Smith, February 2006." How a new cable-less land seismic survey
acquisition system was born”.
Moteiv, Inc., Nov. 2000, , J. Hill, R. Szewczyk, A. Woo, S. Hollar, D. E. Culler, and
K. S. J. Pister, “System architecture directions for networked sensors,”
in Proc. the 9th International Conference on Architectural Support for
58
Wireless Geophones
Tim Beims, JULY 2006. "THE AMERICAN OIL 8.GAS REPORTER(Array Of New
Technologies,Improved Business Conditions Transforming Land
Seismic)".
WEB SITES
http://cens.ucla.edu/
http://www.cens.ucla.edu
www.echologics.com
http://enl.usc.edu/
http://www.moteiv.com
http://nesl.ee.ucla.edu
59
Wireless Geophones
http://shino8.eng.uci.edu/MEMS_ppt Feng
http://www.wirelessSeismic.com
http://wins.rsc.rockwell.com/
60
Wireless Geophones
61